meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

US foreign policy approach remains adrift

24 May 2024

Commentary
Edmund O'Sullivan
Former editor of MEED

Former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Chas Freeman, said in May that the US has no Middle East strategy and is stumbling from one improvisation to the next.

Some say this is because Secretary of State Tony Blinken and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan both rose to where they are now principally because of their loyalty to the Democratic Party generally and President Joe Biden specifically. Their influence is consequently shaped more by political considerations than a broader understanding of the complexities of international affairs or America’s long-term interests.

There is little chance that this short-term approach will change, regardless of who wins in November’s presidential poll. Donald Trump is focusing on what will work for him this autumn and, if elected, will likely continue to follow a formula of self-interest; what works for the US in the Middle East will always come second.

There is little chance that this short-term approach will change

If there was a golden era for US Middle East policy, it may have begun in 1945 when President Roosevelt met Saudi Arabia’s King Abdul Aziz Al Saud to reach an understanding between the world’s most robust democracy and one of the most conservative kingdoms that served the interests of both.

In 1956, President Eisenhower then intervened to force Britain and France to stop their war on Egypt over the Suez Canal. From then on, the US became the dominant foreign force in much of the region and a welcome alternative to the old imperial powers and the Soviet Union.

That balance was lost in 1967, however, when President Johnson stood behind Israel despite its expansionary war against Egypt, Syria and Jordan.

A brief flicker of hope flared following the 1973 Arab-Israel war, but by then the polarisation in the region was reflected in US policy.

It was not until 1991, after Iraq had been expelled from Kuwait by a coalition that enjoyed almost unanimous Arab support, that a new opportunity arose for the US to at last develop a strategy that was built on solid foundations. 

The Madrid conference in October 1991 put Washington at the heart of a multilateral process that aimed to bridge the gap between Israel and the Arab nations. This was destroyed, however, by President Clinton – another political partisan – who opted for the bilateral approach defined by the Oslo agreements of 1993. It was bound to fail, and did.

Optimists say we will have to wait at least four more years before there is another opportunity for Washington to get it right. Pessimists say it will take longer than that, perhaps a generation or more. But what if they are both wrong and the long-term plan that Ambassador Freeman wants, and we all yearn for, does not actually exist? 

Connect with Edmund O’Sullivan on Twitter

More from Edmund O’Sullivan:

> Rainmaking in the world economy
> New shock treatment for Egypt’s economy
> Syria’s long march in from the cold
> Lebanon’s pain captured in a call from Beirut
> Troubled end to 2023 bodes ill for stability
> The Holy Land and delusions it inspires
> Region to mark golden jubilee of 1973 war
> Gulf funds help reshape football
> When a war crime is denied
> Embracing the new Washington consensus

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/11814753/main.gif
Edmund O’Sullivan

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • GCC banks show resilience amid regional conflict

    5 March 2026

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    The GCC’s banking sector is facing its most significant test in years following the attacks by Israel and the US on Iran, and the subsequent strikes launched by Iran on all six GCC states.

    The data so far indicates that the region’s finances are holding firm. “Fitch believes GCC sovereign ratings generally have sufficient headroom to withstand a short regional conflict that does not escalate significantly further, including in most cases substantial assets that provide a buffer against short-term hydrocarbon revenue disruption,” it said in a report on 3 March.

    In the UAE, the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) issued a statement on 5 March saying that the nation’s banking and financial sector continues to operate normally. It said the UAE’s banking assets now exceed AED5.42tn ($1.48tn), supported by a capital adequacy ratio of 17% and a liquidity coverage ratio of 146.6%, adding that both figures sit comfortably above international regulatory requirements.

    “The UAE’s banking and financial sector continues to maintain very strong levels of capital adequacy and liquidity … reflecting the scale, resilience and strength of financial institutions operating in the country,” said Khaled Mohamed Balama, governor of the CBUAE.

    While the immediate financial metrics are sound, the broader operating environment is not without its challenges. Fitch notes that the attacks raise risks to the 2026 baseline, which had previously assumed robust non-oil growth driven by the region’s massive pipeline of diversification projects.

    Economic impact

    The conflict has already impacted the real economy. Air travel suspensions, a slowdown in consumer activity and shifting risk perceptions regarding tourism could weigh on non-oil GDP if the tension lingers. Fitch highlighted that the key metric to monitor will be the “strength of operating conditions, particularly non-oil growth and general confidence in the region”.

    The critical variable remains the duration of the conflict. If hostilities are contained within a month – as is the current expectation among analysts – the impact on GCC economic growth is likely to be temporary.

    There are specific regional nuances to watch. While most GCC banks enjoy ample liquidity, those in Qatar and Saudi Arabia have historically faced tighter conditions. “The conflict could make it more challenging for GCC-based entities to issue debt in overseas capital markets. This could particularly increase Saudi banks’ reliance on more expensive domestic markets,” said Fitch. 

    For now, the strategy from both regulators and ratings agencies is one of cautious optimism. The region’s capital expenditure programmes and diversification drives provide a structural momentum that is difficult to derail in the short term.

    Fitch concluded that as long as energy infrastructure remains intact and public spending continues to shore up growth, the GCC’s financial institutions are well-positioned to navigate the crisis.

    READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Riyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15875387/main.gif
    Colin Foreman
  • Fitch Ratings sees limited oil price impact of Iran conflict

    5 March 2026

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    The de facto blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in the Gulf by Iran since 28 February is likely to be temporary given its vital economic role in global oil trade, according to credit ratings agency Fitch Ratings.

    This, alongside global oil market oversupply, should limit oil price rises and mitigate any potential disruptions to Iranian oil supply, Fitch Ratings said in a note.

    As a result, the ratings agency does not expect significant upside to its December 2025 assumption of an average Brent oil price of $63 a barrel for 2026.

    “The strait is not formally closed, but vessels are increasingly avoiding it given the risk of attack by Iran or its proxies. Oil majors have halted shipments for safety reasons, and insurers are cancelling war risk cover for vessels. However, we expect this effective closure of the strait to be temporary. It is a vital artery for seaborne oil transportation, with limited alternative routes,” said Angelina Valavina, EMEA head of Natural Resources and Commodities at Fitch Ratings.

    Oil prices rose on 5 March, extending a rally as the ‌escalating US-Israeli war with Iran continued to disrupt supplies, prompting some major producers to cut production and others to take measures to ensure supply security.

    Brent crude was up $2.35, or 2.9%, at $83.75 a barrel at 12pm Gulf Standard Time, a fifth session of gains. US ​West Texas Intermediate crude rose $2.42, or 3.2%, to $77.08.

    ALSO READ: Oil prices rise to highest in a year as regional conflict deepens

    “Prior to the conflict, around 20 million barrels a day (b/d) of crude oil and petroleum products transited the strait, accounting for about a quarter of global seaborne oil trade and a fifth of global oil consumption. About half of the oil volumes transported through the strait are exports from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, with the remainder from Iraq, Kuwait and Iran. About half of these exports go to China and India.

    “A protracted closure would affect both exporting and importing countries and therefore is not our baseline assumption. If the strait were to remain effectively closed for a protracted period, naval protection for tanker navigation could be considered, as occurred during the 1980s' Iran-Iraq war,” Valavina said in the note from Fitch Ratings.

    “In addition, the global oil market is oversupplied, which should limit the geopolitical risk premium and cap risks to oil price increases. Global supply growth exceeded demand growth in 2025. Fitch expects this trend to continue in 2026. Supply increased by about 3 million b/d in 2025, while demand grew by well below 1 million b/d,” Valavina said.

    “We forecast supply growth of 2.4 million b/d in 2026, with demand growth of about 0.8 million b/d. Half of 2025-26 supply increases come from unaffected non-Opec+ producers. Opec+ spare production capacity is 4.3 million b/d,” she added.

    “In addition, global observed oil inventories rose by 1.3 million b/d in 2025 to reach their highest level since March 2021. Total global inventories stood at 8.2 billion barrels at end-2025. This is sufficient to cover a halt in oil shipments via the Strait of Hormuz for over 400 days.

    “Saudi Arabia and the UAE have some infrastructure to bypass the strait, which may mitigate transit disruptions. Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabian Oil Company; A+/Stable) operates the 5 million b/d East–West crude oil pipeline to an export port on the Red Sea. The UAE operates a 1.5 million b/d capacity pipeline linking its oil fields to the Fujairah export terminal on the Gulf of Oman with a maximum achieved flow of 1.8 million b/d.

    “While Iran is a sizeable oil producer, producing about 3.5 million b/d and exporting about 2 million b/d, it accounts only for about 3.5% of global crude oil production. This means that potential supply disruption would be offset by global market oversupply.”

    Valavina concluded: “However, the duration and intensity of the increasingly regional conflict remain uncertain. Any protracted blockage of the strait or material and sustained damage to the region’s oil and gas production and transportation infrastructure would materially affect oil markets and likely result in a more material rise in our base case 2026 oil price assumption. Oil price volatility would rise if there were to be any material disruption to Iranian oil production.”

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15872225/main.jpg
    Indrajit Sen
  • Alec resumes project operations across the UAE

    5 March 2026

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    UAE-based construction firm Alec has resumed on-site and in-office operations across its UAE projects from 4 March.

    In a statement, the company said that it is working closely with clients to ensure a prompt and safe return to full-scale activity.

    The move follows a temporary work-from-home policy introduced across the company’s UAE operations in response to ongoing events, as Alec Holdings reaffirmed its commitment to protecting its workforce while continuing to deliver in clients’ best interests.

    During the same period, the company said its operations in Saudi Arabia remained fully operational.

    Alec also confirmed it remains on track to hold its first Annual General Assembly meeting post-listing on 24 March, in line with regulatory guidelines.

    Barry Lewis, CEO of Alec Holdings, said the company’s “priority is, and always will be, the safety and security of our workforce”, adding that Alec was grateful to clients for their support.

    “That trust has been built over decades of delivering on our promises, and it is something we value deeply,” he said.

    Lewis added that the company would continue to focus on transparency and close collaboration with clients and partners to maintain safety across sites and offices.

    Lewis also pointed to Alec’s investments in digital collaboration platforms, workforce management systems and enhanced security protocols, describing them as “tried and tested” capabilities that have helped keep projects on track while protecting employees.

    He said the company remained confident in the resilience of its operations and its ability to adapt responsibly as circumstances evolve.

    READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Riyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15872176/main3704.jpg
    Yasir Iqbal
  • QatarEnergy issues force majeure to customers

    5 March 2026

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    QatarEnergy has issued force majeure to customers who have been affected by its decision to stop production and shipments of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and associated products.

    “QatarEnergy values its relationships with all of its stakeholders and will continue to communicate the latest available information,” the state enterprise said in a statement on 4 March.

    QatarEnergy announced its decision to halt production of LNG and associated products on 2 March due to military attacks on the company’s operating facilities in Ras Laffan Industrial City and Mesaieed Industrial City in Qatar.

    The following day, the company said it was stopping output of products in the downstream energy value chain, including urea, polymers, methanol, aluminium and other products.

    The state enterprise did not blame Iran for the attacks in either of its statements, but it is understood that its facilities have been hit by drones and/or missiles launched by Tehran, as it retaliates against Israel, the US and their military bases in the GCC states, further escalating the ongoing conflict.

    QatarEnergy currently has a nameplate LNG production capacity of 77.5 million tonnes a year (t/y), with all its processing trains and export infrastructure located in Ras Laffan Industrial City, which lies about 90 kilometres to the north of Doha.

    In Mesaieed Industrial City, situated around 45km south of Doha, QatarEnergy operates crude oil refining facilities, including natural gas liquids (NGL) units, as well as petrochemical production complexes and other units in the hydrocarbon value chain.

    ALSO READ: 
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15872121/main0755.jpg
    Indrajit Sen
  • Local firm wins Jeddah stormwater contract

    5 March 2026

    Saudi Arabia’s Alkhorayef Water & Power Technologies (AWPT) has won a five-year contract from Jeddah Municipality for stormwater network services in the city.

    The contract covers the operation and cleaning of stormwater and surface water networks in the airport’s sub-municipality area of Jeddah, AWPT said in a statement to the Saudi stock exchange.

    Valued at $25m, the contract forms part of ongoing efforts by Saudi municipalities to maintain and upgrade urban stormwater infrastructure as cities expand and face increasing pressure on drainage systems.

    According to regional projects tracker MEED Projects, Jeddah Municipality awarded two major stormwater infrastructure contracts in 2025.

    The awards covered phases one and two of the King Abdullah Road-Falasteen Road (KAFA) tunnel project, each valued at about $175m.

    The contracts were awarded to Saudi contractor Thrustboring Construction Company for the construction of large-diameter stormwater drainage tunnels. US-based Aecom is the consultant for the project.

    As MEED previously reported, the contracts for the three-year scheme were initially tendered in 2024.

    In January, AWPT won another contract with state-owned utility National Water Company (NWC) to operate and maintain water assets in Tabuk City.

    The scope of work includes the operation and maintenance of water networks, pump stations, wells, tanks and related facilities over a 36-month period.

    READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Riyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15870416/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall