meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

Cop28 focuses energy transition spotlight on UAE

28 February 2023

 

Global climate negotiators, civil society groups, entrepreneurs and journalists will descend on Dubai’s Expo City in November for the 28th Conference of the Parties (Cop28) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, putting the UAE at the centre and in charge of the annual climate talks.

UAE Vice President, Prime Minister and Ruler of Dubai, Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, has said Cop28 is the most important event the UAE will host in 2023. It is hard to argue otherwise.

Cop28 is expected to follow through with the implementation of a breakthrough loss-and-damage fund to help the most vulnerable countries address climate change, which was included for the first time in a Cop agreement last year.

It will conclude the first global stocktake, an assessment of the progress each country has made against the goals of the Paris Agreement, signed in 2016 by 195 nations, with the aim of keeping the mean global temperature rise to below 2 degrees Celsius compared with pre-industrial levels.

Contrasting agendas

Under the auspices of a state whose wealth was built for the most part on oil, negotiators are expected to lock horns over the policies, technologies and funding platforms best placed to enable climate mitigation and adaptation, and to wean the world off fossil fuels.

The relevance of the UAE's leadership in this year's Cop negotiations reflects the dilemma between meeting climate targets and a world that cannot yet live without hydrocarbons

It is not the first time an Opec member will host a Cop event – Qatar and Indonesia hosted them in 2012 and 2013, respectively. However, the appointment of Abu Dhabi oil chief and UAE climate envoy Sultan al-Jaber as Cop28 president-designate caused an uproar among environment and climate advocacy groups in January.

“I thought someone from outside the conventional energy sector would have given more credibility to the event,” an independent consultant tells MEED.

Despite this, commentators have also noted the UAE’s strategic clout and potential to act as a bridge between the affluent and developed countries increasingly referred to as the global north, such as the US, EU states, Russia and Japan, and the economically challenged countries in the global south, which includes swathes of Asia, Africa and Latin America.

The UAE maintains close economic and political ties with the majority of the countries in both groups, which largely have contrasting geopolitical, economic and energy profiles, as well as climate agendas.

According to Frank Wouters, director of the EU GCC Clean Energy Network and senior vice-president of Reliance Industries, the UAE, as one of the biggest donors of official development aid (ODA), can provide credibility and leadership in the effort to mobilise badly needed global capital towards climate change mitigation and adaptation efforts.

For instance, at Cop15 in Denmark in 2009, developed countries committed to a collective goal of mobilising $100bn a year for climate action in developing countries by 2020. 

The goal was formalised at Cop16 in Mexico, and reiterated at Cop21 in France, with the timeline extended to 2025.

The latest available figure in 2020 stood at $83.3bn. “The reality is that this has not happened,” says Wouters. “So more can and should be done.”

With the UAE consistently rated among the countries with the highest ODA against gross national income, Cop28 is expected to provide further impetus to reaching this collective goal – one of the tangible outcomes most negotiators have hoped for at previous Cop events.

Low-carbon fuels as the next LNG

A seat at the table

Despite the somewhat counter-intuitive proposition of giving petroleum-exporting countries a seat at the Cop negotiating table, the move is an important one, another expert tells MEED.

Mhamed Biygautane, a lecturer in public policy at the University of Melbourne, says these countries’ involvement in early discussions and negotiations is critical for any resultant decisions to have a meaningful impact on the ground.

“Petroleum states can make or break any climate-change negotiations because their interests are obviously at stake here,” he says.  

“This is particularly the case for GCC states, whose economies rely heavily on oil rents and any reductions in oil exports will most certainly adversely affect their economies.”

Karen Young, senior research scholar at Columbia University’s Centre on Global Energy Policy, also points out the importance of considering the major difference in the politics of energy transition between national oil companies such as those based in Abu Dhabi and Saudi Arabia, and international oil companies such as BP and Shell.

“The state and the firm are linked, so energy policy … can include an emphasis on carbon capture and storage (CCS), on cleaner production and simultaneously on investments in renewables and economic statecraft – to deploy investment and technology to partner states that are both profitable and strategic in foreign relations,” Young says.

For example, the UAE has two national champions, Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc) and clean energy firm Masdar, which in a different framework could be seen as a contradiction.

According to Young, the UAE is managing the energy transition with a goal of not just state survival, but of dominance across energy markets, technology and political ties across a broad geography.

This suggests that the UAE sees Cop28 as an opportunity not just to set a climate agenda, but also to put the country in a strong economic and political leadership position for decades.

Greenwashing fears

Significantly, 2022 was a year of record profits for global and national oil majors, as the war in Ukraine depressed supply and inflated prices.

 Aramco earns $42.4bn profit in third quarter

While oil firms around the world will continue to invest in renewables, some experts say they are likely to reinvest a significant amount in conventional hydrocarbons development due to robust oil demand, regardless of climate objectives.

This has reinforced fears of widespread greenwashing, or oil majors walking back on their net-zero targets, an issue commonly raised by advocacy groups at Cop events.

“Greenwashing is real, but ultimately it is not a useful framework,” says Young. “There is oil demand. There will continue to be oil demand. What matters is how we produce and transport it and, simultaneously, with purposeful government policy, reduce demand by creating incentives to use renewable energy and increase the costs of continuing to use oil.”

Biygautane also says stronger monitoring and international conventions with more powers for sanctions and penalties are necessary to deter businesses within and outside the hydrocarbons industry from making promises they will not honour.

Another expert points out the urgent need to focus on deploying clean technologies other than renewable energy, and to decarbonise sectors other than power, such as transport and buildings, along with the need for a bigger focus on transmission and distribution within the power sector.

“The major shortcoming remains in ensuring the required financing is there, which requires collective action from governments, corporates, financing and development institutions, in addition to individual behaviour and action,” says Jessica Obeid, academy associate at think tank Chatham House’s energy, environment and resources programme in London.

“It takes a village to achieve a serious sustainable transformation of our energy systems … requirements are many and efforts are only a few,” she says.

Resource allocation

For the GCC states, where historical data has pointed to a significant discrepancy between hydrocarbons production and clean energy investments, this will mean more resource allocation is required.

For example, data from regional projects tracker MEED Projects shows that the value of wind, solar and waste-to-energy generation contracts equates to a mere 10 per cent of the $254bn-worth of contracts awarded across the GCC states’ oil and gas sectors over the past 10 years, excluding investments made by GCC-based investors and developers overseas.

When it comes to projects in the advanced procurement stage, the ratio of renewable energy projects more than doubles, at 24 per cent against the value of oil and gas schemes. 

This provides a positive market signal that could further improve if a portion of the GCC economic vision-related renewable energy schemes, carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) and clean hydrogen projects move into procurement.

While this improvement may not prove to be enough to appease all climate change advocates, the clear policy convergence on clean hydrocarbons production between the UAE, Oman, Saudi Arabia and, to a lesser extent, Kuwait, is

significant. It could help to further drive the gradual uncoupling of their economies from fossil fuels over the coming years or decades. 

Columbia University’s Young concludes: “Which states ride the coattails of the UAE in this Cop and its subsequent agenda will be interesting to watch.” 

Technology and teamwork are critical if a low-carbon future is to be secured, says Mubadala's Saed Arar

Spotlight on the UAE

The UAE has been building up its green and clean energy base and working on energy transition objectives for some time. It set an energy diversification agenda in 2017 and was the first Middle East country to declare a target of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. 

The Abu Dhabi Energy Department has launched regulations covering waste-to-energy, electric vehicles and clean energy certificates, along with energy-efficiency initiatives that include building retrofits. 

The UAE’s clean energy installed capacity, including three units of the Barakah nuclear power plant, stood at 7.6GW as of December. It is also finalising its green hydrogen roadmap.

Pragmatic transition

The growing number of new projects involving Masdar, which Al-Jaber chairs, forms part of the UAE’s pragmatic energy transition strategy. This involves developing and expanding nuclear and renewable energy and hydrogen capacity in addition to expanding its hydrocarbons output.

Adnoc and Abu Dhabi National Energy (Taqa) have taken control of Masdar, whose operations have been split into separate renewable energy and green hydrogen businesses. The firm aims to have 100GW of renewable installed capacity and 1 million tonnes of green hydrogen by 2030.

“Adnoc is the only national oil company (NOC) to pursue renewable merger and acquisition, buying into the H2Teeside hydrogen project in the UK alongside BP,” notes Kavita Jadhav, research director, corporate research at UK-based Wood MacKenzie. “Its investments in low-carbon energy will increase, and it may also make further international acquisitions in hydrogen; CCUS; and solar, in a wave that could be similar to the rush of activity seen in the UK and Europe in the run-up to Cop26.”

Jadhav predicts the UAE and wider Middle East could have a similar eureka moment to the Inflation Reduction Act in the US, which promises a boom time for hydrogen, CCS and solar.

“A lot can happen when you have the spotlight on you,” she says.
https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/10590455/main.gif
Jennifer Aguinaldo

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Saudi Arabia’s private sector steps up

    4 March 2026

    Commentary
    Colin Foreman
    Editor

    Read the March issue of MEED Business Review

    At the Future Investment Initiative (FII) in Riyadh in 2019, a head of a regional family business voiced a guarded concern. The worry was that the scale and speed of the Public Investment Fund’s (PIF’s) projects were crowding out the private sector, leaving little space for traditional players to compete.

    Fast forward more than six years and much has changed. In 2026, the era of the PIF acting as the principal driver for development is giving way to a new phase where the private sector is taking a more active role.

    At February’s Private Sector Forum (PSF), officials acknowledged that the kingdom’s priorities have evolved since 2016. This has led to reprioritisation, including the indefinite postponement of the 2029 Asian Winter Games in Trojena and the scaling back of projects such as The Line – moves framed as strategic adjustments amid global economic uncertainty.

    With the 2034 Fifa World Cup and Expo 2030 on the horizon, alongside the rapid ascent of artificial intelligence, Riyadh is right to realign its capital. It is far more reassuring to see a government adapt its strategy to a changing global economy than to blindly pursue an outdated plan. The PIF, now managing $913bn in assets, is seeking ‘escape velocity’, allowing sectors such as tourism and real estate to stand independently.

    The private sector is beginning to respond. Recent agreements signed at the PSF – ranging from King Salman International airport’s mixed-use developments to Roshn’s logistics partnership with Agility – show that local and regional firms are rising to the challenge.

    There is still work to be done. Some sectors are more ready for investment than others, and scaling back projects has dented the confidence of some investors.

    But overall, the tide is turning. The crowding out fears of 2019 have been replaced by a drive to get the private sector more involved, and while it will take time for momentum to fully develop, the process of passing the baton has already begun.

    READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Riyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15842555/main.gif
    Colin Foreman
  • Etihad Rail conducts passenger rail trial run in Abu Dhabi

    4 March 2026

    Etihad Rail, the UAE’s national rail operator, has carried out a passenger train trial on the line linking Al-Ghuwaifat station at the Saudi border with Al-Faya station in Abu Dhabi.

    The test was organised in coordination with the Emergencies, Crises and Disasters Management Centre Abu Dhabi (ADCMC).

    In a statement, ADCMC said the exercise is intended to help maintain essential services and offer safe, dependable transport options as conditions change.

    It also highlighted the route’s strategic value in supporting movement for citizens and residents, while giving authorities the ability to activate alternate corridors in line with approved emergency response plans.

    ADCMC added that running this route with Etihad Rail fits within a wider set of coordinated measures designed to reinforce logistical security, aligned with business continuity planning and multi-scenario risk management frameworks.

    The UAE’s first national passenger rail network is due to begin operations soon, using the existing 900-kilometre (km) railway stretching from Al-Ghuwaifat to Fujairah.

    The system will include 11 stations. Early services are expected to connect Mohammed Bin Zayed City (Abu Dhabi), Jumeirah Golf Estates (Dubai), University City (Sharjah) and Al-Hilal (Fujairah).

    Other stops include Al-Sila’, Al-Dhannah, Al-Mirfa, Madinat Zayed, Mezaira’a and Al-Faya in Abu Dhabi, along with Al-Dhaid in Sharjah.

    The passenger fleet is planned to include 13 trains, each with a capacity for up to 400 passengers.

    Target travel times include 57 minutes between Abu Dhabi and Dubai, 105 minutes from Abu Dhabi to Fujairah, and 70 minutes from Abu Dhabi to Ruwais.

    On the operations side, Etihad Rail and France’s Keolis agreed in October 2025 to form a joint venture to oversee passenger services.

    In June 2022, Etihad Rail awarded Spain’s CAF Group a AED1.2bn ($327m) contract covering the design, manufacture, supply and maintenance of the passenger trains.

    Freight services are already running, with operations spanning 11 terminals: Ruwais Inland Terminal, Ruwais Port, ICAD, Khalifa Port, Dubai Industrial City, Jebel Ali Port, Al-Ghail Dry Port, Fujairah Port, Ghuwaifat Terminal, Shah Terminal and Habshan Terminal.

    READ THE MARCH 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Riyadh urges private sector to take greater role; Chemical players look to spend rationally; Economic uptick lends confidence to Cairo’s reforms.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the March 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15854553/main.jpg
    Yasir Iqbal
  • Iraq’s Atrush and Sarsang oil fields stop production due to Iran conflict

    4 March 2026

    Production has stopped at the Atrush and Sarsang blocks in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, and output has been slashed at key fields in the south of the country.

    Canada-based ShaMaran Petroleum Corporation, which holds stakes in Atrush and Sarsang, said that production had stopped at both fields as a precautionary measure due to “the deterioration in the regional security environment” related to the US and Israel’s conflict with Iran.

    ShaMaran holds a 50% working interest in the Atrush Block and an 18% working interest in the Sarsang Block.

    Erbil-headquartered HKN Energy is also a partner in both fields.

    Prior to the latest shutdown, in the company’s most recent quarterly report, it said that Atrush had produced an average of 29,400 barrels a day (b/d) over the three-month period, and Sarsang produced 18,200 b/d.

    Due to the field closures in Iraqi Kurdistan, it has been reported that exports to the Turkish port of Ceyhan via the Iraq-Turkiye pipeline have fallen to zero while all of the crude produced in the region is used domestically.

    Iraq’s Rumaila field, in the south of the country, is also being severely impacted by the ongoing conflict.

    On 3 March, the decision was taken to completely stop production at the South Rumaila field, after Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps declared the Strait of Hormuz closed.

    The Rumaila oil field, which is made up of North Rumaila and South Rumaila, is the second-biggest oil field in the world.

    The oil field normally has the capacity to produce around 1.2 million b/d, but has cut production by at least 700,000 b/d due to overloaded storage.

    Also in the south of the country, there have been cuts to production at the West Qurna-2 and Maysan fields.

    Several other Iraqi oil and gas fields have shut down recently amid the US and Israel’s ongoing war with Iran.

    The Shaikan field in northern Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan region has stopped production due to security concerns.

    The field is operated by London-listed Gulf Keystone Petroleum, which has said in a statement that it had “temporarily shut-in production operations and has taken measures to protect staff in light of the developing regional security environment”.

    Shaikan is one of Iraqi Kurdistan’s largest producing fields and produced more than 41,500 barrels a day in 2025.

    The production stoppage at Shaikan came days after gas production was halted at Iraqi Kurdistan’s Khor Mor field on 28 February.

    UAE-based Dana Gas stopped supplying power plants from the field due to the “abnormal situation and war taking place in the area”, according to a joint statement from the Kurdistan region’s natural resources and electricity ministries.

    The gas halt is expected to cut electricity generation capacity by 2,500-3,000MW, with authorities seeking alternative supply to limit the shortfall, the ministries said.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15853790/main.jpg
    Wil Crisp
  • Iraq under pressure as oil exports slashed

    4 March 2026

    Analysis
    Wil Crisp
    Oil & gas reporter

    Iraq’s oil and gas sector is facing mounting challenges as production levels drop sharply amid the US and Israel’s ongoing war with Iran.

    In the south of the country, oil exports have been paralysed by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and, in the country’s northern region of Iraqi Kurdistan, exports via the Iraq-Turkiye Pipeline (ITP) have fallen to zero.

    Industry insiders are expecting the impact to be felt for some time to come.

    On 2 March, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said the Strait of Hormuz is closed and warned that any vessel attempting to pass through will be attacked.

    Ebrahim Jabari, a senior adviser to the IRGC’s commander-in-chief, said: “The strait is closed. If anyone tries to pass, the heroes of the Revolutionary Guard and the regular navy will set those ships ablaze.”

    Stakeholders in Iraq’s oil and gas sector believe that the closure of the Strait by Iran is likely to have a long-term impact on companies operating in the south of the country.

    One source said: “The outlook for the companies operating in the south is very bad right now.

    “Potentially, a lot of companies in the south are going to be very anxious about the Strait of Hormuz for a very long time.

    “There are hardly any other export routes they can use, and even if Iran’s military capabilities are substantially eroded, it’s going to be very hard to defend ships that are passing through there.”

    On 3 March, the decision was taken to completely stop production at the South Rumaila field, after Iran’s IRGC declared the Strait of Hormuz closed.

    The Rumaila oil field, which is made up of North Rumaila and South Rumaila, is the second-biggest oil field in the world.

    The oil field normally has the capacity to produce 1.2 million barrels a day (b/d), but has cut production by at least 700,000 b/d due to overloaded storage.

    Also in the south of the country, there have been cuts to production at the West Qurna 2 and Maysan fields.

    Pipeline problem

    The main export route for oil producers in Iraqi Kurdistan is the ITP.

    This key pipeline, which reopened on 27 September last year, was closed again after production from the region dropped dramatically due to multiple oil fields closing as a safety precaution.

    The fields that have temporarily stopped production include the Atrush and Sarsang fields.

    Canada-based ShaMaran Petroleum Corporation, which holds stakes in both fields, said that the closures were due to “the deterioration in the regional security environment”.

    On top of this, the Iraqi Kurdistan’s Shaikan field, which London-listed Gulf Keystone Petroleum operates, has stopped production due to security concerns.

    Shaikan is one of Iraqi Kurdistan’s largest producing fields and produced more than 41,500 b/d in 2025.

    “When it comes to the outlook for future oil exports, the calculation is completely different for these companies in Iraqi Kurdistan compared to the companies in the south of the country,” said one source.

    “It’s possible that the pipeline will be easier to open in the near future than the Strait of Hormuz.

    “It’s not so close to Iran and, so far, no damage has been sustained by the pipeline or the oil fields.

    “With prices so high right now, everyone involved in exporting oil via the pipeline is highly motivated to see it restarted.”

    The disruption to global oil and gas supplies caused by the Iran conflict has driven global oil prices up by around 15%, with Brent crude oil briefly rising above $85 a barrel on 3 March, the highest it has been since July 2024.

    One source said: “These high oil prices are going to be a nightmare for consumers – but if you are an oil company, it’s an opportunity to make some serious money.

    “However, you can only make that money if you can ship your oil – and a lot of oil companies in Iraq are going to struggle to do just that.”

    Another source said: “There’s nothing technically wrong with the Kurdistan fields or the pipeline at the moment, and a lot of people believe they could be brought back online relatively quickly.

    “The pipeline has only been shut down because of the oil field closures. All of the oil that is currently being produced in Iraqi Kurdistan is being used domestically.”

    Key staff at Iraqi Kurdistan’s oil companies remain in the country, and the companies are planning quick restarts to cash in on current high prices, according to sources.

    One said: “While many of these companies have plans in place for evacuations by land to Turkiye if the situation worsens, right now it seems more likely that things will stabilise and the companies will bring their fields back online soon.

    “Workers have been told to stay inside – but many are used to the threat of drone and rocket attacks, and they are still going to the pub and living their lives as normal.”

    Uncertain future

    While many stakeholders in Iraqi Kurdistan believe the outlook for oil companies in the region is better than in the south of the country, significant challenges remain, and the situation could change dramatically due to the chaotic nature of the ongoing conflict.

    One factor that is likely to remain challenging in Iraqi Kurdistan is logistics for key personnel.

    One source said: “Airport closures and flight cancellations are likely to dog this region for some time to come, so getting people in and out is expected to remain difficult.”

    Another concern is potential attacks on oil fields by militant groups in the region that are loyal to Iran.

    “We’ve seen that Iran wants to lash out and do damage to oil assets in nearby countries – so an attack on key fields in Iraqi Kurdistan would not be a surprise,” the source added.

    An attack on the ITP pipeline itself could dramatically change the outlook for Iraqi Kurdistan.

    Drone attacks or rockets could potentially put the pipeline out of action for months, dealing a serious blow to the outlook for the region’s oil companies.

    While the future for the oil sector in both federal Iraq and the Kurdistan region remains highly uncertain, it is clear to everyone involved that the disruptions to the country’s oil and gas sector are causing severe economic damage to the oil-reliant country.

    On 3 March, Baghdad-based research organisation Eco Iraq Observatory estimated that Iraq was losing $128m a day after the shutdown of the Rumaila and Kurdistan fields.

    It said a one-week shutdown could cost the Iraqi treasury nearly $900m, and a month could result in losses exceeding $3.8bn.

    With Iraq relying on oil for more than 90% of government revenues, it is likely that the country will rapidly enter an economic crisis if it does not find a way to bring exports back online over the coming days.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15853788/main.jpg
    Wil Crisp
  • NWC to tender next phase of sewage treatment programme

    4 March 2026

     

    Saudi Arabia’s National Water Company (NWC) is preparing to tender a contract for the construction of 10 sewage treatment plants as part of the next phase of its long-term operations and maintenance (LTOM) sewage treatment programme. 

    The final details of the Eastern A Cluster (LTOM14) package are being finalised, with a tender likely to be issued in March or April, sources close to the project told MEED.

    Estimated to cost $180m, the sewage treatment plants will have a total capacity of 184,440 cubic metres a day (cm/d).

    The tender for the North Western C Cluster (LTOM 13) package is currently on “on hold”, sources added.

    This $250m project includes the construction of four sewage treatment plants with a total capacity of 132,000 cm/d.

    Details were not disclosed as to when this tender will likely be released.

    In February, MEED exclusively reported that NWC was evaluating five bids for package 12 of the sewage treatment programme.

    Known as the North Western B Cluster, LTOM12 forms part of the second phase of NWC’s rehabilitation of sewage treatment plants programme.

    The contract covers the construction and upgrade of seven sewage treatment plants with a combined capacity of about 162,000 cm/d.

    The companies that have submitted proposals include:

    • Alkhorayef Water & Power Technologies (Saudi Arabia)
    • Civil Works Company (Saudi Arabia)
    • Miahona (Saudi Arabia)
    • Beijing Enterprises Water Group – BEWG (Hong Kong)
    • Al-Yamama (Saudi Arabia)

    MEED also recently reported that six contractors are competing for the North Western A Cluster Sewage Treatment Plants Package 11 (LTOM11), which has an estimated value of about $211m.

    The project involves the construction and upgrade of two sewage treatment plants with a combined capacity of about 440,000 cm/d.

    The scheme is being procured on an engineering, procurement and construction basis with a long-term operations component. 

    In January, a consortium of United Water (China), Prosus Energy (UAE) and Armada Holding (Saudi Arabia) won the main contract for the Northern Cluster Sewage Treatment Plants Package 10 (LTOM10).

    This contract was the first to be awarded under the second phase of NWC’s rehabilitation of sewage treatment plants programme.

    NWC previously awarded $2.7bn-worth of contracts for the first phase of its LTOM programme. This comprises nine packages covering the treatment of 4.6 million cm/d of sewage water for the next 15 years.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15841370/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall