meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

GCC banks navigate Credit Suisse fallout

31 March 2023

 

Saudi National Bank chairman Ammar al-Khudairy’s abrupt resignation on 27 March capped a turbulent few weeks for the world’s financial system. This period saw the kingdom’s champion bank dragged into the harsh glare of the global spotlight and serious questions asked about Gulf financial institutions’ readiness to serve as props in an increasingly jumpy financial order.

A short sentence uttered in an interview by a senior Saudi banker precipitated the collapse of a 160-year-old institution. Ruling out extending beyond its 10 per cent stake as it would entail a higher capital cost led to the fellow Swiss bank UBS buying the troubled lender at a steep discount.

Al-Khudairy took the rap for what was deemed an avoidable crisis, in which SNB took a hosing: it bought the Credit Suisse stock at CHF3.82 ($4.2) a share; UBS has paid just CHF0.76 ($0.83) a share.

The pain goes wider than SNB and the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), the other Gulf institution directly impacted by Credit Suisse’s troubles, given its 6.9 per cent stake in the lender.

The crisis poses serious questions about the role of wealthy Gulf institutions in a global system that is increasingly reliant on them, but has yet to stress test the relationship.

On the one hand, Gulf investors have been spooked about their exposure to venerable banking institutions that were once seen as copper-bottomed plays. Conversely, Western banks may now legitimately ask whether their Gulf counterparts are reliable partners in a crisis.

Volatile landscape

The backdrop is one of wider concern about the health of global financial markets. The Credit Suisse crisis was prefaced by US regulators shutting Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) on 10 March, following mass withdrawals of customer deposits.

For now, analysts caution against panic. First, SNB’s exposure – and that of other prominent Gulf lenders – appears limited.

“The impact of SNB’s investment in Credit Suisse and the subsequent takeover by UBS on SNB are limited because the initial investment represents less than 2 per cent of SNB’s investment portfolio and 70-80 bps of the bank’s risk-adjusted capital ratio,” says Mohamed Damak, senior director, Financial Institutions Ratings, at ratings agency S&P.

As to problems in the Western markets, again, exposures are manageable. “On average, banks we rate in GCC had exposure to the US of 4.6 per cent of assets and 2.3 per cent of liabilities at year-end 2022,” says Damak.

“Generally, GCC banks would have limited lending activity in the US and most of their assets there would be in high-credit quality instruments or with the Federal Reserve. The exposure to Europe tends to be limited as well, except for banks that have a presence in some European countries like France or the UK. Most of the activity in these jurisdictions tends to be linked to home countries or generally made of high-quality exposures.”

This will not end SNB shareholder anxiety that the bank’s raison d’etre – supporting domestic projects related to Vision 2030 – had been sidelined in the pursuit of equity positions in global blue chips.

Qatari contagion

Similar questions will be asked in Qatar, where the QIA provided ballast for the Swiss bank’s balance sheet in 2021, when it issued $2bn in convertible notes. The Qatari wealth fund will be reviewing its bank holdings and stress-testing its wider portfolio.

Others will do the same. “Gulf sovereign wealth funds will probably review their asset allocations, regardless of this current crisis,” one Gulf-based economist tells MEED. “The reality is that their role is changing. They were, in the past, more opportunistic investors. Today they are becoming strategic vehicles.”

If Gulf funds like QIA will no longer serve as the global financial system’s white knights – as they proved in the 2008 financial crisis – this may prompt a reconfiguration of investment strategies.

There will be a steep learning curve, says one Gulf-based economist – on both sides.

Governance implications

In light of the growing financial strength of the Gulf institutions come new responsibilities and governance requirements, reflecting the dawning reality that Gulf institutions are growing into increasingly globally systemically significant investors or sources of capital.

“They need to act accordingly,” says the economist. “Not just from the global governance perspective, but also from the perspective of protecting their assets.”

Gulf institutions’ transformation into opportunistic investors was well-timed when liquidity was required at short notice.

“The money centres of the world turned to one of the biggest honey pots they could identify. And, of course, some of the old reservations were conveniently parked aside, at least for the time being,” says the economist.

The challenge for the Gulf institutions was the lack of deep experience or institutional frameworks needed to underpin those initial investments.

“Opportunities arose, these countries chose to take them and they got lucky because they helped stabilise the global financial system, and they helped protect the reputation of these institutions. And no major mistakes were made. But that initial opportunistic approach will no longer fly,” says the economist.

Gulf sector outlook

The Credit Suisse saga has also prompted much ruminating in Western media to the extent that Western institutions may cast a more wary eye in future over their Gulf counterparts.

But absent new funding sources, the GCC's appeal may prove irresistible to them. After all, says the economist, beggars can’t be choosers.

“What is the alternative to resorting to institutions such as the Gulf sovereign funds? They’re not going to go to China, that’s for sure. The only real alternative is to get some sort of a backstop from national central banks. And that is pretty much as close as you can get to a moral hazard,” he says.

The broader global picture is evolving. How Gulf institutions related to primarily Western institutions will also be influenced by the change in the GCC states’ foreign policy.

Gulf governments are increasingly cognisant of the need for a balanced, multi-directional foreign policy. And that is something they will also want to reflect in their wealth funds and banks’ investment behaviour.

The next year should provide an insight into how the post-Credit Suisse modus vivendi will play out.

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/10724320/main2803.jpg
James Gavin

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Executive briefing: US-Israel-Iran conflict

    6 March 2026

    Download the briefing

    In this executive briefing, Ed James and Colin Foreman from MEED outline the key developments in the US-Israel-Iran conflict and examine the potential economic, infrastructure and market impacts across the Middle East.

    Drawing on regional data and analysis, the briefing explores the drivers behind the escalation, the scale of attacks across GCC states, and the possible short- and long-term implications for energy markets, shipping, aviation and regional investment.

    For ongoing updates and verified reporting as events unfold, follow MEED’s mega thread here.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15890483/main.gif
    MEED Editorial
  • Kuwait extends bid deadline for Al-Khairan phase one IWPP

    6 March 2026

     

    Kuwait has extended bidding for the first phase of the Al-Khairan independent water and power producer (IWPP) project.

    The project is being procured by the Kuwait Authority for Partnership Projects (Kapp) and the Ministry of Electricity, Water & Renewable Energy (MEWRE).

    The facility will have a capacity of 1,800MW and 33 million imperial gallons a day (MIGD) of desalinated water.

    It will be located at Al-Khairan, adjacent to the Al-Zour South thermal plant.

    The new deadline is 30 April.

    The main contract was tendered last September, and the deadline had already been extended once, most recently until 4 March.

    Three consortiums and two individual companies were previously prequalified to participate.

    These include:

    • Abu Dhabi National Energy Company (Taqa) / A H Al-Sagar & Brothers (Saudi Arabia) / Jera (Japan)
    • Acwa (Saudi Arabia) / Gulf Investment Corporation (Kuwait)
    • China Power / Malakoff International (Malaysia) / Abdul Aziz Al-Ajlan Sons (Saudi Arabia)
    • Nebras Power (Qatar)                                                                                                                                        
    • Sumitomo Corporation (Japan)

    The Al-Khairan IWPP project is part of Kuwait’s long-term plan to expand power and water production capacity through public-private partnerships (PPPs).

    The winning bidder will sign a set of PPP agreements covering financing, design, construction, operation and transfer of the project.

    The energy conversion and water purchase agreement is expected to cover a 25-year supply period.

    Kapp extended another deadline recently for a contract to develop zone two of the third phase of the Al-Dibdibah power and Al-Shagaya renewable energy project.

    The PPP authority is procuring the 500MW solar photovoltaic independent power project (IPP) in partnership with the ministry.

    The bid submission deadline was moved to the end of April, a source close to the project told MEED.

    According to the MEWRE, the total generation capacity currently offered under partnership projects has reached 6,100MW, equivalent to about 30% of Kuwait’s existing power capacity.

    The ministry and Kapp are also preparing to tender the main contract for the 3,600MW Nuwaiseeb power and water desalination plant after plans were approved by Kuwait’s Council of Ministers last November.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15889101/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • UAE utilities say services stable amid tensions

    6 March 2026

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    Abu Dhabi National Energy Company (Taqa) and Etihad Water & Electricity (EtihadWE) have confirmed that water and electricity services in the UAE are operating normally amid ongoing regional tensions.

    In a statement, Taqa said it had activated its risk management frameworks and “power generation, water desalination, transmission, distribution and wastewater services are operating safely and without interruption”.

    According to Etihad WE, services are being delivered with “approved response plans” and “precautionary operational procedures” amid the current regional circumstances.

    Taqa is one of the UAE’s largest integrated utilities, with assets including the Taweelah B independent power and water (IWPP) plant and the 2,400MW Fujairah F3 combined-cycle power plant.

    EtihadWE operates electricity and water distribution networks across the Northern Emirates, supplying more than two million residents.

    Iran’s recent missile attacks on energy infrastructure across the GCC in retaliation for US-Israel attacks have drawn renewed attention to the importance of the region’s utilities sector.

    While power and water assets have largely avoided damage, there have been some incidents affecting broader energy infrastructure.

    Saudi Aramco had shut down its Ras Tanura refinery following a drone strike, while US cloud provider Amazon Web Services reported service outages after incidents at two data centres in the UAE.

    In January, Taqa and Etihad won a contract alongside France’s Saur to develop and operate a major wastewater treatment plant in the UAE’s northern emirate of Ras Al-Khaimah.

    The Rakwa wastewater infrastructure project is RAK’s first public-private partnership for a sewage treatment plant.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15888121/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • Drawn-out conflict may shift planning priorities

    6 March 2026

    Commentary
    Mark Dowdall
    Power & water editor

    Across the GCC, power and water networks have largely been planned around steadily rising consumption, driven by population growth and cooling demand.

    A drawn-out conflict in the region may begin to change how planners think about these systems – particularly how they can keep operating if parts of the network are disrupted.

    On Thursday, Iran’s Energy Minister Abbas Aliabadi said that US-Israeli attacks had damaged water and electricity supply facilities in several parts of the country, while urging the public to be careful with water and electricity consumption.

    So far, major power and water infrastructure in the GCC has largely avoided damage. In the case of desalination, plants of this scale supply drinking water to millions of people, so striking them would immediately affect civilian populations and represent a significant escalation.

    There is also an element of mutual vulnerability. Iran relies on its own electricity and water infrastructure, and Aliabadi’s comments this week suggest those systems are already under pressure. Targeting desalination plants in the GCC could invite similar disruptions at home.

    However, if infrastructure disruption becomes a recurring risk in the region, the question may gradually shift from how to produce more water and electricity to how to reduce immediate reliance on continuous supply.

    Some elements of that thinking are already visible in the project pipeline. In Saudi Arabia, for example, total reservoir storage capacity has reached about 25.1 million cubic metres, with roughly 44% located in the Mecca region and 31% in Riyadh. This provides a buffer that can sustain supply temporarily if desalination production is disrupted.

    Additionally, the kingdom has about $8bn-worth of water storage projects in early study or feed stages. As regional tensions persist, schemes like this may move higher up the priority list.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15887101/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • US oil companies to profit while Middle East exports are curtailed

    6 March 2026

    While the oil and gas operations of the Middle East’s biggest producers are being dramatically curtailed by the conflict sparked by the US and Israel’s attack on Iran, US producers are likely to see windfall profits.

    So far, the list of oil and gas assets in the Mena region disrupted by the conflict is long and includes facilities in all GCC nations, as well as Iraq and Iran itself.

    In addition to oil fields and refineries that have been shut – either due to direct Iranian attacks or concerns over further strikes – about 20 million barrels a day (b/d) of production has been removed from the global market by the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

    Oil price

    The disruption to global oil and gas supplies caused by the Iran conflict has pushed oil prices up by around 15%, with Brent briefly rising above $85 a barrel on 3 March – its highest level since July 2024.

    This has boosted investor optimism about the outlook for US oil companies.

    Texas-headquartered ExxonMobil made $56bn in profit in 2022 after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine created a sustained period of higher oil prices. It was a record year for the company, and it could see a similar bump this year if oil prices remain high.

    Shale response

    US shale producers are ramping up production to capitalise on higher oil prices, according to the Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA).

    Recently drilled shale wells could add around 240,000 b/d of supply in May, and an additional 400,000 b/d could be added in the second half of the year, according to an IEA document cited by the Financial Times.

    Gas impact

    The impact of the Iran conflict on liquefied natural gas (LNG) prices has been even more pronounced than on oil, with several gas benchmarks hitting multi-year highs.

    The Dutch Title Transfer Facility rose by 55%, reaching its highest level since fuel markets spiked after Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

    One of the key factors driving prices higher was Qatar – the world’s second-biggest LNG producer – halting exports on 2 March after Iranian attacks on several facilities.

    Qatar is expected to take at least several weeks to restart exports from its liquefaction terminals.

    Not only will time be required to ensure the export route through the Strait of Hormuz  is secure, but restarting LNG export terminals is also a gradual process. They require a slow restart to avoid damaging cryogenic equipment, which cools natural gas to around -160°C.

    In addition, LNG trains must be brought back online sequentially; Qatar’s Ras Laffan hub has 14 trains.

    US advantage

    While the world’s second-biggest LNG producer is likely to be offline for some time, the US – the world’s biggest LNG producer – is already operating near full capacity and is benefiting from the higher-price environment.

    Cheniere and Venture Global, the two biggest US LNG producers, have both seen their share prices rise amid the conflict.

    Cheniere shares are up 18% since the start of February, while Venture Global’s share price has risen 12% over the same period.

    The scale of additional revenues earned by US companies – and the revenue losses suffered in the Middle East’s oil and gas sector – will largely depend on how long the disruption linked to the Iran conflict continues.

    If the disruption persists and significant long-term damage is done to Middle East oil and gas infrastructure, US-based oil and gas companies could record another year of record profits.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15886759/main.png
    Wil Crisp