meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

Iraq under pressure as oil exports slashed

4 March 2026

Analysis
Wil Crisp
Oil & gas reporter

Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

Iraq’s oil and gas sector is facing mounting challenges as production levels drop sharply amid the US and Israel’s ongoing war with Iran.

In the south of the country, oil exports have been paralysed by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and, in the country’s northern region of Iraqi Kurdistan, exports via the Iraq-Turkiye Pipeline (ITP) have fallen to zero.

Industry insiders are expecting the impact to be felt for some time to come.

On 2 March, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said the Strait of Hormuz is closed and warned that any vessel attempting to pass through will be attacked.

Ebrahim Jabari, a senior adviser to the IRGC’s commander-in-chief, said: “The strait is closed. If anyone tries to pass, the heroes of the Revolutionary Guard and the regular navy will set those ships ablaze.”

Stakeholders in Iraq’s oil and gas sector believe that the closure of the Strait by Iran is likely to have a long-term impact on companies operating in the south of the country.

One source said: “The outlook for the companies operating in the south is very bad right now.

“Potentially, a lot of companies in the south are going to be very anxious about the Strait of Hormuz for a very long time.

“There are hardly any other export routes they can use, and even if Iran’s military capabilities are substantially eroded, it’s going to be very hard to defend ships that are passing through there.”

On 3 March, the decision was taken to completely stop production at the South Rumaila field, after Iran’s IRGC declared the Strait of Hormuz closed.

The Rumaila oil field, which is made up of North Rumaila and South Rumaila, is the second-biggest oil field in the world.

The oil field normally has the capacity to produce 1.2 million barrels a day (b/d), but has cut production by at least 700,000 b/d due to overloaded storage.

Also in the south of the country, there have been cuts to production at the West Qurna 2 and Maysan fields.

Pipeline problem

The main export route for oil producers in Iraqi Kurdistan is the ITP.

This key pipeline, which reopened on 27 September last year, was closed again after production from the region dropped dramatically due to multiple oil fields closing as a safety precaution.

The fields that have temporarily stopped production include the Atrush and Sarsang fields.

Canada-based ShaMaran Petroleum Corporation, which holds stakes in both fields, said that the closures were due to “the deterioration in the regional security environment”.

On top of this, the Iraqi Kurdistan’s Shaikan field, which London-listed Gulf Keystone Petroleum operates, has stopped production due to security concerns.

Shaikan is one of Iraqi Kurdistan’s largest producing fields and produced more than 41,500 b/d in 2025.

“When it comes to the outlook for future oil exports, the calculation is completely different for these companies in Iraqi Kurdistan compared to the companies in the south of the country,” said one source.

“It’s possible that the pipeline will be easier to open in the near future than the Strait of Hormuz.

“It’s not so close to Iran and, so far, no damage has been sustained by the pipeline or the oil fields.

“With prices so high right now, everyone involved in exporting oil via the pipeline is highly motivated to see it restarted.”

The disruption to global oil and gas supplies caused by the Iran conflict has driven global oil prices up by around 15%, with Brent crude oil briefly rising above $85 a barrel on 3 March, the highest it has been since July 2024.

One source said: “These high oil prices are going to be a nightmare for consumers – but if you are an oil company, it’s an opportunity to make some serious money.

“However, you can only make that money if you can ship your oil – and a lot of oil companies in Iraq are going to struggle to do just that.”

Another source said: “There’s nothing technically wrong with the Kurdistan fields or the pipeline at the moment, and a lot of people believe they could be brought back online relatively quickly.

“The pipeline has only been shut down because of the oil field closures. All of the oil that is currently being produced in Iraqi Kurdistan is being used domestically.”

Key staff at Iraqi Kurdistan’s oil companies remain in the country, and the companies are planning quick restarts to cash in on current high prices, according to sources.

One said: “While many of these companies have plans in place for evacuations by land to Turkiye if the situation worsens, right now it seems more likely that things will stabilise and the companies will bring their fields back online soon.

“Workers have been told to stay inside – but many are used to the threat of drone and rocket attacks, and they are still going to the pub and living their lives as normal.”

Uncertain future

While many stakeholders in Iraqi Kurdistan believe the outlook for oil companies in the region is better than in the south of the country, significant challenges remain, and the situation could change dramatically due to the chaotic nature of the ongoing conflict.

One factor that is likely to remain challenging in Iraqi Kurdistan is logistics for key personnel.

One source said: “Airport closures and flight cancellations are likely to dog this region for some time to come, so getting people in and out is expected to remain difficult.”

Another concern is potential attacks on oil fields by militant groups in the region that are loyal to Iran.

“We’ve seen that Iran wants to lash out and do damage to oil assets in nearby countries – so an attack on key fields in Iraqi Kurdistan would not be a surprise,” the source added.

An attack on the ITP pipeline itself could dramatically change the outlook for Iraqi Kurdistan.

Drone attacks or rockets could potentially put the pipeline out of action for months, dealing a serious blow to the outlook for the region’s oil companies.

While the future for the oil sector in both federal Iraq and the Kurdistan region remains highly uncertain, it is clear to everyone involved that the disruptions to the country’s oil and gas sector are causing severe economic damage to the oil-reliant country.

On 3 March, Baghdad-based research organisation Eco Iraq Observatory estimated that Iraq was losing $128m a day after the shutdown of the Rumaila and Kurdistan fields.

It said a one-week shutdown could cost the Iraqi treasury nearly $900m, and a month could result in losses exceeding $3.8bn.

With Iraq relying on oil for more than 90% of government revenues, it is likely that the country will rapidly enter an economic crisis if it does not find a way to bring exports back online over the coming days.

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15853788/main.jpg
Wil Crisp

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Kuwait signs $16bn oil pipeline infrastructure deal

    27 July 2026

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) has signed a $16bn infrastructure agreement with a consortium comprising Blackstone, Brookfield and KKR to establish a joint venture covering the country’s domestic and export crude oil pipeline network.

    Structured as a 20.5-year lease-and-leaseback transaction, the deal covers all 13 of KOC’s crude oil pipelines, spanning about 320 kilometres.

    Known as Project Peregrine, the transaction is set to become Kuwait’s largest energy infrastructure partnership and the largest foreign direct investment in the country’s history.

    Under the agreement, KOC will retain a 51% ownership stake in the newly formed joint venture, while Blackstone, Brookfield and KKR will collectively own the remaining 49%, with each investor holding an equal share. KOC will maintain full ownership, operation and maintenance of the pipeline system.

    The joint venture will lease the pipeline usage rights from KOC and grant the company exclusive rights to operate the network in exchange for a volume-based tariff. The agreement does not affect Kuwait’s authority over crude production or refinery throughput.

    The transaction is expected to generate $7.85bn in upfront proceeds for KOC, supporting Kuwait Petroleum Corporation’s capital investment programme, including its goal of increasing crude oil production capacity to 4 million barrels a day by 2035.

    KPC deputy chairman and CEO Shaikh Nawaf Saud Al-Sabah said the agreement marks a milestone for Kuwait’s energy sector while preserving state control of critical infrastructure.

    “Project Peregrine represents the largest foreign direct investment in Kuwait’s history while preserving full national ownership and operational control,” Al-Sabah said.

    The agreement also marks the first time major global institutional investors have committed long-term capital to Kuwait’s midstream infrastructure.

    Representatives of Blackstone, Brookfield and KKR said the investment reflects confidence in Kuwait’s energy sector and long-term infrastructure strategy.

    The transaction remains subject to customary regulatory approvals and closing conditions.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/17786431/main4812.jpg
    Indrajit Sen
  • Consortiums submit bids for Shagaya zone two plant

    27 July 2026

     

    At least three consortiums have submitted bids for zone two of the third phase of Kuwait’s Al-Dibdibah power and Al-Shagaya renewable energy project.

    The Kuwait Authority for Partnership Projects (Kapp) is procuring the 500MW solar photovoltaic (PV) independent power project (IPP) in partnership with Kuwait’s Ministry of Electricity, Water & Renewable Energy (MEWRE).

    According to a source, bids were submitted on 26 July. The bidding consortiums are: 

    • Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company (Masdar, UAE) / Al-Ghanim International (Kuwait)
    • Acwa (Saudi Arabia) / Arabian Engineering Projects Contracting Company (Kuwait)
    • EDF Renewables (France) / Al-Kharafi & Sons (Kuwait) / Korea Western Power Company 

    Kapp issued a tender to develop the project last November. In October 2025, MEED reported that five consortiums and five individual companies had prequalified to participate in the project.

    The Al-Dibdibah power and Al-Shagaya renewable energy phase three zone two project is located within the administrative boundaries of Kuwait’s Jahra governorate, west of Kuwait City.

    The winning bidder will design, finance, construct and maintain the project.

    The zone two scheme is the fourth renewable energy project to be developed under Kuwait’s public-private partnership programme.

    Zone one

    Kuwait aims to have a renewable energy installed capacity of 22,100MW by 2030 as part of the 20-year strategy announced in March 2025 and ending in 2050.

    In July, MEED reported that a frontrunner had emerged for the Al-Dibdibah and Al-Shagaya phase three, zone one contract following the opening of financial bids.

    The phase three, zone one IPP will have a total power generating capacity of 1,100MW.

    Similar to the zone two project, EY and DLA Piper, together with DNV, are advising the client on the zone one solar IPP.

    Separately, Kuwait-based contractor Power Grid Company recently won a KD48.6m ($158.7m) contract to build a 400kV overhead transmission line linking the Shagaya solar energy generation station with Wafra in southern Kuwait.

    The transmission line will connect Shagaya to the Wafra (Z) transformer station and is part of the wider Shagaya masterplan. The contract was awarded by MEWRE, with Power Grid one of three firms that submitted bids last year.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/17786075/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • GCC banks prove resilient amid turmoil

    27 July 2026

     

    Gulf banks are proving adept at navigating the economic and geopolitical turbulence that comes with operating in the region. These skills have come to the fore this year, as regional lenders draw on stable funding profiles and ample capital and liquidity buffers that protect them from near-term credit risks. 

    GCC banks’ fundamentals have proved remarkably resilient to the Iran-related turmoil, assuming the intensity of the February-April stage of the military conflict does not resume.

    There have not been any significant outflows of external funding. While anecdotal evidence suggests some depositors briefly moved funds out of the region at the start of the war, ratings agency S&P Global notes that their return reflects confidence that the war will prove short-lived.

    Funding strength

    Metrics for the early part of the year revealed a robust picture. Domestic deposits held up strongly in the first quarter of 2026, total GCC domestic deposits rising by 16.9% in year-on-year terms, compensating for the decline in interbank funding. 

    State-linked deposits grew at a particularly rapid pace, led by the UAE and Kuwait, which offset decelerating private-sector deposit growth in those countries. 

    Domestic deposits accelerated in April, a pointer to GCC governments’ proactive stances in shielding their banking systems from undue stress. The inflow of public deposits accelerated quite significantly in this period, although that pace will likely subside as conditions gradually normalise. 

    Such deposits continue to underpin GCC banks’ wider performances. “Funding and liquidity is generally a strength for the region. Government deposits typically make up 20%-30% of the banking sector deposits. That is really important as these are sticky deposits,” says Redmond Ramsdale, head of Middle East ratings at Fitch Ratings.

    Funding and liquidity is generally a strength for the region

    Gulf states’ heavy reliance on public sector and government-related deposits has proved valuable in the current environment, anchoring banks’ funding profiles and helping reduce potential risks.

    Fund outflows have not materialised to any significant degree. “We had some anecdotal evidence of funds being withdrawn, but they returned in the following weeks,” says Ramsdale.

    Solid fundamentals

    GCC banks entered the conflict period in strong shape. According to S&P, domestic private sector credit growth in the region remained robust in the first quarter – the annualised growth rate was 8% at the end of March. 

    Core capital buffers are about 15%-16% – higher still for the top lenders – ensuring total loss-absorbing capacity stays below 9% of equity. Regulatory ratios exceed relevant thresholds, providing a significant buffer, according to ratings agency Moody’s.

    “If you look at the whole region, the proportion of the lending book that is non-performing, on a weighted average basis, sits around 2%,” says Badis Shubailat, a senior analyst at Moody’s. 

    “Against this solid level of asset quality, you have a cushion of provisions for expected losses that more than covers the existing stock of problem loans, which provides a strong first line of defence.”

    Then, as a second line of defence, are core capital buffers that remain high by global standards, with levels around 15%-16%. Put together, this explains why the banks are sitting on comfortable positions in terms of loss-absorption capacity.

    At the end of Q1 2025, the top 45 GCC banks reported an average Tier 1 capital ratio of 17%, with coverage ratios of 155.8%, according to S&P. 

    “Credit losses are at historical lows of 50 basis points (bps) for the region, and there are very good provisioning buffers – all of which helps to mitigate the negative consequences of the expected asset quality deterioration,” says Tatjana Lescova, director and lead analyst at S&P.

    According to Shubailat, the fact that the conflict impact on GCC banks has not been as pronounced as on other sectors reflects that over the past three years – and until right before the conflict started – the region as a whole, and its banking systems, had demonstrated remarkable resilience. In contrast, major advanced economies were struggling with inflationary pressures and subdued economic growth. 

    “This was visible in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, the two largest economic diversification engines in the region, which happen to also represent more than two-thirds of total banking system assets,” says Shubailat.

    Limited exposure

    Gulf banks have also been helped by the fact that those economic sectors most impacted by conflict – tourism, hospitality, energy – do not generally form a large part of their collective loans books. 

    “There will be weaker performance of borrowers in the most obvious affected sectors like infrastructure, tourism, logistics, transport and real estate, but tourism is actually a pretty small exposure for the banks – less than 3% of loan books,” says Ramsdale. “There might be a bit of pressure on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which are less able to cope with the pressures than the larger corporates, but again, for banks, SME lending is not very big.” 

    Banks’ exposure to the real estate and construction sectors is highest in Qatar – 31% of total credit at the end of March – while the exposure in Kuwait stands at 25%, with Saudi Arabia at 16% and Bahrain at 12%, notes S&P. UAE banks have been consistently reducing their exposure to these sectors, down to 13% at the end of March, compared to 21% at year-end 2020. 

    Moody’s Shubailat says that developers in the UAE sit on solid balance sheets and strong revenue backlogs, while banks’ exposure to the construction sector has declined. “So the quantum is lower, the credit quality of the exposure is better, and the banks are sitting on higher capital and provisioning buffers,” he notes.

    Gulf bankers are not resting on their laurels. They know that even if bad loans have been limited, they cannot forestall the possibility of problem exposures further down the road. 

    “Asset quality deterioration is a risk that we expect to materialise later in the year. This is because of weaker macro expectations, and negative impact on some of the corporate sectors, albeit varying across different GCC countries,” says Lescova.

    On average, for the region, S&P expects 20 bps of increases in credit losses for this year. When it comes to asset quality, the regulatory forbearance measures announced by three central banks will help alleviate the impact.

    Policy support

    Central bank moves have added another layer of support. Forbearance measures from the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar central banks have allowed additional headroom.

    For example, in mid-March, the Central Bank of the UAE launched a five-pillar resilience package that relaxed capital buffer stipulations, representing more than $272bn in support. 

    Kuwait eased liquidity requirements, raised maximum lending limits and released a portion of the capital conservation buffer to expand refinancing and credit quality absorption capacity. Qatar, meanwhile, has cut the reserve requirement from 4.5% to 3.5% for deposits.

    Forbearance measures from the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar central banks have allowed additional headroom

    Such measures were not a response to a banking crisis, says Ramsdale. “Some of the support packages that we have seen coming out of the central banks, in the UAE, Qatar and Kuwait, were preventative support measures,” he says.

    “They were designed to boost confidence and limit that pass through from temporary deposit volatility. It was not to do with acute banking stress.”

    Market confidence

    Larger banks are better positioned to cope with straitened economic times. They are generally more geographically diversified beyond their domestic markets, and international operations have historically been a growth driver for them. 

    “When there is increased market uncertainty, larger banks may benefit from a flight-to-quality movement, with deposits moved away from smaller banks. Based on Q1 results, only a few smaller banks have reported a contraction in the customer deposits,” says Lescova.

    The GCC’s largest banks, including Al-Rajhi Banking & Investment Corporation, Saudi National Bank, First Abu Dhabi Bank, Qatar National Bank, Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and Emirates NBD, remain highly profitable, although they may not perform as strongly as they would have had the conflict not occurred.

    “We already expected some softening in profitability before the conflict, because of the normalisation of the cost of risk upwards from incredibly low levels over the last three years, [which] were driven by a very strong recovery performance from the banks,” says Shubailat. 

    “In turn, this current situation adds a layer of pressure to the normalising profitability story by increasing provisioning needs in light of the recent economic shocks,” he adds.  

    Confidence in GCC banks was evident from the outset of the conflict. In early April, Emirates NBD priced a $750m AT1 capital issuance, the first international debt capital markets transaction by a GCC issuer since late February.

    “The first ceasefire saw things like private placements start happening again, and that slowly translated into the opening up of public markets. 

    “Emirates NBD was one of the first banks to open up that market, and we are seeing the largest banks issuing again,” says Ramsdale.

    The operating environment for Saudi Arabia is ranked BBB+ – a strong position, all things considered. Ramsdale notes that Riyadh’s reprioritisation of large projects associated with Vision 2030 “means growth will probably be slightly slower in Saudi Arabia”, but adds: “That is actually a good thing, because growth was so strong it was beginning to pressure funding, liquidity and capitalisation. 

    “Taking off some of that pressure is a positive for banks.”

    Growth prospects

    Stronger earnings performances will allow banks to bankroll mergers and acquisitions (M&A), building on inorganic routes to growth. Within the past year, the National Bank of Bahrain and Bank of Bahrain & Kuwait (BBK) have agreed to explore a merger, while BBK has also absorbed HSBC’s retail banking business.

    Emirates NBD is reported to be looking to acquire HSBC’s business in Turkiye, a country where the Dubai bank already has a presence through its takeover of DenizBank in 2019. It also grew its stake in India’s RBL Bank this year to 60%. 

    “Certainly the big banks will remain opportunistic over M&A – where the value comes at the right price, then they are interested. And if the big international banks are going to pull out, they tend to have some of the best-quality assets, so you can understand why regional players might be interested in them,” says Ramsdale.

    Such moves should provide reassurance that, despite recent challenges, GCC banks are well placed to ride out the remainder of 2026 and resume the positive trajectory  that was evident before the Iran war shook the region. 

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/17722682/main.gif
    James Gavin
  • Saudi Arabia issues RFQ for third round of gas-fired IPPs

    27 July 2026

     

    Saudi Power Procurement Company (SPPC) has issued the request for qualifications (RFQ) for the third round of its combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) independent power producer (IPP) programme.

    According to the documents, the deadline for developers to submit statements of qualification is 16 August.

    SPPC expects to issue notices of prequalification on 11 September, after which request for proposals documents will be issued to qualified applicants. 

    The latest date for the submission of clarification questions is 9 August.

    The RFQ covers future CCGT IPPs, although the document does not specify the number, locations or capacities of the projects.

    Earlier in July, MEED reported that Saudi Arabia had begun qualification for CCGT plants to be built with provision for future carbon capture units.

    The projects will comprise new CCGT plants developed on a build-own-operate basis. Each project will be implemented through a special-purpose project company wholly owned by the successful bidder.

    The project companies will sell the entire capacity and output of the plants to SPPC under 25-year power-purchase agreements starting from the respective commercial operation dates. SPPC will be responsible for dispatching electricity from the plants. 

    The plants will use advanced H-class or J-class gas turbine technology. Each IPP is expected to comprise two or three gas turbine generators, corresponding heat recovery steam generators with duct firing, and one or two steam turbine generators.

    Natural gas will be the primary fuel, with diesel used as a backup. SPPC will be responsible for supplying both fuels under the power-purchase agreements.

    CCGT IPP programme

    SPPC said the procurement marks the next stage of its CCGT IPP programme.

    The first four projects comprise Taiba 1, Taiba 2, Qassim 1 and Qassim 2, with a combined capacity of 7,200MW.

    The second group comprises Rumah 1, Rumah 2, Nairyah 1 and Nairyah 2, also with a combined capacity of 7,200MW.

    All eight plants are under construction, with Qassim 1 and Taiba 1 expected to reach commissioning in 2028. 

    Developers that were prequalified as financial or technical members for the Rumah and Nairyah projects can request to maintain the same qualification for the upcoming CCGT projects. They must submit the request and updated financial information by the 16 August deadline. 

    For new applicants, financial members must have reached financial close on at least two non-recourse IPP, IWPP, IWP or ISTP projects since January 2010. At least one must have involved senior debt of $500m or more. Applicants must also have a minimum net worth of $350m.

    Technical members must demonstrate development experience on at least two conventional energy IPPs with a combined capacity of 2,000MW since January 2016. They must also have ownership experience on at least two such projects totalling 3,000MW and relevant operations and maintenance experience.

    US/India-based Synergy Consulting is the financial adviser for the procurement, Germany’s Fichtner is the technical adviser and UK-headquartered Eversheds Sutherland is the legal adviser. 

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/17785272/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • Contractor wins The Chedi residences Dubai contract

    27 July 2026

    Dubai-based firm Ancient Builders Constructions has won a contract to build The Chedi Private Residences, located in the Barsha Heights area near Sheikh Zayed Road.

    The contract was awarded by local developer Al-Seeb Real Estate Development.

    The project comprises a 250-metre-tall, 44-storey tower and will offer about 117 residential units upon completion.

    Enabling works are under way and are being undertaken by local firm Soiltec Piling & Foundation.

    Dubai-based High Art Engineering Consultancy is the project consultant.

    Local architectural firms Bruno Guelaff and BG Group are the project designers.

    Construction is expected to be completed by 2029.

    Al-Seeb Real Estate Development’s latest contract award in the UAE market comes amid heightened real estate activity in the construction sector. Schemes worth more than $323bn are in the execution or planning stages, according to UK-based analytics firm GlobalData.

    GlobalData forecasts that output from the UAE’s residential construction sector will grow by 3% in real terms over 2026-29, supported by infrastructure, energy and utilities developments, as well as residential construction projects.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/17785193/main.png
    Yasir Iqbal