Hydrogen’s future may not be so green

29 May 2025

Commentary
Jennifer Aguinaldo
Energy & technology editor

Much has changed in the region’s hydrogen landscape since the first projects were launched in a flurry of excitement.

Initially, in anticipation of demand for low-carbon fuel arising from Asia and Europe by the early 2030s, aspiring green hubs such as Egypt, Morocco, Abu Dhabi and Saudi Arabia announced batches of large-scale green hydrogen and ammonia projects.

Two or three of these have progressed. At Neom, the world’s largest and most ambitious green hydrogen and ammonia production plant is under construction. The $8.4bn project reached financial close in May 2023, achieved a 60% completion rate in December, and appears on track to meet the company’s 2026 target commercial operation date.

In Oman, meanwhile, where the sultanate’s third hydrogen block land auction is ongoing, developers and downstream companies are expected to submit bids sometime this year.

However, across the Middle East and North Africa region, most of the projects announced in the past few years remain in the concept or preliminary design stages, while the rest have not moved beyond signing the memorandums of understanding.

With the exception of Oman, there have been few announcements on new green hydrogen projects in the region over the past 12 months.

Shareholders have even revolted over clean hydrogen plans. Seifi Ghasemi, former CEO of Air Products, which co-owns the Neom Green Hydrogen Company, along with Saudi utility developer Acwa Power and gigaproject developer Neom, was removed from the firm’s board earlier this year, with sources citing the company shareholders’ opposition to the firm’s green hydrogen plans.

In addition to being a co-owner, Air Products is also the main offtaker, contractor and systems integrator of the Neom green hydrogen project.

Cost issue

The main issue for these projects remains the cost of production, according to Michael Liebreich, managing partner at UK firm EcoPragma Capita.

“If green ammonia is going to work anywhere, it should be [in] Oman and the GCC,” he explains. However, the London-based executive and entrepreneur has doubts about green hydrogen’s economics.

Earlier this year, his conversations with “a number of participants in green hydrogen and ammonia projects” indicate that the costs they are able to achieve today come to around $6 a kilogram (kg), and potentially $4/kg in five years for projects coming online in the early 2030s.

“They talk about $3/kg or $2.5/kg, but you could only get there by offering incentives such as subsidies, concessionary finance, free land, free infrastructure and offtake guarantees,” notes Liebreich.

While the region has very cheap solar power, a $15 a megawatt-hour (MWh) solar tariff does not necessarily lead to cheap hydrogen because it is only available roughly 25% of the time. To get to 24/7, one needs batteries, and in jurisdictions like Abu Dhabi, this will take the price to roughly $50/MWh.

Adds Liebreich: “And since you need 50kWh of power per kilogram of hydrogen, assuming an 80% efficiency, that means you have $2.50/kg just of electricity cost. No capex, no maintenance, no compression, no pipelines, nothing. So $4/kg looks like being a floor price for a long time; $3/kg would be the outside edge of achievable.”

Meanwhile, fossil gas at around $1-1.50/kg creates an extra cost of $2.50/kg, which means that anyone producing a million tonnes of green hydrogen a year has to cover the extra cost of $2.5bn a year and find at least 15 years of guaranteed offtake to get the project built.

“You need to secure 15 years of support to close the cost gap of $37.5bn. You need it guaranteed upfront by someone with a bullet-proof balance sheet – so that’s either a government or sovereign wealth fund.”

The near-impossibility of exporting liquid hydrogen to Europe due to prohibitive costs and inefficiency of liquefying the hydrogen should also be considered.

In comparison, a more feasible option could be putting ammonia on a ship to Europe, where it could benefit from a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) at the same price as a tonne of carbon under EU-ETS.

According to Liebreich, under this scenario, each kilogram of green hydrogen reduces emissions by around 9kg, and the EU-ETS price today is €72 ($81)/tonne.

“So each kilogram of green hydrogen will avoid a carbon price of $0.009 x 81, which is equal to $0.72. That closes your gap, so a tonne of green ammonia is now only $320 more than a tonne of grey, or only double the price,” Liebreich explains.

“Look at it another way, if you want to export 1 million tonnes of hydrogen as ammonia a year into Europe, you are still looking at an annual cost gap of $1.8bn after taking the EU-ETS CBAM into account. And you need a 15-year deal, so that’s $27bn,” he notes, under the assumption one can get the hydrogen price down to $4/kg.

Far from being rosy, Liebreich concludes that green hydrogen-wise, the region could be heading down a blind alley. “There will be almost no import market for green hydrogen or its derivatives because, in the best scenario, they will remain too expensive.”

Bright side

Liebreich’s dour forecast collides with the vision of most regional stakeholders that net zero by 2050 will not be possible without low-carbon, and particularly green, hydrogen and its derivatives, including green ammonia, methanol and sustainable aviation fuel.

Mohammad Abdelqader El-Ramahi, chief green hydrogen officer at Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company (Masdar), for instance, told MEED in October that green hydrogen is the most important driver and enabler of net zero and decarbonisation. “Very few people know that electrification alone can address no more than 30% of our decarbonisation [needs], even if we install all sorts of renewable sources,” he said.

Abu Dhabi intends to replicate its success in the energy sector’s previous four waves – oil and gas in the 1960s, liquefied natural gas and anti-flaring in the 1970s, renewable energy in the 2000s and nuclear energy in the 2020s – in the sector’s fifth low-carbon hydrogen wave.   

The list of Masdar’s potential green hydrogen partners includes Ireland-headquartered Linde; France’s TotalEnergies; the UK’s BP; Austria’s Verbund; and Japan’s Mitsui, Osaka Gas, Mitsubishi Chemical, Inpex and Toyo Gas.

Despite the slow progress and major reality check, hope proverbially springs. “Green hydrogen is the inevitable future fuel,” El-Ramahi asserted.

 

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/13956351/main.gif
Jennifer Aguinaldo
Related Articles
  • Oman’s Barka 5 IWP solar plant begins full operations

    1 May 2026

    Spain’s GS Inima has begun permanent operations at the solar photovoltaic (PV) plant serving the Barka 5 independent water project (IWP) in Oman.

    The solar facility is the third of its kind in Oman to power a large-scale desalination facility through a self-supply model.

    In a statement, GS Inima said it will provide up to 50% of the desalination plant’s electricity needs during daytime operations, improving efficiency and reducing reliance on external power sources.

    The PV plant has an installed capacity of 6.5MWp. It is designed to optimise energy consumption at the adjacent reverse osmosis desalination facility.

    The project was developed by GS Inima in collaboration with local firm Nafath Renewable Energy as the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor. China-based OCA Global provided owner’s engineering services.

    The Barka 5 IWP has a desalination capacity of approximately 100,000 cubic metres a day.

    GS Inima won the contract to develop the Barka 5 IWP project in November 2020. As previously reported, financial close was reached in 2022, and construction of the facility was completed in 2024.  

    The self-supply solar PV plant is equipped with 10,504 bifacial modules supplied by China’s Jinko Solar. These are mounted on fixed structures provided by Mibet Energy.

    Power is managed through 18 Sungrow inverters with a total capacity of 320kWac each, while electricity is fed into the desalination plant through an 11kV connection.

    The integration of solar power supports the efficiency of the Barka 5 facility, which has an energy consumption rate of 2.7kWh per cubic metre. 

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16645971/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • Qiddiya receives high-speed rail PPP prequalifications

    1 May 2026

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    Saudi Arabia’s Royal Commission for Riyadh City, in collaboration with Qiddiya Investment Company (QIC) and the National Centre for Privatisation & PPP, received prequalification statements from firms on 30 April for the public-private partnership (PPP) package of the Qiddiya high-speed rail project in Riyadh.

    This follows the submission of prequalification statements for the engineering, procurement, construction and financing (EPCF) package on 16 April, as reported by MEED.

    The prequalification notice was issued on 19 January, and a project briefing session was held on 23 February at Qiddiya Entertainment City.

    The Qiddiya high-speed rail project, also known as Q-Express, will connect King Salman International airport and the King Abdullah Financial District (KAFD) with Qiddiya City. The line will operate at speeds of up to 250 kilometres an hour, reaching Qiddiya in 30 minutes.

    The line is expected to be developed in two phases. The first phase will connect Qiddiya with KAFD and King Khalid International airport.

    The second phase will start from a development known as the North Pole and travel to the New Murabba development, King Salman Park, central Riyadh and Industrial City in the south of the city.

    In November last year, MEED reported that more than 145 local and international companies had expressed interest in developing the project, including 68 contracting companies, 23 design and project management consultants, 16 investment firms, 12 rail operators, 10 rolling stock providers and 16 other services firms.

    In November 2023, MEED reported that French consultant Egis had been appointed as the technical adviser for the project. UK-based consultancy Ernst & Young is acting as the transaction adviser, and Ashurst is the legal adviser.

    Qiddiya is one of Saudi Arabia’s five official gigaprojects and covers a total area of 376 square kilometres (sq km), with 223 sq km of developed land. 

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16641057/main.gif
    Yasir Iqbal
  • Bid deadline extensions hint at tighter project market

    1 May 2026

    Commentary
    Mark Dowdall
    Power & water editor

    There has been a steady run of bid deadline extensions across major power and water projects in recent weeks.

    The latest is the Al-Dibdibah and Al-Shagaya solar independent power producer (IPP) plant in Kuwait, where the submission date has been moved again to 31 May, following an earlier shift from February to the end of April. Similarly, bidding for the first phase of the Al-Khairan IWPP has also been extended.

    In Bahrain, bidding for the 1.2GW Sitra IWPP has been pushed back by another month to 17 May, having already been under main contract tender since last August.

    Meanwhile, in Dubai, contractors have been given additional time to submit bids for both the Jebel Ali sewage treatment plant expansion and a dams rehabilitation project in Hatta.

    Individually, these shifts are not unusual, and extensions are a routine part of the procurement cycle, especially with large, capital-intensive schemes.

    However, amid regional tensions and increasingly complex risk profiles, stakeholders are having to weigh up how much they can absorb, whether that is performance guarantees, financing exposure or delivery risk.

    For contractors and developers, this could mean looking more closely at supply chains, insurance costs and the potential for disruption. Lenders, too, are likely taking a more measured view on long-term exposure.

    This caution can show up in the bid process. More internal approvals, more conservative pricing, and in some cases, perhaps a hesitation to commit altogether.

    At the same time, strong pipelines across the GCC mean contractors are not short of work. Firms can afford to be selective, focusing on projects where risk and return are better aligned.

    Clients, in turn, face a choice. Push ahead with more limited competition or extend and try to draw in stronger participation. Most appear to be opting for the latter.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16640998/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • Saudi Arabia launches $2bn Jawharat Al-Arous project

    1 May 2026

    Saudi Arabia has launched Jawharat Al-Arous, an SR8bn ($2bn) private-sector-led residential development in north Jeddah.

    The scheme covers 107 million square metres and comprises 18 residential neighbourhoods planned to accommodate more than 700,000 residents. It will provide more than 80,000 residential and commercial plots.

    The masterplan also includes 41 government-backed infrastructure and service zones to support large-scale urban expansion.

    The project was unveiled by Mecca Region Governor Khalid Al-Faisal and will be overseen by Saud Bin Mishaal Bin Abdulaziz.

    According to a recent report by real estate firm Cavendish Maxwell, Jeddah’s residential stock stood at about 1.09 million units at the end of 2025, following the completion of around 4,000 units that year.

    An expanding pipeline of about 18,000 units in 2026 and 22,000 units in 2027 is expected to bring total stock to around 1.14 million units by 2027, gradually adding supply without destabilising market equilibrium.

    GlobalData expects the Saudi construction industry to grow by 3.6% in real terms in 2026, supported by increased foreign direct investment (FDI) and investment in the housing and manufacturing sectors.

    The residential construction sector is forecast to grow by 3.8% in real terms in 2026 and to record an average annual growth rate of 4.7% between 2027 and 2030, supported by Saudi Vision 2030’s goal of increasing homeownership from 65.4% in 2024 to 70% by 2030, including through the delivery of 600,000 homes by 2030.


    MEED’s April 2026 report on Saudi Arabia includes:

    > COMMENT: Risk accelerates Saudi spending shift
    > GVT &: ECONOMY: Riyadh navigates a changed landscape
    > BANKING: Testing times for Saudi banks
    > UPSTREAM: Offshore oil and gas projects to dominate Aramco capex in 2026
    > DOWNSTREAM: Saudi downstream projects market enters lean period
    > POWER: Wind power gathers pace in Saudi Arabia

    > WATER: Sharakat plan signals next phase of Saudi water expansion
    > CONSTRUCTION: Saudi construction enters a period of strategic readjustment
    > TRANSPORT: Rail expansion powers Saudi Arabia’s infrastructure push

    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16640863/main.png
    Yasir Iqbal
  • Damage to US bases in region expected to cost more than $15bn

    1 May 2026

    The $25bn estimate a Pentagon official gave US lawmakers on 29 April did not include the cost of repairing damage to US bases in the Middle East, and the real cost of the war is likely to be between $40bn and $50bn, according to CNN.

    That would put the cost of repairing bases and replacing destroyed assets at between $15bn and $25bn.

    Jules Hurst III, the Pentagon official serving as the agency’s comptroller, told the House Armed Services Committee that “most” of the $25bn he cited had been spent on munitions. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth declined to say whether the figure included repairs to damaged US bases.

    Iranian strikes across the Gulf in the early days of the war significantly damaged at least nine US military sites in 48 hours, hitting facilities in Bahrain, Kuwait, Iraq, the UAE and Qatar.

    Six US servicemembers were killed in an attack on a command post in Kuwait, and 20 more were injured.

    Three sources told CNN that the figure provided to the House Armed Services Committee did not include the cost of rebuilding US military installations and replacing destroyed assets.

    One source said the true cost would likely be between $40bn and $50bn.

    US contractors such as KBR and Fluor, as well as local firms, are likely to be among the leading contenders for contracts to repair and rebuild US bases in the region.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16638663/main.gif
    Wil Crisp