meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

Oil and gas contractors feel interest rate pinch

24 February 2023

Commentary

Wil Crisp

Oil & gas reporter

Rising interest rates are eating into the profits of some contractors developing oil and gas projects in the Middle East and North Africa (Mena) region and are likely to force them to put up prices for clients.

Although contingent upon the agreed financing arrangements, higher interest rates will likely leave many contractors paying more to borrow the money they spend on project execution.

This month, the central banks of the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain raised their benchmark borrowing rates after the US Federal Reserve raised its key interest rate in its first policy decision of the year on 1 February.

GCC currencies, except for that of Kuwait, are pegged to the US dollar and therefore follow US monetary policy.

The Fed increased its policy rate by 25 basis points as it continued to push to bring inflation down towards its target range of 2 per cent and restore price stability.

This was the eighth rate increase since the US central bank started raising rates in March last year and pushed rates in the US to their highest since the 2008 financial crisis.

Rising interest rates have raised costs significantly for some contractors executing projects in the Mena region, dramatically reducing profit margins.

Contractors that have taken out loans to execute projects using a build-operate-transfer (BOT) contract model are among those hardest hit.

Under a BOT contract, a public entity grants a concession to a company to finance, build and operate a project.

The company usually deploys debt and equity upfront to build the project and then operates it over the long term to recoup its investment. It then transfers control of the project back to the public entity.

Because the company only usually starts paying off its loan gradually once the project is completed and the facility is operational, it can take many years to pay back. The higher interest rates are likely to significantly impact the contractor’s profits.

Contractors that have taken a loan to execute a project using the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract model are also likely to be negatively impacted by higher interest rates, but to a lesser extent.

This is because EPC contractors are usually fully paid for their work when the project is completed, allowing them to pay off their loan far more quickly than if a BOT contract model has been used.

The additional costs associated with higher rates are likely to be especially problematic for contractors wrestling with supply chain issues and higher material costs due to inflation.

For clients looking to tender major oil and gas projects, the higher interest rates could mean a project may see less enthusiasm from contractors if it tenders a contract using the BOT model.

If they use this model, they can also expect to see higher prices quoted as contractors try to pass on the cost of higher interest rates.

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/10621486/main.jpg
Wil Crisp

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • War casts shadow over UAE construction boom

    6 April 2026

     

    The UAE’s construction sector entered the year in a position of strength. According to regional projects tracker MEED Projects, contract awards reached $59bn in 2025, a record that surpassed the $53bn awarded in 2024.

    With market conditions expected to remain buoyant, 2026 was forecast to be another strong year. However, the Iran conflict that began on 28 February is set to change that narrative.

    In the short term, the construction sector proved resilient during the first weeks of the conflict. With the exception of a few sites in high-risk zones, construction activity across the UAE has largely continued uninterrupted.

    Cost pressures

    Despite continued activity on the ground, the industry is bracing for cost escalation. Brent crude prices have risen well above the $100-a-barrel mark. For the construction sector, the impact was felt most acutely on 1 April, when the UAE adjusted its domestic fuel prices.

    Diesel surged to AED4.69 a litre, up sharply from AED2.72 in March. This nearly 72% increase has immediate and far-reaching implications for project overheads, affecting heavy machinery operations, site power generation, and the transport of bulk materials such as sand, steel and cement.

    For projects signed under fixed-price contracts during the lower-inflation environment of 2024 and 2025, these increases pose a significant threat to contractor margins and potentially to overall project viability.

    Supply disruption

    These inflationary pressures are compounded by logistical challenges stemming from instability in the Strait of Hormuz. As a critical artery for regional imports, any disruption has ripple effects across the construction supply chain – particularly for long-lead items such as specialised façade systems, high-end finishing materials and key MEP components.

    While the UAE has leveraged overland routes to mitigate some of these bottlenecks, the shift is unlikely to be cost-neutral or time-neutral.

    Insurance gaps

    Legal and contractual frameworks governing projects are now under increased scrutiny. A key concern is the limitation of standard insurance policies. Many contractor all-risk and logistics policies exclude coverage for losses arising from active conflict, creating a significant gap for goods in transit.

    As freight is rerouted to alternative ports and transported over longer distances by road, insurers are becoming increasingly reluctant to provide cover for these extended journeys.

    Contractors are being advised to adopt a more disciplined approach. To recover costs linked to these disruptions, the industry is being urged to move away from the broad claims that have historically characterised regional disputes.

    Employers are unlikely to accept claims that do not clearly distinguish conflict-related impacts from pre-existing project delays. Instead, contractors must precisely document separate heads of claim, including supply chain cost increases, on-site stoppages, and new health and safety requirements.

    Market outlook

    In the longer term, the sector is in a wait-and-see phase. The market’s trajectory will depend heavily on the government’s ability to manage public finances following a period of significant, unforeseen expenditure.

    The cost of defence, combined with reduced tourism revenue, lower oil exports and weaker consumer spending, has created a complex and as yet undetermined fiscal challenge.

    Although construction is likely to be used as a tool for economic stimulus once the conflict subsides, the availability of capital for major new projects remains unknown. Government spending priorities will likely shift towards resilience, including accelerated infrastructure development on the UAE’s east coast.

    Fujairah and the Sharjah enclave of Khor Fakkan – both located outside the Strait of Hormuz – are expected to play an increasingly central role in strategic infrastructure planning. Over the next decade, investment may focus on strengthening the logistics and industrial capacity of these ports to better shield the federation from future geopolitical shocks.

    For the private real estate sector, the outlook depends on whether the attacks that began on 28 February have permanently altered the UAE’s reputation as a secure, low-tax safe haven. While the conflict is testing investor confidence, the country’s operational resilience may still compare favourably with challenges in other global markets.

    If the risks are viewed as manageable, investment could rebound quickly. However, prolonged uncertainty would result in a slower recovery. By early April, warning signs had already emerged, with some developers facing cashflow pressures due to slowing sales.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16267286/main.gif
    Colin Foreman
  • War takes a rising toll on Kuwait’s oil sector

    6 April 2026

    Commentary
    Wil Crisp
    Oil & gas reporter

    The US and Israel’s ongoing war on Iran is taking a rising toll on Kuwait’s oil sector, which is likely to be felt for years, even if the war concludes relatively quickly.

    The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz to shipping has meant that Kuwaiti oil exports have completely stopped, forcing the country to declare force majeure last month.

    The inability to export oil has led storage facilities to reach maximum capacity and forced Kuwait to stop production completely at key oil fields.

    Resuming production from these assets is not likely to be easy, and production from these fields could take months to ramp up to normal levels even if shipping is allowed to cross the Strait of Hormuz freely.

    The blockage in the Strait of Hormuz has also prevented Kuwaitis from importing equipment and materials to carry out maintenance work or projects in the oil and gas sector.

    On top of the severe negative impacts caused by the disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the country’s energy sector is seeing increasing damage to oil and gas facilities from Iranian strikes.

    Over the past few days, a wide range of Kuwaiti oil and gas infrastructure has been hit and damaged.

    This includes strikes on Kuwait’s Al-Ahmadi oil refinery, one of the biggest in the Middle East, which was attacked on 5 April, causing fires in a “number of operational units”.

    If future operations at the refinery are limited by damage to the facility, it could potentially lead to much lower volumes of refined products being available both on the domestic market and for export.

    On 5 April, Iran also struck facilities operated by Petrochemical Industries Company (PIC) and Kuwait National Petroleum Company (KNPC), both subsidiaries of state-owned Kuwait Petroleum Corporation (KPC).

    On the same day, the building that houses the headquarters of KPC and the country’s Oil Ministry was also hit, causing a fire.

    In a statement released on 5 April, KPC said that assessments of the damage to the office building, as well as to the PIC and KNPC facilities, were ongoing.

    If the damage to the PIC and KNPC facilities is significant, it could further reduce Kuwait’s refining capacity and erode the country’s petrochemical production capacity.

    This, in turn, would negatively impact the oil and gas sector’s ability to generate future revenues.

    As the war continues, it is likely that damage to oil and gas infrastructure will continue to mount, further eroding the country’s ability to return quickly to normal operations.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16265361/main.png
    Wil Crisp
  • Kuwait reports war damage on oil infrastructure

    6 April 2026

    State-owned Kuwait Petroleum Corporation (KPC) has said that some units have sustained significant damage following Iranian strikes on oil and gas infrastructure in recent days.

    Strikes hit facilities operated by its subsidiaries Petrochemical Industries Company (PIC) and Kuwait National Petroleum ​Company (KNPC).

    Strikes also hit the offices of KPC and the Oil Ministry, as well as power and water desalination plants.

    In a statement released on 5 April, KPC said: “On 5 April, 2026, the oil sector complex located in Shuwaikh, which houses the KPC building and the Ministry of Oil, was attacked by drones, resulting in a fire at the building and significant material damage.

    “Several operational facilities belonging to the corporation, both at KNPC [sites] and PIC [sites], were also subjected to similar drone attacks, leading to fires at a number of these facilities, and causing significant material damage.

    “Emergency and firefighting teams from the concerned companies, with the support of the General Fire Force, implemented the approved response plans.

    “The teams continue to work to control the fires and prevent their spread to adjacent facilities.

    “The corporation confirmed, thanks be to God, that no human casualties were recorded as a result of these attacks.”

    In a television address, Hisham Ahmed Al-Rifai, a spokesperson for the company, said that the offices of KPC and the Oil Ministry were targeted at dawn on 5 April.

    He called the attack “reprehensible” and said that Iran used drones to carry it out.

    Al-Rifai said that KPC is still assessing damage to the office building and to the PIC and KNPC facilities.

    The past few days have seen significant damage dealt to a range of oil and gas infrastructure.

    On 3 April, early-morning strikes hit Kuwait’s Al-Ahmadi oil refinery, causing fires in a “number of operational units”.

    The strikes on 3 April were the third time that the refinery had been hit since the regional conflict started.

    The refining facility is one of the largest in the Middle East and is an important source of refined products for both the domestic market and exports.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16265360/main.gif
    Wil Crisp
  • Safety and security matters

    3 April 2026

    Commentary
    Colin Foreman
    Editor

    Read the April issue of MEED Business Review

    Employment and investment opportunities in a low or no-tax environment have been key attractions for people and businesses located in the GCC for decades. Another crucial factor has been safety and security.

    That reputation has been tested by the missile and drone attacks that began on 28 February. Whether the GCC’s safe haven status has been damaged depends on perspective. 

    For some, the fact that attacks occurred fundamentally changes how the region is viewed. For others, the ability to absorb a serious shock, respond quickly, and keep daily life and businesses functioning demonstrates resilience.

    Any assessment of safety is also relative. Many people and businesses that relocate in the GCC do so not only for opportunity, but because of dissatisfaction elsewhere. Common reasons include limited economic prospects, high taxation, distrust in political leadership and concerns about personal safety. Even with the recent conflict, the GCC may still compare favourably for those considering these factors.

    There is no doubt that missile and drone attacks are extremely dangerous, and the fear of further incidents can linger. Even if attacks are infrequent, the uncertainty matters. It can influence personal decisions, travel advice, and the cost of insurance and risk management. These perceptions will shape the region’s attractiveness.

    Safety concerns vary. In many parts of the world, higher levels of crime are an everyday worry for residents and businesses. For some, the GCC may still feel like the better option, provided the current tensions do not become the new normal.

    How this question is answered will play an important role in how the region’s economies perform in the period ahead. If confidence returns quickly and the risk is seen as contained and manageable, investment and hiring will likely rebound faster than many expect. If uncertainty persists or escalates, the road to recovery will be a long one.

    READ THE APRIL 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Economic shock threatens long-term outlook; Riyadh adjusts to fiscal and geopolitical risk; GCC contractor ranking reflects gigaprojects slowdown.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the April 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:

    > GCC CONTRACTOR RANKING: Construction guard undergoes a shift
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here

     

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16250747/main.gif
    Colin Foreman
  • Saudi forecast remains one of growth

    3 April 2026

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16250096/main.gif
    MEED Editorial