meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

No end in sight for Lebanon’s economic woes

12 June 2023

This package on Lebanon also includes:

> Political deadlock in Lebanon blocks reforms
> Lebanon moves to secure $150m solar financing
> Dar al-Handasah acquires Turkish consultant
> Eni and Total complete Lebanon gas deal

 

Experts remain pessimistic about the outlook for Lebanon’s economy as the crisis continues to worsen more than three years after it began in 2019.

The country only has a caretaker government and no president – and it is hard to see how it will implement the reforms the IMF says are needed.

On 8 June, IMF spokesperson Julie Kozack said: “Lebanon needs urgent action to implement a comprehensive economic reform programme to arrest the severe and deepening crisis and to allow Lebanon’s economy to recover.”

She added that the IMF was concerned that delays in implementing key reforms were keeping the economy severely depressed.

“We are concerned about irreversible consequences for the economy, especially for the poor citizens of Lebanon and the middle class,” she said.

Lebanon’s currency has weakened dramatically since the start of the country’s economic crisis, plunging much of the population into poverty.

In March, the Lebanese pound, officially pegged at 15,000 to the dollar, was trading at 100,000 against the dollar on the country’s parallel market, down from 1,507 before the economic crisis hit in 2019.

In May, a World Bank report stated: “The systemic failure of Lebanon’s banking system and the collapse of the currency have resulted in a large, dollarised cash-based economy.

“It not only threatens to compromise the effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policy, but also heightens the risk of money laundering, increases informality and prompts further tax evasion.”

In April 2020, the Lebanese government agreed with IMF staff to implement a series of reforms to end the crisis, but very few have been executed.

This is mainly due to the country’s ongoing political deadlock.

Lebanon has had no head of state since President Michel Aoun’s term ended at the end of October 2022, worsening the country’s political paralysis at a time when important policy decisions are needed to get the economy back on track.

According to the IMF, the economic outlook for Lebanon is highly uncertain and depends on policy actions taken by the authorities to carry out the agreed reforms.

Kozack said: “Timely implementation of these reforms is critical to end the current crisis and prevent a further deterioration in living standards of the people of Lebanon.”

She added: “Lebanon will need strong financial support from the broader international community and the financial needs of Lebanon over the next several years are very large given the magnitude of the economic crisis.”

Bailout prospects

While the IMF has said that Lebanon will need significant financial support from other countries to help it get through its economic crisis, it is unclear where that support will come from.

Nicholas Blanford, a non-resident senior fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Middle East programmes, says it is unlikely that Saudi Arabia will be willing to bail the country out financially as it has done in the past.

He said: “Saudi Arabia has pumped billions of dollars into Lebanon over the years, including helping with the reconstruction programme in the 1990s after the civil war. Saudi has also helped Lebanon financially through various economic slumps.”

The change of leadership in Saudi Arabia when King Salman came to the throne in 2015 led to a change in policy regarding financial bailouts for Lebanon, according to Blanford.

“It seems like Saudi feels that it got very little in return for its past investment in Lebanon due to the fact that Hezbollah remains a dominant force in the country politically and militarily.

“The Americans and the French have, for several years, been pressing the Saudis to show more interest in Lebanon as a pushback against Iranian influence, but, so far, they haven’t shown much interest.”

The Lebanese are keeping their fingers crossed that economically viable quantities of oil and gas are found, but there is also a huge amount of scepticism given the state of the political system here and the nature of the politicians
Nicholas Blanford, Atlantic Council’s Middle East programmes

In October last year, Lebanon and Israel agreed a deal to end a long-running maritime border dispute in the Mediterranean Sea, clearing the way for increased oil and gas exploration activity in Lebanese waters.

Following the deal, in May this year, it was announced that a consortium led by France’s TotalEnergies would start drilling for oil and gas off the country's coast at the beginning of September.

While it is possible that new hydrocarbon discoveries in Lebanese waters could help ease the country’s economic problems over the long term, it is doubtful that this would provide any benefit in the short term, according to Blanford.

“The Lebanese are keeping their fingers crossed that economically viable quantities of oil and gas are found, but there is also a huge amount of scepticism given the state of the political system here and the nature of the politicians themselves.”

Blanford believes that many Lebanese citizens are worried that if commercially viable quantities of hydrocarbons are found, they are ultimately only likely to benefit the country’s oligarchs rather than the general public.

Due to the wide range of severe political and economic problems that Lebanon faces, there is unlikely to be any improvement over the coming months unless common ground is found between the country’s rival political blocs.

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/10932005/main.gif
Wil Crisp

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Iran launches regional attacks after US and Israel strikes start

    28 February 2026

    Iran launched missiles aimed at Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar and the UAE on Saturday, 28 February, after the US and Israel began airstrikes on the Islamic Republic earlier in the day.

    Official news agencies in the countries targeted by Iran have confirmed the attacks and that missiles have been intercepted by air defences. There has been limited damage reported from the strikes, although one fatality has been reported in the UAE.

    The UAE’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) said there was a blatant attack involving Iranian ballistic missiles and that UAE air defence systems intercepted a number of missiles. It also confirmed that missile debris falling into a residential area resulted in the death of one civilian of Asian nationality. The UAE also said it reserves its full right to respond to this escalation and to take all necessary measures to protect itself.

    In Bahrain, the National Communication Centre (NCC) confirmed external attacks targeting sites and installations within Bahrain’s borders. It said the security and military authorities had immediately activated established emergency protocols and were taking all necessary operational measures on the ground.

    In Doha, the Ministry of Defence confirmed that Qatar had been attacked and that all missiles were intercepted before reaching Qatari territory.

    In Kuwait, the official Kuwait News Agency reported that air defence systems had dealt with missiles detected in Kuwaiti airspace.

    Meanwhile, in Amman, a senior military official from the Jordanian Armed Forces (JAF) confirmed that air defences had intercepted and neutralised two ballistic missiles targeting Jordanian territory.

    Saudi Arabia has condemned the attacks and has “affirmed its full solidarity with and unwavering support for the brotherly countries, and its readiness to place all its capabilities at their disposal in support of any measures they may undertake”.

    Main image: UAE announces successful interception of new wave of Iranian missiles. Credit: Wam

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15813394/main.gif
    Colin Foreman
  • Egypt’s Obelisk equity move merits attention

    27 February 2026

    Commentary
    Mark Dowdall
    Power & water editor

    The first phase of Africa’s planned largest hybrid solar and battery installation project reached commercial operations this week. While the 1.1GW Obelisk facility in Egypt is significant in capacity terms, the more interesting detail may lie in its ownership structure.

    Scatec secured the 25-year US dollar-denominated power purchase agreement in 2024 and moved the project into construction as majority shareholder with Norwegian Investment Fund for Developing Countries (Norfund).

    In November, France’s EDF acquired a 20% equity stake to join the project as a shareholder, while discussions with additional equity partners are at an “advanced” stage.

    With the development risk largely already absorbed and revenues secured under a long-term, dollar-denominated contract, the question arises: how are developers approaching capital allocation in the renewables market?

    Especially in emerging markets, sponsors must consider currency convertibility, sovereign exposure and overall balance sheet concentration. Bringing in partners after key milestones reduces that exposure without abandoning the asset.

    However, risk mitigation is not the only driver behind these decisions.

    This week, Masdar agreed to sell a 60% stake in a portfolio of wind assets in Portugal, a more mature European market with stable regulation and limited currency risk.

    Given the developer’s 100GW global target, this would seem a prudent way to recycle capital as part of an aggressive growth strategy.

    Meeting global climate targets will require sustained and rapid expansion of renewable capacity. Estimates suggest the world must add more than 1,100GW of renewables annually through 2030 to remain on track.

    Increasingly, as pipelines expand and capacity targets rise, developers are likely to weigh carefully when to hold assets and when to release capital.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15798541/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • Petrokemya awards contract for ethylene oxide project

    27 February 2026

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    Petrokemya, an affiliate of Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (Sabic), has awarded China National Chemical Engineering Group Corporation (CNCEC) the main contract for an ethylene oxide catalyst project.

    The project covers engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) of a new 4,000-tonne-a-year (t/y) ethylene oxide catalyst production unit, encompassing multiple units for catalyst carrier washing and drying, as well as supporting utilities.

    Ethylene oxide catalysts are the core technology of the ethylene oxide industry chain, directly determining production efficiency, product quality and energy consumption of the process unit.

    Petrokemya is a wholly owned affiliate of Sabic, with its main petrochemical production complex located in Jubail Industrial City, in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province.

    The ethylene oxide catalyst project is the ninth contract awarded by Petrokemya to CNCEC since 2015. Previous jobs cover EPC works on seven specialty chemical projects and a project to upgrade and expand output capacity at Petrokemya’s main methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) production unit.

    Petrokemya awarded CNCEC the contract for the MTBE plant expansion project in November 2022, with the contractor starting work the following month.

    Through the project, the output potential of Petrokemya’s MTBE unit will increase from 700,000 t/y to 1 million t/y, purportedly making it the world’s largest single-unit MTBE plant.

    CNCEC achieved mechanical completion of the MTBE plant expansion project in August last year, and the project is now understood to have been commissioned.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15797372/main4837.jpg
    Indrajit Sen
  • Regulatory environment shifting for Kuwait oil and gas tenders

    27 February 2026

     

    Changes to the way key contracts are tendered in Kuwait have increased expectations that the country is shifting to a new regulatory environment for oil and gas projects.

    Contractors interested in bidding for Kuwait’s planned tender for a $3.3bn gas processing facility have been briefed that the country’s Central Agency for Public Tenders (Capt) will not be involved in the tender process.

    The exclusion of Capt from participating in the tender process has come at a time of increasing concerns surrounding the role of the agency, and has sparked speculation that it could be excluded from an increasing number of strategic tenders in future.

    Capt is responsible for reviewing technical and commercial evaluations of bids and verifying that bidding is competitive.

    Prior to its suspension in May 2024, Kuwait’s parliament was often blamed for blocking projects and halting the initiatives of Kuwait Petroleum Corporation (KPC).

    However, the suspension of parliament has not triggered an uptick in project activity at KPC, indicating that other problems are holding back decision-making.

    As time has passed, many stakeholders have started to view Capt as a key sticking point in the tendering process.

    One source said: “There is a lot of frustration within some parts of the country’s oil and gas sector about the time it takes for Capt to review everything and approve a tender.”

    Although this is not completely unheard of for small contracts tendered by Kuwait Gulf Oil Company (KGOC) to bypass Capt, it is unusual to see very large contracts bypass the agency.

    “A lot of people were very surprised when they heard that Capt would not be involved in this process,” said one source.

    “While the agency is resented by many in the sector that see it as a big reason for a lot of delays, it’s also highly respected for stopping corruption and bad practices.

    “If you look historically at which large contracts avoided a review by Capt or its predecessor, it was only the most critical and urgent projects.

    “The fact that this project is being permitted to side-step the agency’s process seems to mark a shift – and we could well see more big contracts following the same route in the future.”

    Past exceptions

    An example of a time period when key contracts were allowed to bypass Kuwait’s Central Tenders Committee (CTC), the predecessor to Capt, was in 1991.

    During this time, in the wake of the Gulf War, urgent contracts needed to be tendered by Kuwait Oil Company (KOC), including some related to extinguishing fires at oil wells, which were lit by retreating Iraqi troops.

    One source said: “I think the early nineties was the last time that large contracts were tendered by KOC without going through the relevant agency.

    “It is easier to bypass Capt when it is a KGOC contract, but it’s still very surprising to see it with a contract of this size.”

    If more contracts in the future are “fast-tracked” in the same way, it is likely that many stakeholders will welcome the effort to speed up tendering.

    However, some are worried that if the streamlined tendering model is replicated too widely, it could undermine checks and balances that stop corruption.

    “Kuwait is lucky as it has a system that makes corrupt practices very difficult to participate in,” said one source.

    “The country needs to be careful and make sure that it doesn’t undermine the rigour of the system by prioritising convenience.”

    Direct awards

    Another factor that has impacted expectations about the future of project tendering in Kuwait’s oil and gas sector is that the methods used for several large contracts have been recently tendered in other sectors.

    Key tenders that are impacting the discussions surrounding Kuwait’s oil and gas sector are the award of the $4bn Grand Mubarak Port contract to China Harbour Engineering Company in December and the award of a $3.3bn wastewater treatment plant contract to China State Construction Engineering Corporation in January.

    Both of those direct contract awards were government-to-government agreements that did not have an open tender process in Kuwait and were not approved by Capt.

    One source said: “These huge contract awards to Chinese companies without open tenders in Kuwait were extremely surprising.

    “If you had asked me at the start of last year whether this kind of thing would be signed off, I would have told you it’s highly unlikely.

    “I think there is no reason why we couldn’t see similar contract awards coming in the future in Kuwait’s oil and gas sector.”

    Another source said: “Just like the gas processing contract, these contracts awarded to Chinese firms seem to have side-stepped Capt in a way that is very surprising.”

    The planned $3.3bn gas processing facility is not the first time that KPC has tried to reduce its reliance on Capt for processing tenders.

    In April 2024, KPC launched its own tendering portal in an effort to streamline the tendering process for projects in the oil and gas sector.

    The portal was named the “KPC and Subsidiaries K-Tendering Portal” and is referred to as “K-Tender” by contractors.

    The portal gave KPC a way of tendering and communicating with contractors without relying on the Capt website.

    “The K-Tender portal was a step towards reducing reliance on Capt and gave KPC the flexibility to tender projects without Capt, even though, at the time, KPC made it clear that it intended to list all tenders both on the Capt website and its own portal.”

    The recent direct contract awards to Chinese contractors and the tendering process for the $3.3bn gas processing facility have sent a signal to contractors in the Kuwaiti market that more unusual tenders could be in the pipeline.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15791028/main.gif
    Wil Crisp
  • Kuwait awards oil pier contract

    27 February 2026

    Kuwait National Petroleum Company (KNPC) has awarded local firm Gulf Dredging & General Contracting Company a $172m contract to help develop a new south arm facility at the Shuaiba oil pier.

    The scope of the contract covers civil, marine, mechanical and electrical work, according to a statement.

    Gulf Dredging & General Contracting Company is a subsidiary of Kuwait-headquartered Heisco.

    The main contractor on the Shuaiba oil pier project is the Greek construction firm Archirodon. In October last year, KNPC awarded Archirodon a KD160m ($528m) contract to develop the new south arm facility.

    The Shuaiba oil pier comprises several structures, including the approach trestle, the north arm facility and the south arm facility. A number of planned projects are to be developed at the Shuaiba port facilities.

    The north arm facility consists of two berths, 31 and 32. When operational, it loads refined products for both KNPC and state-owned Petrochemicals Industries Company.

    The north arm facility is currently not operational and will be upgraded as part of a separate project.

    KNPC is a subsidiary of Kuwait Petroleum Corporation (KPC).

    Last year, KPC chief executive Sheikh Nawaf Al-Sabah reiterated that the company plans to increase its oil production capacity to 4 million barrels a day by 2035.

    About 90% of Kuwait’s oil production comes from Kuwait Oil Company, which also plans to achieve a daily gas production capacity of 1.5 trillion cubic feet by 2040.

    Kuwait is estimated to have 100 billion barrels of oil reserves.

    Under KPC’s 2040 strategy, it plans to invest $410bn, sourced from cash flow, debt and joint ventures with other businesses.

    Of the $410bn, KPC and its subsidiaries intend to invest $110bn to accomplish the group’s energy transition targets.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15791026/main.jpg
    Wil Crisp