meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

Region remains global project finance hotspot

25 October 2024

 

This package also includes: PPP activity eases back but remains strong

While the Middle East and North Africa (Mena) region has recently become the focus of global attentions for all the wrong reasons – amid surging conflict in the Levant – advisers continue to see the adjacent Gulf as a standout market for project finance.

“The Middle East market has been buoyant compared to the project finance market in many other parts of the world,” says Matthew Escritt, a partner at the UAE office of law firm Pinsent Masons, who has advised on large regional financings. 

“By far and away, the Middle East is the place to be if you want to do big-ticket project finance.”

Major deals such as the $6.1bn financing for Neom Green Hydrogen Company, which closed in 2023, affirm the region’s continued affinity with large and sometimes complex transactions that involve senior and mezzanine facilities and bring numerous financial institutions into the mix.

The use of project finance structures across a widening array of sectors – from hard and soft infrastructure, to newer asset classes such as green energy – suggests that the Middle East will remain a hotspot for funding activity.

Ratings agency S&P Global has forecast that alongside the energy sector, the region will see significant investments in transport and social infrastructure, as well as in digitalisation, with large outlays on connectivity and a doubling of data centre capacity as the region’s population continues to grow.

Regional reconfiguration

While the Mena region as a whole has seen an uptick in activity, the picture is not even.

“Activity in Saudi Arabia has seen something of a slowdown after it became clear that some of the kingdom’s more ambitious plans were being recalibrated,” says Escritt.

“Liquidity has become tighter and we’re finding that procurers are taking longer to announce their preferred bidder.”

Appetite among international banks has been weaker for some sectors, such as social infrastructure. 

Neom’s large green hydrogen financing of 2023 remains a standout rather than the norm, although local lenders appear ready to step into the breach when circumstances allow. For example, in April of this year, when Neom secured a $2.7bn revolving credit facility to cover short-term financing requirements, it was nine local banks that ended up providing the financing.  It was, according to Neom CEO Nadhim Al-Nasr, a “natural fit” within the company’s wider funding structure.

International banks’ interest remains fixed on energy sector and infrastructure projects. Outside of these, says Escritt, the project finance market is dominated by large local banks. This, he says, has contributed to a tighter liquidity environment as these financial institutions run up against exposure limits. “The key to unlocking that market’s undoubted potential is to create conditions that improve the appetite of foreign lenders for Saudi Arabian credits,” says Escritt.

International lenders’ comfort zones were once largely focused on massive financings such as the kingdom’s Sadara petrochemicals project, which in 2013 drew commitments of $12.5bn.  

“Frankly, the days of the Sadara blockbuster-type projects are over. But there’s still some substantial projects out there,” says John Dewar, a partner at international law firm Milbank, which specialises in energy and infrastructure financings.

Dewar points out that there are still a fair number of $2bn-$4bn projects in the region, but that it is more challenging to syndicate larger scales of debt. Even export credit agency (ECA) support is not a given in the Mena region.

“Even if they’ve got large export content in them, it’s still more difficult to get them mobilised into oil and gas financings, for example. The ECAs are pulling back from those types of deals,” says Dewar. “Petrochemicals is slightly easier, but nonetheless, over the next couple of years we will see fewer agency lenders involved in the petrochemicals sector than we have at the moment.”

The UAE – Abu Dhabi in particular – remains a bright spot in the region.  

 “Abu Dhabi has shown that it is very good at getting things done,” says Escritt, whose team helped bring the Khalifa University student accommodation public-private partnership project to financial close – another significant social infrastructure project in the UAE capital. 

“There’s a strong appetite among the major project finance players for Abu Dhabi risk – they like it. 

“You are also now seeing the larger local banks stepping into this space, with Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and First Abu Dhabi Bank in particular showing appetite for these credits,” says Escritt.

The Qatari market has proved more sluggish, although the Al-Wakra and Wukair independent sewage treatment plant project – the country’s first – has seen progress this year with a $540m financing on a 75:25 debt-to-equity ratio basis, including a soft mini-perm structure.

Emergent energy markets

Energy has traditionally been a magnet for project financing in the Mena region and should support one of the emerging areas within that segment – carbon capture and storage (CCS), which is an area of focus for regional oil companies.

Saudi Aramco’s first phase of its Accelerated Carbon Capture and Sequestration project is expected to be the world’s largest CCS hub upon completion. Aramco aims to transport and capture 9 million tonnes a year of emissions by 2027 in its first phase.

Carbon-capture financing could prove an attractive opportunity for banks, swelling the liquidity that is already there for hydrogen schemes.

Lender appetite has increased for these new energy schemes. “[Saudi Arabia] had a large splash on solar power recently with Acwa Power financings, while Saudi Aramco will have relatively large financing requirements for its energy transition projects. The [kingdom is] now still very much focused on project finance transactions,” says Dewar.

With Oman pushing green hydrogen projects in Duqm and Dhofar, and Egypt backing an ambitious renewables programme under a structure that investors have found to be attractive and bankable, project financing should make more headway in the low-carbon space across the region. 

In renewables, there is more depth in the market and more lenders willing to participate, although as law firm AO Shearman has noted, there remains a deficiency in bankability and unpredictable development costs in green hydrogen schemes.

This piqued interest in non-fossil fuel project funding contrasts with the reduced appetite globally among banks for traditional hydrocarbons schemes. “If you’re looking at oil and gas financing, then it’s increasingly a struggle outside of some of the Chinese banks,” says Dewar. “That’s not to say that in the Middle East there aren’t still a number of local and regional banks that are happy to participate in the market.”

Government support will remain critical in getting centrepiece financings under way in areas such as green hydrogen. And, as AO Shearman notes, given the nature of the supply chain for green hydrogen projects, there is value in including ECA-supported debt in the financing mix. In particular, where Mena projects involve key equipment coming in from outside the region, ECAs have an important role to play in building confidence.

ECAs remain a mainstay in traditional Gulf downstream sectors such as petrochemicals. For example, South Korea’s Hyundai Engineering & Construction has tapped $1bn of project financing support from the Export-Import Bank of Korea for the Amiral petrochemicals project in Saudi Arabia. As the lone South Korean contractor deployed on the estimated $7bn scheme, it therefore enjoys sole access to this project financing facility.

Project sponsors will also be looking to capital market instruments, despite these losing favour in recent years as the global
interest-rate environment rendered proposed bond components in project financings less appealing to many.

With the US Federal Reserve in a gradual monetary easing cycle, however, the use of project-related bonds may begin to revive.

For example, Saudi Aramco has managed to complete some large gas pipeline financings using acquisition facilities that were refinanced in the bond and sukuk markets.

“As the interest-rate environment changes, that’s going to get more people thinking about bond refinancing activity. We’ll see a bit more in a year’s time, when interest rates have come down and investors readjust and start to look for more attractive yields,” says Dewar.

With a different interest-rate climate in place, and more lenders and project backers gaining experience in the new energy schemes that are emerging in the Gulf and the wider Mena region, the hope is that banks will be dipping back into the region with transactions that will maintain its status as the global project finance hotspot for a while longer.

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/12678172/main.gif
James Gavin

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • US-Israel attack on Iran incurs heavy regional price

    5 March 2026

     

    The joint US-Israeli military campaign against Iran, launched on 28 February under operations codenamed Epic Fury and Operation Roaring Lion, has pulled the GCC into the most destabilising regional confrontation in a generation.

    Six days into the crisis, the scale of collateral damage to Gulf capitals is becoming fully visible in damaged infrastructure, grounded aircraft, shuttered ports, halted energy production and a darkening investment climate.

    Every member of the GCC has absorbed Iranian missile or drone strikes, despite none having launched offensive operations against Tehran.

    In contrast to the restrained signalling from Iran during the 12-day war in June 2025 – when it choreographed its Gulf retaliation to a single base in Qatar – this campaign represents a deliberate effort to punish the US and states harbouring its assets.

    By 4 March, Iran had fired 186 ballistic missiles at the UAE alone, according to the UAE Ministry of Defence, with all but one intercepted, but with lethal debris falling across Abu Dhabi and Dubai. Of 812 drones launched toward the UAE, 57 made impact.

    Across the Gulf, however, the overall damage tallied so far is stark, particularly at US military bases. Iranian volleys have been directed with special intensity at the US Navy’s 5th Fleet headquarters in Bahrain and the Al-Udeid airbase in Qatar, alongside every US airbase and associated radar and satellite communications system across the region.

    Strangled logistics

    The Strait of Hormuz – the 33-kilometre-wide channel between Iran and Oman – was also declared closed to traffic by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) the same day the US-Israeli attacks began.

    Closing the strait, through which approximately 20 million barrels of crude oil pass every day, has been a perennial Iranian threat, and now Tehran is making good on it.

    The strait is the sole maritime exit for much of the energy exported from the Gulf states, making up around a fifth of all seaborne oil traded globally in total.

    At least five vessels have been struck so far in enforcement of the blockade, but the real impediment to ships is now the withdrawal of war risk cover by insurance underwriters – leaving ships inside and outside of the strait stranded.

    Oil prices have responded accordingly, with Brent crude rising above $80 a barrel – up from closer to $60 – and with analysts placing $100 a barrel firmly back on the table if the disruption runs for more than a few weeks.

    LNG shutdown

    If the Hormuz closure has convulsed oil markets, the direct attack on Qatar’s energy infrastructure has delivered a separate and arguably more structurally significant blow.

    Iranian drones struck QatarEnergy’s facilities at both Ras Laffan Industrial City and Mesaieed Industrial City, forcing a complete halt to all liquefied natural gas (LNG) production and associated output.

    Qatar, which operated 14 LNG trains with a combined annual capacity of 77 million tonnes – accounting for roughly 20% of global LNG trade – now operates none. Doha, incensed, has cut ties with Iran.

    European benchmark gas futures meanwhile jumped almost 50% within hours of the announcement. Asian LNG spot prices rose by more than a third. Country-level squeezes have been even harder, with gas prices spiking by 93% in the UK, for example.

    Qatari production had been filling the void left in Europe by its boycott of Russian gas, so its halting of production now places European energy stocks under significant stress. Asian buyers, including Bangladesh, India and Pakistan, will also be feeling the strain.

    Regional trade risk

    The same war risk exclusions that have grounded the tanker fleet apply with equal force to container shipping, bulk carriers and general cargo vessels – extending the disruption beyond energy into every category of goods that moves through Gulf ports.

    And the ports themselves are also in jeopardy. Jebel Ali in Dubai – the region’s busiest port – was temporarily closed after fire broke out from debris falling from missile interceptions overhead. Other regional ports have also seen various suspensions.

    The world’s major container carriers have also drawn their own conclusions. MSC, Maersk, Hapag-Lloyd and CMA CGM have all halted Hormuz crossings entirely.

    Importers across the Gulf – a region that is overwhelmingly dependent on seaborne trade for food, consumer goods, construction materials and industrial inputs – face costly re-routing.

    Vessels are discharging Gulf-bound containers at Salalah in Oman, Khor Fakkan, Sohar and Duqm, from where onward delivery might be arranged overland. Spot freight rates for Gulf-destined cargo are in turn rising sharply as feeder capacity is overwhelmed.

    Travel under assault

    The Gulf’s aviation hubs have also been brought to a relative standstill.

    A drone strike on Dubai International, the busiest airport on earth for international travel, was the most dramatic incident, but several airports have been hit and sweeping airspace closures have grounded all but a handful of flights over the Gulf.

    On the worst day so far, more than 1,500 flights to or from Middle Eastern destinations were cancelled. The broader long-haul linkage through the Gulf from Europe to Asia has also been severed, forcing international legs to reroute away from the Gulf corridor.

    Drone and shrapnel strikes on luxury hospitality projects in the region have meanwhile dealt a heavy blow to the GCC’s touristic safe-haven status. The region’s busy meetings, incentives, conferences and exhibitions (MICE) calendar is in disarray.

    Gulf tourism entered 2026 in a strong position. Regional travel bookings had reached close to $101bn – 23% above pre-pandemic levels. Luxury hotel occupancy across Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Doha and Riyadh had set successive records through the first two months of the year. That momentum has been destroyed inside of a week.

    Tourism Economics projects a fall in Middle East travel arrivals of around 11% year-on-year even in an optimistic scenario where the conflict resolves within weeks – meaning 23 million fewer visitors and a $34bn contraction in tourism spending.

    If the conflict runs for two months, the projected decline steepens to 27%, with up to 38 million lost arrivals and $56bn in foregone receipts.

    Long-term risks

    The IMF had projected GDP growth of about 4% across the six GCC economies in 2026, driven substantially by non-oil diversification and fuelled by sustained inflows of foreign capital, foreign talent and foreign visitors.

    Each of those flows is now disrupted, and some portion of the disruption will outlast the immediate security situation. Businesses could also restructure themselves to mitigate for elevated scenario of future regional risk.

    The GCC states find themselves in a position of extraordinary and largely undeserved exposure. They did not initiate this conflict, and several of them invested heavily in diplomatic outreach and mediation between concerned parties.

    The region is nevertheless absorbing the consequences.

    The preferred Gulf instruments of mediation, back-channel diplomacy and economic persuasion have been rendered irrelevant by the speed and scale of events.

    The region’s airlines, ports, refineries, LNG complexes, hotels, conference centres, stock exchanges and carefully constructed global image are all paying a price set by decisions made elsewhere. And the bill is still running.

    Investors will reassess, and the governments of the GCC now face the question of how to restore peace and order in a region being actively contested militarily by the US.

    READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Riyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15859120/main.gif
    John Bambridge
  • Egypt strengthens its economic position

    4 March 2026

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15858071/main.gif
    MEED Editorial
  • Power and water assets face strategic risk amid Iran attacks

    4 March 2026

     

    Recent attacks on energy infrastructure across the GCC have drawn renewed attention to the strategic importance of the region’s power and water sector.

    On 2 March, Qatar’s Ministry of Defence announced that the country had come under two drone attacks launched from Iran.

    One drone targeted a water tank owned by Mesaieed Power Plant, while another targeted a power facility in Ras Laffan Industrial City.

    Elsewhere in the region, Saudi Aramco shut down its Ras Tanura refinery following a drone strike, while US cloud provider Amazon Web Services reported service outages after incidents at two data centres in the UAE.

    Desalination reliance

    Across the GCC, desalination now provides the majority of drinking water. In Kuwait, about 90% of potable water comes from desalination plants, while the figure is about 70% in Saudi Arabia. In the UAE and Oman, the figures are 42% and 86%, respectively. While the geopolitical narrative tends to be dominated by oil, it is power and water infrastructure that is perhaps most critical to everyday life.

    For instance, the Ras Al-Khair desalination plant in Saudi Arabia is among the largest operational facilities of its kind. According to MEED Projects, the plant produces about 1.1 million cubic metres a day (cm/d) of desalinated water.

    Using a typical domestic water consumption benchmark of roughly 250 litres per person per day, that output is sufficient to supply potable water for around four million people.

    Other large projects operate on a similar scale. The Yanbu phase 3 desalination plant produces roughly 550,000 cm/d, while the Shuaibah 3 independent water project (IWP), commissioned near Jeddah last year, has a capacity of 600,000 cm/d. Facilities of this scale can supply drinking water to populations of between two million and four million people.

    The region’s reliance on large coastal desalination facilities also creates structural vulnerabilities, as most plants are located along the Gulf coastline to allow seawater intake.

    Many are also integrated with thermal power plants, producing electricity and desalinated water at the same site. This configuration offers operational efficiencies, but concentrates critical infrastructure in a limited number of locations.

    In February, Kuwait signed a 25-year energy conversion and water purchase agreement for the Al-Zour North independent water and power plant (IWPP) phases two and three. Once completed, the facility will add 2,700MW of power and 545,000 cm/d of desalinated water to Kuwait’s supply network

    Separately, Kuwait’s Council of Ministers recently approved plans for the Kuwait Authority for Partnership Projects (Kapp) to tender the first phase of the Nuwaiseeb power and water desalination plant as an IWPP project. The first phase of the scheme will have an estimated power generation capacity of 3,600MW and a desalination capacity of 341,000 cm/d.

    While several GCC states maintain strategic water storage reserves, these typically cover only a limited number of days of consumption in major cities. This makes water infrastructure one of the most sensitive categories of critical assets in the region.

    Electricity infrastructure

    Standalone electricity infrastructure is equally central to the functioning of GCC economies. Power generation supports residential demand, large industrial complexes, transport networks and digital infrastructure.

    One example is the UAE’s Barakah nuclear power plant in Abu Dhabi, which has a total capacity of 5.6GW across four reactors. According to Emirates Nuclear Energy Corporation (Enec), the plant’s four APR1400 reactors produce 40TWh annually, which is equivalent to around 25% of the UAE’s electricity needs.

    At the same time, Gulf electricity systems are becoming increasingly interconnected. The GCC Interconnection Authority grid links the national networks of member states and enables countries to exchange electricity during periods of peak demand or supply disruption.

    According to WorldBank studies, desalination plants typically operate continuously because water storage capacity is limited relative to demand. Similarly, power grids must balance supply and demand in real time.

    Amid ongoing missile and drone attacks on GCC states, Iran said on Monday that it was closing off the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime route. GCC countries import roughly 85% of their food, much of it transported by sea, while the strait handles about a fifth of global oil supply. Disruptions to power and water infrastructure across the region could have even more immediate consequences.

    READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Riyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15856956/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • Algeria tenders multiple railway consultancy contracts

    4 March 2026

    Algeria’s state railway company, Agence Nationale d’Etudes et de Suivi de la Realisation des Investissements Ferroviaires (Anesrif), has tendered several consultancy tenders for various railway schemes in the country.

    The first tender was issued for the study of the new Bouinane/Meftah/Khemis El-Khechna railway line.

    The tender was issued on 3 March, with a bid submission deadline of 12 April.

    The second tender covers the detailed study of the Sidi Arcine railway station.

    The tender for the project was floated on 1 March. The bid submission deadline is 30 March.

    The other tender covers the completion of the study of the Zeralda/Gouraya railway line.

    The notice was floated in late February, with a bid submission deadline of the end of March.

    The latest consultancy tenders follow Anesrif’s formal start of the procurement process for its multibillion-dollar Laghouat-Ghardaia-El-Meniaa railway project, as MEED reported earlier this week.

    International and local firms have been given until 8 March to submit expressions of interest for the overall client’s engineer role on the 495-kilometre-long railway development.

    Consultancies have also been given until 12 March for two separate contracts covering the project supervision and control of the first 265km-long element between Laghouat and Ghardaia, and the 230km-long line between Ghardaia and El-Meniaa.

    This Laghouat-Ghardaia section, which is estimated to cost about $1.4bn, will comprise 21 viaducts, one tunnel, 55 pipe crossings and five stations.

    The 230km-long Ghardaia to El-Meniaa second section will start at Metlili station and extend south to El-Meniaa. It will comprise six viaducts, 35 railway structures and three stations, and have an estimated total construction cost of about $1.2bn.

    The speed of passenger trains on the railway will be 220 kilometres an hour (km/h) and 100km/h for freight trains.

    The solicitations of interest for the construction of the two sections were originally scheduled for February, but to date have not been released.

    READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Riyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15855965/main.jpg
    Yasir Iqbal
  • Conflict has limited impact on GCC projects

    4 March 2026

     

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    The conflict in the Gulf has so far had a limited impact on projects in the GCC, with most sites operating normally since hostilities began on 28 February. In total, there are 6,738 projects under execution across the GCC, with a combined value of $951bn, according to regional projects tracker MEED Projects.

    Contracting companies in the region say that the majority of their projects have not been affected by the conflict, and work has continued onsite without disruption. However, a few sites have temporarily halted operations, either at the request of the authorities or because they were considered at risk due to their strategic locations.

    “Work has continued on our projects in Dubai. We have only one site where we were asked to stop work,” says a contractor overseeing projects across Dubai.

    Another contractor operating across the UAE has also continued work but halted operations at one site following a nearby security incident. “We have one site that was close to a facility that was struck by debris, so we stopped work,” the contractor says.

    Work has also continued on projects outside of the UAE. In Saudi Arabia and Qatar, contractors continue to work on projects, including strategically sensitive oil and gas projects. “We have continued work on most of our projects. There are a few sites where we have been asked to stop work, but this is the minority, and at most sites we are still working,” says an international contractor.

    Supply chain concerns

    While operations largely continue as normal, there are concerns that projects could be impacted later due to supply chain disruption. Ports in the region have been targets, and with international shipping passing through the Strait of Hormuz effectively stopping, there is an expectation that international shipments will be delayed. A related concern is the sharp spike in oil prices that will be inflationary.

    How the disruption is handled will depend on the terms of specific contracts and on how companies choose to navigate the issue. The general consensus among contractors and lawyers is that it is not a force majeure event. Instead, it is general disruption that should be noted and documented, should there be cost or time implications later in the project.

    One Dubai-based contractor said the strategy for now is to support clients as best as possible amid this uncertainty, while noting that there may be cost implications later.

    The region has been considered a safe place for tourism, and also for the rich to live in a tax-free haven. The attacks on Dubai may change that perception, and that will impact the market in the future
    International contractor

    Future prospects

    There are also concerns about the market’s future. There have been record levels of contract awards in recent years, and the worry is that the pace of contract awards may slow as uncertainty grips the market.

    At the same time, some contract awards have been expedited. One Dubai-based contractor has signed two contracts since the conflict started. “We have signed deals that had been lingering for a while. I think the logic is that the client wants to lock in resources before prices or anything else changes,” says the contractor.

    Longer term, it is expected that priorities for construction could shift. Contractors say that defence will become more of a priority for governments in the future, and so will strategic infrastructure projects such as power and water.

    There might also be increased interest in making infrastructure more secure, which will add an additional layer of complexity for construction companies. “Facilities like data centres may be located underground in the future to protect them from attacks,” says a UAE-based contractor.

    The outlook for other sectors is more challenged, particularly real estate and tourism.

    “The region has been considered a safe place for tourism, and also for the rich to live in a tax-free haven,” says the international contractor. “The attacks on Dubai may change that perception, and that will impact the market in the future. Tourism is a key component of national visions across the GCC, so I think there will have to be a rethink of economic strategies for the future.”

    READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Riyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15855051/main.jpg
    Colin Foreman