Construction step change boosts order books
29 April 2024
Using data from regional projects tracker MEED Projects, the region’s most active contractor is Nesma & Partners, with $14.7bn of work at the execution stage. In 2023, the Saudi Arabia-based contractor topped the ranking with $5.3bn of work in execution, a total that would not even make the top 10 this year. Dubai-based Alec ranks 10th this year with $6bn of work under execution.
Five Saudi-based contractors are in the top 10, reflecting the volume of construction work under way in the kingdom. Four of them are the contractors that the Public Investment Fund (PIF) invested in – Al Bawani, Almabani, El Seif and Nesma. The other is Shibh Al Jazira Contracting.
Two UAE-based companies, Trojan General Contracting and Alec, are in the top 10. While not as active as Saudi Arabia, the UAE market remains a crucial construction market, even though it is increasingly dominated by contractors with government or government-related shareholders.
The other three contractors are Turkiye’s Limak, which is working extensively in Kuwait; Italy’s Webuild, which has won a series of major orders in Saudi Arabia in the past three years; and Beijing-based China State Construction Engineering Corporation (CSCEC), which works across the GCC and is the world’s third most active contractor, according to GlobalData’s ranking of global construction companies.
Volume of work
With a clear shift in the volume of work being undertaken, only five of the companies from 2023 remain in the top 10 this year. They are Nesma, Limak, Almabani, Webuild and CSCEC. Dropping out the top 10 are Saudi Arabia’s Alfanar Construction, Saudi Binladin Group – which was consistently the region’s most active contractor for many years – India’s Shapooorji Pallonji, Beijing-based China Harbour Engineering Corporation and Saudi Arabian Baytur.
With large contracts still being tendered in Saudi Arabia, it is likely that there will also be significant changes to next year’s ranking. The four contractors that the PIF invested in will likely continue to dominate, while other players will also look to take advantage of the work available in the kingdom and move up the rankings.
With large contracts still being tendered in Saudi Arabia, it is likely that there will also be significant changes to next year’s ranking
This will include other local players, as Shibh Al Jazira has demonstrated in 2024, and international companies that are looking to build their order books – just as Webuild has done in recent years.
As contractors pick up more work, there are nascent concerns that you can have too much of a good thing. Companies that grow rapidly become more difficult to manage and experience has shown that when markets correct, organisations that tempered their ambitions are more manageable and resilient, and are the ones more likely to survive.
Bahrain
Bahrain’s contractor ranking has remained largely static this year. The top two contractors have not changed and only one company has joined the top 10 this year.
China Machinery Engineering Corporation maintains its lead position with $698m of work in the execution phase, thanks to its contract to build the East Sitra development for the housing ministry. Al Hamad Building Contracting is in second place, with $560m-worth of projects in the execution phase.
Nass Contracting is in third place, having moved up from fifth last year. Kooheji Contractor, which was ranked third last year, is now fourth.
The rest of the ranking remains largely the same, with Saleh Abdullah Al Muhanna & Partners replacing Al Taitoon Contracting in the top 10.
The relative lack of change to the Bahraini ranking reflects the quiet market conditions in the country when compared to the larger GCC markets.
This is largely due to major projects such as the new terminal building at Bahrain International airport having been completed and tendering and contract awards not yet having started for major new projects, including the first phase of the Bahrain metro network and the second causeway connecting to Saudi Arabia.
Kuwait
Turkiye’s Limak Holding has strengthened its position at the top of Kuwait’s ranking this year. The contractor has $5.6bn of construction work at the execution stage, according to MEED Projects. This is about $600m more than the $5bn it had when it headed the 2023 ranking.
Limak’s work in execution was boosted last year when the Public Works Ministry awarded it more construction work at Kuwait International airport. It secured a contract for package three of the expansion of Terminal 2, which covers the construction of aircraft parking aprons, taxiways and service buildings.
In joint second place is Shapoorji Pallonji with $1.4bn of work at the execution stage. The Indian contractor is working on two healthcare projects and one education scheme in a joint venture with the local Al Sager General Trading & Contracting, which is also working on $1.4bn of projects at the execution stage.
The only other non-Kuwaiti contractor in the top 10 is China Gezhouba Group Corporation, which is in fourth place with $1.3bn of projects at the execution stage. Its largest project is the infrastructure works at South Saad Al Abdullah Residential City.
Oman
The local Galfar Engineering & Contracting remains at the top of the Oman ranking in 2024, with about $900m of construction and transport projects at the execution stage, according to MEED Projects. The contractor’s total is slightly less than the $1.1bn it recorded last year.
Several key changes have occurred in the Omani top 10 this year. Local contractor Saif Salim Essa Al Harasi & Company has moved into fourth place thanks to several major contract awards.
In December last year, it secured a $118m contract for the construction of a hospital, and in October it was awarded a design-and-build contract for a cultural complex. The cultural complex was won as part of a joint venture with Turkish contractor Sembol Construction, which has also moved into the top 10 in seventh position.
Another contractor that has moved into Oman’s top 10 is China Communications Construction Company. In January, it secured a marine works contract at the Yiti Sustainable City project.
Qatar
Two contractors top the Qatar ranking in 2024 with $1.4bn of ongoing projects each. Turkish contractor TAV Construction and the local Midmac Contracting Company both lead, largely due to their ongoing work at Hamad International airport.
Closely behind, in third position, is the local Generic Engineering Technologies, which is working on several projects in Qatar, including the upgrade of the Lusail Formula 1 and MotoGP race circuit.
Urbacon Trading & Contracting, which topped last year’s ranking with $1.8bn of projects at the execution stage, is in fifth place this year with $1.2bn of projects. The contractor has taken significant strides in the past year to win work in other markets, including Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia
There has been a major shift in the level of construction activity undertaken by the 10 most active contractors in Saudi Arabia in 2024.
This year, the total value of projects undertaken by the top 10 contractors is $71.5bn, more than a 130% increase from the $31bn recorded by the top 10 in 2023.
The local Nesma & Partners tops the Saudi ranking again this year with $14.7bn-worth of projects at the execution stage. The total, which is about 50% more than that of the second-ranked contractor, highlights Nesma’s leading position in the Saudi market, and the scale of the opportunities that the kingdom’s projects sector now offers.
In second position is Italy’s Webuild with just short of $10bn of projects at the execution stage. Earlier this year, it secured a $4.7bn contract to construct dams at the Trojena mountain resort in Neom, adding to other major orders at Neom and Diriyah.
The four contractors that received investment from the PIF in 2023 now occupy four out of the top six positions in the
Saudi Ranking. They are Nesma, El Seif, Al Bawani and Almabani.
UAE
The UAE’s construction market has grown strongly over the past year, and this is reflected in the 2024 contractor ranking. Like Saudi Arabia, the top 10 UAE contractors have more than doubled the total value of projects they have at the execution stage. This year, the top 10 have $27.6bn of work, which is a 123% increase from the $12.4bn last year.
The top-ranked contractor in the UAE this year is Trojan General Contracting, which is part of Alpha Dhabi. In April, Alpha Dhabi Holding agreed to sell a 49% stake in its construction subsidiary Alpha Dhabi Construction Holding (ADCH) to local investment firm ADQ. Trojan is part of ADCH.
With $6.2bn of projects at the execution stage, Trojan is ahead of National Marine Dredging Company (NMDC), which has $3.1bn of work. NMDC topped last year’s ranking with $2.3bn of projects.
In third place is UK-headquartered Innovo, with $3bn of projects, followed by Dubai-based Alec with $2.6bn.
Contractors need to grow quickly to maintain their rankings. Al Amry Transport & General Contracting has moved down to fifth place from fourth, even though it more than doubled the value of its projects at the execution stage. China State Construction Engineering Corporation has also dropped in the ranking, from third to sixth place, despite increasing its value of projects to $2.4bn from $1.6bn.
Exclusive from Meed
-
-
Brookfield to double down on Gulf investment5 May 2026
-
-
Oman seeks adviser for hydrogen-based IPP5 May 2026
-
NCP seeks firms for healthcare PPP project5 May 2026
All of this is only 1% of what MEED.com has to offer
Subscribe now and unlock all the 153,671 articles on MEED.com
- All the latest news, data, and market intelligence across MENA at your fingerprints
- First-hand updates and inside information on projects, clients and competitors that matter to you
- 20 years' archive of information, data, and news for you to access at your convenience
- Strategize to succeed and minimise risks with timely analysis of current and future market trends
Related Articles
-
Hormuz crisis revives 1970s-style energy shock5 May 2026
Commentary
Colin Foreman
EditorRead the May issue of MEED Business Review
The conflict with Iran is threatening to recalibrate the global energy system. The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz has caused an energy security crisis reminiscent of the shocks of the 1970s – both in scale and in its potential long-term implications.
The 1973-74 energy crisis, triggered by an Opec oil embargo, sent prices soaring and altered the trajectory of the global economy. It spurred the creation of the International Energy Agency, the development of strategic petroleum reserves and a wave of energy-efficiency policies. It also cemented energy-for-security arrangements between the West and the Gulf – relationships now being tested again by the latest conflict.Today’s disruption – 11 million barrels of oil a day and around 20% of global liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipping capacity – creates a deficit that far exceeds the roughly 5 million barrels a day removed from the market in 1973.
While the shocks of the 1970s ushered in a decade of stagflation and a lasting shift towards diversified supply, the current crisis could accelerate demand destruction and a pivot towards energy sovereignty.
The story is a developing one. From Vietnam’s cancellation of LNG projects in favour of renewables to the surge in electric vehicle adoption across Europe, the perceived unreliability of traditional supply routes is forcing an unprecedented reorientation of capital.
The Middle East – long the indispensable heartbeat of global industry – now risks sustained challenges to its market share as producers in the US, Russia, Africa and South America develop new projects unencumbered by reliance on the Strait of Hormuz.
The structural changes taking root in 2026, like those in 1974, will outlive the conflict itself. Even a swift cessation of hostilities may not allow markets to return to their pre-conflict norms.
READ THE MAY 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDFGlobal energy sector forced to recalibrate; Conflict hits debt issuance and listings activity; UAE’s non-oil sector faces unclear recovery period amid disruption.
Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the May 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
> REGIONAL LNG: War undermines business case for Middle East LNG> CAPITAL MARKETS: Damage avoidance frames debt issuance> MARKET FOCUS: Conflict tests UAE diversificationTo see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click herehttps://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16685390/main.gif -
Brookfield to double down on Gulf investment5 May 2026
Brookfield CEO Bruce Flatt has said the asset and alternative investment management company intends to increase its investments in the Gulf, despite the ongoing conflict in the region.
When asked whether the war is changing the way he thinks about the Gulf region during an interview with CNBC at the Milken Institute Global Conference on 4 May, he said: “No, short answer no – in fact, [we’re] doubling down, we are doing more.
“When you find great businesses, countries, great people, and the market offers you an opportunity to invest when others are not, it is always the best opportunity in the world, so we are doing more. We have been there for 25 years; we are continuing to do all of the investments we have there, and we are going to do more.”
Flatt suggested the current period of geopolitical stress could accelerate long-term economic strengthening across the Gulf, arguing that governments and businesses will respond by investing in self-sufficiency and strategic infrastructure. “They will eventually build better countries because of this,” he said.
Flatt added: “They’re going to build resiliency in all their systems. They’re going to build their own artificial intelligence (AI). They’re going to build their own pipelines to the coast. They’re going to do things they didn’t do before. They have to do it. They probably should have, but they’re going to now, and they’re going to be more resilient.”
UAE meetings
Flatt has also travelled to the region since the conflict began on 28 February, meeting senior UAE officials to discuss investment opportunities and deepen cooperation. In Abu Dhabi on 9 April, he met Sheikh Khaled Bin Mohamed Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Chairman of the Abu Dhabi Executive Council. The meeting explored ways to strengthen cooperation in investment and asset management between UAE-based institutions and Brookfield, in line with global economic trends and evolving market demands.
Two days later in Dubai, Flatt met Sheikh Maktoum Bin Mohammed Bin Rashid Al-Maktoum, First Deputy Ruler of Dubai, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Finance and Chairman of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC). During the meeting, both sides explored opportunities to expand cooperation, highlighting the UAE and Dubai’s value proposition for global investors, including an integrated financial system, a flexible and advanced regulatory environment and world-class digital infrastructure. Discussions also covered Dubai’s role as a bridge between East and West, and the emirate’s emphasis on long-term partnerships and a transparent, business-friendly environment.
Qatar partnership
Brookfield’s regional activities are not limited to the UAE. In late 2025, the firm and Qai – Qatar’s AI company and a subsidiary of Qatar Investment Authority – announced a strategic partnership to establish a $20bn joint venture focused on AI infrastructure in Qatar and select international markets. The venture is expected to support Qatar’s ambition to become a hub for AI services and infrastructure in the Middle East. It is slated to be backed through Brookfield’s Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Fund, part of a broader AI infrastructure programme targeting up to $100bn in global investment.
Brookfield Infrastructure maintains a vast and diversified global portfolio characterised by high-barrier-to-entry assets across five core sectors. The data infrastructure segment has become a primary growth engine, currently comprising 150 data centres with significant operating capacity and about 308,000 operational telecom sites. In the utility and energy midstream space, the firm manages over 1,900 miles of electric transmission lines and a network of 2,100 miles of gas pipelines. The transport sector is another cornerstone of the portfolio, anchored by 22,500 miles of rail operations.
https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16686052/main.gif -
Insurers will only cover a fraction of war damage to oil and gas facilities5 May 2026

Insurers are expected to cover only a fraction of the damage to oil and gas facilities in the Middle East caused by the regional war, according to industry sources.
Standard industrial property and business interruption policies typically exclude damage and disruption caused by acts of war. Companies therefore need specialist war-risk insurance or political violence and terrorism (PVT) insurance to be eligible for payouts.
While most state-owned national oil companies (NOCs) are likely to have arranged this type of cover for major facilities, it is less common among smaller private or publicly traded companies.
As a result, many assets – such as smaller fertiliser plants and chemical facilities – are expected to be uninsured for war-related damage.
“War insurance was never a widely purchased product in the region,” said one source. “It’s one of these things that people never really believe is going to happen.
“In a lot of companies, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars every year for this kind of product was seen as something they couldn’t really justify.”
Even companies that purchased war-risk or PVT insurance before the US and Israel attacked Iran on 28 February are unlikely to be covered for the full extent of war damage.
War-risk insurance for large assets such as oil refineries or LNG terminals typically carries limits of $200m to $500m.
In many cases, repairs to the region’s large and complex oil and gas facilities are likely to cost billions of dollars.
One source said: “If you had, for example, an oil refinery that’s worth $8bn, you couldn’t really buy a war insurance policy to cover the price of a complete rebuild.
“There just isn’t enough insurance capacity in the market to buy that level of cover.
“Very often NOCs were buying cover at the highest level they could find, but this was limited by what markets were prepared to insure.”
Payout timing
Full insurance settlements for war damage are expected to take significant time – potentially 18 months to two years for some policyholders.
Payments typically begin with an initial payout of around 20%-30% of the total claim. This is followed by a second payment mid-project – usually once engineering is complete – and then a final payment.
In most cases, projects to rebuild and repair damaged oil and gas facilities are not expected to be delayed while owners wait for insurance proceeds.
One source said: “A lot of the owners of these damaged facilities don’t see the current situation as the right time to start rebuilding, but that isn’t because they are waiting for insurance money.
“The risk of new attacks and more damage is still high, and they are going to want to wait for signs of more stability before they start rebuilding.”
Experts believe that once the security environment improves, facility owners will begin tendering repair and reconstruction contracts even if insurers have not settled claims.
“A lot of the companies that operate oil, gas and chemical facilities in the region have access to funds that will allow them to rebuild without being reliant on insurers,” said one source.
“Even if they have a policy that they expect to pay out, it is likely that they will go ahead with the project before receiving full payment if they think it is the right time to rebuild.”
Once the security environment improves, the cost of rebuilding fully destroyed units is expected to be higher than when they were originally constructed, due to multiple rebuild projects progressing in parallel across the region.
This is likely to drive a spike in demand for skilled labour and materials, pushing up costs.
Market impact
Insurers providing this type of cover in the region have generally experienced several years of low payout levels, so they are expected to meet claims with limited financial strain.
However, the volume of claims stemming from the US and Israel’s war with Iran is expected to harden the war-risk and PVT insurance market, increasing premiums for owners of oil and gas facilities for some time.
Ultimately, the limited scope of coverage means the financial burden of the war will fall more heavily on asset owners than on insurers.
Even where cover is in place, policy limits mean insurers will only partially offset the cost of rebuilding large facilities, leaving companies and governments to bridge funding gaps.
The experience is likely to prompt a reassessment of risk across the region’s energy sector, with lenders and investors placing greater emphasis on potential political violence-related damage when evaluating projects.
READ THE MAY 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDFGlobal energy sector forced to recalibrate; Conflict hits debt issuance and listings activity; UAE’s non-oil sector faces unclear recovery period amid disruption.
Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the May 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
> REGIONAL LNG: War undermines business case for Middle East LNG> CAPITAL MARKETS: Damage avoidance frames debt issuance> MARKET FOCUS: Conflict tests UAE diversificationTo see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click herehttps://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16683871/main.jpg -
Oman seeks adviser for hydrogen-based IPP5 May 2026
Oman’s Nama Power & Water Procurement Company (PWP) has issued a tender for technoeconomic consultancy services for power generation using green hydrogen.
The offtaker said it intends to appoint a consultant to undertake an initial assessment for the development of a new independent power project (IPP).
The plant is expected to be capable of operating on up to 100% hydrogen with an indicative generation capacity in the range of 800MW to 1,000MW.
The bid submission deadline is 21 June.
To date, hydrogen deployment has focused mainly on production and export projects, while power generation activity remains largely limited to pilot schemes rather than utility-scale, fully hydrogen-fired plants.
According to a typical IPP development timeline spanning feasibility, procurement, financing and construction, the potential plant would be unlikely to enter operation before the early 2030s.
Nama PWP also recently issued a separate consultancy tender seeking services to support ESG policy development.
The deadline for firms to submit offers is 10 May.
READ THE MAY 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDFGlobal energy sector forced to recalibrate; Conflict hits debt issuance and listings activity; UAE’s non-oil sector faces unclear recovery period amid disruption.
Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the May 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:
> REGIONAL LNG: War undermines business case for Middle East LNG> CAPITAL MARKETS: Damage avoidance frames debt issuance> MARKET FOCUS: Conflict tests UAE diversificationTo see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click herehttps://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16683857/main.jpg -
NCP seeks firms for healthcare PPP project5 May 2026
Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Defence and the National Centre for Privatisation & PPP (NCP) have issued an expression of interest and request for qualification (RFQ) notice for the Chronic Kidney Disease Care and National Dialysis Services project.
The notice was issued on 4 May, with a submission deadline of 15 June.
The project will be delivered as a public-private partnership (PPP) under a design, repurpose, finance and maintain (DRFM) model, with a six-year contract term.
NCP said the initiative supports Saudi Vision 2030 by increasing private sector participation in the healthcare sector.
The project is structured into four packages, each covering a minimum number of patients across multiple regions to ensure wide geographic reach and improved access.
Selected operators will be required to provide the necessary facilities, equipment and information technology systems, as well as supply qualified personnel. They will also manage clinical services – including in-centre haemodialysis, home haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, vascular access and outpatient services – alongside non-clinical operations.
In January, Saudi Arabia launched a National Privatisation Strategy, which aims to mobilise $64bn in private sector capital by 2030.
The strategy builds on the privatisation programme first introduced in 2018. It will focus on unlocking state-owned assets for private investment and privatising selected government services.
In a statement, NCP said the new strategy comprises 147 opportunities drawn from a broader pipeline of more than 500 projects across 18 sectors.
https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16683825/main.gif

