meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

Saudi nuclear move has geopolitical significance

28 February 2023

Commentary

Jennifer Aguinaldo

Energy & technology editor

Saudi Arabia's Finance Ministry’s disclosure that it received bids late last year for the contract to build the kingdom's first nuclear power plant is major energy news with potential widespread geopolitical significance.

The bids came in weeks before Foreign Affairs Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan al-Saud told a security conference in Munich that he could not rule out a regional nuclear arms race.

“If one state gets nuclear weapons, especially one that has expressed aggression towards its neighbours, I think everyone will start thinking about how to protect themselves,” Prince Faisal said in reference to Iran’s programme and the need for negotiations between Tehran and world powers to resume.

READ: Top nuclear projects to watch this year

Assuming the bids are for the large-scale nuclear power plant that Riyadh has been planning for since 2016, the list of companies that submitted a bid for the contract is tightly guarded.

Five companies were understood to have requested information on the project from King Abdullah City for Atomic & Renewable Energy (KA-Care) in 2017, including the US firm Westinghouse, France’s EDF and Russia’s Rosatom. South Korea’s Kepco and China National Nuclear Corporation also responded to the request for qualifications for the main contract. 

More recent, unconfirmed developments suggest that Westinghouse and possibly EDF may no longer be in the race, leaving three companies at the table.

Washington worried

Washington is wary of the contract being awarded to Chinese or Russian contractors. This would weaken or render irrelevant its demands for Riyadh to abandon its nuclear fuel cycle ambitions before signing any bilateral nuclear cooperation agreement (NCA), otherwise known in Washington as a 123 agreement.

According to an Energy Intelligence report, the stalemate centres around Washington’s demands for Saudi Arabia to make a commitment to the NCA not to pursue a domestic uranium enrichment or reprocessing programme. The US also wants the kingdom to sign and ratify the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Additional Protocol (IAEA AP), allowing nuclear inspectors fuller access to Saudi's nuclear programme.

The report alludes to the US supporting Kepco’s bid, not only to keep Riyadh away from its geopolitical adversaries but because it provides Washington with a final lever for pressuring Riyadh to accept its conditions for the 123 agreement and/or the IAEA protocol.

The topic was understood to be a key item on US President Joe Biden’s agenda during his trip to Riyadh in July, which yielded unclear results.

Crucially, Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman al-Saud announced in January last year that Saudi Arabia has uranium resources that it wants to exploit transparently through partnerships.

UAE role

Some say that the UAE – whose Barakah nuclear power plant was built by Kepco and which has signed a 123 agreement with the US – is backing the South Korean firm’s bid.

Tellingly in November, the US and UAE governments signed the $100bn Partnership for Accelerating Clean Energy (Pace) programme. Analysts say this could shift the two countries’ energy cooperation more towards nuclear energy, with the UAE aiming to position itself as an investor in regional and developing economies’ nuclear power.

Then in January, the UAE pledged to invest $30bn in South Korea’s nuclear power, defence, hydrogen and solar energy industries. They also announced plans to deepen their nuclear cooperation with Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) and Emirates Nuclear Energy Corporation (Enec) signing a deal to “expand practical cooperation in the field of developing export markets for nuclear power plants in third countries and joint procurement of business finance”.

As industry insiders speculate on what will happen next, all eyes will be on Riyadh to see if it makes an official announcement to award the contract, which a Saudi-based expert says can only be made by the highest levels of the country’s leadership.

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/10635817/main.jpg
Jennifer Aguinaldo

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Executive briefing: US-Israel-Iran conflict

    6 March 2026

    Download the briefing

    In this executive briefing, Ed James and Colin Foreman from MEED outline the key developments in the US-Israel-Iran conflict and examine the potential economic, infrastructure and market impacts across the Middle East.

    Drawing on regional data and analysis, the briefing explores the drivers behind the escalation, the scale of attacks across GCC states, and the possible short- and long-term implications for energy markets, shipping, aviation and regional investment.

    For ongoing updates and verified reporting as events unfold, follow MEED’s mega thread here.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15890483/main.gif
    MEED Editorial
  • Kuwait extends bid deadline for Al-Khairan phase one IWPP

    6 March 2026

     

    Kuwait has extended bidding for the first phase of the Al-Khairan independent water and power producer (IWPP) project.

    The project is being procured by the Kuwait Authority for Partnership Projects (Kapp) and the Ministry of Electricity, Water & Renewable Energy (MEWRE).

    The facility will have a capacity of 1,800MW and 33 million imperial gallons a day (MIGD) of desalinated water.

    It will be located at Al-Khairan, adjacent to the Al-Zour South thermal plant.

    The new deadline is 30 April.

    The main contract was tendered last September, and the deadline had already been extended once, most recently until 4 March.

    Three consortiums and two individual companies were previously prequalified to participate.

    These include:

    • Abu Dhabi National Energy Company (Taqa) / A H Al-Sagar & Brothers (Saudi Arabia) / Jera (Japan)
    • Acwa (Saudi Arabia) / Gulf Investment Corporation (Kuwait)
    • China Power / Malakoff International (Malaysia) / Abdul Aziz Al-Ajlan Sons (Saudi Arabia)
    • Nebras Power (Qatar)                                                                                                                                        
    • Sumitomo Corporation (Japan)

    The Al-Khairan IWPP project is part of Kuwait’s long-term plan to expand power and water production capacity through public-private partnerships (PPPs).

    The winning bidder will sign a set of PPP agreements covering financing, design, construction, operation and transfer of the project.

    The energy conversion and water purchase agreement is expected to cover a 25-year supply period.

    Kapp extended another deadline recently for a contract to develop zone two of the third phase of the Al-Dibdibah power and Al-Shagaya renewable energy project.

    The PPP authority is procuring the 500MW solar photovoltaic independent power project (IPP) in partnership with the ministry.

    The bid submission deadline was moved to the end of April, a source close to the project told MEED.

    According to the MEWRE, the total generation capacity currently offered under partnership projects has reached 6,100MW, equivalent to about 30% of Kuwait’s existing power capacity.

    The ministry and Kapp are also preparing to tender the main contract for the 3,600MW Nuwaiseeb power and water desalination plant after plans were approved by Kuwait’s Council of Ministers last November.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15889101/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • UAE utilities say services stable amid tensions

    6 March 2026

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    Abu Dhabi National Energy Company (Taqa) and Etihad Water & Electricity (EtihadWE) have confirmed that water and electricity services in the UAE are operating normally amid ongoing regional tensions.

    In a statement, Taqa said it had activated its risk management frameworks and “power generation, water desalination, transmission, distribution and wastewater services are operating safely and without interruption”.

    According to Etihad WE, services are being delivered with “approved response plans” and “precautionary operational procedures” amid the current regional circumstances.

    Taqa is one of the UAE’s largest integrated utilities, with assets including the Taweelah B independent power and water (IWPP) plant and the 2,400MW Fujairah F3 combined-cycle power plant.

    EtihadWE operates electricity and water distribution networks across the Northern Emirates, supplying more than two million residents.

    Iran’s recent missile attacks on energy infrastructure across the GCC in retaliation for US-Israel attacks have drawn renewed attention to the importance of the region’s utilities sector.

    While power and water assets have largely avoided damage, there have been some incidents affecting broader energy infrastructure.

    Saudi Aramco had shut down its Ras Tanura refinery following a drone strike, while US cloud provider Amazon Web Services reported service outages after incidents at two data centres in the UAE.

    In January, Taqa and Etihad won a contract alongside France’s Saur to develop and operate a major wastewater treatment plant in the UAE’s northern emirate of Ras Al-Khaimah.

    The Rakwa wastewater infrastructure project is RAK’s first public-private partnership for a sewage treatment plant.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15888121/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • Drawn-out conflict may shift planning priorities

    6 March 2026

    Commentary
    Mark Dowdall
    Power & water editor

    Across the GCC, power and water networks have largely been planned around steadily rising consumption, driven by population growth and cooling demand.

    A drawn-out conflict in the region may begin to change how planners think about these systems – particularly how they can keep operating if parts of the network are disrupted.

    On Thursday, Iran’s Energy Minister Abbas Aliabadi said that US-Israeli attacks had damaged water and electricity supply facilities in several parts of the country, while urging the public to be careful with water and electricity consumption.

    So far, major power and water infrastructure in the GCC has largely avoided damage. In the case of desalination, plants of this scale supply drinking water to millions of people, so striking them would immediately affect civilian populations and represent a significant escalation.

    There is also an element of mutual vulnerability. Iran relies on its own electricity and water infrastructure, and Aliabadi’s comments this week suggest those systems are already under pressure. Targeting desalination plants in the GCC could invite similar disruptions at home.

    However, if infrastructure disruption becomes a recurring risk in the region, the question may gradually shift from how to produce more water and electricity to how to reduce immediate reliance on continuous supply.

    Some elements of that thinking are already visible in the project pipeline. In Saudi Arabia, for example, total reservoir storage capacity has reached about 25.1 million cubic metres, with roughly 44% located in the Mecca region and 31% in Riyadh. This provides a buffer that can sustain supply temporarily if desalination production is disrupted.

    Additionally, the kingdom has about $8bn-worth of water storage projects in early study or feed stages. As regional tensions persist, schemes like this may move higher up the priority list.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15887101/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • US oil companies to profit while Middle East exports are curtailed

    6 March 2026

    While the oil and gas operations of the Middle East’s biggest producers are being dramatically curtailed by the conflict sparked by the US and Israel’s attack on Iran, US producers are likely to see windfall profits.

    So far, the list of oil and gas assets in the Mena region disrupted by the conflict is long and includes facilities in all GCC nations, as well as Iraq and Iran itself.

    In addition to oil fields and refineries that have been shut – either due to direct Iranian attacks or concerns over further strikes – about 20 million barrels a day (b/d) of production has been removed from the global market by the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

    Oil price

    The disruption to global oil and gas supplies caused by the Iran conflict has pushed oil prices up by around 15%, with Brent briefly rising above $85 a barrel on 3 March – its highest level since July 2024.

    This has boosted investor optimism about the outlook for US oil companies.

    Texas-headquartered ExxonMobil made $56bn in profit in 2022 after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine created a sustained period of higher oil prices. It was a record year for the company, and it could see a similar bump this year if oil prices remain high.

    Shale response

    US shale producers are ramping up production to capitalise on higher oil prices, according to the Paris-based International Energy Agency (IEA).

    Recently drilled shale wells could add around 240,000 b/d of supply in May, and an additional 400,000 b/d could be added in the second half of the year, according to an IEA document cited by the Financial Times.

    Gas impact

    The impact of the Iran conflict on liquefied natural gas (LNG) prices has been even more pronounced than on oil, with several gas benchmarks hitting multi-year highs.

    The Dutch Title Transfer Facility rose by 55%, reaching its highest level since fuel markets spiked after Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

    One of the key factors driving prices higher was Qatar – the world’s second-biggest LNG producer – halting exports on 2 March after Iranian attacks on several facilities.

    Qatar is expected to take at least several weeks to restart exports from its liquefaction terminals.

    Not only will time be required to ensure the export route through the Strait of Hormuz  is secure, but restarting LNG export terminals is also a gradual process. They require a slow restart to avoid damaging cryogenic equipment, which cools natural gas to around -160°C.

    In addition, LNG trains must be brought back online sequentially; Qatar’s Ras Laffan hub has 14 trains.

    US advantage

    While the world’s second-biggest LNG producer is likely to be offline for some time, the US – the world’s biggest LNG producer – is already operating near full capacity and is benefiting from the higher-price environment.

    Cheniere and Venture Global, the two biggest US LNG producers, have both seen their share prices rise amid the conflict.

    Cheniere shares are up 18% since the start of February, while Venture Global’s share price has risen 12% over the same period.

    The scale of additional revenues earned by US companies – and the revenue losses suffered in the Middle East’s oil and gas sector – will largely depend on how long the disruption linked to the Iran conflict continues.

    If the disruption persists and significant long-term damage is done to Middle East oil and gas infrastructure, US-based oil and gas companies could record another year of record profits.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15886759/main.png
    Wil Crisp