GCC banks navigate Credit Suisse fallout

31 March 2023

 

Saudi National Bank chairman Ammar al-Khudairy’s abrupt resignation on 27 March capped a turbulent few weeks for the world’s financial system. This period saw the kingdom’s champion bank dragged into the harsh glare of the global spotlight and serious questions asked about Gulf financial institutions’ readiness to serve as props in an increasingly jumpy financial order.

A short sentence uttered in an interview by a senior Saudi banker precipitated the collapse of a 160-year-old institution. Ruling out extending beyond its 10 per cent stake as it would entail a higher capital cost led to the fellow Swiss bank UBS buying the troubled lender at a steep discount.

Al-Khudairy took the rap for what was deemed an avoidable crisis, in which SNB took a hosing: it bought the Credit Suisse stock at CHF3.82 ($4.2) a share; UBS has paid just CHF0.76 ($0.83) a share.

The pain goes wider than SNB and the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), the other Gulf institution directly impacted by Credit Suisse’s troubles, given its 6.9 per cent stake in the lender.

The crisis poses serious questions about the role of wealthy Gulf institutions in a global system that is increasingly reliant on them, but has yet to stress test the relationship.

On the one hand, Gulf investors have been spooked about their exposure to venerable banking institutions that were once seen as copper-bottomed plays. Conversely, Western banks may now legitimately ask whether their Gulf counterparts are reliable partners in a crisis.

Volatile landscape

The backdrop is one of wider concern about the health of global financial markets. The Credit Suisse crisis was prefaced by US regulators shutting Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) on 10 March, following mass withdrawals of customer deposits.

For now, analysts caution against panic. First, SNB’s exposure – and that of other prominent Gulf lenders – appears limited.

“The impact of SNB’s investment in Credit Suisse and the subsequent takeover by UBS on SNB are limited because the initial investment represents less than 2 per cent of SNB’s investment portfolio and 70-80 bps of the bank’s risk-adjusted capital ratio,” says Mohamed Damak, senior director, Financial Institutions Ratings, at ratings agency S&P.

As to problems in the Western markets, again, exposures are manageable. “On average, banks we rate in GCC had exposure to the US of 4.6 per cent of assets and 2.3 per cent of liabilities at year-end 2022,” says Damak.

“Generally, GCC banks would have limited lending activity in the US and most of their assets there would be in high-credit quality instruments or with the Federal Reserve. The exposure to Europe tends to be limited as well, except for banks that have a presence in some European countries like France or the UK. Most of the activity in these jurisdictions tends to be linked to home countries or generally made of high-quality exposures.”

This will not end SNB shareholder anxiety that the bank’s raison d’etre – supporting domestic projects related to Vision 2030 – had been sidelined in the pursuit of equity positions in global blue chips.

Qatari contagion

Similar questions will be asked in Qatar, where the QIA provided ballast for the Swiss bank’s balance sheet in 2021, when it issued $2bn in convertible notes. The Qatari wealth fund will be reviewing its bank holdings and stress-testing its wider portfolio.

Others will do the same. “Gulf sovereign wealth funds will probably review their asset allocations, regardless of this current crisis,” one Gulf-based economist tells MEED. “The reality is that their role is changing. They were, in the past, more opportunistic investors. Today they are becoming strategic vehicles.”

If Gulf funds like QIA will no longer serve as the global financial system’s white knights – as they proved in the 2008 financial crisis – this may prompt a reconfiguration of investment strategies.

There will be a steep learning curve, says one Gulf-based economist – on both sides.

Governance implications

In light of the growing financial strength of the Gulf institutions come new responsibilities and governance requirements, reflecting the dawning reality that Gulf institutions are growing into increasingly globally systemically significant investors or sources of capital.

“They need to act accordingly,” says the economist. “Not just from the global governance perspective, but also from the perspective of protecting their assets.”

Gulf institutions’ transformation into opportunistic investors was well-timed when liquidity was required at short notice.

“The money centres of the world turned to one of the biggest honey pots they could identify. And, of course, some of the old reservations were conveniently parked aside, at least for the time being,” says the economist.

The challenge for the Gulf institutions was the lack of deep experience or institutional frameworks needed to underpin those initial investments.

“Opportunities arose, these countries chose to take them and they got lucky because they helped stabilise the global financial system, and they helped protect the reputation of these institutions. And no major mistakes were made. But that initial opportunistic approach will no longer fly,” says the economist.

Gulf sector outlook

The Credit Suisse saga has also prompted much ruminating in Western media to the extent that Western institutions may cast a more wary eye in future over their Gulf counterparts.

But absent new funding sources, the GCC's appeal may prove irresistible to them. After all, says the economist, beggars can’t be choosers.

“What is the alternative to resorting to institutions such as the Gulf sovereign funds? They’re not going to go to China, that’s for sure. The only real alternative is to get some sort of a backstop from national central banks. And that is pretty much as close as you can get to a moral hazard,” he says.

The broader global picture is evolving. How Gulf institutions related to primarily Western institutions will also be influenced by the change in the GCC states’ foreign policy.

Gulf governments are increasingly cognisant of the need for a balanced, multi-directional foreign policy. And that is something they will also want to reflect in their wealth funds and banks’ investment behaviour.

The next year should provide an insight into how the post-Credit Suisse modus vivendi will play out.

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/10724320/main2803.jpg
James Gavin
Related Articles
  • Gulf economies under fire

    26 March 2026

     

    When the first missiles and drones were fired at the GCC on 28 February, the region’s economic story pivoted abruptly, from long-term vision-building to near-term resilience.

    The conflict is now the Gulf’s most consequential economic stress test in a generation. It is challenging the safe haven premium that underpins capital inflows, while disrupting the physical networks that keep the region’s economies running, from energy exports and shipping lanes to airports and tourism.

    Over the past two decades, GCC governments have worked to pair diversification with an image of stability: open economies, predictable regulation and security that felt, to many investors, close to non-negotiable.

    This crisis has reopened an older question last asked during the 1990 to 1991 Gulf War: not simply how fast the Gulf can grow, but whether it can remain investable and operational under sustained security risk. The early evidence is mixed and still emerging.

    Energy infrastructure has been damaged and supply chains have been paralysed, but other parts of the economy, such as retail and construction, have continued to operate largely as normal.

    LNG strike

    The clearest and most quantifiable example of the economic toll came when Iranian strikes targeted Ras Laffan Industrial City in Qatar. The damage reported by QatarEnergy is significant. Liquefied natural gas (LNG)-producing trains 4 and 6, which account for about 17% of Qatar’s total LNG exports, need repairing. The expected revenue loss is $20bn a year.

    In a statement, QatarEnergy president and CEO Saad Sherida Al-Kaabi said the repairs will take three to five years to complete, underlining the long-term impact on the Qatari economy. JP Morgan estimates that Qatar’s GDP could contract by 9% this year.

    Qatar is not the only GCC state to have suffered damage to its energy infrastructure. Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia and the UAE have all had energy assets targeted.

    In addition to damage caused by missiles or drones, logistics problems triggered by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz are having a material impact. Aluminium Bahrain (Alba) has implemented a controlled shutdown of reduction lines 1, 2 and 3, one example of how supply chain paralysis is spreading into industry.

    By idling 19% of its production capacity, approximately 308,000 tonnes a year, Alba is attempting to preserve raw material inventory and prioritise the operational stability of its newer, more efficient lines 4, 5 and 6. However, the macro implications for Manama are severe. Alba contributes 12% to Bahrain’s GDP, with the broader aluminium sector, a vital driver of the kingdom’s Economic Vision 2030, accounting for over 15%.

    The conflict is now the Gulf’s most consequential economic stress test in a generation

    Dubai disruption

    In Dubai, where the economy has made great strides in diversifying away from oil and gas and into sectors including tourism, aviation and real estate, the disruption caused by the war is also taking a toll. Despite a few high-profile attacks, the city’s infrastructure remains almost entirely intact. The problem is that its accessibility has been halved. As of late March, data shows flight capacity hovering at 50% across 70% of destinations. Hotels in the emirate are operating at single-digit occupancy levels.

    In response, Dubai has begun reviewing support packages for the sector, including fee relief and the removal of penalties for delayed payments. This stance mirrors Dubai’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic, a crisis the emirate ultimately navigated well. The plan is that an initial focus on resilient source markets, such as Russia and Africa, will allow the tourism sector to move onto the road to recovery.

    The Dubai property market is perhaps the most sensitive barometer of international confidence. For three weeks, the market has lived in a state of suspended animation. While AED11.9bn in real estate sales were recorded in early March, analysts warn of a significant time lag. These figures represent registrations of sales agreed weeks or months ago, and the true impact of the 28 February escalation may not be reflected in official data until late March or April.

    Early indicators from brokers and market analysts point to falling transaction volumes. The narrative of safety and guaranteed returns that fuelled the post-pandemic boom, and attracted billions in overseas wealth, has been dented. Investors are increasingly seeking reassurance that their capital is not anchored in a conflict zone.

    Rather than cutting headline prices, which would damage long-term community values, some developers are offering registration waivers, 0.5% monthly payment plans and extended grace periods.

    More than 15,000 flights were cancelled at seven major regional airports in the first week of March

    Aviation strain

    With airports in Bahrain, Riyadh, Kuwait, Dubai and Abu Dhabi all targeted during the conflict, the Middle East’s aviation sector is grappling with unprecedented operational friction. According to Fitch Ratings, more than 15,000 flights were cancelled at seven major regional airports in the first week of March alone.

    The main international hubs, Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Doha, are facing a sharp spike in operating costs. Rerouting around restricted airspace requires longer flight paths, additional technical stops and increased expenses for crew overtime. While carriers have buffers through fuel hedging, ranging from 50% to 80%, the sheer volume of refunds, vouchers, and accommodation for 1.5 million displaced passengers is weighing on balance sheets.

    The aviation insurance market is also shifting. With insurers holding the right to cancel war cover during active conflict, the risk profile of regional fleets is being repriced in real time. 

    If the conflict remains short-lived, the impact on annual profitability may be temporary. But a prolonged period of airspace instability would test the flexibility of the region’s transport infrastructure at a time when aviation is meant to be a central pillar of growth.

    Banking support

    Underpinning all sectors is the banking system, and the response from regional regulators has been swift. The Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) has approved a Financial Institution Resilience Package that aims to both reassure and protect the economy.

    The UAE’s banking sector entered the conflict from a position of strength, with foreign exchange reserves exceeding AED1tn ($272bn) and a capital adequacy ratio of 17%. By allowing banks to tap reserve balances up to 30%, and providing term liquidity facilities in both dirhams and dollars, the CBUAE is signalling that the system remains liquid, capitalised, and ready to support corporate and individual borrowers through temporary classification flexibility.

    The outlook across the GCC is not uniform. S&P Global Ratings has flagged Bahrain and Qatar as more exposed to potential capital outflows. In a severe stress scenario, the region could see domestic deposit outflows of up to $307bn. Bahrain’s retail banks are under scrutiny due to recent growth in external debt and thinner funding buffers.

    The risk of non-performing loans also looms. S&P suggests that, in a high-stress scenario, total losses across the GCC’s 45 largest banks could reach $37bn, with the logistics, tourism and real estate sectors bearing the brunt. The banking sector is the ultimate backstop. While it is well-placed to navigate the conflict, much will depend on how long the economic impact lasts.

    Brand challenge

    For decades, the GCC has positioned itself as a place where capital is safe, taxes are low and the lifestyle is aspirational. The conflict that began on 28 February has undermined that perception of safety. Restoring it will be the key challenge for the coming years.

    All is far from lost. The region’s military defences have performed well, and casualties have been kept to a minimum. There has been economic damage, especially to energy infrastructure and airports, but elsewhere cities across the region have continued to function, with residents leading mostly normal lives.

    The region will be hoping it can demonstrate that it remains functional and safe even during conflict. While many who remained in the region may concur with that sentiment, the more difficult task will be convincing the rest of the world. Adding to that problem is the likelihood that the regime in Tehran remains, leaving the lingering possibility of further strikes in the future.

    That possibility will be a hurdle for investment decisions to overcome. The test for the region’s leaders is no longer only about building the world’s tallest buildings or largest smelters. It is about proving they can protect them. 

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16145428/main.gif
    Colin Foreman
  • Arada completes Sokoon buildings construction

    26 March 2026

    Sharjah-based private real estate developer Arada has announced the completion of five additional buildings in the Naseej District of its Aljada development.

    Kuwaiti firm Mohammad Abdulmohsen Al-Kharafi & Sons secured the construction contract for the Sokoon buildings in 2023, replacing Airolink Building Contracting as the project’s main contractor.

    The first four Sokoon buildings were completed in December 2023.

    In April last year, Arada also announced the completion of all eight Tiraz buildings in the Naseej District. The Tiraz buildings comprise 920 homes, including studios, one-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments.

    With the completion of the five Sokoon buildings, Aljada’s total number of completed residential units has risen to more than 8,200.

    Spanning 2.2 square kilometres, Aljada features residential districts, retail spaces, educational institutions, healthcare services and other facilities.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16141382/main.png
    Yasir Iqbal
  • Local contractor wins Medina substation contract

    26 March 2026

    Danway Saudi Arabia has won a contract with National Grid SA to construct a new 110/13.8kV substation in Medina.

    The contract is valued at more than SR100m ($26.7m) and covers the construction of the King Abdulaziz Road substation, including design, engineering, supply, installation, testing and commissioning.

    The project is expected to take approximately 23 months to complete.

    Key components include 110kV gas-insulated switchgear (GIS), 50/67MVA 110/13.8kV power transformers and 13.8kV switchgear.

    National Grid SA is a wholly owned subsidiary of Saudi Energy, formerly Saudi Electricity Company. It owns and operates the kingdom’s high-voltage transmission network and is responsible for grid planning, interconnection and system reliability.

    The operator recently appointed another local firm, Nesma Infrastructure & Technology, as the contractor for the construction of two 380kV double-circuit overhead transmission lines in Riyadh, connecting an existing substation to a wind power substation, referred to as Samha Wind BSP.

    As MEED understands, National Grid SA is also due to begin construction on the replacement of 132kV oil-filled underground cable circuits between several substations in the Central Operation Area in Murabba in Riyadh.

    Riyadh-based Keir International is the engineering, procurement and construction contractor for the project.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16139578/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • Neom terminates $5bn Trojena dams contract with Webuild

    26 March 2026

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    Neom has terminated its contract with Italian contractor Webuild for the construction of three dams feeding a freshwater lake, as well as ‘The Bow’ architectural structure at Trojena in northwest Saudi Arabia.

    In a statement posted on its website, Webuild said: “The termination will become effective on 29 March. As of that date, the works are approximately 30% complete, with a remaining project backlog for Webuild of approximately €2.8bn ($3.2bn).”

    Neom awarded Webuild a SR20bn ($5bn) contract to build the dams in late 2023, which MEED exclusively reported at the time.

    The termination is the latest in a series of high-profile contract cancellations by Neom in recent weeks. Earlier this week, Neom terminated its contract with Malaysian contractor Eversendai Corporation for the steel structural works on the Ski Village project in Trojena.

    In a statement published on its website, Eversendai said it had received an official notice that the termination would take effect from 26 March.

    In January this year, Saudi Arabia confirmed the postponement of the 2029 Asian Winter Games, which were scheduled to be held at Trojena. Trojena was chosen to host the event in October 2022.

    Neom has also cancelled contracts for the construction of the tunnel sections of The Line in northwest Saudi Arabia.

    In a stock exchange filing dated 13 March, South Korean contractor Hyundai E&C said Neom cancelled its contract on 29 December last year.

    Hyundai E&C was executing the drill-and-blast section of The Line’s tunnels in a joint venture with Greece’s Archirodon and South Korean counterpart Samsung C&T.

    These developments follow a wider strategic review of Neom last year, as Saudi Arabia reassesses priorities under its Vision 2030 programme.

    With tighter liquidity at the sovereign wealth fund level, resources are being redirected towards projects linked to the Fifa World Cup 2034, Expo 2030, and essential housing, healthcare and education initiatives.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16140200/main.jpg
    Yasir Iqbal
  • Iraq gas field project disrupted by regional conflict

    26 March 2026

     

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    Progress on Iraq’s project to develop the strategically important Akkas gas field has been disrupted by security issues related to the US and Israel’s ongoing war with Iran, according to industry sources.

    Work activity at the project site has been significantly reduced due to security concerns, and the project is now expected to take longer to complete.

    Iraq held a ceremony in January this year to mark the restart of drilling operations at the site as part of the field development project.

    In July last year, Iraq’s Oil Ministry announced signing a contract with the US-based oil field services provider SLB to develop production at Iraq’s Akkas gas field.

    Under the terms of the deal, SLB will drill wells at the Akkas field, aiming to initially raise production to 100 million cubic feet a day (cf/d).

    Many of SLB’s non-Iraqi employees have now been evacuated from the country.

    Over the long term, Iraq is targeting gas production of 400 million cf/d from the field.

    The contract with SLB replaces a previous deal with Ukraine-based Ukrzemresurs, which has been terminated.

    It also covers the construction of surface infrastructure and pipelines to connect Akkas to central processing units.

    The gas produced at Akkas will be used to fuel the Anbar combined-cycle power plant, which is under construction by the Electricity Ministry.

    Akkas gas field development

    The Akkas gas field, located in Anbar province in western Iraq, has 5.6 trillion cubic feet of proven reserves. The field was discovered in 1992 and began production in 1993.

    Since then, Iraq’s plans to develop the Akkas gas field to its full potential have experienced several setbacks.

    In April last year, the Iraqi Oil Ministry signed an agreement with Ukrzemresurs to develop the field.

    At the time, the Oil Ministry said that the partners were aiming to produce 100 million cf/d in the first two years, as per the agreement, with output targeted to increase to 400 million cf/d within four years.

    Prior to Ukrzemresurs, South Korean company Kogas was responsible for developing the field.

    Rights to the field were originally awarded to a consortium of Kogas and Kazakhstan’s state-owned oil company KazMunaiGas (KMG) in the third licensing round, which was launched in October 2011.

    KMG pulled out, leaving Kogas as the sole investor and operator on new contract terms.

    When the deal with Ukrzemresurs was originally announced last year, it was negatively received by some Iraqi politicians, with the Oil and Gas Committee in Iraq’s parliament rejecting the contract signing.

    At the time, Ali Al-Mashkour, a member of the Oil and Gas Committee, told Iraq’s Shafaq News Agency: “This contract involves a great waste of Iraq’s wealth, and there will be a waste of Iraq’s oil, and this confirms that Iraq is once again failing to choose reputable companies to work with in the most important economic field in the country.”

    He added: “We will work to uncover and expose the suspicions in this contract during the next stage, especially since this contract was made by some representatives for specific interests, which we will reveal soon with evidence.”

    Plans to sign the contract to develop the Akkas gas field with a Ukrainian company were first announced by the Oil Ministry in September 2023, but Ukrzemresurs was not named at the time.

    Iraq’s government is trying to transform the country into a gas-exporting nation. Currently, Iraq is reliant on Iran for gas imports.

    Both Saudi Arabia and the US, which are looking to contain Iranian influence in the region, have been supporting Iraq in developing its non-associated gas fields as this will reduce Iraq’s economic reliance on Iran.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16138892/main.png
    Wil Crisp