Oil prices rise to highest in a year as regional conflict deepens

2 March 2026

Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran, which began on 28 February and killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, along with Iran’s subsequent strikes on GCC states and critical energy infrastructure, have driven a spike in oil prices.

The price of Brent reached its highest level in a year, rising by more than 8% in early trade on 2 March, briefly exceeding $82 a barrel before easing back above $78. US oil benchmark WTI traded around $72.

Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world’s crude supplies are said to pass every day, has effectively halted, bringing Gulf oil exports close to a standstill.

Liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker crossings have stopped since 28 February, disrupting around 120 billion cubic metres a year of supply from Qatar and the UAE, a volume comparable to the gas Europe has lost from Russia since 2021.

Petrochemical markets have also reacted, with China’s methanol futures rising more than 6% amid concerns over Iranian supply. Iran is the world’s second-largest methanol producer.

Strait of Hormuz oil disruption

Trade transiting the Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz is of critical importance to the global economy, especially regarding the export of oil and gas from Middle Eastern producers to markets in Asia and Europe.

Trade has largely ground to a halt for precautionary reasons. Although there is no formal blockade, tankers remain anchored due to heightened security and insurance risks, intensifying supply concerns.

Oman reported an explosion on an oil tanker near the Strait of Hormuz in the afternoon of 2 March that killed one crew member of Indian nationality. The tanker was flying the flag of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and was attacked by a drone boat 52 nautical miles (96.3 kilometres) off the coast of Muscat, according to Oman’s Maritime Security Centre (MSC).

The vessel, named MKD VYOM, was carrying approximately 59,463 metric tonnes of cargo and the attack, the source of which remains unknown, triggered an explosion in the main engine room, resulting in a fire.  There were 21 people of multiple nationalities on board, including 16 Indian, four Bangladeshi and one Ukrainian national. Oman’s MSC evacuated the crew using the commercial vessel MV SAND, which flies the flag of the Republic of Panama.

Earlier on 2 March, Saudi Aramco shut down its Ras Tanura refinery and export facility, located in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province and along the Gulf coast, after it caught fire in a drone attack launched by Iran.

The risk of disruption largely depends on how the conflict develops, how long the Iranian regime can endure, and its military strength and command lines. Iran’s naval fleet appears to have been wiped out, complicating any closure of the shipping route around Hormuz.

“Markets are pricing in the threat: Brent and WTI spiked ~10–13%, with prices now driven more by shipping security and vessel availability than upstream supply. The market is treating this as a logistics shock, not a production shock. Even with spare capacity in the GCC, barrels are only ‘real’ when they can be lifted and delivered,” says Jaison Davis, economic research analyst at GlobalData.

“Tanker rerouting, port disruptions, and vessel queues can tighten prompt supply quickly, amplifying volatility and pushing crude higher even without sustained outages,” he says.

“GCC exposure varies. Saudi Arabia and the UAE can divert some exports via pipelines and terminals outside Hormuz (e.g., to Fujairah), but capacity is limited and prone to bottlenecks, so it can’t fully replace seaborne flows. Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar rely heavily on Hormuz and are most exposed,” Davis adds.

He further says: “Smaller Gulf states are staring at a volume problem, not just a price problem. Higher oil prices can support revenues, but if exports are delayed or curtailed, fiscal balances deteriorate quickly. A month-long severe disruption could widen deficits by 1-3 percentage points of GDP in several exporters, with Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar most vulnerable.”

 In Asia, particularly in China, oil storage is well filled to offset such an outage. Europe also benefits from ample storage, as well as from the fact that Saudi Arabia ships substantial volumes of oil directly from the Red Sea and through the Suez Canal into the Mediterranean.

The most feared scenario of an economically damaging oil and gas supply disruption requires serious damage to infrastructure, rather than the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which was likely to have happened in the first days of the conflict. Trade through the Strait likely remains crippled for days if not weeks, but the oil market seems prepared for this most likely scenario.

Potential LNG shortage

The LNG supply scenario has also become risky after state-owned QatarEnergy announced the halting of operations at its main production complex at Ras Laffan Industrial City, following a 2 March attack by Iranian drones.

Reduced Qatari LNG exports are expected to push up gas prices globally. Additionally, no LNG vessels have transited the Strait of Hormuz since 28 February, effectively cutting off around 20% of global LNG supply.

Europe imports a relatively small share of its LNG directly from Qatar, but Asia’s dependence is much greater. This is likely to increase competition for flexible LNG cargoes and drive global prices higher.

European storage levels, at 30% at the start of February, add to vulnerability ahead of the summer refill season. If disruption persists into the second quarter, further upside in gas and potentially oil prices remains possible, particularly if shipping disruptions and insurance constraints continue to limit flows.

“Qatar’s LNG is a key flashpoint: all cargoes pass through Hormuz, and major Asian buyers (Japan, South Korea, India) rely on a steady supply. A prolonged delay or closure would likely spike Asian spot LNG prices amid tight supply and high freight, feeding global energy inflation and making $100+ oil plausible,” Davis says.

Wider implications

Should the war drag on and critical energy infrastructure continue to be attacked, oil and gas markets could suffer undesirable consequences, least of all unsustainable price fluctuations.

“Near-term risks are shifting downstream: storage limits at Bahrain’s Sitra refinery, possible disruption at Kuwait’s Shuaiba petrochemical hub, and safety-driven evacuations near Oman’s Khasab port show how quickly refining, petrochemical supply chains, and ports can be hit. Output hikes, like Saudi +206 kbpd (thousand barrels a day), matter little if shipping is constrained, Davis says.

He concludes: “Downstream assets are the first to feel real-world disruption: storage fills, feedstock deliveries slip, and safety protocols restrict throughput. When refineries and petrochemical sites slow, the economic hit extends beyond crude, into fuels, plastics, and industrial inputs, creating broader inflationary pressure and supply-chain uncertainty across regional trade routes.”

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15829817/main0431.jpg
Indrajit Sen
Related Articles
  • Ora Developers adds land bank to its Bayn masterplan

    17 April 2026

    Egyptian firm Ora Developers has signed a land acquisition agreement with Abu Dhabi-based developer Modon Holding to acquire an additional 4.8 million square metres (sq m) of land in the Ghantoot area between Abu Dhabi and Dubai.

    Ora Developers said that the land acquisition will increase the existing Bayn masterplan from 4.8 million sq m to 9.6 million sq m.

    The firm added that the total investment in the masterplan upon completion is expected to reach AED30bn ($8bn).

    In January, Ora Developers appointed six engineering consultancies to lead the development of the first phase of its Bayn residential community project.

    The developer appointed UK-based firm Mace to lead the overall project management.

    Canadian firm WSP will serve as the masterplan, infrastructure, landscape and water bodies design consultant, as reported by MEED in May last year.

    Another US firm, Aecom, will provide construction supervision services.

    Hong Kong’s 10 Design is the project’s architectural concept design consultant.

    Local firm Dewan Architects & Engineers is the project’s design consultant and architect of record.

    The UK’s Currie & Brown is the cost consultant.

    The first phase will offer 805 villas and townhouses, and the project is expected to be completed in 2028.

    The project will also include a neighbourhood park, sports facilities, a water park, a five-star hotel and a shopping mall.

    In December last year, Abu Dhabi government-owned contractor NMDC Group won a AED142m ($39m) contract from Ora Developers.

    The contract scope covers the execution of enabling works on the Bayn masterplan.

    The main construction works on the project's first phase are expected to begin in the second quarter of this year.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16439214/main.jpg
    Yasir Iqbal
  • SAR extends deadline for Riyadh section of Saudi Landbridge

    16 April 2026

     

    Saudi Arabia Railways (SAR) has set a deadline of 29 April for a design-and-build contract for the construction of a new railway line, the Riyadh Rail Link, which will run from north to south Riyadh.

    The tender was issued on 29 January. The previous bid submission deadline was 29 March.

    The scope of work includes constructing a 35-kilometre-long double-track railway line connecting SAR’s North-South railway to the Eastern railway network.

    The contract also covers the procurement, construction and installation of associated infrastructure such as viaducts, civil works, utility installations, signalling systems and other related works.

    The project is expected to form a key component of the Saudi Landbridge railway.

    In January, SAR said it will deliver the Saudi Landbridge project through a “new mechanism” by 2034, after failing to reach an agreement with a Chinese consortium for the construction of the project, as MEED reported.

    In an interview with local media, SAR CEO Bashar Bin Khalid Al-Malik said the consortium failed to meet local content requirements and that the project will now be delivered in several phases under a different procurement model.

    The project has been under negotiation between Saudi Arabia and China-backed investors keen to develop it through a public-private partnership.

    Al-Malik said that the project cost is about SR100bn ($26.6bn).

    It comprises more than 1,500 kilometres (km) of new track. The core component is a 900km new railway between Riyadh and Jeddah, which will provide direct freight access to the capital from King Abdullah Port on the Red Sea.

    Other key sections include upgrading the existing Riyadh-Dammam line, a bypass around the capital called the Riyadh Link, and a link between King Abdullah Port and Yanbu.

    The Saudi Landbridge is one of the kingdom’s most anticipated project programmes. Plans to develop it were first announced in 2004, but put on hold in 2010 before being revived a year later. Key stumbling blocks were rights-of-way issues, route alignment and its high cost.


    MEED’s April 2026 report on Saudi Arabia includes:

    > COMMENT: Risk accelerates Saudi spending shift
    > GVT &: ECONOMY: Riyadh navigates a changed landscape
    > BANKING: Testing times for Saudi banks
    > UPSTREAM: Offshore oil and gas projects to dominate Aramco capex in 2026
    > DOWNSTREAM: Saudi downstream projects market enters lean period
    > POWER: Wind power gathers pace in Saudi Arabia

    > WATER: Sharakat plan signals next phase of Saudi water expansion
    > CONSTRUCTION: Saudi construction enters a period of strategic readjustment
    > TRANSPORT: Rail expansion powers Saudi Arabia’s infrastructure push

    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16418597/main.gif
    Yasir Iqbal
  • Public Investment Fund backs Neom

    16 April 2026

    Commentary
    Colin Foreman
    Editor

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) has backed Neom by including it as one of six strategic ecosystems in its newly approved 2026-30 strategy.

    The future of the $500bn gigaproject had been thrown into doubt following the postponement of the 2029 Asian Winter Games at the Trojena mountain resort, the cancellation of construction contracts – such as the $5bn deal with Italian contractor Webuild for dam works at Trojena – and the slowdown of development at The Line, where tunnelling contracts were cancelled and staff left the project.

    The backing comes as Neom’s operational focus appears to be evolving in response to shifting regional dynamics and global economic conditions. For example, on 15 April Neom posted on its official X account about a new Europe-Egypt-Neom-GCC corridor, describing it as a faster route for time-sensitive goods. It said the corridor combines trucking and ferry services to move goods quickly into the Gulf, adding that importers from several European markets are already using it to reach the UAE, Kuwait, Iraq, Oman and beyond.

    Powered by Pan Marine, DFDS and regional RoPax services, the initiative is positioned as a way to add flexibility and resilience to regional supply chains. This emphasis on logistics and immediate trade utility suggests a shift away from the more speculative architectural announcements that characterised Neom’s early years, towards activity more directly tied to current market realities.

    PIF’s broader 2026-30 strategy places heavy emphasis on “delivering competitive domestic ecosystems to connect sectors, unlock the full potential of strategic assets, maximise long-term returns and continue to drive the economic transformation of Saudi Arabia”.

    The inclusion of Neom as a standalone ecosystem within the Vision Portfolio suggests that while the project remains part of the kingdom’s Vision 2030 goals, it will be subject to the fund's focus on working with the private sector.

    That means the long-term success of Neom will increasingly depend on its ability to attract external investment and function as a viable economic hub rather than just a state-funded construction site.


    MEED’s April 2026 report on Saudi Arabia includes:

    > COMMENT: Risk accelerates Saudi spending shift
    > GVT &: ECONOMY: Riyadh navigates a changed landscape
    > BANKING: Testing times for Saudi banks
    > UPSTREAM: Offshore oil and gas projects to dominate Aramco capex in 2026
    > DOWNSTREAM: Saudi downstream projects market enters lean period
    > POWER: Wind power gathers pace in Saudi Arabia

    > WATER: Sharakat plan signals next phase of Saudi water expansion
    > CONSTRUCTION: Saudi construction enters a period of strategic readjustment
    > TRANSPORT: Rail expansion powers Saudi Arabia’s infrastructure push

    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16417262/main.jpeg
    Colin Foreman
  • Kuwait gas project worth $3.3bn put on hold

    16 April 2026

     

    State-owned Kuwait Gulf Oil Company’s (KGOC’s) planned tender for the development of an onshore gas plant next to the Al-Zour refinery has been put on hold due to uncertainty created by the US and Israel’s war with Iran, according to industry sources.

    The project budget is estimated to be $3.3bn, and the last meeting with contractors to discuss the project took place in Kuwait on 10 February.

    Previously, it was expected to be tendered in late March, but the tendering process was delayed due to the regional conflict and disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

    One source said: “This tender is now effectively on hold while KGOC waits for increased stability in the region before it invites companies to bid for the contract.”

    Under current plans, the plant will have the capacity to process up to 632 million cubic feet a day of gas and 88.9 million barrels a day of condensates from the Dorra offshore field, located in Gulf waters in the Saudi-Kuwait Neutral Zone.

    Ownership of the field is disputed by Iran, which refers to the field as Arash.

    Iran claims the field partially extends into Iranian territory and asserts that Tehran should be a stakeholder in its development.

    It is believed that the Dorra field’s close proximity to Iran will make development difficult due to the current security environment.

    The offshore elements of the project are expected to be especially difficult to protect from attacks from Iran.

    In July last year, MEED reported that KGOC had initiated the project by launching an early engagement process with contractors for the main engineering, procurement and construction tender.

    France-based Technip Energies completed the contract for the front-end engineering and design.


    READ THE APRIL 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Economic shock threatens long-term outlook; Riyadh adjusts to fiscal and geopolitical risk; GCC contractor ranking reflects gigaprojects slowdown.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the April 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:

    > GCC CONTRACTOR RANKING: Construction guard undergoes a shift
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16413221/main.png
    Wil Crisp
  • Iraq pushes to revive oil pipeline through Saudi Arabia

    16 April 2026

    Iraq is pushing to revive an oil pipeline that passes through Saudi Arabia, allowing it to diversify export routes.

    Saheb Bazoun, a spokesman for Iraq’s Oil Ministry, said the pipeline would help to insulate Iraq from any future blockades of the Strait of Hormuz, which has been largely closed since 28 February.

    The original pipeline through Saudi Arabia has not been used for more than 30 years and would need work to be done in order to bring it online.

    It is 1,568km long, extending from the city of Zubair in Iraq to the Saudi port of Yanbu on the Red Sea.

    The pipeline was built in two phases during the 1980s. The first phase stretches between Zubair and Khurais, while the second extends to Yanbu. The pipeline’s operating capacity reached over 1.6 million barrels a day (b/d).

    Following the Gulf War, the pipeline was shut down in August 1990. It has remained out of operation for decades, despite Iraq’s several attempts to restart it.

    The original pipeline project cost over $2.6bn, including storage tanks and loading terminals.

    In the wake of the US and Israel attacking Iran on 28 February, global markets have lost 11 million barrels a day (b/d) of oil supply due to the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz.


    READ THE APRIL 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Economic shock threatens long-term outlook; Riyadh adjusts to fiscal and geopolitical risk; GCC contractor ranking reflects gigaprojects slowdown.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the April 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:

    > GCC CONTRACTOR RANKING: Construction guard undergoes a shift
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16413290/main.jpg
    Wil Crisp