Saudi Arabia under project pressure

28 March 2023


Saudi Arabia’s projects market is overheating. The volume of projects announced in the past six years vastly exceeds the resources that are available to work in the kingdom. 

Combined with tight deadlines to complete projects as part of Vision 2030, the pressure on the construction industry to deliver is ratcheting up and turning the tables on the supply chain as the shift from a buyer’s to a seller’s market accelerates.

For the five years from 2016 to 2020, there was an average of about $14bn-worth of contract awards a year in Saudi Arabia for the construction and transport sectors. After rising to $21bn in 2021, the total rose to $32bn in 2022 – the second-best year on record. 

The near doubling of the total annual value of contract awards by the end of 2022 has required a significant scale-up of resources in the kingdom, and the ramp-up is set to continue. 

Much of this pressure is due to the five official gigaprojects, which are major programmes of work that will involve a sustained flow of contract awards for years to come.

Gigaproject focus

The project most recently classified as a gigaproject by the Saudi authorities is the Diriyah Gate development on the western outskirts of Riyadh. It joins the $500bn Neom development in the northwest of the kingdom, Qiddiya entertainment city outside Riyadh, Red Sea Global’s projects on the Red Sea coast and Roshn’s housing developments across the kingdom.

These projects are relatively new. They began to be launched in 2017 and spent much of the following three years in the design phase. 

After a start that was hampered by the work and travel restrictions required to manage the Covid-19 pandemic, construction activity on these projects has accelerated sharply since the start of 2022. 

According to regional project tracker MEED Projects, there have been $36bn-worth of contract awards across these official gigaprojects since 2017. Compared to the entire Saudi projects market over the same period that represents 14.5 per cent of contract awards. 

The percentage rises to 20 per cent if a more recent time frame is used and only contract awards since the start of 2022 are included. As work gathers pace on the gigaprojects, their significance is expected to grow even further.

More major projects

Saudi Arabia’s ambitions are not limited to the five gigaprojects. In January, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman al-Saud launched the world’s largest modern downtown in Riyadh. 

Known as the New Murabba project, it involves the development of 19 square kilometres of land to the northwest of the capital. The centrepiece of the project is the Mukaab, which is a 400-metre-cubed structure with a tower standing inside it. 

New Murabba is part of a plan announced in January 2021 to double the size of Riyadh from 7.5 million residents to 15-20 million residents in 2030. Other major projects in the capital include King Salman International airport, King Salman Park, Sports Boulevard and Mohammed bin Salman Non-Profit City. 

Beyond the capital there are development projects planned in all major urban centres by Saudi Downtown Company, as well as entertainment centres being developed by Saudi Entertainment Ventures (Seven).

Connecting these cities and projects will be railways, roads, ports and airports that form part of the National Transport & Logistics strategy, which aims to turn the kingdom into a global hub for travel and trade by 2030.

World’s largest piling project shifts to The Line’s marina

Resourcing challenges  

One of the key challenges for the development firms and government agencies responsible for delivering these projects is securing the resources they need. 

As client bodies attempt to make their projects more attractive for companies to work on, the industry is changing. The first signs of this change can be seen in the consultancy market. 

After years of searching for project opportunities, the big consultancy businesses are now only selectively bidding for projects in the kingdom. This is because their orderbooks are already full, and for many international firms there is a concern that they could become over-exposed to the Saudi market. 

On contracts that have already been won there are also challenges. Staffing projects is proving difficult as the kingdom remains a hard sell for many project professionals, despite significant social reforms that have taken place in recent years. 

Then, once staff have been recruited and deployed on projects, there is the prospect of losing them to competitors or clients that require the same human resources.

Securing contractors

As activity on site accelerates, the bigger concern is contracting resources. As things stand, there are not enough contractors working in Saudi Arabia to deliver all of the planned projects. 

The first way to deal with this problem is to increase the capacity of contractors in the kingdom. In February this year, the Public Investment Fund (PIF) invested $1.3bn in four local construction firms: Al-Bawani Holding Company, Almabani General Contractors Company, El-Seif Engineering Contracting Company and Nesma & Partners Contracting Company. 

This investment will allow the companies to scale up their capacity, adopt advanced technologies and improve local supply chains. 

As these firms grow, the hope is that it will encourage other local companies to also expand.

International or regional companies can also help, and over the past two years foreign players have become active in the kingdom again. Firms such as Bouygues, Samsung C&T, Hyundai Engineering Construction, China State, Webuild, FCC, Alec, Consolidated Contractors Company and Urbacon Trading Contracting Company have all secured major orders. 

In some cases, these contract awards have been supported with foreign finance, which gives the contractor an additional level of comfort when it comes to potential payment for projects. For others, the contract awards reflect growing assurance in the Saudi market. 

Boosting appeal

Confidence has been lifted by measures to make the Saudi market more attractive. Payment terms are improving and many of the frustrations typically faced by contractors are being addressed. 

One example is the use of performance guarantees. Red Sea Global, which is developing the Red Sea Project and Amaala gigaprojects on the Red Sea coast, no longer requires contractors to submit bid bonds and returns performance bonds on completion of the project, along with half of the retention. 

Alternative procurement methods and contract types are also being used, notably early contractor involvement and design and build. 

These different approaches reduce risk for the contractor and allow the client to lock in resources at a much earlier stage of the procurement process. 

Red Sea Global has adopted a different approach and is self-delivering the bulk of its projects. By acting as its own management contractor, it engages with subcontractors itself. While this means it does not need to secure the services of a main contractor, it still requires engaging with the supply chain, which – like the main contractor market – has finite resources in Saudi Arabia.

Payment terms are improving and many of the frustrations typically faced by contractors are being addressed 

Driving efficiency

On the other side of the equation, making construction more efficient could also help to limit the resources required. 

Client bodies are exploring modern methods of construction to increase the speed of delivery, reduce costs and cut the amount of resources needed on site.

The market could also be self-limiting. Decision-making in the kingdom remains centralised, which means key project decisions can be slow. While this is changing as development companies are left to run their own projects, bureaucracy can impact the speed of delivery, which ultimately reduces the immediate demand for resources on a project. 

While slow decision-making could impact progress on some projects, the overriding story for 2023 will be one of sustained pressure on the kingdom’s construction sector as it becomes a seller’s market. 

With that, there is the likelihood that contractor margins will start to creep up, just as they did in the UAE when its construction market overheated in 2003 and 2008. 

So far, that does not appear to have happened, as clients in Saudi Arabia have managed to find sufficient resources. For that to remain the case will be a major challenge, however, as on-site activity for most projects in the kingdom is still several years away from peaking. 

Daniel King, director, Currie & Brown

International contractors continue to see a level of risk in the Saudi market

“There is a lot of opportunity. A large volume of work is being planned, designed and rolled out. With that, there is significant pressure right now on the market in terms of resources and supply chain. 

“On the consultancy side, the market is tremendously difficult. 

“Even with the best incentives and best set of practices, retaining staff is a challenge. People are being attracted elsewhere and the competition is fierce. 

“For the contractors, there are a lot of tenders being let. The perception that the market has risk remains, however. That is certainly the perception for international contractors, and they are still looking at the Saudi market with some level of risk appreciation in terms of how quickly they are going to be paid and what the margins really are. 

“That approach will likely prevail for the short to medium term, until clients’ practices change in terms of contractual frameworks and payment practices. 

“Varied procurement practices are coming into play to guarantee supply chain. It might be early contractor involvement or partnering, but the main purpose is to guarantee the right level of contractors.”

Adel Karem Jemah, senior vice-president, Hill International

To prevent resource shortages, supply chain and procurement must be carefully considered

“It is imperative to consider alternative methods of procurement during boom times, and the current boom in Saudi Arabia is unprecedented considering the types, size, nature and complexity of projects that have been announced in line with Vision 2030. 

“This necessitates giving due consideration to the supply chain and type of procurement.

“It is not enough to look for resources locally or even regionally to cope with such projects. One needs to reach out to where such resources are available globally, either due to slowdowns in certain regions or the completion of other major projects. 

“Cost-plus contracts were used previously in many projects in Saudi Arabia. However, the risk for such contracts rests with the client and sometimes the cost ends up much more than expected. That is why financiers prefer the lump-sum type of contracts. 

“Nonetheless, I can see this type of contract being used for fast-track projects with very tight schedules, for instance to meet deadlines for facilities required for international or regional sporting events. 

“In any case, the evaluation and selection of contractors needs to be done with extreme diligence.”

MEED's April 2023 special report on Saudi Arabia includes:

> ECONOMY: Riyadh steps up the Vision 2030 tempo

> CONSTRUCTION: Saudi construction project ramp-up accelerates

> UPSTREAM: Aramco slated to escalate upstream spending

> DOWNSTREAM: Petchems ambitions define Saudi downstream

> POWER: Saudi Arabia reinvigorates power sector

> WATER: Saudi water begins next growth phase

> BANKING: Saudi banks bid to keep ahead of the pack
Colin Foreman
Related Articles
  • Abu Dhabi starts battery storage prequalification

    27 May 2024


    Register for MEED's guest programme 

    Interested developers and developer consortiums have submitted their statements of qualifications (SOQs) for a contract to develop an independent 400MW battery energy storage system (bess) power project in Abu Dhabi.

    State offtaker Emirates Water & Electricity Company (Ewec) received the SOQs on 20 May, according to industry sources.

    Ewec issued the request for prequalifications for the contract on 2 May.

    Called Bess 1, the project will closely follow the model of Ewec's independent power project (IPP) programme, in which developers enter into a long-term energy storage agreement (ESA) with Ewec as the sole procurer.

    The first plant will be in Al Bihouth, approximately 45 kilometres (km) southwest of Abu Dhabi, and the second plant will be in Madinat Zayed, about 160km southwest of the city.  

    The facilities will be able to store and discharge 400MW of power for not less than one hour throughout the ESA term. The project also covers ancillary equipment, associated infrastructure and facilities.

    Each plant will have no less than 200 megawatt-hours of energy storage capacity.

    The project has attracted strong interest among developers, resulting in a highly competitive bidding process, one of the sources tells MEED.

    The project will be structured as a standalone IPP and will be developed on a build-own-operate basis.

    The ESA will be for 15 years, commencing on the project's commercial operation date, which falls in the third quarter of 2026. 

    According to Ewec, the bess project will provide additional flexibility to the system and ancillary services such as frequency response and voltage regulation.

    "Bess technology will play a crucial role in Ewec's strategic plan to diversify its portfolio of energy projects with a focus on sustainability, in addition to increasing its total solar photovoltaic power generation capacity to 7.5GW," the firm said upon issuing the expression of interest to developers and developer consortiums in March.

    US-headquartered Sargent & Lundy, London-based Consilium Officium and the US' White & Case are the client's technical, financial and legal advisers for the project, respectively.

    MEED's April 2024 special report on the UAE includes:

    > COMMENT: UAE rides high on non-oil boom
    > GVT & ECONOMY: Non-oil activity underpins UAE economy

    > BANKING: UAE banks seize the moment
    > UPSTREAM: Adnoc oil and gas project spending sees steep uptick
    > DOWNSTREAM: UAE builds its downstream and chemical sectors

    > POWER: UAE marks successful power project deliveries
    > WATER: Dubai tunnels project dominates UAE pipeline
    > DUBAI CONSTRUCTION: Dubai real estate boosts construction sector

    > ABU DHABI CONSTRUCTION: Abu Dhabi makes major construction investments
    Jennifer Aguinaldo
  • Riyadh reins in spending

    24 May 2024


    On the surface, it feels like business as usual in Saudi Arabia as new projects continue to be launched.

    On 8 May, designs for another futuristic project at Neom’s Gulf of Aqaba were released with slick computer-generated imagery. Known as Jaumur (pictured), it includes the development of a mixed-use community featuring 1,200 residential units and two hotels offering 350 rooms. The most eye-catching part of the project is at the marina, which will have a 1.5-kilometre aerofoil that will rise above the yacht berths.

    Beneath the surface, a consensus is emerging that the kingdom’s projects market is in the midst of a recalibration as spending is reined in.

    The challenge for Riyadh over the next few years will be balancing the delivery of its ambitions with the reality of its financial capabilities.

    The first public sign that things were changing came in December 2023, when Finance Minister Mohammed Al Jadaan told reporters at the launch of the 2024 budget that the delivery of some of the projects included in the Saudi Vision 2030 plan may be delayed to avoid pressure on the economy.

    Tightening the purse strings

    The ministry-level decision is trickling down as individual development companies are not getting their full budgets approved. “Our firm is working on almost all of the major projects in Saudi Arabia in some capacity,” says an international consultant. “The feedback we are getting is that budget spending for 2024 has been reduced by about 30% on average.”

    Many of these delivery companies are subsidiaries of sovereign wealth vehicle the Public Investment Fund (PIF), which has taken a leading role in transforming the kingdom’s economy over the past eight years with development schemes including its five official gigaprojects, Neom, Roshn, Red Sea Global (RSG), Qiddiya and Diriyah.

    The reports of budget cuts have coincided with a drop in contract awards. According to MEED’s Gigaprojects Tracker, there has been a sharp decline in the value of contracts awarded by the five official gigaprojects this year. 

    In April, they awarded $166m of work, down from $271m in March and $509m in February. The total in January was $5.56bn, largely due to the $4.7bn contract awarded to the local Webuild for the construction of dams at the Trojena mountain resort in Neom.

    The reports of budget cuts have coincided with a drop in contract awards

    Funding options

    The budget cuts are just part of the message, says the consultant. The delivery companies are being told to find external investment to deliver their projects, and there are already signs of this happening. The clearest came in late April, when Neom announced a $2.7bn revolving credit facility from nine local banks to cater to the project’s short-term financing requirements.

    In a statement, Neom CEO Nadhmi Nasser highlighted the project’s drive to find new sources of funding. “As Neom continues to gather pace, this new credit facility, backed by Saudi Arabia’s leading financial institutions, is a natural fit within our wider strategy for funding. We continue to explore a variety of funding sources as we deliver transformational infrastructure assets while supporting the wider Vision 2030 programme,” he said. 

    In a research note following the deal, London-based Capital Economics said: “While this does take some of the onus away from the government and Public Investment Fund, it is increasingly using resources that could be used more productively in the private non-oil sector.”

    Capital Economics also noted that the facility adds to the growing share of commercial banks’ lending to the public sector. Since 2015, this share has increased from 7% to 22% in March 2024.

    Another solution for development companies is deploying public-private partnerships (PPPs) to deliver infrastructure and utilities. This is attractive because PPPs reduce the initial capital expenditure required for a project. 

    RSG has already pursued this route for The Red Sea Project and Amaala; other development companies are exploring the PPP avenue for their projects.

    Real estate investment is another option. There is an expectation that Riyadh will introduce a foreign ownership law that could turbocharge the market as a similar law did for Dubai in the early 2000s. 

    There are already examples of real estate investment deals being done, including the National Housing Company with Spain’s Urbas Group for housing in Riyadh, RSG with Kingdom Holding Company for hotels, and King Salman with a real estate development fund.

    PPP offers budget and efficiency routes

    Prioritising projects

    As projects in the kingdom are developed differently, the challenge for the construction industry will be identifying which of the many schemes that aim to transform the Saudi economy are a top priority.

    Much will depend on the success of the investment drive. The most likely projects to go ahead are those linked to global events with immovable deadlines. Experience across the region over the past decade has shown that even if construction elsewhere slowed down, construction for Expo 2020 in Dubai and the 2022 Fifa World Cup in Qatar continued regardless. 

    “For Saudi Arabia, there are three major events: the Asian Winter Games in 2029, Expo 2030 and World Cup 2034. They will be the obvious priorities,” says the international consultant.
    Colin Foreman
  • Baghdad faces mounting pressure

    24 May 2024

    John Bambridge
    Analysis editor

    The role of Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Al Sudani is becoming an increasingly unenviable one as Iraq wrestles with a combination of political turbulence, weakening growth and a declining security situation.

    On the political front, the potential return to frontline politics by Shia leader Moqtada Al Sadr under the rebranded banner of the National Shiite Movement appears likely to undermine the incumbent Al Sudani by once again dividing the Shia base. While the next national election is not due until October 2025, Al Sadr is a vocal political figure in Iraq whose opposition could cause substantial trouble for Al Sudani in the interim.

    In the north, the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) is threatening to sit out long-overdue regional parliamentary elections over a Federal Supreme Court decision that threatened to diminish the influence of ethnic minority groups that have traditionally aligned themselves politically with the KDP. The dispute promises to deepen the political chaos in the north.

    On the economic front, weaker oil prices alongside the impact of the Opec-led production cuts are set to drive Baghdad deeper into the red in 2024. Also contributing is Al Sudani’s expansionary 2023 budget, which laid out two years of higher spending, including changes to public sector hiring practices that will drastically increase the country’s wage bill. The latter move, while likely to be politically popular, is expected to raise the cost of salaries and pensions from 15% in 2022 to 25.8% of GDP by 2025. 

    This comes at a time when Baghdad has laid out an economic vision anchored in a $17bn transport corridor linking Al Faw Port and Basra with Mersin Port in Turkiye. The overland logistics route would bypass the Red Sea and Suez Canal, with all its afflictions, as well as provide an alternative to the India-Europe route that was previously backed by several GCC members, but which had been controversially looking at using Israeli ports. It remains to be seen whether the government can mobilise the capital needed for the planned highways and high-speed rail links. 

    Iraq’s security situation also remains patchy. In April, drone attacks at the Khor Mas gas field in Iraqi Kurdistan caused production to halt. There have been many other similar attacks in recent years, leading to the withdrawal of several major oil firms from the country. The inability of Baghdad to stamp out such instances exemplifies the persisting weakness of the overall security situation in the country. It does not bode well either for the oil and gas sector or for Al Sudani’s grand vision for the country as a secure and favourable transport corridor. Iraq needs a credible economic vision for the future, and a strong logistics role is a viable option, but Baghdad’s journey there is likely to be an arduous one.

    MEED's June 2024 market focus on Iraq includes:

    > GOVERNMENT: Al Sudani struggles to maintain Iraq’s political stability
    > ECONOMY: Iraq economic revival faces headwinds
    > SECURITY: Iraq gas field attack to impact projects
    > OIL & GAS: Iraqi oil and gas projects activity dips, but holds
    > POWER: Iraq electricity sector makes slow progress
    > CONSTRUCTION: Iraq steps up post-war revival

    John Bambridge
  • US foreign policy approach remains adrift

    24 May 2024

    Edmund O'Sullivan
    Former editor of MEED

    Former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Chas Freeman, said in May that the US has no Middle East strategy and is stumbling from one improvisation to the next.

    Some say this is because Secretary of State Tony Blinken and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan both rose to where they are now principally because of their loyalty to the Democratic Party generally and President Joe Biden specifically. Their influence is consequently shaped more by political considerations than a broader understanding of the complexities of international affairs or America’s long-term interests.

    There is little chance that this short-term approach will change, regardless of who wins in November’s presidential poll. Donald Trump is focusing on what will work for him this autumn and, if elected, will likely continue to follow a formula of self-interest; what works for the US in the Middle East will always come second.

    There is little chance that this short-term approach will change

    If there was a golden era for US Middle East policy, it may have begun in 1945 when President Roosevelt met Saudi Arabia’s King Abdul Aziz Al Saud to reach an understanding between the world’s most robust democracy and one of the most conservative kingdoms that served the interests of both.

    In 1956, President Eisenhower then intervened to force Britain and France to stop their war on Egypt over the Suez Canal. From then on, the US became the dominant foreign force in much of the region and a welcome alternative to the old imperial powers and the Soviet Union.

    That balance was lost in 1967, however, when President Johnson stood behind Israel despite its expansionary war against Egypt, Syria and Jordan.

    A brief flicker of hope flared following the 1973 Arab-Israel war, but by then the polarisation in the region was reflected in US policy.

    It was not until 1991, after Iraq had been expelled from Kuwait by a coalition that enjoyed almost unanimous Arab support, that a new opportunity arose for the US to at last develop a strategy that was built on solid foundations. 

    The Madrid conference in October 1991 put Washington at the heart of a multilateral process that aimed to bridge the gap between Israel and the Arab nations. This was destroyed, however, by President Clinton – another political partisan – who opted for the bilateral approach defined by the Oslo agreements of 1993. It was bound to fail, and did.

    Optimists say we will have to wait at least four more years before there is another opportunity for Washington to get it right. Pessimists say it will take longer than that, perhaps a generation or more. But what if they are both wrong and the long-term plan that Ambassador Freeman wants, and we all yearn for, does not actually exist? 

    Connect with Edmund O’Sullivan on Twitter

    More from Edmund O’Sullivan:

    Rainmaking in the world economy
    New shock treatment for Egypt’s economy
    Syria’s long march in from the cold
    Lebanon’s pain captured in a call from Beirut
    Troubled end to 2023 bodes ill for stability
    The Holy Land and delusions it inspires
    Region to mark golden jubilee of 1973 war
    Gulf funds help reshape football
    When a war crime is denied
    Embracing the new Washington consensus
    Edmund O’Sullivan
  • Alcazar Energy $490m fund reaches closing

    24 May 2024

    Luxembourg-registered Alcazar Energy Partners (AEP)-II, a sustainable infrastructure fund focused on utility-scale renewable energy projects in emerging markets, has reached a final closing of $490m.

    According to Dubai-based renewable energy developer Alcazar Energy Partners (AEP), the fund attracted capital from investors in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia.  

    These include eight additional investors such as the US' International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) since the fund's first closing in November 2022.

    AEP said: "These partners… support AEP-II’s strategy to develop over 1.6GW of clean energy projects across select emerging markets that once operational will mitigate over 3 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions a year while generating long-term employment opportunities in the countries in which they operate." 

    So far, AEP-II has successfully acquired the project rights for its first two wind farms with a total capacity of 456MW in the Western Balkans

    In 2021, China Three Gorges, whose shareholders included the International Finance Corporation and the Silk Road Fund, acquired AEP-I's portfolios.

    In the Middle East and North Africa region, Alcazar Energy's projects include two wind farms and a solar power plant in Maan, Jordan, and four solar schemes across Egypt, with a total operational capacity of 411MW.
    Jennifer Aguinaldo