meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

Cop28 keeps 1.5°C goal within reach

20 December 2023

 

The 28th Conference of the Parties of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (Cop28), helmed by the UAE’s Sultan al-Jaber, stopped short of recommending the phasing down of fossil fuels, which was on the wish list of half of the countries that ratified the Paris Agreement eight years earlier, and which were present at the 2023 climate summit in Dubai.

However, the conference scored a major victory by referencing, for the first time since Cop started, the need to transition away from fossil fuels to keep the 1.5-degree-Celsius temperature goal alive.

With few exceptions, the Cop28 UAE climate agreement – or the UAE Consensus, as Al-Jaber prefers to call it – has been described by world leaders as historic.

The UN Framework Convention for Climate Change said the agreement signals the “beginning of the end of the fossil fuel era by laying the ground for a swift, just and equitable transition, underpinned by deep emissions cuts and scaled-up finance”.

“We are standing here in an oil country, surrounded by oil countries, and we made the decision saying let’s move away from oil and gas,” Denmark’s Climate & Energy Minister, Dan Jorgensen, said after the final climate text was adopted on 13 December.

Phasing down or out

After campaigning for the final text of the agreement to exclude the phasing down or phasing out of fossil fuels, reports say that Opec member Saudi Arabia appears satisfied with the outcome.

According to a report by Reuters, Saudi Arabia views the agreement as akin to a menu that allows every country to follow its own pathway to the energy transition.

Opec members account for close to 80 per cent of the world’s proven oil reserves, along with about a third of global oil output. Phasing fossil fuels out threatens the members that have not yet diversified their economies away from oil revenues.

As expected, the least-developed countries and islands that are most vulnerable to climate change wanted more from the Cop28 agreement. 

“It reflects the very lowest possible ambition that we could accept, rather than what we know, according to the best available science, is necessary to urgently address the climate crisis,” said Senegal’s Climate Minister, Madeleine Diouf.

“The agreement highlights the vast gap between developing-country needs and the finance available, as well as underscoring rapidly dwindling fiscal space due to the debt crisis,” she explained. “Yet it fails to deliver a credible response to this challenge.”

Despite opposing views, various research and studies, including those conducted by the International Panel for Climate Change, confirm that human activities – with burning fossil fuels at the top of that list – contribute to global warming to a huge extent.

Taking the carbon from the environment, or replacing fossil fuels with non-carbon emitting alternatives, are seen as a key solution to keep the ocean levels from rising as icebergs dissolve, or to avoid extreme weather events such as droughts or flooding.

Some experts say that even the 1.5-degree-Celsius target will not entirely rule out the more frequent occurrences of catastrophic events, based on today’s environmental scenario, when the temperature is estimated to be at 1.06 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

In September, for example, thousands of lives were lost in Derna, Libya, when a storm swept through the region. Experts said Storm Daniel drew energy from extremely warm seawater in the Mediterranean, causing unexpected heavy rainfall that overwhelmed two dams in the area.

Phasing fossil fuels out threatens Opec members that have not yet diversified their economies away from oil revenues

Next steps

Beyond the initial reactions and responses, many agree that the Cop28 text will provide momentum for a global energy transition, and will have a fair impact on hydrocarbons-producing countries in the Gulf.

A Dubai-based consultant focusing on energy projects and investments tells MEED: “It is a step in the right direction, and if the implementation leads to positive gains, it will allow confidence to deepen.

“There is a lot of talk about how it is watered down with regards to fossil fuel use, but we need to give the Middle Eastern countries the time to transition to new revenue sources, otherwise we only bring economic fragility to an already politically fragile region,” the consultant adds. “That is in nobody’s interest.”

The consultant warns against using the text as an excuse to put new money into polluting projects, however. “We need a more robust methodology for new capital commitment to ensure that it goes into clean projects,” she notes.

Karen Young, a senior research scholar at the Centre on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University in the US, agrees. “I think the final language was obviously a concession to oil and gas producers, but also a push to make them more accountable,” she says.

The language implies a shift in demand. “Gulf producers reason that they will be able to meet the tail-end of that demand curve more efficiently and with fewer emissions than their competitors,” adds Young. 

“That logic has not changed, and the timeline is, of course, totally dependent on technology, finance and how quickly and in what geographies that demand curve moves.”

Over the short term, the Cop28 agreement is not expected to result in any real change to the Gulf economies, except in terms of domestic infrastructure, where momentum will likely grow for more renewables deployment; more carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS); and new investment in – and export of – liquefied natural gas, ammonia and hydrogen.

There will also be continued competition for market share and market management of oil, according to Young. 

Loss and damage

The call to transition away from fossil fuels was not the only accomplishment at Cop28.

The agreement called on the parties to contribute to tripling renewable energy globally and doubling the global annual rate of energy efficiency improvements by 2030, as well as accelerating efforts towards the phase-down of unabated coal power.

It also rallied the parties to reduce methane emissions and accelerate zero- and low-emission technologies, including renewables, nuclear and abatement and removal technologies such as CCUS, particularly in hard-to-abate sectors, as well
as in the production of low-carbon hydrogen.

Equally important, Cop28 managed to secure $89bn in pledges covering climate finance, local climate action and the Loss and Damage Fund.

Lisa Jacobson, president of the US-based Business Council for Sustainable Energy, tells MEED that the agreement on the Loss and Damage Fund early in Cop28 demonstrated a commitment by governments to assist the most vulnerable countries as they cope with the impacts of climate change.

Jacobson, like many others, expects the pledges – which some analysts say equate to only about 0.2 per cent of the necessary funding – to grow in time.

Unlike the funds that focus on climate mitigation and adaptation projects, the Loss and Damage Fund addresses the needs of communities or countries that have already sustained economic losses due to extreme weather events like floods, droughts or wildfires.

“The Loss and Damage Fund operationalisation has been critical … other financing pledges have also been important,” says Jessica Obeid, a partner at New Energy Consult. “Yet the critical factors are the processes [for] eligibility, among others, which remain to be seen, along with moving from pledges to commitments and disbursements. 

“In all cases, the commitments still fall short of the required financing for climate change mitigation and adaptation measures.”

The next step for Cop will have to include developing transparent eligibility and allocation criteria and simplified application processes, as well as building domestic capacity, says Obeid. “Leveraging further financing is also key, and may require institutional and technical assistance.”

Cop28 secured $89bn in pledges covering climate finance, local climate action and the Loss and Damage Fund

Coalition of the willing 

Despite Cop28’s historic substance and intent, a healthy dose of cynicism remains. “Cop has been around for nearly 30 years, yet emissions have continued to increase year after year,” a UAE-based business leader tells MEED.

From this vantage point, the forging of a coalition of the willing – or several coalitions of the willing – could be the best way to deliver the energy transition without exceeding the 1.5-degree-Celsius temperature goal.

An example of this is the more than 125 countries that have signed on to the pledge to triple renewable energy capacity globally and double the energy efficiency improvement rates by 2030. While such agreements are non-binding, a willing coalition will help encourage others to pursue those pledges. 

“That is an example of a coalition having a strong impact and working effectively to elevate the issue they are advocating for, and creating a platform for countries and stakeholders to identify emission reduction and adaptation strategies,” concludes Jacobson.

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/11376263/main.jpg
Jennifer Aguinaldo

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Gas demand reshapes priorities

    31 October 2025

    Commentary
    Colin Foreman
    Editor

    Read the November issue of MEED Business Review

    Gas has increasingly been regarded as a crucial transition fuel over the past decade as governments race to cut carbon emissions and meet climate pledges – including the Paris Agreement’s aim to keep warming well below 2°C and pursue efforts to limit it to 1.5°C.

    Those commitments have driven the demand for liquefied natural gas (LNG) globally and this has reshaped investment priorities across the region, with Qatar, Oman and the UAE eyeing future export growth.

    QatarEnergy’s North Field expansion is the largest investment. The estimated $40bn programme will push Qatar’s LNG output towards 142 million tonnes a year by the end of this decade, almost doubling its present position and consolidating its role as a market anchor.

    Abu Dhabi is also committed to expanding its capacity. Its downstream strategies include a major greenfield LNG terminal at Ruwais, due to enter service in 2028 with two 4.8 million t/y trains adding 9.6 million t/y to the UAE’s export capability.

    These programmes are keeping contractors busy. Over the past five years, more than $44bn of LNG-related contracts have been awarded in the region – which is more than eight times the $5.3bn recorded in the previous five year period.

    At the same time, there are ample opportunities for contractors as other countries in the region build import infrastructure. Projects are already under way in Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, Algeria and Morocco – and more are expected.

    With base load concerns remaining for many countries when it comes to completely switching to renewables, gas is expected to be a fuel of choice for the decades to come. The investments made in production capacity mean the region will play a pivotal role in delivering the world’s energy needs.

    READ THE NOVEMBER 2025 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Mena players up the ante in global LNG production race; Investment takes UAE non-oil economy from strength to strength; Project finance activity draws international lenders back to market

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the November 2025 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/14992876/main.gif
    Colin Foreman
  • Dubai evaluates Al-Maktoum airport substructure bids

    31 October 2025

     

    Dubai Aviation Engineering Projects (DAEP) is evaluating the bids it received from contractors on 15 September for substructure works for the first phase of the expansion of Al-Maktoum International airport.

    “The bid evaluation is ongoing and the project is expected to be awarded by the end of this year,” sources close to the project told MEED.

    MEED understands that the bidders include:

    • Alec (local)
    • China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (China)
    • China State Construction Engineering Corporation (China)
    • China Harbour Engineering Company (China)
    • Dutco Construction (local)
    • Innovo (local)
    • Limak / PowerChina (Turkiye/China)
    • Shapoorji Pallonji (India)
    • Webuild / Tristar (Italy/local)

    According to an official description on DAEP’s website, the expanded airport’s West Terminal will be a seven-level, 800,000-square-metre facility with an annual capacity of 45 million passengers.

    It will be the second of three terminals at Al-Maktoum International airport, linked to the airside by a 14-station automated people-mover (APM) system.

    In August, MEED exclusively reported that DAEP had received bids from firms to build the APM at Al-Maktoum airport. 

    The system will run under the apron of the entire airfield and the airport’s terminals. It will consist of several tracks, taking passengers from the terminals to the concourses.

    Four underground stations will be built as part of the first phase. The overall plan includes 14 stations across the airport.

    The airport’s construction is planned to be undertaken in three phases. The airport will cover an area of 70 square kilometres (sq km) south of Dubai and will have five parallel runways, five terminal buildings and 400 aircraft gates.

    It will be five times the size of the existing Dubai International airport and will have the world’s largest passenger-handling capacity of 260 million passengers a year. For cargo, it will have the capacity to handle 12 million tonnes a year.

    Construction progress

    Construction on the first phase has already begun. In May, MEED exclusively reported that DAEP had awarded a AED1bn ($272m) deal to UAE firm Binladin Contracting Group to construct the second runway at the airport.

    The enabling works on the terminal are also ongoing and are being undertaken by Abu Dhabi-based Tristar E&C.

    While speaking to the press on the sidelines of the Airport Show in Dubai in May, Khalifa Al-Zaffin, executive chairman of Dubai Aviation City Corporation, said the government of Dubai will award more packages this year, including for the APM and baggage handling systems.

    “Several other packages are expected to be tendered this year, including the terminal substructure, 132kV substations and district cooling plants,” Al-Zaffin said.

    Construction works on the project’s first phase are expected to be completed by 2032.

    The government approved the updated designs and timelines for its largest construction project in April 2024.

    In a statement, the authorities said the plan is for all operations from Dubai International airport to be transferred to Al-Maktoum International within 10 years.

    The statement added that the project will create housing demand for 1 million people around the airport.

    In September last year, MEED exclusively reported that a team comprising Austria’s Coop Himmelb(l)au and Lebanon’s Dar Al-Handasah had been confirmed as the lead masterplanning and design consultants on the expansion of Al-Maktoum airport.

    Project history

    The expansion of Al-Maktoum International, also known as Dubai World Central (DWC), is a long-standing project. It was officially launched in 2014, with a different design from the one approved in April 2024. At that time, it involved building the biggest airport in the world by 2050, with the capacity to handle 255 million passengers a year.

    An initial phase, due to be completed in 2030, involved increasing the airport’s capacity to 130 million passengers a year. The development was to cover an area of 56 sq km.

    Progress on the project slipped as the region grappled with the impact of lower oil prices and Dubai focused on developing the Expo 2020 site. Tendering for work on the project then stalled with the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic in early 2020.

    READ THE NOVEMBER 2025 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Mena players up the ante in global LNG production race; Investment takes UAE non-oil economy from strength to strength; Project finance activity draws international lenders back to market

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the November 2025 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/14991651/main.jpg
    Yasir Iqbal
  • Libya oil project expected to progress despite Petrofac collapse

    31 October 2025

     

    The tender process for Libya’s 6J North Gialo oil field development project is expected to progress following Petrofac’s announcement that it has gone into administration, according to industry sources.

    UK-based Petrofac is one of just two companies that submitted bids for the project. The other is Egypt-based Petrojet.

    In September, MEED revealed that the bids had been submitted for the project and were under evaluation.

    The client on the project is Libya’s Waha Oil Company and Petrofac completed the front-end engineering and design (feed) for the project in 2020.

    Waha is a joint venture of Libya’s National Oil Corporation (NOC), France’s TotalEnergies and US-based ConocoPhillips.

    Commenting on the impact of Petrofac’s insolvency, one industry source said: “This has definitely increased uncertainty for the project.

    “It could potentially mean that this contract is retendered, but there is a lot of confidence that this tender will still go ahead in some form.

    “Waha Oil and Libya’s NOC have made it clear that this project is a priority and they want it to go ahead.

    “Progress is still expected on this tender, but it is possible that there will be more delays before this contract is awarded and signed.”

    The 6J North Gialo field development project is part of a series of tenders that are collectively expected to be worth $1bn.

    The three projects are:

    • NC98
    • Gialo 3
    • 6J North Gialo

    All three projects will develop Libyan reservoirs that have not yet been tapped.

    The 6J North Gialo project was the first to be tendered and it is expected to be followed by NC98, with the Gialo 3 project likely to be tendered last.

    Together, the projects are expected to double Waha’s production from about 300,000 barrels a day (b/d) of oil to 600,000 b/d. The Waha concession covers 13 million acres.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/14990491/main.png
    Wil Crisp
  • Firms prepare project management bids for Dorra gas scheme

    31 October 2025

    Engineering firms are preparing to submit bids to Al-Khafji Joint Operations (KJO) for a tender covering project management consultancy (PMC) for the multibillion-dollar Dorra gas field facilities development project.

    MEED reported in March that KJO was pushing forward with a major project to produce gas from the Dorra offshore field, located in Gulf waters in the Neutral Zone shared by Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

    KJO has divided the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) scope of work on the project to produce gas from the Dorra field into four EPC packages – three offshore and one onshore.

    The broad scope of services under the tender involves providing PMC for EPC works for the Dorra gas facilities development project.

    KJO issued the tender for PMC services for EPC works on the Dorra gas facilities development project on 29 September. Engineering firms have until 24 November to submit bids for the tender, sources told MEED.

    According to sources, the following firms, among others, are understood to be bidding for the PMC tender:

    • Fluor (US)
    • KBR (US)
    • Kent (Saudi Arabia/UAE)
    • Tecnicas Reunidas (Spain)
    • Wood (UK)
    • Worley (Australia)

    KJO hosted a job explanation meeting with the bidders for the tender on 15 October, as per sources.

    ALSO READ: Saudi Arabia and Kuwait accelerate Dorra gas field development

    MEED recently reported that Indian contractor Larsen & Toubro Energy Hydrocarbon (L&TEH) has won the main EPC contract for offshore package 1 of the Dorra gas field facilities project.

    The contract awarded by KJO to L&TEH is estimated to be valued between $140m and $150m, sources told MEED.

    In August, MEED reported that L&TEH had emerged as the frontrunner to win offshore package 1 of the Dorra gas field facilities project, based on KJO's initial bid evaluation.

    Contractors submitted bids for the package by a deadline of 2 June, it was previously reported.

    With regards to the other three EPC packages of the Dorra gas field offshore and onshore facilities project, the following contractors are understood to be among those bidding:

    • Lamprell (Saudi Arabia/UAE)
    • Larsen & Toubro Energy Hydrocarbon (India)
    • McDermott (US)
    • NMDC Energy (UAE)
    • Saipem (Italy)

    Contractors are currently working towards a bid submission deadline of 31 October for the project's other three EPC packages – offshore packages 2A and 2B and onshore package 3, according to sources.

    The previous bid submission deadlines for the three packages were 30 June, 31 July, 25 August and 15 September.

    The EPC scope of work on the packages of the Dorra gas field offshore and onshore facilities project is as follows:

    Package 2A – Dorra gas field wellhead topsides, flowlines and umbilicals

    • Seven gas wellhead platforms or topsides, with production routed to the central gathering platform
    • Corrosion-resistant, alloy-lined intra-field flowlines and umbilicals connecting the gas wellhead platforms to the central gathering platform and the auxiliary platform

    Package 2B: Dorra central gathering platform complex, export pipelines and cables

    • Central gathering platform
    • Auxiliary platform
    • Dorra accommodation platform
    • Flare platform
    • Bridge platform
    • Pipelines for gas and condensate transmission to each shareholder
    • Produced water pipeline from the central gathering platform to Al-Khafji field and from the planned onshore processing facility next to the Al-Zour refinery in Kuwait to Al-Khafji field
    • Recovered monoethylene glycol (MEG) pipeline from Al-Khafji field to the central gathering platform
    • Control and power system linking Al-Khafji onshore facilities to offshore units
    • Offshore central control room at Dorra accommodation platform

    Package 3: Onshore gas processing facilities

    • Buildings to be constructed as part of KJO’s Dorra project onshore package include:
      • Dorra control building
      • Operator building
      • Operations, maintenance and engineering building
      • Process interface building
      • Onshore 115/69kV substation
      • Two gas-insulated substations
      • Warehouse
      • Maintenance building
      • Mosque
      • Telecommunications tower radio building
      • Beach valve substation at the planned onshore processing facility next to the Al-Zour refinery in Kuwait
         
    • Processing facilities for KJO's onshore package:
      • Produced water receiving and treatment
      • Sour water stripping and treated water system
      • Rich MEG storage tank
      • MEG regeneration and reclamation
      • Recovered hydrocarbons system
      • Lean MEG storage and supply
      • Fresh MEG storage and supply
      • Beach valve stations at Al-Khafji and Al-Zour
         
    • Utilities:
      • Instrument and plant air system
      • Nitrogen generation system
      • Diesel storage and distribution system
      • Fuel gas system
      • Closed drain and slop tank system
      • Hazardous area open drains system
      • Industrial water system
      • Drinking water system
      • Flare gas recovery system and a low-pressure flare system
      • Fire water system
      • Emergency diesel generator
      • Sewage treatment

    The Dorra field is estimated to hold 20 trillion cubic metres of gas and 310 million barrels of oil.

    Kuwait and Saudi Arabia have been working together to develop the offshore field since it was discovered in 1965. The two sides expect to produce about 1 billion cubic feet a day of gas from the asset and have agreed to split the gas output equally.

    A geopolitical tussle over ownership of the asset has hampered progress.

    Iran, which calls the field Arash, claims that it partially extends into its territory and that Tehran should be a stakeholder in any development project. 

    Kuwait and Saudi Arabia maintain that the Dorra field lies entirely in the waters of their shared territory, known as the Neutral Zone or Divided Zone, and that Iran has no legal basis for its claim. 

    In February 2024, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia reiterated their claim to the Dorra field in a joint statement issued during an official meeting in Riyadh between Kuwaiti Emir Sheikh Mishal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah and Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed Bin Salman Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud.

    KJO, which is jointly owned by Saudi Aramco subsidiary Aramco Gulf Operations Company and Kuwait Gulf Oil Company, a subsidiary of state-owned Kuwait Petroleum Corporation (KPC), is understood to have issued the tenders for the project in August 2024.

    MEED reported in September 2023 that Aramco and KPC had selected France’s Technip Energies to carry out front-end engineering and design (feed) and pre-feed work on the Dorra offshore field development project.

    The original feed work for a project to develop the field was performed more than a decade ago. However, due to changes in technology, the engineering design needed to be updated before the project could reach a final investment decision.

    ALSO READ: Kent wins feed contract for Khafji desalter plant upgrade
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/14989042/main1446.jpg
    Indrajit Sen
  • Oman invites consultancy bids for wind and solar IPPs

    31 October 2025

    Oman state offtaker Nama Power & Water Procurement Company (Nama PWP) has invited bids for financial and commercial consultancy services for the development of renewable energy independent power producer (IPP) projects in Oman.

    The tender, referenced under OPWP/2025/039, covers planned solar and wind projects.

    The bid submission deadline is 13 November.

    According to the company, the selected consultant will advise on structuring, financial modelling, risk assessment and transaction support for the procurement of future renewable IPP projects.

    Nama PWP, part of the government-owned Nama Group, has been driving the country’s energy transition through multiple solar and wind IPPs in Dhofar, Ibri, Manah and other regions.

    In October, it issued a separate tender for supervisory consultancy services for the Duqm, Sadah and Mahout wind IPPs.

    The bid submission deadline is 20 November.

    The three IPPs are part of Nama PWP's plans to procure five wind power stations with a combined capacity of 1,171MW.

    The planned schemes and their capacities are:

    • Dhofar 2: 132MW
    • Sadah: 99MW
    • Duqm: 270MW
    • Mahout: 400MW
    • Jaalan Bani Bu Ali: 270MW

    MEED understands that the deadline for supervisory consultancy services bids for the Dhofar 2 and Jaalan Ban Bu Ali projects has now closed and these bids are in the evaluation stage.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/14982749/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall