meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

Region remains global project finance hotspot

25 October 2024

 

This package also includes: PPP activity eases back but remains strong

While the Middle East and North Africa (Mena) region has recently become the focus of global attentions for all the wrong reasons – amid surging conflict in the Levant – advisers continue to see the adjacent Gulf as a standout market for project finance.

“The Middle East market has been buoyant compared to the project finance market in many other parts of the world,” says Matthew Escritt, a partner at the UAE office of law firm Pinsent Masons, who has advised on large regional financings. 

“By far and away, the Middle East is the place to be if you want to do big-ticket project finance.”

Major deals such as the $6.1bn financing for Neom Green Hydrogen Company, which closed in 2023, affirm the region’s continued affinity with large and sometimes complex transactions that involve senior and mezzanine facilities and bring numerous financial institutions into the mix.

The use of project finance structures across a widening array of sectors – from hard and soft infrastructure, to newer asset classes such as green energy – suggests that the Middle East will remain a hotspot for funding activity.

Ratings agency S&P Global has forecast that alongside the energy sector, the region will see significant investments in transport and social infrastructure, as well as in digitalisation, with large outlays on connectivity and a doubling of data centre capacity as the region’s population continues to grow.

Regional reconfiguration

While the Mena region as a whole has seen an uptick in activity, the picture is not even.

“Activity in Saudi Arabia has seen something of a slowdown after it became clear that some of the kingdom’s more ambitious plans were being recalibrated,” says Escritt.

“Liquidity has become tighter and we’re finding that procurers are taking longer to announce their preferred bidder.”

Appetite among international banks has been weaker for some sectors, such as social infrastructure. 

Neom’s large green hydrogen financing of 2023 remains a standout rather than the norm, although local lenders appear ready to step into the breach when circumstances allow. For example, in April of this year, when Neom secured a $2.7bn revolving credit facility to cover short-term financing requirements, it was nine local banks that ended up providing the financing.  It was, according to Neom CEO Nadhim Al-Nasr, a “natural fit” within the company’s wider funding structure.

International banks’ interest remains fixed on energy sector and infrastructure projects. Outside of these, says Escritt, the project finance market is dominated by large local banks. This, he says, has contributed to a tighter liquidity environment as these financial institutions run up against exposure limits. “The key to unlocking that market’s undoubted potential is to create conditions that improve the appetite of foreign lenders for Saudi Arabian credits,” says Escritt.

International lenders’ comfort zones were once largely focused on massive financings such as the kingdom’s Sadara petrochemicals project, which in 2013 drew commitments of $12.5bn.  

“Frankly, the days of the Sadara blockbuster-type projects are over. But there’s still some substantial projects out there,” says John Dewar, a partner at international law firm Milbank, which specialises in energy and infrastructure financings.

Dewar points out that there are still a fair number of $2bn-$4bn projects in the region, but that it is more challenging to syndicate larger scales of debt. Even export credit agency (ECA) support is not a given in the Mena region.

“Even if they’ve got large export content in them, it’s still more difficult to get them mobilised into oil and gas financings, for example. The ECAs are pulling back from those types of deals,” says Dewar. “Petrochemicals is slightly easier, but nonetheless, over the next couple of years we will see fewer agency lenders involved in the petrochemicals sector than we have at the moment.”

The UAE – Abu Dhabi in particular – remains a bright spot in the region.  

 “Abu Dhabi has shown that it is very good at getting things done,” says Escritt, whose team helped bring the Khalifa University student accommodation public-private partnership project to financial close – another significant social infrastructure project in the UAE capital. 

“There’s a strong appetite among the major project finance players for Abu Dhabi risk – they like it. 

“You are also now seeing the larger local banks stepping into this space, with Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and First Abu Dhabi Bank in particular showing appetite for these credits,” says Escritt.

The Qatari market has proved more sluggish, although the Al-Wakra and Wukair independent sewage treatment plant project – the country’s first – has seen progress this year with a $540m financing on a 75:25 debt-to-equity ratio basis, including a soft mini-perm structure.

Emergent energy markets

Energy has traditionally been a magnet for project financing in the Mena region and should support one of the emerging areas within that segment – carbon capture and storage (CCS), which is an area of focus for regional oil companies.

Saudi Aramco’s first phase of its Accelerated Carbon Capture and Sequestration project is expected to be the world’s largest CCS hub upon completion. Aramco aims to transport and capture 9 million tonnes a year of emissions by 2027 in its first phase.

Carbon-capture financing could prove an attractive opportunity for banks, swelling the liquidity that is already there for hydrogen schemes.

Lender appetite has increased for these new energy schemes. “[Saudi Arabia] had a large splash on solar power recently with Acwa Power financings, while Saudi Aramco will have relatively large financing requirements for its energy transition projects. The [kingdom is] now still very much focused on project finance transactions,” says Dewar.

With Oman pushing green hydrogen projects in Duqm and Dhofar, and Egypt backing an ambitious renewables programme under a structure that investors have found to be attractive and bankable, project financing should make more headway in the low-carbon space across the region. 

In renewables, there is more depth in the market and more lenders willing to participate, although as law firm AO Shearman has noted, there remains a deficiency in bankability and unpredictable development costs in green hydrogen schemes.

This piqued interest in non-fossil fuel project funding contrasts with the reduced appetite globally among banks for traditional hydrocarbons schemes. “If you’re looking at oil and gas financing, then it’s increasingly a struggle outside of some of the Chinese banks,” says Dewar. “That’s not to say that in the Middle East there aren’t still a number of local and regional banks that are happy to participate in the market.”

Government support will remain critical in getting centrepiece financings under way in areas such as green hydrogen. And, as AO Shearman notes, given the nature of the supply chain for green hydrogen projects, there is value in including ECA-supported debt in the financing mix. In particular, where Mena projects involve key equipment coming in from outside the region, ECAs have an important role to play in building confidence.

ECAs remain a mainstay in traditional Gulf downstream sectors such as petrochemicals. For example, South Korea’s Hyundai Engineering & Construction has tapped $1bn of project financing support from the Export-Import Bank of Korea for the Amiral petrochemicals project in Saudi Arabia. As the lone South Korean contractor deployed on the estimated $7bn scheme, it therefore enjoys sole access to this project financing facility.

Project sponsors will also be looking to capital market instruments, despite these losing favour in recent years as the global
interest-rate environment rendered proposed bond components in project financings less appealing to many.

With the US Federal Reserve in a gradual monetary easing cycle, however, the use of project-related bonds may begin to revive.

For example, Saudi Aramco has managed to complete some large gas pipeline financings using acquisition facilities that were refinanced in the bond and sukuk markets.

“As the interest-rate environment changes, that’s going to get more people thinking about bond refinancing activity. We’ll see a bit more in a year’s time, when interest rates have come down and investors readjust and start to look for more attractive yields,” says Dewar.

With a different interest-rate climate in place, and more lenders and project backers gaining experience in the new energy schemes that are emerging in the Gulf and the wider Mena region, the hope is that banks will be dipping back into the region with transactions that will maintain its status as the global project finance hotspot for a while longer.

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/12678172/main.gif
James Gavin

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Navigating financial markets amid geopolitical fragmentation

    28 December 2025

     

    As we move towards 2026, geopolitical fragmentation is no longer a background risk that occasionally disrupts markets.

    It has become a defining feature of the global financial landscape. Shifting alliances, persistent regional tensions, sanctions and the reconfiguration of supply chains are reshaping how capital flows, how liquidity behaves and how confidence is formed.

    For firms operating in the Middle East, this does not simply mean preparing for more volatility. It means operating in a system where the underlying rules are evolving.

    For much of the past three decades, businesses and investors worked within a broadly convergent global framework. Trade expanded, financial markets deepened and policy coordination – while imperfect – created a sense of predictability. That environment has changed.

    Today, economic decisions are increasingly influenced by strategic alignment, security considerations and political resilience. Markets still function, but they do so in a more fragmented and less forgiving way.

    Shifting landscape

    One of the most important consequences of this shift is that risk no longer travels along familiar paths. In the past, geopolitical events were often treated as temporary shocks layered onto an otherwise stable system.

    Today, they shape the system itself. Trade flows are influenced as much by political compatibility as by cost efficiency. Supply chains, once optimised for speed and scale, are reorganising into regional or allied clusters. Financial markets respond not only to data, but to narratives about stability, alignment and long-term credibility.

    This change places greater pressure on firms that rely on historical relationships to guide decisions. Models built on past correlations – between interest rates and equity markets, or between energy prices and regional growth – are less reliable when markets move between different regimes. The challenge is not simply higher volatility, but the fact that correlations themselves can shift quickly.

    Monetary policy adds a second layer of complexity. Major central banks are no longer moving in step. The US, Europe and parts of Asia face different inflation dynamics and political constraints, leading to diverging interest-rate paths.

    For the GCC, where currencies are largely pegged to the US dollar, this divergence has direct consequences. Local financial conditions are closely tied to decisions taken by the Federal Reserve, even when regional economic conditions follow a different cycle.

    This matters because funding costs, liquidity availability and hedging conditions are shaped by global rather than local forces. When US policy remains tight, dollar liquidity becomes more selective. When expectations shift abruptly, market depth can disappear quickly.

    For firms with international exposure, long-term investment plans, or reliance on external financing, these dynamics require careful management. They cannot be treated as secondary macro considerations.

    Energy markets further complicate the picture. The Middle East remains central to global energy supply, which means geopolitical events often interact with oil prices and financial conditions at the same time.

    When shifts in energy expectations coincide with changes in global interest-rate sentiment, liquidity conditions can tighten rapidly. This interaction is well known in academic research on fixed exchange-rate systems, but its practical implications are often underestimated in corporate planning.

    Expanding vulnerabilities

    These dynamics expose clear vulnerabilities. Concentrated supply chains are more susceptible to disruption. Financing structures dependent on continuous market access are more exposed to sudden repricing. Risk management approaches that assume stable relationships between assets are more likely to disappoint. Operational risks – particularly in technology and data – are increasingly shaped by geopolitical considerations rather than purely technical ones.

    At the same time, the region enters 2026 from a position of relative strength. GCC economies benefit from fiscal buffers, long-term investment programmes and a growing perception of stability compared to other parts of the world. In an environment where uncertainty is widespread, predictability itself becomes valuable. Capital increasingly seeks jurisdictions that combine economic ambition with institutional credibility.

    The question, therefore, is not whether opportunities exist, but whether firms are prepared to capture them responsibly. This requires a shift in how future risks are assessed and embedded into decision-making. Linear forecasts and static plans are insufficient when the environment itself can change state. Scenario thinking must evolve beyond optimistic and pessimistic cases to reflect different combinations of geopolitical alignment, monetary conditions, and supply-chain stability. These scenarios should inform capital allocation, not sit in strategy documents.

    Liquidity and risk management discipline also become central. In both trading and corporate finance, experience shows that many failures stem not from being wrong on direction, but from being overexposed when conditions change. Scaling risk to market conditions, maintaining funding flexibility and understanding how quickly liquidity can evaporate are essential practices. This is as true for corporate balance sheets as it is for trading books.

    Operational resilience must be viewed through the same lens. Supply-chain redundancy, cybersecurity preparedness and data governance are no longer purely operational concerns. They influence financial stability, investor confidence and regulatory trust. In a fragmented world, operational disruptions can quickly translate into financial and reputational damage.

    Facing the future

    As we approach 2026, leadership in the Middle East faces a clear test. The global environment is unlikely to become simpler or more predictable. Firms that continue to rely on assumptions shaped by a different era will find themselves reacting rather than positioning. Those that invest in disciplined risk management, flexible planning and operational resilience will be better placed to navigate uncertainty and to turn volatility into strategic advantage.

    In this environment, risk management is not an obstacle to growth. It is the framework that makes sustainable growth possible.

    Ultimately – and this is an often overlooked critical point – none of these adjustments, whether in scenario planning, liquidity discipline, or operational resilience, can be effective without the right human capital in place. 

    Geopolitical fragmentation and financial volatility are not risks that can be fully addressed through models or policies alone. They require informed judgement, institutional memory and the ability to interpret weak signals before they become material threats or missed opportunities. 

    Firms that succeed in this environment will be those that deliberately invest in corporate knowledge: building internal capabilities where possible and complementing them with external expertise where necessary. This means involving professionals with the right background, cross-market experience and a proven, proactive approach to risk awareness and governance. 

    In a fragmented world, competitive advantage increasingly depends not only on capital or strategy, but on the quality of people entrusted with understanding risk, challenging assumptions and guiding decision-making under uncertainty.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15306336/main.gif
  • Oman’s growth forecast points upwards

    24 December 2025

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15306449/main.gif
    MEED Editorial
  • December 2025: Data drives regional projects

    23 December 2025

    Click here to download the PDF

    Includes: Top inward FDI locations by project volume | Brent spot price | Construction output

    MEED’s January 2026 report on Oman includes:

    > COMMENT: Oman steadies growth with strategic restraint
    > ECONOMY: Oman pursues diversification amid regional concerns
    > BANKING: Oman banks feel impact of stronger economy
    > OIL & GAS: LNG goals galvanise Oman’s oil and gas sector
    > POWER & WATER: Oman prepares for a wave of IPP awards
    > CONSTRUCTION: Momentum builds in construction sector

    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15306140/main.gif
    MEED Editorial
  • Local firm bids lowest for Kuwait substation deal

    22 December 2025

    The local Al-Ahleia Switchgear Company has submitted the lowest price of KD33.9m ($110.3m) for a contract to build a 400/132/11 kV substation at the South Surra township for Kuwait’s Public Authority for Housing Welfare (PAHW).

    The bid was marginally lower than the two other offers of KD35.1m and KD35.5m submitted respectively by Saudi Arabia’s National Contracting Company (NCC) and India’s Larsen & Toubro.

    PAHW is expected to take about three months to evaluate the prices before selecting the successful contractor.

    The project is one of several transmission and distribution projects either out to bid or recently awarded by Kuwait’s main affordable housing client.

    This year alone, it has awarded two contracts worth more than $100m for cable works at its 1Z, 2Z, 3Z and 4Z 400kV substations at Al-Istiqlal City, and two deals totalling just under $280m for the construction of seven 132/11kV substations in the same township.

    Most recently, it has tendered two contracts to build seven 132/11kV main substations at its affordable housing project, west of Kuwait City. The bid deadline for the two deals covering the MS-01 through to MS-08 substations is 8 January.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15305745/main.gif
    Edward James
  • Saudi-Dutch JV awards ‘supercentre’ metals reclamation project

    22 December 2025

    The local Advanced Circular Materials Company (ACMC), a joint venture of the Netherlands-based Shell & AMG Recycling BV (SARBV) and local firm United Company for Industry (UCI), has awarded the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract for the first phase of its $500m-plus metals reclamation complex in Jubail.

    The contract, estimated to be worth in excess of $200m, was won by China TianChen Engineering Corporation (TCC), a subsidiary of China National Chemical Engineering Company (CNCEC), following the issue of the tender in July 2024.

    Under the terms of the deal, TCC will process gasification ash generated at Saudi Aramco’s Jizan refining complex on the Red Sea coast to produce battery-grade vanadium oxide and vanadium electrolyte for vanadium redox flow batteries. AMG will provide the licensed technology required for the production process.

    The works are the first of four planned phases at the catalyst and gasification ash recycling ‘Supercentre’, which is located at the PlasChem Park in Jubail Industrial City 2 alongside the Sadara integrated refining and petrochemical complex.

    Phase 2 will expand the facility to process spent catalysts from heavy oil upgrading facilities to produce ferrovanadium for the steel industry and/or additional battery-grade vanadium oxide.

    Phase 3 involves installing a manufacturing facility for residue-upgrading catalysts.

    In the fourth phase, a vanadium electrolyte production plant will be developed.

    The developers expect a total reduction of 3.6 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions a year when the four phases of the project are commissioned.

    SARBV first announced its intention to build a metal reclamation and catalyst manufacturing facility in Saudi Arabia in November 2019. The kingdom’s Ministry of Investment, then known as the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority (Sagia), supported the project.

    In July 2022, SARBV and UCI signed the agreement to formalise their joint venture and build the proposed facility.

    The project has received support from Saudi Aramco’s Namaat industrial investment programme. Aramco, at the time, also signed an agreement with the joint venture to offtake vanadium-bearing gasification ash from its Jizan refining complex.

    Photo credit: SARBV

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15305326/main.gif
    Edward James