meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

GCC shelters from the trade wars

18 April 2025

 

The ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs that US President Donald Trump announced on 2 April have plunged global markets into turmoil, with many previously bullish investors turning bearish as a large swathe of reciprocal tariffs were announced.

A week later, Trump announced a 90-day pause on the new tariff regime for most trading partners except China, which received an increased tariff rate of 145%, which was then increased to 245%.

As global stock markets suffered some of their worst days on record, for the GCC, the main mechanism of transmission of economic pain came through the negative oil price shock. Brent crude prices dropped by about 16% and dipped below $60 a barrel for the first time since 2021.

Falling prices

For TS Lombard’s general base case, the negative impact of weaker oil demand is offset by more constructive aspects, which highlight the region’s resilience as it is relatively sheltered from the direct effects of Trump’s tariffs compared to most other emerging markets.

To focus on the negatives first, oil prices have taken a significant hit, dropping to lows unseen since before the Russia-Ukraine war. 

It has been generally accepted that during the period from 2022 to February 2025, there was a $70 a barrel price floor for oil, supported by reduced Opec+ production in 2023 and 2024, coupled with geopolitical risk premium resulting from conflicts in Europe and the Middle East.

The geopolitical narrative began to untangle in 2024, and then completely unravel in 2025, as markets no longer price in any real oil shock risk. 

This story has been exacerbated in 2025 with a twofold blow in early April: Trump announced his Liberation Day tariffs, and Opec+ announced plans to raise production even further, from an increase of 114,000 barrels a day (b/d) to 411,000 b/d by May, which shocked the oil market.

It is key to note that non-oil expansion depends on crude prices to finance growth, rather than for oil’s contribution to GDP. In Saudi Arabia, for example, non-oil GDP grows at about 2% when oil is below the $60 a barrel range, versus 4.7% on average above $80 a barrel.

Low oil prices become a concern when discussing GCC government budget balances. Economic diversification and oil decoupling plans have required high levels of capital expenditure, as the region begins to brace for a future of less oil dependency – though the deadline for this remains at least 10 years away.

Although GCC markets have decoupled from oil, overall funding and spending in the GCC remains driven by oil revenues. This can be seen with the breakeven oil prices for GCC countries.

There is a wide range of fiscal breakeven points within the GCC, with states such as Bahrain and Saudi Arabia suffering the most from drops in oil revenues. Despite these variations, the outlook for oil can be summarised in four points:

  • Opec+ policy creates excess supply, coupled with weak global – and namely Chinese – demand on crude; 
  • Pricing out of geopolitical risk;
  • Tariff policy creates global uncertainty, especially in energy-intensive industries; 
  • An Opec decision on production numbers will hinge on the outcome of Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE.

TS Lombard does not expect oil prices to fall much further. It would not be in Trump’s favour to depress oil prices too far, as it would result in too much pain for US shale producers. 

Trump wants lower energy inputs; a positive supply-side factor; and to showcase a win from his campaign pledges, many of which have yet to materialise. Nonetheless, the base case for oil remains bearish this year relative to the past two years, although TS Lombard is not overly negative on expectations about current price equilibrium in the $60-$70 a barrel range.

Potential upside

With markets remaining in a tumultuous state, and while questions are being asked about trade deals and the re-implementation of tariffs, it is key to note that oil, energy and various petrochemicals products have been exempt from US tariffs. 

This means that, for a volatile and demand-dependent market, oil may see some upside towards the end of this year, as markets begin to price in tariff risk and supply-side disruption.

In terms of non-oil exports from the GCC to the US, with the exception of aluminium, little has changed from pre-Liberation Day operations. 

In 2024, the US enjoyed a trade surplus with the GCC in general. For example, 91% of Saudi exports to the US in January 2025 were crude or crude-based products such as ethylene, propylene polymers, fertilisers, some plastics products, and rubber – most of which are exempt from tariffs. 

For the UAE, 80% of exports to the US were similarly exempt, including supplying the US with 8% of its total aluminium demand. Significantly, Canada and China are the main aluminium exporters to the US.

With China and Canada also being major targets for Trump, countries such as the UAE and Bahrain will maintain a competitive advantage in selling to the US market, despite facing either the 10% baseline tariff, or the specific 25% aluminium tariff. The best case scenario is that both these GCC states are able to negotiate a trade deal that could exempt or curb the negative tariff effect on their aluminium exports.

Limiting impact

Although several industries have already suffered – as petrochemicals in general has suffered because of the drop in demand and oversupply in the market – the GCC finds itself in a unique position. Its economies are geared to being market- and trade-friendly, and they have low regulatory barriers, large amounts of space and energy to engage in manufacturing-intensive activities.

Coupled with strong relations with the Trump administration, the GCC has both an economic and geopolitical opportunity to act as a global intermediary. It has already been announced that Trump’s first foreign visits will be to the region, and today major global negotiations – from ceasefires to investment mandates – take place in the GCC.

A common argument being made regarding the latest output decision by Opec+ is that it is a geopolitical ploy to appease Trump’s pursuit of lower energy prices and gain favourable negotiating positions for the GCC states. Items on this docket range from civilian nuclear and drone programmes through to the approach to Iran and the Gaza-Israel question.

Saudi Arabia’s non-oil GDP remains high, showing the resilience of the kingdom when facing economic headwinds. Specifically, the kingdom has kept up its streak of strong non-oil purchasing managers’ index performances. 

With the GCC exhibiting stable conditions as the world moves towards uncertainty and erecting trade barriers, the region’s overall competitiveness could be enhanced. This is especially true in the case of the real economy, where investments still have a mostly local rather than international reliance. 

Overall, the short-term story relates to oil – and namely to the capital flows that oil brings, which fund economic diversification expenditures in the GCC. 

Although lower oil prices are a key detractor for the region, the story is far from being all bad news. 

Improved geopolitical relations and opportunities arising from the positioning of the GCC states allows them to exploit emerging gaps in markets that were previously dominated by economies that have been targeted with tariffs.

 

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/13720569/main.jpg

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Risk accelerates Saudi spending shift

    27 March 2026

    Commentary
    John Bambridge
    Analysis editor

    The headline story of Saudi Arabia’s project economy in 2026 is what is no longer being built: The Line deferred. The Mukaab suspended. Trojena stripped of its marquee event. Saudi Arabia’s construction sector is in a period of readjustment, pivoting away from prestige-driven capital expenditure towards deliverable priorities.

    Operation Epic Fury changes none of this. The pivot was already under way following the Public Investment Fund’s board review in late 2024, which cut budgets across more than 100 investee companies by up to 60%. However, the Iran war has helped accelerate and clarify the shift.

    Grasping the full picture of this pivot, it is less austere than it might appear. Project awards declined in 2025, but remained above historical averages, resulting in a net gain for the sector.

    Activity generally remains strong. Saudi Arabia’s rail network is expanding on multiple fronts: the Jeddah Metro Blue Line has returned to procurement, while high-speed and national rail projects are advancing. Desalination capacity is forecast to nearly double by 2031, and wind power contract values surged by 175% in 2025. Saudi Aramco is maintaining high capital expenditure in 2026, focused on offshore projects and gas production.

    These programmes may not attract the global attention of a 170-kilometre mirrored city, but they share something gigaprojects often lacked: a clear functional return. Water security, energy diversification, transport connectivity and domestic gas supply are the load-bearing infrastructure of a modern economy. The kingdom is now building that infrastructure again in earnest.

    The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has made the strategic logic of this reorientation even harder to ignore. Glitzy projects do not secure borders. By contrast, a country that cannot guarantee the security of its export corridors is strongly incentivised to invest in infrastructure that supports its domestic economic base and strengthens resilience. Every desalination plant, rail link and gigawatt of renewable capacity reduces Saudi Arabia’s exposure to external shocks.

    The medium-term direction was already clear: capital was being redeployed from speculative projects towards infrastructure with bankable returns. That rationale has now gained additional strategic weight.

    As Saudi Arabia’s project economy matures, what is emerging is less photogenic but far more defensible: the infrastructure backbone that Vision 2030 always required, and that the kingdom’s exposure to regional instability now demands. The Iran war did not create this shift, but it has removed any remaining argument for reversing it.

     

    MEED’s April 2026 report on Saudi Arabia includes:

    > GVT &: ECONOMY: Riyadh navigates a changed landscape
    > BANKING: Testing times for Saudi banks
    > UPSTREAM: Offshore oil and gas projects to dominate Aramco capex in 2026
    > DOWNSTREAM: Saudi downstream projects market enters lean period
    > POWER: Wind power gathers pace in Saudi Arabia
    > WATER: Sharakat plan signals next phase of Saudi water expansion
    > CONSTRUCTION: Saudi construction enters a period of strategic readjustment
    > TRANSPORT: Rail expansion powers Saudi Arabia’s infrastructure push

    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16163037/main.gif
    John Bambridge
  • Remaking construction in Saudi Arabia

    27 March 2026

     

    As the Public Investment Fund (PIF) took a leading role in developing projects following the launch of Vision 2030, it quickly realised that Saudi Arabia’s construction sector needed support if the kingdom was to achieve its broader economic ambitions.

    The PIF’s National Development Division (NDD) is the entity tasked with building capacity and capability in the construction sector to support PIF projects and other strategically important schemes in the kingdom. 

    “Our job is to facilitate the development of the local value chains, which are essential to support the development and operations of PIF portfolio companies,” says Leyla Abdimomunova, head of real estate and construction, National Development Division, PIF.

    The scale of this undertaking requires a multi-front strategy, targeting everything from consultancy services and contracting capacity to raw materials and advanced technologies. 

    “The focus is on design and construction services, building materials, construction equipment and the value chain for all things in construction technology. This work requires engagements with stakeholders within the PIF portfolio: development and contracting companies where PIF has a share,” says Abdimomunova. “We also work closely with governmental stakeholders – including the Ministry of Municipalities & Housing, the Ministry of Investment and the Ministry of Industry & Mineral Resources – alongside our private sector partners, to ensure alignment across the ecosystem. 

    “This collaboration approach is essential to addressing market challenges holistically and creating an environment where businesses can invest, grow and participate more effectively in Saudi Arabia’s development,” she notes.

    Unified strategy 

    The integrated approach was born out of necessity. 

    “When we started this work five years ago, the initial challenge we dealt with was the shortage of the local supply of construction services and materials,” says Abdimomunova.

    To bridge the gap, the NDD looked to both support local players and attract international firms. 

    “The focus was on the localisation of the supply chain, bringing the manufacturing capacity into the kingdom by either expanding the existing capacities of local players or installing new capacity together with local players, but also bringing foreign investments into the country to set up factories,” she says.

    On the services side, the challenge was reputational. Riyadh had to convince the world’s best builders that the Saudi market had fundamentally changed. While courting global giants, the NDD also had to address the fragmentation of the domestic market. 

    “We found that there were two primary obstacles in our portfolio: a high concentration of contractors on one hand, and underutilised capabilities of the local contractors on the other hand.”

    The challenge was moving the large number of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from the periphery to the core of the PIF’s portfolio of projects. 

    “In order to overcome these obstacles, a lot of focus was on attracting international contractors – those that were not working in the kingdom at the time – in order to expand and diversify the pool of contractors, while also putting a lot of effort into building up the capabilities within the local market,” Abdimomunova notes. 

    “The local contracting market is very fragmented. A large proportion of contractors are SMEs, and only the large Saudi contractors are predominantly known inside the kingdom. 

    “We put in place programmes to support the development of the medium-sized contractors and increase their visibility to our development companies,” she says.

    A lot of effort went into making sure contractors have access to financing
    Leyla Abdimomunova, National Development Division, PIF

    The NDD has also introduced practical upskilling and financial tools. “We put in place a few tools, working together with ecosystem partners. For example, the Prequalification Platform, which was launched and is being operated with the Saudi Contractors Authority, [and] contractor upskilling bootcamps that have been delivered by our development companies to provide contractors with the basic understanding needed to be able to bid for projects.

    “A lot of effort went into making sure contractors have access to financing,” Abdimomunova adds.

    Indeed, addressing the finances of the construction sector was another critical area for the NDD. 

    By moving beyond traditional methods and practices, it has introduced more flexible liquidity options for the industry. 

    “We launched the Contractor Financing Programme to expand access to financing and strengthen liquidity for contactors supporting Saudi Arabia’s development pipeline. 

    “In partnership with the National Infrastructure Fund, we introduced guarantee mechanisms to unlock additional bank lending capacity, alongside a new product for the region: surety bonds – as an insurance alternative to traditional bank guarantees,” says Abdimomunova. 

    “Since receiving regulatory approval last year, 34 surety bonds have already been issued, helping contractors participate more effectively in large-scale projects.”

    Adjusting priorities

    With the foundational work established, the NDD is now shifting its focus towards streamlining the experience for international companies and tackling the sector’s long-standing structural hurdles. 

    Looking ahead, the NDD intends to tackle the perennial problems of the industry – payment delays and productivity – to ensure that the transformation of the sector is permanent.

    “Going forwards, our work will go one level deeper, focusing on resolving structural challenges and strengthening the underlying enablers that support private sector participation. 

    “We are working closely with our partners across Saudi Arabia to ensure these improvements are sustainable, scalable and embedded not only within the PIF’s ecosystem, but across the broader national economy,” Abdimomunova concludes. 

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16160974/main.gif
    Colin Foreman
  • Contractor appointed for Morocco grand stadium rail station

    27 March 2026

    Moroccan construction firm Jet Contractors has won a contract to build a railway station at the Grand Stade Hassan II stadium in Benslimane, as part of the Kenitra-Marrakech high-speed rail project.

    The estimated $45m deal was awarded by the Moroccan National Railways Office (ONCF).

    The new station will serve the 115,000-seat Grand Stade Hassan II and will allow passengers to travel from Casablanca and Rabat in 20 minutes using the high-speed rail network.

    It is expected to handle around 12 million passengers a year. Construction of the station is scheduled for completion in 2028.

    Construction work on the main stadium started in June last year, when a joint venture of local contractors Travaux Generaux de Construction de Casablanca and Societe Generale des Travaux du Maroc was awarded a $320m contract for the next stage of works on the stadium. The venue will be one of the hosts for the 2030 Fifa World Cup.

    The stadium is being built on a 100-hectare site in the El-Mansouria area of Benslimane Province, 38 kilometres north of Casablanca.

    Morocco has been investing heavily in upgrading its infrastructure for the football World Cup, which it is co-hosting with Spain and Portugal.

    Morocco was effectively confirmed as a host country alongside Spain and Portugal in October 2023, after the group emerged as the sole bidder for the event. The official selection was announced in December last year.

    Along with building a stadium in Benslimane, the Moroccan government plans to revamp six existing stadiums in Agadir, Casablanca, Fez, Marrakech, Rabat and Tangier, and upgrade air, road and rail projects.

    Last year, Morocco’s transport and logistics minister unveiled a MD96bn ($9.5bn) investment plan to transform the country’s rail infrastructure by 2030.

    The announcement followed the award of about MD20bn-worth of contracts in November 2024 – mostly to local and Chinese firms – for civil works packages on the Marrakech-Kenitra high-speed rail line.

    The link will extend the Al-Boraq railway, a high-speed rail line between Tangier, Rabat and Casablanca. The line started operating in 2018 and was Africa’s first high-speed railway system.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16159882/main.jpg
    Yasir Iqbal
  • March 2026: Data drives regional projects

    27 March 2026

    Click here to download the PDF

    Includes: Commodity tracker | Top 10 global contractors | Brent spot price | Construction output

    MEED’s April 2026 report on Saudi Arabia includes:

    > GVT &: ECONOMY: Riyadh navigates a changed landscape
    > BANKING: Testing times for Saudi banks
    > UPSTREAM: Offshore oil and gas projects to dominate Aramco capex in 2026
    > DOWNSTREAM: Saudi downstream projects market enters lean period
    > POWER: Wind power gathers pace in Saudi Arabia
    > WATER: Sharakat plan signals next phase of Saudi water expansion
    > CONSTRUCTION: Saudi construction enters a period of strategic readjustment
    > TRANSPORT: Rail expansion powers Saudi Arabia’s infrastructure push

    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16146608/main.gif
    MEED Editorial
  • Redefining the region’s arbitration landscape

    27 March 2026

     

    In the midst of increasing international investments and commercial transactions in the Middle East, arbitration remains a key component for the resolution of complex commercial disputes. Its effectiveness, however, depends not only on arbitral tribunals, but also on how national courts define their roles in oversight and enforcement.

    Recent trends in the Middle East have shown a more disciplined judicial approach with a clearer delineation of roles between courts and arbitral tribunals.

    Enforcement: a narrower approach

    Enforcement of foreign awards has been a key area of development.

    In the UAE, the Committee for the Unification of Federal and Local Judicial Principles ruled in Petition No. 1 of 2025 that an award shall be valid and enforceable provided the arbitrators sign only the final page. Referring to earlier Dubai Court of Cassation decisions (1), the Committee noted that procedural rules should not be used to defeat substantive rights and that legal procedures are meant to serve justice, not to create technical barriers. 

    The Dubai Court of Cassation adopted the same approach, confirming that arbitrators are not required to sign every page of the award and that issues already examined during arbitration, including signatory capacity, cannot be reopened at the enforcement stage. (2) 

    A similar emphasis on clarity can be seen in Saudi Arabia, where the Arbitration Law is currently under review, with the aim of modernising the legislative framework and enhancing predictability. The draft reform includes clearer provisions regarding court–tribunal interaction, permits courts to stay annulment proceedings or enforcement challenges for up to 60 days to enable tribunals to cure defects, and confirms that partial and interim awards have the authority of a final judgment and are directly enforceable.

    The ADGM and Dubai Courts have also introduced a system of reciprocal enforcement of ratified arbitral awards without the need to re-examine the underlying award.

    These developments therefore suggest a narrower approach and a reduced scope for expansive review at the enforcement stage.

    Recent trends have shown a more disciplined judicial approach with a clearer delineation of roles between courts and arbitral tribunals

    Judicial intervention: limits of review

    Courts have also refined the scope of annulment and supervisory review.

    The Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation clarified that annulment is not an appeal on the merits. Courts may not reweigh evidence or revisit a tribunal’s interpretation of the law. The grounds of annulment remain limited to the statutory grounds set out in the Federal Arbitration Law. (3)

    Egyptian courts likewise limit grounds for annulment to exhaustively listed statutory grounds, excluding reassessment of the merits.

    In the wider regional landscape, Morocco’s arbitration reform demonstrates a similar trajectory. The updated framework modernises the regime and clarifies the supportive role of domestic courts, reinforcing a structured balance between oversight and arbitral autonomy.

    Across these jurisdictions, review powers are increasingly exercised within defined legal parameters rather than through re-examination of arbitral reasoning.

    Public policy: a limited exception

    Public policy continues to be a ground for refusing enforcement, but recent decisions suggest it is applied with greater restraint. For instance, in the UAE, the imposition of compound interest is not considered to be in contravention of public policy. (4) At the DIFC level, the Court specified that the refusal on public policy grounds is subject to a high standard and is only justified where enforcement would “violate the forum state’s most basic notions of morality and justice”. (5)

    Saudi Arabia recognises sharia compliance and public policy as potential grounds for refusal. While rooted in the foundations of its legal system, they operate within defined statutory boundaries.

    Public policy therefore functions as a defined safeguard rather than a vehicle for broad review.

    Implications for cross-border activity

    Where enforcement review is confined to the grounds set out in the New York Convention and annulment remains limited to statutory bases, the interaction between tribunals and courts becomes more predictable. In disputes involving assets across multiple states, this delineation contributes to greater certainty at the post-award stage.

    The complementary role of the ICC

    Institutional practice operates alongside these developments.

    The ICC Court and its Secretariat ensure proceedings are conducted with care, independence, impartiality and integrity, in strict compliance with the Court’s obligations and duties under its rules. In doing so, the Court and the Secretariat monitor cases to safeguard due process and procedural fairness.

    One of the distinctive features of ICC arbitration and a cornerstone of the Rules is the Court’s scrutiny of all draft awards. Such a process serves to enhance the quality of the award, improve its general accuracy and persuasiveness; and maximise its legal effectiveness by identifying any defects that could be used in an attempt to have it set aside at the place of arbitration or resist its enforcement elsewhere. 

    In complex, multi-contract and multi-jurisdictional disputes, this scrutiny plays an important role in safeguarding enforceability across different jurisdictions. 

    As courts continue to define the limits of intervention, institutional discipline and judicial oversight increasingly operate side by side, reinforcing confidence in arbitration across the Middle East.

    1. Dubai Court of Cassation – Cases No. 109/2022 and No. 403/2020  2. Dubai Court of Cassation – Appeals Nos. 778 and 887 of 2025  3. Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation – Cases Nos. 1115/2024 and No. 166/2024  4. Dubai Court of Cassation – Appeals Nos. 778 and 887 of 2025  5. DIFC Court of Appeal’s decision dated 9 January 2025

    About the author
    Laetitia Rabbat is deputy counsel, ICC International Court of Arbitration, Abu Dhabi

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16145450/main.gif