meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

Chinese firms dominate region’s projects market

5 March 2025

 

This package also includes: China construction at pivotal juncture

Chinese construction companies secured over $90bn in contracts in the Middle East and North Africa (Mena) in 2024. Their market share was 26% of the $347bn total for the region, according to regional projects tracker MEED Projects. 

The record-breaking performance underscores the growing influence of Chinese firms in the region’s projects market.

In the past decade, Chinese construction companies have steadily increased their foothold in the region. 

Between 2015 and 2019, the value of contracts won by Chinese firms ranged from $12bn to $23bn, reflecting a solid presence. There was a dip in 2016, when $12bn of awards reflected government spending cuts, and a second occurred in 2020, when lower oil prices and the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic led to awards of $13bn.

Since the pandemic, Chinese contractors’ orderbooks have grown sharply, with contract values rebounding to $26bn in 2021, dipping slightly in 2022 to $22bn. Then, in 2023, contracts awarded to Chinese contractors more than doubled to $51bn, rising even further to reach a record-breaking $90bn in 2024.

Leading players

According to MEED Projects, the top-ranking company by contract value and project volume based on work at the execution stage is China State Construction Engineering Corporation (CSCEC), with 47 projects totalling $23.5bn.

The other active companies are Sepco 3 Electric Power Construction Corporation, with $17.1bn of work across 14 projects; PowerChina, with $17bn across 22 projects; and Hualu Engineering & Technology, with $14bn of work concentrated in just three high-value projects. 

Sinopec and China Energy Engineering Corporation managed 19 and 14 projects, respectively, reflecting their broad engagement in the region.

China Harbour Engineering Company has a more diversified orderbook, with 32 projects worth a total of $8.1bn. Meanwhile, China Petroleum Engineering & Construction Corporation has 27 projects, amounting to $5.7bn.

China’s strengths

The record volumes of work secured by Chinese contractors in recent years can be explained by a combination of factors. 

Saudi Arabia has become the largest market for Chinese contractors in the Mena region

Traditionally, Chinese firms have enjoyed a lower cost base than their international competitors. This comes from lower manpower costs, access to cheaper materials and equipment, and financial support from state banks. 

Culturally, Chinese firms have typically had a different attitude to risk than many other contractors. Instead of seeking to turn a profit on specific projects, Chinese firms have entered markets cautiously and, as their knowledge of the local market grew, built a commanding long-term position.

More recently, the edge that Chinese contractors enjoy has come from the technical experience they have gained from delivering large-scale, complex projects in their domestic market. While in the past Chinese contractors were only considered capable of delivering basic construction work, they now have some of the best project references in the world. 

This was demonstrated in 2024, when CSCEC competed to complete the 1,000-metre-plus tower in Jeddah. The work was eventually given back to the incumbent Saudi Binladin Group, but when CSCEC was pursuing the contract, it boasted a portfolio of several completed super-high-rise and mega-tall projects, exceeding anything its competitors could demonstrate.

Meanwhile, in the UAE, the five groups that competed for the $5.5bn contract for Dubai Metro’s Blue Line extension all had at least one Chinese firm as a consortium member. The eventual winner was a team of Turkiye’s Limak Holding and Mapa Group with the Hong Kong office of China Railway Rolling Stock Corporation.

Oil and gas is another area where expertise has been developed. Twenty years ago, Chinese contractors could not prequalify for work on most oil and gas projects in the region, but today they compete for and win work from Mena’s leading oil companies. For example, Chinese firms won four of the 17 contracts awarded last year for the third expansion phase of Saudi Aramco’s Master Gas System project.

China’s domestic market has created a pool of resources that are being deployed internationally as the outlook for the Chinese construction market shows signs of weakness.

Chinese contractors have also been able to give their clients the solutions they require. 

In North Africa, they have raised finances for projects in countries that in some cases lack funding. This has enabled Chinese companies to develop a steady pipeline of projects across North Africa.

In February this year, China’s Tianchen Engineering Corporation was selected by state-owned Egyptian Petrochemicals Holding Company to execute three contracts to develop industrial projects in Egypt. In Algeria, the Agence Nationale d’Etudes et de la Realisation des Investissements Ferroviaires (Anesrif) awarded a $476m railway line upgrade contract in late 2024 to a joint venture of China Railway Sixth Group and the local Infrarer.

In Saudi Arabia, where funding is less of a concern, Chinese contractors have been able to deploy the large project teams required to deliver Riyadh’s Vision 2030.

Saudi foothold

Saudi Arabia has become the largest market for Chinese contractors in the Mena region, with $43bn of contract awards in 2024. This accounted for nearly 30% of the $143bn total for the kingdom last year.

Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 comes at a perfect time for Chinese contractors. Riyadh is hungry for resources to deliver its ever-growing roster of projects, including the five official gigaprojects, the requirements of which are extensive. 

At the top level, they require funding and financial support, but contractors and suppliers are also needed to deliver the projects. The contract award numbers show that Chinese companies looking to expand their international reach have latched onto this opportunity.

For China, Saudi Arabia is not just a volume play. Other markets in Asia and Africa also offer opportunities for Chinese contractors as part of Beijing’s $4tn Belt & Road Initiative, launched in 2013. In recent years, however, the problem for Chinese companies in many of these markets is that the soft loans provided to complete projects cannot be repaid.

The key difference for China when looking at Saudi Arabia is that it sees a reliable market that is financially strong and backed by oil wealth.

Beyond construction, Chinese firms are investing in the Saudi supply chain, which is a pillar of Vision 2030. Earlier this year, China Harbour Engineering Company inaugurated a 200,000-square-metre modular building factory at gigaproject developer Roshn’s Sedra project in Riyadh.

Other investments include a steel plate manufacturing complex in Ras Al-Khair Industrial City, developed by Saudi Aramco, the Public Investment Fund (PIF) and China’s Baosteel; and Lenovo’s Oasis Project, a $2bn technology hub in Riyadh, set to manufacture computer devices and serve as the company’s regional headquarters for the Middle East and Africa.

The economic forces that bring Saudi Arabia and China together are also being encouraged, particularly by the PIF.

Last year, agreements worth up to $50bn were signed with major Chinese financial institutions, including the Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China and China Construction Bank, to ensure a steady stream of funding for Chinese firms working in the kingdom.

Broader outlook 

As the influence of Chinese contractors grows on the international stage, it has raised concerns. In 2022, the US Department of Defence released the names of what it calls “Chinese military companies”. The list included some of China’s largest contracting companies.

The economic forces that bring Saudi Arabia and China together are also being encouraged, particularly by the Public Investment Fund

In a statement at the time, the Department of Defence said it “is determined to highlight and counter the PRC [People’s Republic of China] Military-Civil Fusion strategy, which supports the modernisation goals of the People’s Liberation Army by ensuring its access to advanced technologies and expertise are acquired and developed by PRC companies, universities and research programmes that appear to be civilian entities”.

The sharp growth in contract awards secured by Chinese contractors in the Mena region since 2022 suggests this concern is limited outside the US.

Looking ahead, Chinese contractors are keen for more work in the Mena region. This was strongly signalled in mid-February, when CSCEC partnered with Cairo-based Al-Organi Group to secure contracts for the $24bn Ras El-Hekma project on Egypt’s Mediterranean coast. 

The 170 million-square-metre master-planned development, backed by Abu Dhabi-based ADQ, is one of the world’s largest ongoing construction projects. The CSCEC-Al-Organi partnership has set a target to secure more than $5bn in contracts on the scheme within the next three years.

With major schemes in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Mena region, Chinese firms will be well positioned to deliver the region’s project ambitions.

China construction at pivotal juncture
 

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/13451503/main.jpg
Colin Foreman

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • War casts shadow over UAE construction boom

    6 April 2026

     

    The UAE’s construction sector entered the year in a position of strength. According to regional projects tracker MEED Projects, contract awards reached $59bn in 2025, a record that surpassed the $53bn awarded in 2024.

    With market conditions expected to remain buoyant, 2026 was forecast to be another strong year. However, the Iran conflict that began on 28 February is set to change that narrative.

    In the short term, the construction sector proved resilient during the first weeks of the conflict. With the exception of a few sites in high-risk zones, construction activity across the UAE has largely continued uninterrupted.

    Cost pressures

    Despite continued activity on the ground, the industry is bracing for cost escalation. Brent crude prices have risen well above the $100-a-barrel mark. For the construction sector, the impact was felt most acutely on 1 April, when the UAE adjusted its domestic fuel prices.

    Diesel surged to AED4.69 a litre, up sharply from AED2.72 in March. This nearly 72% increase has immediate and far-reaching implications for project overheads, affecting heavy machinery operations, site power generation, and the transport of bulk materials such as sand, steel and cement.

    For projects signed under fixed-price contracts during the lower-inflation environment of 2024 and 2025, these increases pose a significant threat to contractor margins and potentially to overall project viability.

    Supply disruption

    These inflationary pressures are compounded by logistical challenges stemming from instability in the Strait of Hormuz. As a critical artery for regional imports, any disruption has ripple effects across the construction supply chain – particularly for long-lead items such as specialised façade systems, high-end finishing materials and key MEP components.

    While the UAE has leveraged overland routes to mitigate some of these bottlenecks, the shift is unlikely to be cost-neutral or time-neutral.

    Insurance gaps

    Legal and contractual frameworks governing projects are now under increased scrutiny. A key concern is the limitation of standard insurance policies. Many contractor all-risk and logistics policies exclude coverage for losses arising from active conflict, creating a significant gap for goods in transit.

    As freight is rerouted to alternative ports and transported over longer distances by road, insurers are becoming increasingly reluctant to provide cover for these extended journeys.

    Contractors are being advised to adopt a more disciplined approach. To recover costs linked to these disruptions, the industry is being urged to move away from the broad claims that have historically characterised regional disputes.

    Employers are unlikely to accept claims that do not clearly distinguish conflict-related impacts from pre-existing project delays. Instead, contractors must precisely document separate heads of claim, including supply chain cost increases, on-site stoppages, and new health and safety requirements.

    Market outlook

    In the longer term, the sector is in a wait-and-see phase. The market’s trajectory will depend heavily on the government’s ability to manage public finances following a period of significant, unforeseen expenditure.

    The cost of defence, combined with reduced tourism revenue, lower oil exports and weaker consumer spending, has created a complex and as yet undetermined fiscal challenge.

    Although construction is likely to be used as a tool for economic stimulus once the conflict subsides, the availability of capital for major new projects remains unknown. Government spending priorities will likely shift towards resilience, including accelerated infrastructure development on the UAE’s east coast.

    Fujairah and the Sharjah enclave of Khor Fakkan – both located outside the Strait of Hormuz – are expected to play an increasingly central role in strategic infrastructure planning. Over the next decade, investment may focus on strengthening the logistics and industrial capacity of these ports to better shield the federation from future geopolitical shocks.

    For the private real estate sector, the outlook depends on whether the attacks that began on 28 February have permanently altered the UAE’s reputation as a secure, low-tax safe haven. While the conflict is testing investor confidence, the country’s operational resilience may still compare favourably with challenges in other global markets.

    If the risks are viewed as manageable, investment could rebound quickly. However, prolonged uncertainty would result in a slower recovery. By early April, warning signs had already emerged, with some developers facing cashflow pressures due to slowing sales.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16267286/main.gif
    Colin Foreman
  • War takes a rising toll on Kuwait’s oil sector

    6 April 2026

    Commentary
    Wil Crisp
    Oil & gas reporter

    The US and Israel’s ongoing war on Iran is taking a rising toll on Kuwait’s oil sector, which is likely to be felt for years, even if the war concludes relatively quickly.

    The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz to shipping has meant that Kuwaiti oil exports have completely stopped, forcing the country to declare force majeure last month.

    The inability to export oil has led storage facilities to reach maximum capacity and forced Kuwait to stop production completely at key oil fields.

    Resuming production from these assets is not likely to be easy, and production from these fields could take months to ramp up to normal levels even if shipping is allowed to cross the Strait of Hormuz freely.

    The blockage in the Strait of Hormuz has also prevented Kuwaitis from importing equipment and materials to carry out maintenance work or projects in the oil and gas sector.

    On top of the severe negative impacts caused by the disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the country’s energy sector is seeing increasing damage to oil and gas facilities from Iranian strikes.

    Over the past few days, a wide range of Kuwaiti oil and gas infrastructure has been hit and damaged.

    This includes strikes on Kuwait’s Al-Ahmadi oil refinery, one of the biggest in the Middle East, which was attacked on 5 April, causing fires in a “number of operational units”.

    If future operations at the refinery are limited by damage to the facility, it could potentially lead to much lower volumes of refined products being available both on the domestic market and for export.

    On 5 April, Iran also struck facilities operated by Petrochemical Industries Company (PIC) and Kuwait National Petroleum Company (KNPC), both subsidiaries of state-owned Kuwait Petroleum Corporation (KPC).

    On the same day, the building that houses the headquarters of KPC and the country’s Oil Ministry was also hit, causing a fire.

    In a statement released on 5 April, KPC said that assessments of the damage to the office building, as well as to the PIC and KNPC facilities, were ongoing.

    If the damage to the PIC and KNPC facilities is significant, it could further reduce Kuwait’s refining capacity and erode the country’s petrochemical production capacity.

    This, in turn, would negatively impact the oil and gas sector’s ability to generate future revenues.

    As the war continues, it is likely that damage to oil and gas infrastructure will continue to mount, further eroding the country’s ability to return quickly to normal operations.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16265361/main.png
    Wil Crisp
  • Kuwait reports war damage on oil infrastructure

    6 April 2026

    State-owned Kuwait Petroleum Corporation (KPC) has said that some units have sustained significant damage following Iranian strikes on oil and gas infrastructure in recent days.

    Strikes hit facilities operated by its subsidiaries Petrochemical Industries Company (PIC) and Kuwait National Petroleum ​Company (KNPC).

    Strikes also hit the offices of KPC and the Oil Ministry, as well as power and water desalination plants.

    In a statement released on 5 April, KPC said: “On 5 April, 2026, the oil sector complex located in Shuwaikh, which houses the KPC building and the Ministry of Oil, was attacked by drones, resulting in a fire at the building and significant material damage.

    “Several operational facilities belonging to the corporation, both at KNPC [sites] and PIC [sites], were also subjected to similar drone attacks, leading to fires at a number of these facilities, and causing significant material damage.

    “Emergency and firefighting teams from the concerned companies, with the support of the General Fire Force, implemented the approved response plans.

    “The teams continue to work to control the fires and prevent their spread to adjacent facilities.

    “The corporation confirmed, thanks be to God, that no human casualties were recorded as a result of these attacks.”

    In a television address, Hisham Ahmed Al-Rifai, a spokesperson for the company, said that the offices of KPC and the Oil Ministry were targeted at dawn on 5 April.

    He called the attack “reprehensible” and said that Iran used drones to carry it out.

    Al-Rifai said that KPC is still assessing damage to the office building and to the PIC and KNPC facilities.

    The past few days have seen significant damage dealt to a range of oil and gas infrastructure.

    On 3 April, early-morning strikes hit Kuwait’s Al-Ahmadi oil refinery, causing fires in a “number of operational units”.

    The strikes on 3 April were the third time that the refinery had been hit since the regional conflict started.

    The refining facility is one of the largest in the Middle East and is an important source of refined products for both the domestic market and exports.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16265360/main.gif
    Wil Crisp
  • Safety and security matters

    3 April 2026

    Commentary
    Colin Foreman
    Editor

    Read the April issue of MEED Business Review

    Employment and investment opportunities in a low or no-tax environment have been key attractions for people and businesses located in the GCC for decades. Another crucial factor has been safety and security.

    That reputation has been tested by the missile and drone attacks that began on 28 February. Whether the GCC’s safe haven status has been damaged depends on perspective. 

    For some, the fact that attacks occurred fundamentally changes how the region is viewed. For others, the ability to absorb a serious shock, respond quickly, and keep daily life and businesses functioning demonstrates resilience.

    Any assessment of safety is also relative. Many people and businesses that relocate in the GCC do so not only for opportunity, but because of dissatisfaction elsewhere. Common reasons include limited economic prospects, high taxation, distrust in political leadership and concerns about personal safety. Even with the recent conflict, the GCC may still compare favourably for those considering these factors.

    There is no doubt that missile and drone attacks are extremely dangerous, and the fear of further incidents can linger. Even if attacks are infrequent, the uncertainty matters. It can influence personal decisions, travel advice, and the cost of insurance and risk management. These perceptions will shape the region’s attractiveness.

    Safety concerns vary. In many parts of the world, higher levels of crime are an everyday worry for residents and businesses. For some, the GCC may still feel like the better option, provided the current tensions do not become the new normal.

    How this question is answered will play an important role in how the region’s economies perform in the period ahead. If confidence returns quickly and the risk is seen as contained and manageable, investment and hiring will likely rebound faster than many expect. If uncertainty persists or escalates, the road to recovery will be a long one.

    READ THE APRIL 2026 MEED BUSINESS REVIEW – click here to view PDF

    Economic shock threatens long-term outlook; Riyadh adjusts to fiscal and geopolitical risk; GCC contractor ranking reflects gigaprojects slowdown.

    Distributed to senior decision-makers in the region and around the world, the April 2026 edition of MEED Business Review includes:

    > GCC CONTRACTOR RANKING: Construction guard undergoes a shift
    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here

     

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16250747/main.gif
    Colin Foreman
  • Saudi forecast remains one of growth

    3 April 2026

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16250096/main.gif
    MEED Editorial