meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

Egypt is in the eye of Trump’s Gaza storm

14 February 2025

 

Egypt finds itself on the frontline of international geopolitical developments, with US President Donald Trump’s suggestion in late January that the Gaza Strip’s population should be permanently relocated to Jordan, Egypt and other Arab countries to make way for the US to seize and redevelop the land.

“I’d like Egypt to take people, and I’d like Jordan to take people,” said Trump on 25 January.

He reiterated his position on 4 February, telling a press conference with visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Gazans should be moved to a “beautiful area with homes and safety […] so that they can live out their lives in peace and harmony”.

The idea has attracted a wave of condemnation from political leaders around the world, with Egypt being as outspoken in its criticism.

Speaking on 29 January, President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi said the proposed displacement of Palestinians “can never be tolerated or allowed because of its impact on Egyptian national security […]. The deportation or displacement of the Palestinian people is an injustice in which we cannot participate.”

Egypt’s Foreign Ministry then issued a statement on 5 February, following a meeting between Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and Palestinian Prime Minister Mohamad Mustafa in Cairo, in which it said Gaza should be rebuilt “without moving the Palestinians out of the Gaza Strip”.

Trump’s idea threatens to create fresh turmoil at a time when Qatar, Egypt and others have been trying to create a follow-up peace deal between Hamas and Israel, to take the place of the initial agreement that came into effect in January and is due to expire in late May.

Economic instability

The Gaza war has already created huge problems for Egypt, in both security and economic terms. Traffic through the Suez Canal plummeted by more than 75% in 2024, as a result of the attacks on shipping by Yemen’s Houthi forces in the Red Sea. 

In October, Al-Sisi said receipts from Suez traffic were just $870m in the second quarter of the year, compared to $2.54bn for the same period a year earlier. He said Egypt had lost $6bn-$7bn in revenues in the previous 10 months.

According to Alexander Perjessy, a senior credit officer at Moody’s Ratings, the fall in Suez Canal receipts was responsible for “shaving off more than a full percentage point from the overall GDP growth rate”.

The ratings agency expects growth of 4% this year, assuming regional conflicts do not worsen. Even if the neighbourhood remains calmer, growth is likely to remain below the pre-pandemic levels of close to 5% in 2015-19.

Others are predicting similar growth levels for this year. UK-based consultancy Oxford Economics expects the economy to grow by 3.9% in 2025 – in line with Saudi Arabia and just behind the UAE. Inflation should also come down to about 18% – still high, but much lower than the 28% estimated for 2024.

Political stability is crucial for Egypt to attract the support it needs from foreign investors. In late January, Cairo sold $2bn-worth of bonds. The issuance attracted almost $10bn-worth of orders, pointing to healthy levels of investor interest. However, financing costs are rising. Perjessy estimates that interest costs “will increase to about 60% of revenue in 2025, one of the highest levels of the sovereigns we rate.”

The Egyptian economy has been bolstered in recent times by some significant deals, including a major UAE investment in the $24bn Ras El-Hekma project that was announced in February 2024. Cairo also agreed an additional $5bn loan from the Washington-based IMF in March 2024, adding to an existing $3bn IMF package from December 2022.

However, the country’s difficult economic situation has prompted Al-Sisi to warn that the reform package agreed with IMF in return for the loans may have to be reviewed.

“The programme we have agreed upon with the fund … if this challenge will hurt public opinion, that people cannot bear it, we must re-evaluate our situation,” he told a health and human development conference in Cairo on 20 October.

Cairo’s aid cut carveout

Egypt has at least avoided the worst of the cuts to US international aid, which have affected almost every other recipient.

In one of his first acts after regaining the White House, Trump suspended foreign aid payments for 90 days. However, a leaked memo from the State Department said military aid to Egypt and Israel was exempted. Annually, Cairo receives about $1.3bn by this route.

A number of defence deals have also since moved ahead. On 4 February, the State Department approved a $625m programme to modernise the Egyptian Navy’s fast missile craft and a separate $304m sale of a long-range radar system.

Incoming US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has meanwhile offered some soothing words. In a phone call with Foreign Minister Abdelatty on 23 January, Rubio thanked his counterpart for Cairo’s Gaza mediation efforts and also touched on a matter of great importance to Egypt: control of the Nile River.

A State Department readout said that the two had discussed the importance of finding a diplomatic solution to the dispute, which has been prompted by Ethiopia’s building of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Cairo worries the hydroelectric plant will reduce downstream flows that are vital for its survival.

In mid-October, Egypt’s Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly told a water conference in Cairo that the dam threatened the livelihoods of more than 1 million people and could lead to 15% of Egypt’s agricultural land being lost.

The geopolitical problems to the south of Egypt have been somewhat overshadowed by the Gaza crisis, but could yet rise in prominence and raise tensions in other regional countries too. In September, Egypt sent at least two arms shipments to the Somalian government, which is locked in its own dispute with Addis Ababa over the latter’s recognition of the breakaway region of Somaliland.

Even if the Gaza crisis is resolved, there will be plenty of geopolitical issues for officials in Cairo to worry about.

Image: Displaced Palestinians set up their tents next to the Egyptian border

MEED’s March special report on Egypt also includes:

> ECONOMY: Egypt’s economy gets its mojo back
> POWER & WATER: Egypt’s utility projects keep pace
> CONSTRUCTION: Coastal city scheme is a boon to Egypt construction

READ THE FEBRUARY MEED BUSINESS REVIEW

Trump unleashes tech opportunities; Doha achieves diplomatic prowess and economic resilience; GCC water developers eye uptick in award activity in 2025.

Published on 1 February 2025 and distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the February MEED Business Review includes:

> WATER & WASTEWATER: Water projects require innovation
https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/13384457/main.jpg
Dominic Dudley

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Navigating financial markets amid geopolitical fragmentation

    28 December 2025

     

    As we move towards 2026, geopolitical fragmentation is no longer a background risk that occasionally disrupts markets.

    It has become a defining feature of the global financial landscape. Shifting alliances, persistent regional tensions, sanctions and the reconfiguration of supply chains are reshaping how capital flows, how liquidity behaves and how confidence is formed.

    For firms operating in the Middle East, this does not simply mean preparing for more volatility. It means operating in a system where the underlying rules are evolving.

    For much of the past three decades, businesses and investors worked within a broadly convergent global framework. Trade expanded, financial markets deepened and policy coordination – while imperfect – created a sense of predictability. That environment has changed.

    Today, economic decisions are increasingly influenced by strategic alignment, security considerations and political resilience. Markets still function, but they do so in a more fragmented and less forgiving way.

    Shifting landscape

    One of the most important consequences of this shift is that risk no longer travels along familiar paths. In the past, geopolitical events were often treated as temporary shocks layered onto an otherwise stable system.

    Today, they shape the system itself. Trade flows are influenced as much by political compatibility as by cost efficiency. Supply chains, once optimised for speed and scale, are reorganising into regional or allied clusters. Financial markets respond not only to data, but to narratives about stability, alignment and long-term credibility.

    This change places greater pressure on firms that rely on historical relationships to guide decisions. Models built on past correlations – between interest rates and equity markets, or between energy prices and regional growth – are less reliable when markets move between different regimes. The challenge is not simply higher volatility, but the fact that correlations themselves can shift quickly.

    Monetary policy adds a second layer of complexity. Major central banks are no longer moving in step. The US, Europe and parts of Asia face different inflation dynamics and political constraints, leading to diverging interest-rate paths.

    For the GCC, where currencies are largely pegged to the US dollar, this divergence has direct consequences. Local financial conditions are closely tied to decisions taken by the Federal Reserve, even when regional economic conditions follow a different cycle.

    This matters because funding costs, liquidity availability and hedging conditions are shaped by global rather than local forces. When US policy remains tight, dollar liquidity becomes more selective. When expectations shift abruptly, market depth can disappear quickly.

    For firms with international exposure, long-term investment plans, or reliance on external financing, these dynamics require careful management. They cannot be treated as secondary macro considerations.

    Energy markets further complicate the picture. The Middle East remains central to global energy supply, which means geopolitical events often interact with oil prices and financial conditions at the same time.

    When shifts in energy expectations coincide with changes in global interest-rate sentiment, liquidity conditions can tighten rapidly. This interaction is well known in academic research on fixed exchange-rate systems, but its practical implications are often underestimated in corporate planning.

    Expanding vulnerabilities

    These dynamics expose clear vulnerabilities. Concentrated supply chains are more susceptible to disruption. Financing structures dependent on continuous market access are more exposed to sudden repricing. Risk management approaches that assume stable relationships between assets are more likely to disappoint. Operational risks – particularly in technology and data – are increasingly shaped by geopolitical considerations rather than purely technical ones.

    At the same time, the region enters 2026 from a position of relative strength. GCC economies benefit from fiscal buffers, long-term investment programmes and a growing perception of stability compared to other parts of the world. In an environment where uncertainty is widespread, predictability itself becomes valuable. Capital increasingly seeks jurisdictions that combine economic ambition with institutional credibility.

    The question, therefore, is not whether opportunities exist, but whether firms are prepared to capture them responsibly. This requires a shift in how future risks are assessed and embedded into decision-making. Linear forecasts and static plans are insufficient when the environment itself can change state. Scenario thinking must evolve beyond optimistic and pessimistic cases to reflect different combinations of geopolitical alignment, monetary conditions, and supply-chain stability. These scenarios should inform capital allocation, not sit in strategy documents.

    Liquidity and risk management discipline also become central. In both trading and corporate finance, experience shows that many failures stem not from being wrong on direction, but from being overexposed when conditions change. Scaling risk to market conditions, maintaining funding flexibility and understanding how quickly liquidity can evaporate are essential practices. This is as true for corporate balance sheets as it is for trading books.

    Operational resilience must be viewed through the same lens. Supply-chain redundancy, cybersecurity preparedness and data governance are no longer purely operational concerns. They influence financial stability, investor confidence and regulatory trust. In a fragmented world, operational disruptions can quickly translate into financial and reputational damage.

    Facing the future

    As we approach 2026, leadership in the Middle East faces a clear test. The global environment is unlikely to become simpler or more predictable. Firms that continue to rely on assumptions shaped by a different era will find themselves reacting rather than positioning. Those that invest in disciplined risk management, flexible planning and operational resilience will be better placed to navigate uncertainty and to turn volatility into strategic advantage.

    In this environment, risk management is not an obstacle to growth. It is the framework that makes sustainable growth possible.

    Ultimately – and this is an often overlooked critical point – none of these adjustments, whether in scenario planning, liquidity discipline, or operational resilience, can be effective without the right human capital in place. 

    Geopolitical fragmentation and financial volatility are not risks that can be fully addressed through models or policies alone. They require informed judgement, institutional memory and the ability to interpret weak signals before they become material threats or missed opportunities. 

    Firms that succeed in this environment will be those that deliberately invest in corporate knowledge: building internal capabilities where possible and complementing them with external expertise where necessary. This means involving professionals with the right background, cross-market experience and a proven, proactive approach to risk awareness and governance. 

    In a fragmented world, competitive advantage increasingly depends not only on capital or strategy, but on the quality of people entrusted with understanding risk, challenging assumptions and guiding decision-making under uncertainty.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15306336/main.gif
  • Oman’s growth forecast points upwards

    24 December 2025

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15306449/main.gif
    MEED Editorial
  • December 2025: Data drives regional projects

    23 December 2025

    Click here to download the PDF

    Includes: Top inward FDI locations by project volume | Brent spot price | Construction output

    MEED’s January 2026 report on Oman includes:

    > COMMENT: Oman steadies growth with strategic restraint
    > ECONOMY: Oman pursues diversification amid regional concerns
    > BANKING: Oman banks feel impact of stronger economy
    > OIL & GAS: LNG goals galvanise Oman’s oil and gas sector
    > POWER & WATER: Oman prepares for a wave of IPP awards
    > CONSTRUCTION: Momentum builds in construction sector

    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15306140/main.gif
    MEED Editorial
  • Local firm bids lowest for Kuwait substation deal

    22 December 2025

    The local Al-Ahleia Switchgear Company has submitted the lowest price of KD33.9m ($110.3m) for a contract to build a 400/132/11 kV substation at the South Surra township for Kuwait’s Public Authority for Housing Welfare (PAHW).

    The bid was marginally lower than the two other offers of KD35.1m and KD35.5m submitted respectively by Saudi Arabia’s National Contracting Company (NCC) and India’s Larsen & Toubro.

    PAHW is expected to take about three months to evaluate the prices before selecting the successful contractor.

    The project is one of several transmission and distribution projects either out to bid or recently awarded by Kuwait’s main affordable housing client.

    This year alone, it has awarded two contracts worth more than $100m for cable works at its 1Z, 2Z, 3Z and 4Z 400kV substations at Al-Istiqlal City, and two deals totalling just under $280m for the construction of seven 132/11kV substations in the same township.

    Most recently, it has tendered two contracts to build seven 132/11kV main substations at its affordable housing project, west of Kuwait City. The bid deadline for the two deals covering the MS-01 through to MS-08 substations is 8 January.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15305745/main.gif
    Edward James
  • Saudi-Dutch JV awards ‘supercentre’ metals reclamation project

    22 December 2025

    The local Advanced Circular Materials Company (ACMC), a joint venture of the Netherlands-based Shell & AMG Recycling BV (SARBV) and local firm United Company for Industry (UCI), has awarded the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract for the first phase of its $500m-plus metals reclamation complex in Jubail.

    The contract, estimated to be worth in excess of $200m, was won by China TianChen Engineering Corporation (TCC), a subsidiary of China National Chemical Engineering Company (CNCEC), following the issue of the tender in July 2024.

    Under the terms of the deal, TCC will process gasification ash generated at Saudi Aramco’s Jizan refining complex on the Red Sea coast to produce battery-grade vanadium oxide and vanadium electrolyte for vanadium redox flow batteries. AMG will provide the licensed technology required for the production process.

    The works are the first of four planned phases at the catalyst and gasification ash recycling ‘Supercentre’, which is located at the PlasChem Park in Jubail Industrial City 2 alongside the Sadara integrated refining and petrochemical complex.

    Phase 2 will expand the facility to process spent catalysts from heavy oil upgrading facilities to produce ferrovanadium for the steel industry and/or additional battery-grade vanadium oxide.

    Phase 3 involves installing a manufacturing facility for residue-upgrading catalysts.

    In the fourth phase, a vanadium electrolyte production plant will be developed.

    The developers expect a total reduction of 3.6 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions a year when the four phases of the project are commissioned.

    SARBV first announced its intention to build a metal reclamation and catalyst manufacturing facility in Saudi Arabia in November 2019. The kingdom’s Ministry of Investment, then known as the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority (Sagia), supported the project.

    In July 2022, SARBV and UCI signed the agreement to formalise their joint venture and build the proposed facility.

    The project has received support from Saudi Aramco’s Namaat industrial investment programme. Aramco, at the time, also signed an agreement with the joint venture to offtake vanadium-bearing gasification ash from its Jizan refining complex.

    Photo credit: SARBV

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15305326/main.gif
    Edward James