Lebanon economic recovery postponed
4 June 2024

The visit to Lebanon by the IMF in May reveals a stark picture of an economy now in its fifth year of intense turmoil following its October 2019 exchange rate collapse, and one which now faces significant additional headwinds.
The IMF’s end-of-mission statement identified a lack of action on economic reforms as exerting a heavy economic toll, while flagging negative spillovers from fighting on the country’s southern border as an exacerbating factor for the already dire economic and social situation.
Yet, despite this apparent dismal assessment, Lebanon can legitimately claim to have turned a corner last year.
Implementing monetary and fiscal reforms has seen the phasing out of monetary financing, the termination of the electronic foreign exchange platform, tighter fiscal policy, and steps towards the unification of exchange rates.
These measures have helped contain exchange rate depreciation, stabilise the money supply and reduce inflationary pressure, the IMF said.
Nassib Ghobril, chief economist at Beirut-based Byblos Bank, agrees. “Last year was a very good year for Lebanon, the first year where the economy was on track to post a positive growth rate since 2017,” he says.
After the first nine months of 2023, Ghobril’s forecast for real GDP growth was 2%, driven by stellar tourism activity that so far that year had produced knock-on benefits for 14 sub-sectors, in addition to improved activity in the wider industrial, agricultural and services sectors.
“And then 7 October and 8 October happened, and that created a shock that put a hold on this momentum — and that’s continuing,” he says.
Contingent growth
Lebanon’s economic outlook now hinges largely on the outcome of the conflict in Gaza and the related violence between Hezbollah and the Israeli Defence Forces, which has forced widespread displacement of the southern population, besides disrupting agriculture and tourism.
Looking ahead, Ghobril predicts a continuation of the current status quo, which would result in a real GDP contraction of 0.5-1% in 2024, at 40% probability. If the conflict expands – also a 40% probability – then it could realise a more serious contraction of 15-20%.
On the other hand, says Ghobril, in a ceasefire scenario, which he puts at 20% probability, “the sooner it happens, we would have a rebound in growth based on the positive shock, the reconstruction of the south and better visibility”.
Tourism revival, important to Lebanon as a hard currency generator, is highly contingent on a stable security situation, even beyond the southern areas most impacted by the fighting.
Minister of Economy and Trade Amin Salam warned in February that it was unclear if visitors from the Lebanese diaspora and elsewhere, who injected about $5-7bn into the economy last summer, would come to the country this season. In Q1 2024, total passenger numbers at Beirut International airport decreased by 6.7% in year-on-year terms to 1.27 million, according to Banque Audi figures.
The conflict’s direct impact on the south has been stark. According to Banque Audi, more than 6,000 acres of forest and agricultural land have been damaged, up to 2,100 acres completely burned, and more than 60,000 olive trees destroyed.
Meanwhile, an estimated 93,000 people have been internally displaced, contributing to an estimated 75% decline in economic activity in the south. The sense that the Israel-Hamas war has stunted Lebanon’s recovery is hard to avoid, rolling back the progress seen in 2023.
Fiscal stabilisation
The IMF has nevertheless lauded the government’s measures to boost revenue collection from VAT and customs, which it said helped close the fiscal deficit to zero last year.
“Looking ahead, we anticipate the fiscal balance to remain close to zero in 2024, on limited financing options and improved revenue collection permitted by the exchange rate adjustment on custom duties and VAT. CPI inflation is expected to stabilise on lower unsterilised interventions of Banque du Liban,” says Thomas Garreau, an analyst at Fitch Ratings.
Balancing current spending looked to be within reach. The government’s budgeted figures for 2024 envisage public spending amounting to $3.4bn, matched by public revenues of $3.4bn, despite an increase in public sector wages of $40m a month.
Exchange rate stabilisation is a clear win for Lebanon. The pound has been stable at £Leb89,500 to the dollar since the end of July 2023 despite multiple security incidents not related to the conflict in the south of the country.
“That’s still ongoing because the central bank managed last year to sterilise liquidity and Lebanese pounds from the market to reduce the differential between the quasi-official exchange rate of the central bank and the parallel market rate, and to stop the speculation on the currency. So it managed to stop the depreciation of the currency,” says Ghobril.
Foreign exchange reserves, which eroded heavily in the post-2019 crisis period, appear to have steadied. The liquid foreign assets of the central Banque du Liban grew by $382m in Q1 2014, reaching $9.6bn.
As Banque Audi notes, the cumulative growth of $1bn in the central bank’s liquid foreign assets since the end of July 2023 is mostly linked to its refraining from any government finance.
Yet the more lasting changes needed to shift the dial on Lebanon’s economic narrative remain elusive.
Bank deposits are frozen, notes the IMF, and the banking sector is unable to provide credit to the economy, as the government and parliament have been unable to find a solution to the sector’s crisis.
Addressing the banks’ losses while protecting depositors is seen as indispensable to economic recovery.
It does not help that the country has been without a president since October 2022, leaving caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati without a full mandate to undertake reforms.
This matters because banking system recovery hinges on political will to implement reforms. Yet the vacuum at the presidential palace leaves little prospect of imminent progress on this front.
“Despite some politicians’ comments, I do not see prospects of an end to the political deadlock as long as the war is ongoing in the south. And even if it suddenly stopped, you would need several months for an overall settlement to materialise on the domestic political front,” says Ghobirl.
The present situation leaves Lebanon politically and economically hobbled, with fears of worse to come due to external events beyond its control.
Exclusive from Meed
-
GCC banks show resilience amid regional conflict5 March 2026
-
-
Alec resumes project operations across the UAE5 March 2026
-
QatarEnergy issues force majeure to customers5 March 2026
-
Local firm wins Jeddah stormwater contract5 March 2026
All of this is only 1% of what MEED.com has to offer
Subscribe now and unlock all the 153,671 articles on MEED.com
- All the latest news, data, and market intelligence across MENA at your fingerprints
- First-hand updates and inside information on projects, clients and competitors that matter to you
- 20 years' archive of information, data, and news for you to access at your convenience
- Strategize to succeed and minimise risks with timely analysis of current and future market trends
Related Articles
-
GCC banks show resilience amid regional conflict5 March 2026
Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access
The GCC’s banking sector is facing its most significant test in years following the attacks by Israel and the US on Iran, and the subsequent strikes launched by Iran on all six GCC states.
The data so far indicates that the region’s finances are holding firm. “Fitch believes GCC sovereign ratings generally have sufficient headroom to withstand a short regional conflict that does not escalate significantly further, including in most cases substantial assets that provide a buffer against short-term hydrocarbon revenue disruption,” it said in a report on 3 March.
In the UAE, the Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) issued a statement on 5 March saying that the nation’s banking and financial sector continues to operate normally. It said the UAE’s banking assets now exceed AED5.42tn ($1.48tn), supported by a capital adequacy ratio of 17% and a liquidity coverage ratio of 146.6%, adding that both figures sit comfortably above international regulatory requirements.
“The UAE’s banking and financial sector continues to maintain very strong levels of capital adequacy and liquidity … reflecting the scale, resilience and strength of financial institutions operating in the country,” said Khaled Mohamed Balama, governor of the CBUAE.
While the immediate financial metrics are sound, the broader operating environment is not without its challenges. Fitch notes that the attacks raise risks to the 2026 baseline, which had previously assumed robust non-oil growth driven by the region’s massive pipeline of diversification projects.
Economic impact
The conflict has already impacted the real economy. Air travel suspensions, a slowdown in consumer activity and shifting risk perceptions regarding tourism could weigh on non-oil GDP if the tension lingers. Fitch highlighted that the key metric to monitor will be the “strength of operating conditions, particularly non-oil growth and general confidence in the region”.
The critical variable remains the duration of the conflict. If hostilities are contained within a month – as is the current expectation among analysts – the impact on GCC economic growth is likely to be temporary.
There are specific regional nuances to watch. While most GCC banks enjoy ample liquidity, those in Qatar and Saudi Arabia have historically faced tighter conditions. “The conflict could make it more challenging for GCC-based entities to issue debt in overseas capital markets. This could particularly increase Saudi banks’ reliance on more expensive domestic markets,” said Fitch.
For now, the strategy from both regulators and ratings agencies is one of cautious optimism. The region’s capital expenditure programmes and diversification drives provide a structural momentum that is difficult to derail in the short term.
Fitch concluded that as long as energy infrastructure remains intact and public spending continues to shore up growth, the GCC’s financial institutions are well-positioned to navigate the crisis.
READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDFRiyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.
Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
> RAMADAN: Data disproves the Ramadan slowdown story> INDUSTRY REPORT: Chemicals producers look to cut spending> INDUSTRY REPORT: Global petrochemical project capex set to rise until 2030> MARKET FOCUS: Egypt’s crisis mode gives way to cautious revival> LEADERSHIP: Delivering Saudi Arabia’s next phase of rail growth> INTERVIEW: Abu Dhabi’s Enersol charts acquisitions pathTo see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click herehttps://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15875387/main.gif -
Fitch Ratings sees limited oil price impact of Iran conflict5 March 2026
Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access
The de facto blockade of the Strait of Hormuz in the Gulf by Iran since 28 February is likely to be temporary given its vital economic role in global oil trade, according to credit ratings agency Fitch Ratings.
This, alongside global oil market oversupply, should limit oil price rises and mitigate any potential disruptions to Iranian oil supply, Fitch Ratings said in a note.
As a result, the ratings agency does not expect significant upside to its December 2025 assumption of an average Brent oil price of $63 a barrel for 2026.
“The strait is not formally closed, but vessels are increasingly avoiding it given the risk of attack by Iran or its proxies. Oil majors have halted shipments for safety reasons, and insurers are cancelling war risk cover for vessels. However, we expect this effective closure of the strait to be temporary. It is a vital artery for seaborne oil transportation, with limited alternative routes,” said Angelina Valavina, EMEA head of Natural Resources and Commodities at Fitch Ratings.
Oil prices rose on 5 March, extending a rally as the escalating US-Israeli war with Iran continued to disrupt supplies, prompting some major producers to cut production and others to take measures to ensure supply security.
Brent crude was up $2.35, or 2.9%, at $83.75 a barrel at 12pm Gulf Standard Time, a fifth session of gains. US ​West Texas Intermediate crude rose $2.42, or 3.2%, to $77.08.
ALSO READ: Oil prices rise to highest in a year as regional conflict deepens
“Prior to the conflict, around 20 million barrels a day (b/d) of crude oil and petroleum products transited the strait, accounting for about a quarter of global seaborne oil trade and a fifth of global oil consumption. About half of the oil volumes transported through the strait are exports from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, with the remainder from Iraq, Kuwait and Iran. About half of these exports go to China and India.
“A protracted closure would affect both exporting and importing countries and therefore is not our baseline assumption. If the strait were to remain effectively closed for a protracted period, naval protection for tanker navigation could be considered, as occurred during the 1980s' Iran-Iraq war,” Valavina said in the note from Fitch Ratings.
“In addition, the global oil market is oversupplied, which should limit the geopolitical risk premium and cap risks to oil price increases. Global supply growth exceeded demand growth in 2025. Fitch expects this trend to continue in 2026. Supply increased by about 3 million b/d in 2025, while demand grew by well below 1 million b/d,” Valavina said.
“We forecast supply growth of 2.4 million b/d in 2026, with demand growth of about 0.8 million b/d. Half of 2025-26 supply increases come from unaffected non-Opec+ producers. Opec+ spare production capacity is 4.3 million b/d,” she added.
“In addition, global observed oil inventories rose by 1.3 million b/d in 2025 to reach their highest level since March 2021. Total global inventories stood at 8.2 billion barrels at end-2025. This is sufficient to cover a halt in oil shipments via the Strait of Hormuz for over 400 days.
“Saudi Arabia and the UAE have some infrastructure to bypass the strait, which may mitigate transit disruptions. Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabian Oil Company; A+/Stable) operates the 5 million b/d East–West crude oil pipeline to an export port on the Red Sea. The UAE operates a 1.5 million b/d capacity pipeline linking its oil fields to the Fujairah export terminal on the Gulf of Oman with a maximum achieved flow of 1.8 million b/d.
“While Iran is a sizeable oil producer, producing about 3.5 million b/d and exporting about 2 million b/d, it accounts only for about 3.5% of global crude oil production. This means that potential supply disruption would be offset by global market oversupply.”
Valavina concluded: “However, the duration and intensity of the increasingly regional conflict remain uncertain. Any protracted blockage of the strait or material and sustained damage to the region’s oil and gas production and transportation infrastructure would materially affect oil markets and likely result in a more material rise in our base case 2026 oil price assumption. Oil price volatility would rise if there were to be any material disruption to Iranian oil production.”
https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15872225/main.jpg -
Alec resumes project operations across the UAE5 March 2026
Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access
UAE-based construction firm Alec has resumed on-site and in-office operations across its UAE projects from 4 March.
In a statement, the company said that it is working closely with clients to ensure a prompt and safe return to full-scale activity.
The move follows a temporary work-from-home policy introduced across the company’s UAE operations in response to ongoing events, as Alec Holdings reaffirmed its commitment to protecting its workforce while continuing to deliver in clients’ best interests.
During the same period, the company said its operations in Saudi Arabia remained fully operational.
Alec also confirmed it remains on track to hold its first Annual General Assembly meeting post-listing on 24 March, in line with regulatory guidelines.
Barry Lewis, CEO of Alec Holdings, said the company’s “priority is, and always will be, the safety and security of our workforce”, adding that Alec was grateful to clients for their support.
“That trust has been built over decades of delivering on our promises, and it is something we value deeply,” he said.
Lewis added that the company would continue to focus on transparency and close collaboration with clients and partners to maintain safety across sites and offices.
Lewis also pointed to Alec’s investments in digital collaboration platforms, workforce management systems and enhanced security protocols, describing them as “tried and tested” capabilities that have helped keep projects on track while protecting employees.
He said the company remained confident in the resilience of its operations and its ability to adapt responsibly as circumstances evolve.
READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDFRiyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.
Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
> RAMADAN: Data disproves the Ramadan slowdown story> INDUSTRY REPORT: Chemicals producers look to cut spending> INDUSTRY REPORT: Global petrochemical project capex set to rise until 2030> MARKET FOCUS: Egypt’s crisis mode gives way to cautious revival> LEADERSHIP: Delivering Saudi Arabia’s next phase of rail growth> INTERVIEW: Abu Dhabi’s Enersol charts acquisitions pathTo see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click herehttps://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15872176/main3704.jpg -
QatarEnergy issues force majeure to customers5 March 2026
Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access
QatarEnergy has issued force majeure to customers who have been affected by its decision to stop production and shipments of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and associated products.
“QatarEnergy values its relationships with all of its stakeholders and will continue to communicate the latest available information,” the state enterprise said in a statement on 4 March.
QatarEnergy announced its decision to halt production of LNG and associated products on 2 March due to military attacks on the company’s operating facilities in Ras Laffan Industrial City and Mesaieed Industrial City in Qatar.
The following day, the company said it was stopping output of products in the downstream energy value chain, including urea, polymers, methanol, aluminium and other products.
The state enterprise did not blame Iran for the attacks in either of its statements, but it is understood that its facilities have been hit by drones and/or missiles launched by Tehran, as it retaliates against Israel, the US and their military bases in the GCC states, further escalating the ongoing conflict.
QatarEnergy currently has a nameplate LNG production capacity of 77.5 million tonnes a year (t/y), with all its processing trains and export infrastructure located in Ras Laffan Industrial City, which lies about 90 kilometres to the north of Doha.
In Mesaieed Industrial City, situated around 45km south of Doha, QatarEnergy operates crude oil refining facilities, including natural gas liquids (NGL) units, as well as petrochemical production complexes and other units in the hydrocarbon value chain.
ALSO READ:
https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15872121/main0755.jpg -
Local firm wins Jeddah stormwater contract5 March 2026
Saudi Arabia’s Alkhorayef Water & Power Technologies (AWPT) has won a five-year contract from Jeddah Municipality for stormwater network services in the city.
The contract covers the operation and cleaning of stormwater and surface water networks in the airport’s sub-municipality area of Jeddah, AWPT said in a statement to the Saudi stock exchange.
Valued at $25m, the contract forms part of ongoing efforts by Saudi municipalities to maintain and upgrade urban stormwater infrastructure as cities expand and face increasing pressure on drainage systems.
According to regional projects tracker MEED Projects, Jeddah Municipality awarded two major stormwater infrastructure contracts in 2025.
The awards covered phases one and two of the King Abdullah Road-Falasteen Road (KAFA) tunnel project, each valued at about $175m.
The contracts were awarded to Saudi contractor Thrustboring Construction Company for the construction of large-diameter stormwater drainage tunnels. US-based Aecom is the consultant for the project.
As MEED previously reported, the contracts for the three-year scheme were initially tendered in 2024.
In January, AWPT won another contract with state-owned utility National Water Company (NWC) to operate and maintain water assets in Tabuk City.
The scope of work includes the operation and maintenance of water networks, pump stations, wells, tanks and related facilities over a 36-month period.
READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDFRiyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.
Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
> RAMADAN: Data disproves the Ramadan slowdown story> INDUSTRY REPORT: Chemicals producers look to cut spending> INDUSTRY REPORT: Global petrochemical project capex set to rise until 2030> MARKET FOCUS: Egypt’s crisis mode gives way to cautious revival> LEADERSHIP: Delivering Saudi Arabia’s next phase of rail growth> INTERVIEW: Abu Dhabi’s Enersol charts acquisitions pathTo see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click herehttps://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15870416/main.jpg