meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

Gulf contractors face post-war materials squeeze

28 April 2026

Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

Despite the tenuous ceasefire and efforts toward a political resolution, the Gulf’s construction materials supply chain is absorbing impacts that will not be quickly mitigated and are likely to be felt for many months.

Insurance premiums can normalise within weeks on restored confidence; commodity prices, port backlogs and depleted diesel inventories will not.

The GCC has $943bn in projects currently under execution, according to MEED Projects – more than half of it awarded in the past two years. That book now faces cost pressures that fixed-price contracts were not written to absorb.

A further $321bn sits at the bidding stage, where submitted prices face scrutiny against a drastically altered set of input costs.

Steel price divergence

GCC crude steel output reached a record 21.64 million tonnes in 2025 – up 9.5% year-on-year – with Saudi Arabia alone producing 10.78 million tonnes, a 12.3% increase, according to the Arab Iron and Steel Union.

The conflict has halted that trajectory as Gulf steelmakers have seen their seaborne supply of iron ore pellets to feed their direct-reduced iron (DRI) plants cut off. This has forced a fallback to ferrous scrap and in turn created a secondary squeeze.

Saudi Arabia’s four electric arc furnace steelmakers typically rely on DRI for 80-85% of their raw material, so a turn to scrap at scale would rapidly exhaust domestic supply.

Saudi steel prices have swiftly risen as a result. Fastmarkets’ weekly assessment for rebar delivered into Saudi Arabia stood at SR2,300-2,460 ($612-655) per tonne on 7 April, up roughly 9% on the midpoint from the pre-conflict level of 23 February.

The price rally has extended through April, with Saudi Iron & Steel Company (Hadeed) raising long-product prices for the fourth time since early April – the latest a SR160 increase to SR2,800 per tonne for 12-32mm rebar.

Pricing is nevertheless diverging across the region. Emirates Steel held its May rebar price unchanged at AED2,721 ($741) per tonne ex-works, citing market stability as the priority despite rising cost pressures from the regional disruption.

The rollover discipline outside Saudi Arabia may partly reflect other Gulf countries’ political and industrial leadership exerting pressure to maintain market confidence during an abnormal period, rather than an accurate read of underlying cost pressures.

Invariably, the DRI feedstock squeeze, elevated freight and higher energy input costs sit on every mill in the region, not just Saudi Arabia’s.

When a geographical market as large as the kingdom exhausts both primary input supply and scrap, it is bound to affect the entire region-wide sector sooner or later.

Held list prices can mask cost accumulation for a while, but delayed passthrough will not change the underlying fundamentals.

Aluminium constraints

In addition to the impacts on the steel sector, the physical damage to Gulf aluminium production was one of the largest shocks to the GCC’s industrial base during the hot period of the Iran conflict.

It will take up to 12 months for Emirates Global Aluminium (EGA) to repair the damage sustained by its Al-Taweelah complex in Abu Dhabi on 28 March. Aluminium Bahrain (Alba) was also hit the same day, and both producers have declared force majeure.

GCC daily aluminium production was down roughly 6% month-on-month in March, according to the International Aluminium Institute – despite that period incorporating only three days of disruption following the 28 March strikes. April will be worse.

The region’s total Q1 aluminium output declined to its lowest point in four years.

London-based commodities firm CRU Group now estimates curtailment at Al-Taweelah alone could remove up to 1.2 million tonnes from 2026 production, while JP Morgan has projected a 1.9 million tonne global deficit for 2026 – the largest since 2000.

Prices have moved accordingly. The aluminium three-month benchmark at the London Metal Exchange (LME) climbed from around $3,100 per tonne at end-February to a peak of $3,670 on 16 April – a three-year high – before easing to around $3,540 with the ceasefire. CRU has modelled a path to $4,000 per tonne under prolonged disruption, while BMI, the research arm of Fitch Group, has given a $3,700 price target.

For regional contractors, this premium could begin to hit hard. Gulf producers have historically supplied GCC construction at a discount to imported metal, reflecting low-cost gas feedstock, proximity and short logistics chains.

With production curtailed at Taweelah, Alba and Qatalum – and Hormuz shipping constrained – that discount has collapsed. Contractors now face LME-plus-import-premium pricing from further afield for the bulk of their aluminium requirement through 2026 – on tenders that were quoted on the Gulf-premium assumption.

Freight, fuel and other inputs

Imported inputs into GCC construction range from specialist steel and electromechanical components to cladding systems and project equipment.

Lloyd’s List Intelligence recorded around 80 vessel transits through the Strait of Hormuz in the week of 13-19 April, against pre-war traffic of 130 or more transits per day.

Kpler has forecast a ceiling of 10-15 daily passages even if the ceasefire holds, leaving project supplies caught up in the disruption. Construction-bound freight will likely not be a priority when transit resumes, however, and premium pricing will still apply.

The UAE east-coast ports are absorbing part of the diverted flow, but Khor Fakkan can only partially compensate, with throughput capped at around 3,000 TEU; Jeddah, the primary contingency hub, has dwell times of 10-12 days.

Imported construction supply chain inputs are already showing the squeeze: for instance, a flow of around 40,000 tonnes of copper cathode bound each month for GCC wire rod producers has been halted, according to Fastmarkets.

Then there is the matter of fuel. Diesel is a direct contractor operating cost, running through site generators, plant, trucking and logistics.

The latter is particularly key. For low-value, high-weight inputs such as cement and aggregate, rising diesel pricing compounds through the supply chain.

Diesel in the UAE tracks international benchmarks monthly and rose to AED4.69 per litre in April, up 72% month-on-month, with Brent having moved from around $65 pre-conflict to a $103 March average. Saudi diesel also follows wholesale references.

Cement as an outlier

Cement is the one base construction input where the conflict has not yet produced a clear contractor-facing cost pressure.

In Saudi Arabia, domestic dispatches fell 5.6% year-on-year in March, reflecting the Ramadan timing and a broader construction-sector softening. Total March sales were down 6.7% year-on-year and 21.3% month-on-month, according to Al-Rajhi Capital.

Saudi cement is largely domestically produced; the sector is not raw-material-constrained. Utilisation rates at Saudi plants dropped in March to 67.4% against a 73-74% sector run rate through most of 2025. Prices have not moved, according to Saudi Arabia’s General Authority for Statistics.

If construction demand increases and energy costs settle at a higher regional baseline, cement producers will reprice – but the trigger will be recovery, not conflict.

Repricing expectations

The space to watch is the $321bn of GCC work at the bidding stage, where pricing structures based on pre-28 February assumptions now face a different cost reality.

Some bids could be repriced, some withdrawn; others will be awarded at margins that no longer cover the input environment that awarded contracts are already absorbing.

As in previous periods of market stress, many Middle East-based contractors will likely accept low or negative margin work if only to maintain their operational cashflow. For contractors already in distress, the margin adjustments could prove tricky to absorb.

In the book already under execution, the gap between committed pricing and current input costs could surface in the coming period as contract renegotiations and programme slippage.

Steel and aluminium will lead. Diesel will run through every line. War risk insurance will ease faster than any of these on confidence restoration – assuming that the political picture stabilises – but that may become the least of contractors’ worries.

Nor is a near-term resolution even remotely guaranteed. The US’ 13 April naval blockade has only compounded Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and every day that logistics in the waterway remains stagnant is another day of pressure on supply chains.

The materials squeeze is not two months old and contained; it is compounding.

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16592059/main.gif
John Bambridge

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Oil prices rise above $100 a barrel as conflict escalates

    9 September 2026

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    Oil prices rose above $100 a barrel on 9 September for the first time since July as the US-Iran conflict escalated and Iran-backed Houthi forces attacked Saudi energy infrastructure.

    Brent crude futures reached $100.95 a barrel, while US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) rose to $95.60. Brent had last traded above $100 on 24 July.

    The latest escalation has heightened concerns about oil supplies from the region, with shipping through both the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea facing disruption.

    Flows through the Strait of Hormuz had fallen below 2 million barrels a day (b/d) from about 8-9 million b/d before the latest escalation, according to Rystad Energy.

    At the same time, Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia threaten another important route for oil exports, with the group targeting energy infrastructure and shipping in and around the Red Sea.

    US strikes on Iranian tankers

    US forces destroyed five Iranian crude oil carriers on 8 September after Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) targeted a US Navy warship with ballistic missiles.

    The US Central Command (Centcom) said the warship successfully evaded two Iranian attacks and that no US personnel were harmed.

    Four of the Iranian vessels – Kaviz, Charminar, Horizon 1 and Riesco – were struck in the Gulf of Oman, while the Derya was attacked near Kharg Island, Iran’s main crude export hub.

    The M/T Riesco subsequently sank in the Gulf of Oman, according to Centcom.

    Iran responded by launching ballistic missiles towards Jordan. Jordan’s armed forces said 18 of 20 missiles were intercepted, with the remaining two falling in unpopulated areas.

    Iran’s IRGC also said it had attacked two US naval vessels, eight oil tankers and 10 other vessels in the Gulf, although it did not identify the vessels or provide evidence of the attacks.

    The latest exchanges mark a further escalation in the US-Iran conflict, which began on 28 February.

    Houthi attacks raise supply concerns

    The conflict has also widened into a renewed confrontation between Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi movement.

    On 8 September, Saudi authorities said Houthi attacks had targeted civilian and economic sites in Abha, Khamis Mushait, Jazan and Najran in the south of the kingdom, injuring 73 people.

    Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Energy said several energy sector facilities and installations had been targeted, causing fires and forcing a temporary halt to some operations.

    The Houthis said their attacks were in response to Saudi military action in Yemen, including what they described as attacks on Houthi positions and a Saudi blockade of ports and airports.

    Riyadh condemns attacks

    Saudi Arabia has strongly condemned the Houthi attacks and warned that it would take measures to defend its territory and national assets.

    In a statement on 8 September, the Ministry of Energy said authorities were working to address the impact of the attacks and ensure the safety of facilities and personnel while maintaining operations in accordance with approved plans.

    Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs also condemned the attacks and said the kingdom had the right to take measures to defend its sovereignty and protect its citizens, residents and national assets.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/19505512/main0138.jpg
    Indrajit Sen
  • What actually slows a gigaproject down

    9 September 2026

     

    Ask anyone delivering a major programme in the GCC what causes delays and sequencing will come up early. Utilities go in too late. Approvals lag behind construction. Stations, depots and access roads are procured as if they belong to different projects rather than one system.

    “None of this is new. The industry has understood these risks for years,” says Alan Caldwell, managing director for transport and infrastructure at WSP Middle East.

    For Caldwell, that is what makes the pattern worth interrogating rather than simply restating.

    “The more important question is why the same issues around interfaces, approvals, stakeholder alignment and delivery sequencing continue to slow major programmes when the risks are already so well understood,” he says.

    The answer, he argues, is not that these programmes are too big or too technically complex. What breaks a schedule is a wider system delivered as a set of disconnected parts; an approval sitting with an authority team with no visibility of the construction sequence downstream; or a station package proceeding without the utilities diversion it depends on.

    “Infrastructure programmes do not struggle because a railway is too large or a highway network is too complex,” Caldwell says. “They encounter difficulties when interconnected elements are delivered in the wrong order.”

    Sequencing decisions are rarely purely technical either, he adds. They are commercial – shaped by which assets need to unlock value first, which phases are tied to funding, and where sales or investment assumptions depend on infrastructure landing in a particular order.

    Approvals sit at the centre of that logic. On many programmes, they become one of the biggest sources of lost time – not because the requirements are unreasonable, but because approvals are not planned, evidenced or owned as part of the delivery logic from day one.

    Caldwell has seen the same pattern across three decades of Gulf delivery, from early work on Palm Jumeirah to today’s region-wide transport programmes.

    “The decisive factor has often been the same: whether interfaces, approvals, responsibilities and delivery sequencing are aligned early enough to prevent complexity becoming delay.”

    Integration needs to be well understood

    “Most programme teams in the region would say they understand the need for integration,” Caldwell says. Fewer are structured to deliver it. “The harder task is turning that understanding into the way projects are actually set up and managed,” he argues.

    Riyadh Metro is the reference point he returns to, precisely because engineering complexity was not the deciding factor in its delivery.

    Coordinating a city-scale transport system meant aligning design, construction, systems, utilities and stakeholder interfaces across every delivery vertical.

    “The lesson for the region today is clear,” Caldwell says. “Ambitious programmes need a delivery model that gives every contributor a shared view of progress, risk, decision-making and the business case driving programme priorities.”

    That shared view, he argues, will be what the next phase of Gulf delivery is judged on.

    Whether clients, consultants, contractors, operators and approval authorities can work to a single delivery logic will be key.

    “This requires more than coordination meetings. It requires integrated ways of working, shared common data environments and governance structures that make risks, decisions and dependencies visible before they become delays,” he says.

    From reporting progress to managing risk before it lands

    Digital tools have a role here, Caldwell says, but not as a headline in themselves.

    Digital twins, programme visualisation and data-led modelling matter only if they help teams identify and address problems before they affect the wider programme.

    “The real value is not technology for its own sake,” he says. “It is the ability to see, in one place, where approvals are outstanding, where interfaces are unresolved, where programme dates are slipping, where clashes are emerging and where decisions need to be escalated."

    None of it works without governance behind it, he cautions. “A dashboard will not resolve a delayed approval if nobody knows who owns the decision, when it needs to be made, or how it should be escalated.”

    Data only has value if the processes and responsibilities around it are clear, which is why Caldwell frames the shift the region needs not as digitisation, but as a move “from programme management as a discipline focused mainly on reporting and coordination, and towards project and programme intelligence”.

    With many of the region’s programmes running for a decade or more, he adds, delivery models also need to flex as funding assumptions, user needs and policy priorities change along the way.

    “The ambition behind the Gulf’s transformation programmes is not in question,” Caldwell says.

    What will determine how much of it is realised on time is whether delivery models evolve at the same pace: earlier integration, clearer approval pathways, shared data environments, and every contributor working to a delivery logic that connects technical sequencing with the funding and operational case behind it.

    “The region’s next challenge is not imagining bigger projects,” he says. “It is changing the way they are delivered, operated and adapted over time.”

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/19502016/main.gif
    Yasir Iqbal
  • Qatari firm wins $221m Qiddiya stadium MEP deal

    9 September 2026

     

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    Qatari contractor Elegancia MEP, part of Estithmar Holding, has won a SR829m ($221m) mechanical package contract for the Prince Mohammed Bin Salman Stadium in Qiddiya, Saudi Arabia.

    The contract covers full mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) works for the stadium, and is Elegancia MEP’s largest award in Saudi Arabia to date.

    The 45,000-seat stadium will feature a fully combined retractable pitch, roof and LED wall.

    The stadium’s main construction works are being undertaken by a joint venture of Spanish firm FCC Construction and local firm Nesma & Partners.

    Saudi gigaproject developer Qiddiya Investment Company awarded an estimated SR15bn ($4bn) deal to build the stadium in October 2024, as MEED exclusively reported.

    The contract covered the construction of a multipurpose stadium on top of the 200-metre-high Tuwaiq cliff in the new sports and entertainment district of Qiddiya City.

    Once completed, the stadium will be the home ground for Saudi Pro League football clubs Al-Nassr and Al-Hilal.

    US-based architect Populous is the project consultant.

    The stadium is one of the venues for the kingdom’s 2034 Fifa World Cup bid and will host events such as the Saudi King Cup, the Asian Cup and the 2034 Asian Games.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/19501493/main.jpg
    Yasir Iqbal
  • Jordan tenders advisory for wastewater treatment plant

    9 September 2026

    The Water Authority Jordan (WAJ) has issued an invitation to prequalify for advisory services for the rehabilitation and expansion of the Shallala wastewater treatment plant in Irbid, northern Jordan.

    The Shallala plant was commissioned in 2013 with a design capacity of about 14,000 cubic metres a day (cm/d).

    The rehabilitation and expansion project will increase its treatment capacity to about 30,500 cm/d to meet projected wastewater flows through 2050.

    The PIU Support and Construction Supervision Consultancy Services tender was released on 19 August.

    The submission deadline is 21 September.

    The consultancy will support the project implementation unit and provide construction supervision services for the project. The project has an estimated value of $69m and is being financed by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    The planned works include rehabilitating the existing activated sludge and treatment units and constructing a new treatment train.

    The scope also includes installing biogas combined heat and power units, improving sludge handling and dewatering systems, and installing odour control and chemical containment systems.

    WAJ is also undertaking the upgrade and expansion of the Ain Ghazal wastewater treatment plant in Amman.

    The existing facility had a capacity of 330,000 cm/d and is being upgraded to 726,712 cm/d to accept and treat expected incoming flows until 2045.

    The local Arab Towers Contracting Company was appointed as the main contractor for the project last year.

    READ THE SEPTEMBER 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Nuclear power ambitions gather pace; Kuwait keeps dealmaking alive despite war; Region invests in raising gas processing capacity.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the September 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/19498520/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • Consultants bid for Abu Dhabi light rail project management

    9 September 2026

     

    Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access 

    Abu Dhabi Transport Company (ADTC) has issued a request for prequalification (RFQ) notice to consultants for a contract for project management engineering consultancy services for the first phase of the light rail transit network, also known as ADT4.

    The notice was issued on 7 September, with a submission deadline of 9 November.

    The project’s first phase will span 19 kilometres (km) and include 23 stations, connecting Zayed International airport (AUH) with nearby areas, including Yas Island, Al‑Raha Beach and Khalifa City.

    The key sections of the tram are:

    AUH to Yas Island: The tram will start from Terminal A at AUH and run through the Yas tunnel to Yas Gateway Park. It will serve areas including Yas Bay, Media Zone, Yas Plaza, Yas Drive, Yas Mall, Sea World and Water Edge.

    This section covers 13km and includes 13 at-grade stations and one underground station.

    Al-Raha: This section will stretch for 4.3km and run along Al-Raha Street. It will serve areas including Al-Zeina, Al-Muneera and Al-Bandar, towards the Aldar head office. The section will include seven at-grade stations.

    Etihad Plaza: This section will pass the Etihad Aviation Training Centre and span about 1.7km. It will feature a main depot near the Etihad Airways headquarters, along with two at-grade stations.

    The tender also covers the procurement of 25 trams, each with a capacity of 270 people, along with associated systems.

    The project was officially launched at the GlobalRail exhibition in Abu Dhabi in October last year.

    Referred to as Abu Dhabi Tram Line 4, the project will be delivered in three phases.

    Construction of the first phase is expected to start next year. The tram is slated to begin operations by 2030.

    Future phases will extend towards Khalifa City and serve additional destinations across Yas Island.

    The project forms a key part of the recently announced AED170bn ($46bn) package of national transport and road projects to be implemented by 2030.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/19493532/main.jpg
    Yasir Iqbal