meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

UK-GCC trade talks make slow progress

11 December 2023

 

There may be some frustration creeping in over the pace of negotiations on a free trade agreement (FTA) between the UK and the GCC, with Gulf officials in particular calling for the process to be expedited.

The two sides launched the process in June 2022 and since then there have been five rounds of talks, the most recent of which wrapped up in Riyadh on 16 November.

The UK’s Department for Business & Trade said a few days later that technical discussions had been held on 21 policy areas and “good progress was made” with the draft text, with advances made in “the majority of chapters”.

The next round of talks is due to take place in the first quarter of 2024.

It is not clear how far the two sides are from reaching a deal, but Gulf officials have said they would like to see faster progress. At a meeting in Manama on 18 November, GCC secretary-general Jassem Mohamed Albudaiwi told the UK’s Minister of State for the Middle East Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (pictured) of the “urgency of expediting the pace of negotiations”.

The UK, however, appears to be in less of a rush. Speaking at the Arab-British Economic Summit in London on 20 November, the country’s chief negotiator on the FTA, Tom Wintle, said: “It is fundamentally about the deal, not the date. We are absolutely committed to working at pace. We have huge political will and commitment on both sides to get this done. I can vouchsafe that both sides are working flat out. But it is about getting the right agreement.”

He declined to be drawn on how much longer the process might take but added: “We are starting to see what I believe will be a really remarkable free trade agreement emerging.”

The slow pace of the UK-GCC negotiations contrasts with the speed at which the UAE has been signing its own versions of bilateral FTAs.

Over the past few years, the UAE has launched negotiations on comprehensive economic partnership agreements (CEPAs) with several countries. The first four deals – with India, Israel, Indonesia and Turkiye – took an average of less than seven months from launch to conclusion.

At heart, what an FTA is looking to do is to make business easier, cheaper, more secure
Tom Wintle, the UK’s chief negotiator for the UK-GCC FTA

Gainful opportunity

Trade between the UK and the six GCC economies was worth £61m ($77bn) in 2022, according to the UK authorities, who suggest that the removal of tariffs and other barriers could increase trade flows by “at least 16 per cent”.

When the negotiations first began, the UK government pointed to the food and drink sector along with manufacturing and renewable energy as areas that stood to benefit from any deal.

In his most recent comments, Wintle emphasised potential gains in the digital realm, “and in particular the opportunity and potential to grow the transformational technologies like e-commerce, like AI [artificial intelligence]”. He went on to talk about “an FTA that really harnesses both what is happening today but importantly the forces that will shape the world of work and commerce in the future”.

In terms of specific demands, Wintle said the UK is looking to “lock in legal certainty on electronic transactions so businesses can make greater use of things like e-contracts, e-signatures, paperless trading”. 

“At heart, what an FTA is looking to do is to make business easier, cheaper, more secure,” he added.

While the talks continue, companies continue to trade. Speaking on the sidelines of the conference, an executive at a technology company that is already present in the UAE and is considering expanding into Saudi Arabia was cautious about the difference an FTA might make. “It is the market opportunity that is the driver,” he said.

Elsewhere in the Middle East, the UK already has FTAs in place with Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco and Tunisia, and has been on a push to sign more since leaving the EU. The talks with the GCC are just one of many sets of live negotiations, with others currently under way between the UK and South Korea, Canada and India, among others.

Trade issues also regularly come up in the strategic dialogues that the UK holds with countries from around the Middle East and North Africa region. In recent weeks, it has held them with Algeria, Bahrain and Tunisia.

Lord Ahmad told the Arab-British Economic Summit that in the recent meeting with Algeria, “we focussed on opportunities to increase our burgeoning trade relationship”, which he said had grown by 24 per cent in the past year to a value of £3bn.

Trade ties with Algeria go back a long way, with the two countries having signed a bilateral Treaty of Peace & Trade in 1682.

Lord Ahmad said the dialogues with Bahrain and Tunisia “focussed on areas such as climate, education, transport and much more as well”, and said in relation to the GCC trade talks that “we are progressing that well”.

“A trade deal with the GCC will boost our collaboration across a huge range of sectors, creating many business opportunities and importantly jobs on both sides, and attracting new investment,” he added.

“For the economies of the Arab world to become less dependent on carbon and fossil fuels, we must open doors for entrepreneurs to take advantage of the technologies – opportunities we can only grasp by removing barriers and facilitating growth, and working with our Gulf partners.”

As the long history of UK-Algeria trade shows, FTA deals are not a new concept even if, as with the ongoing GCC talks, it can take time to frame an agreement that takes into account the fast-moving nature of commerce.

Image: UK Minister of State for the Middle East Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon at the 2023 Arab-British Economic Summit

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/11350781/main0606.gif
Dominic Dudley

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Navigating financial markets amid geopolitical fragmentation

    28 December 2025

     

    As we move towards 2026, geopolitical fragmentation is no longer a background risk that occasionally disrupts markets.

    It has become a defining feature of the global financial landscape. Shifting alliances, persistent regional tensions, sanctions and the reconfiguration of supply chains are reshaping how capital flows, how liquidity behaves and how confidence is formed.

    For firms operating in the Middle East, this does not simply mean preparing for more volatility. It means operating in a system where the underlying rules are evolving.

    For much of the past three decades, businesses and investors worked within a broadly convergent global framework. Trade expanded, financial markets deepened and policy coordination – while imperfect – created a sense of predictability. That environment has changed.

    Today, economic decisions are increasingly influenced by strategic alignment, security considerations and political resilience. Markets still function, but they do so in a more fragmented and less forgiving way.

    Shifting landscape

    One of the most important consequences of this shift is that risk no longer travels along familiar paths. In the past, geopolitical events were often treated as temporary shocks layered onto an otherwise stable system.

    Today, they shape the system itself. Trade flows are influenced as much by political compatibility as by cost efficiency. Supply chains, once optimised for speed and scale, are reorganising into regional or allied clusters. Financial markets respond not only to data, but to narratives about stability, alignment and long-term credibility.

    This change places greater pressure on firms that rely on historical relationships to guide decisions. Models built on past correlations – between interest rates and equity markets, or between energy prices and regional growth – are less reliable when markets move between different regimes. The challenge is not simply higher volatility, but the fact that correlations themselves can shift quickly.

    Monetary policy adds a second layer of complexity. Major central banks are no longer moving in step. The US, Europe and parts of Asia face different inflation dynamics and political constraints, leading to diverging interest-rate paths.

    For the GCC, where currencies are largely pegged to the US dollar, this divergence has direct consequences. Local financial conditions are closely tied to decisions taken by the Federal Reserve, even when regional economic conditions follow a different cycle.

    This matters because funding costs, liquidity availability and hedging conditions are shaped by global rather than local forces. When US policy remains tight, dollar liquidity becomes more selective. When expectations shift abruptly, market depth can disappear quickly.

    For firms with international exposure, long-term investment plans, or reliance on external financing, these dynamics require careful management. They cannot be treated as secondary macro considerations.

    Energy markets further complicate the picture. The Middle East remains central to global energy supply, which means geopolitical events often interact with oil prices and financial conditions at the same time.

    When shifts in energy expectations coincide with changes in global interest-rate sentiment, liquidity conditions can tighten rapidly. This interaction is well known in academic research on fixed exchange-rate systems, but its practical implications are often underestimated in corporate planning.

    Expanding vulnerabilities

    These dynamics expose clear vulnerabilities. Concentrated supply chains are more susceptible to disruption. Financing structures dependent on continuous market access are more exposed to sudden repricing. Risk management approaches that assume stable relationships between assets are more likely to disappoint. Operational risks – particularly in technology and data – are increasingly shaped by geopolitical considerations rather than purely technical ones.

    At the same time, the region enters 2026 from a position of relative strength. GCC economies benefit from fiscal buffers, long-term investment programmes and a growing perception of stability compared to other parts of the world. In an environment where uncertainty is widespread, predictability itself becomes valuable. Capital increasingly seeks jurisdictions that combine economic ambition with institutional credibility.

    The question, therefore, is not whether opportunities exist, but whether firms are prepared to capture them responsibly. This requires a shift in how future risks are assessed and embedded into decision-making. Linear forecasts and static plans are insufficient when the environment itself can change state. Scenario thinking must evolve beyond optimistic and pessimistic cases to reflect different combinations of geopolitical alignment, monetary conditions, and supply-chain stability. These scenarios should inform capital allocation, not sit in strategy documents.

    Liquidity and risk management discipline also become central. In both trading and corporate finance, experience shows that many failures stem not from being wrong on direction, but from being overexposed when conditions change. Scaling risk to market conditions, maintaining funding flexibility and understanding how quickly liquidity can evaporate are essential practices. This is as true for corporate balance sheets as it is for trading books.

    Operational resilience must be viewed through the same lens. Supply-chain redundancy, cybersecurity preparedness and data governance are no longer purely operational concerns. They influence financial stability, investor confidence and regulatory trust. In a fragmented world, operational disruptions can quickly translate into financial and reputational damage.

    Facing the future

    As we approach 2026, leadership in the Middle East faces a clear test. The global environment is unlikely to become simpler or more predictable. Firms that continue to rely on assumptions shaped by a different era will find themselves reacting rather than positioning. Those that invest in disciplined risk management, flexible planning and operational resilience will be better placed to navigate uncertainty and to turn volatility into strategic advantage.

    In this environment, risk management is not an obstacle to growth. It is the framework that makes sustainable growth possible.

    Ultimately – and this is an often overlooked critical point – none of these adjustments, whether in scenario planning, liquidity discipline, or operational resilience, can be effective without the right human capital in place. 

    Geopolitical fragmentation and financial volatility are not risks that can be fully addressed through models or policies alone. They require informed judgement, institutional memory and the ability to interpret weak signals before they become material threats or missed opportunities. 

    Firms that succeed in this environment will be those that deliberately invest in corporate knowledge: building internal capabilities where possible and complementing them with external expertise where necessary. This means involving professionals with the right background, cross-market experience and a proven, proactive approach to risk awareness and governance. 

    In a fragmented world, competitive advantage increasingly depends not only on capital or strategy, but on the quality of people entrusted with understanding risk, challenging assumptions and guiding decision-making under uncertainty.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15306336/main.gif
  • Oman’s growth forecast points upwards

    24 December 2025

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15306449/main.gif
    MEED Editorial
  • December 2025: Data drives regional projects

    23 December 2025

    Click here to download the PDF

    Includes: Top inward FDI locations by project volume | Brent spot price | Construction output

    MEED’s January 2026 report on Oman includes:

    > COMMENT: Oman steadies growth with strategic restraint
    > ECONOMY: Oman pursues diversification amid regional concerns
    > BANKING: Oman banks feel impact of stronger economy
    > OIL & GAS: LNG goals galvanise Oman’s oil and gas sector
    > POWER & WATER: Oman prepares for a wave of IPP awards
    > CONSTRUCTION: Momentum builds in construction sector

    To see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click here
    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15306140/main.gif
    MEED Editorial
  • Local firm bids lowest for Kuwait substation deal

    22 December 2025

    The local Al-Ahleia Switchgear Company has submitted the lowest price of KD33.9m ($110.3m) for a contract to build a 400/132/11 kV substation at the South Surra township for Kuwait’s Public Authority for Housing Welfare (PAHW).

    The bid was marginally lower than the two other offers of KD35.1m and KD35.5m submitted respectively by Saudi Arabia’s National Contracting Company (NCC) and India’s Larsen & Toubro.

    PAHW is expected to take about three months to evaluate the prices before selecting the successful contractor.

    The project is one of several transmission and distribution projects either out to bid or recently awarded by Kuwait’s main affordable housing client.

    This year alone, it has awarded two contracts worth more than $100m for cable works at its 1Z, 2Z, 3Z and 4Z 400kV substations at Al-Istiqlal City, and two deals totalling just under $280m for the construction of seven 132/11kV substations in the same township.

    Most recently, it has tendered two contracts to build seven 132/11kV main substations at its affordable housing project, west of Kuwait City. The bid deadline for the two deals covering the MS-01 through to MS-08 substations is 8 January.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15305745/main.gif
    Edward James
  • Saudi-Dutch JV awards ‘supercentre’ metals reclamation project

    22 December 2025

    The local Advanced Circular Materials Company (ACMC), a joint venture of the Netherlands-based Shell & AMG Recycling BV (SARBV) and local firm United Company for Industry (UCI), has awarded the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract for the first phase of its $500m-plus metals reclamation complex in Jubail.

    The contract, estimated to be worth in excess of $200m, was won by China TianChen Engineering Corporation (TCC), a subsidiary of China National Chemical Engineering Company (CNCEC), following the issue of the tender in July 2024.

    Under the terms of the deal, TCC will process gasification ash generated at Saudi Aramco’s Jizan refining complex on the Red Sea coast to produce battery-grade vanadium oxide and vanadium electrolyte for vanadium redox flow batteries. AMG will provide the licensed technology required for the production process.

    The works are the first of four planned phases at the catalyst and gasification ash recycling ‘Supercentre’, which is located at the PlasChem Park in Jubail Industrial City 2 alongside the Sadara integrated refining and petrochemical complex.

    Phase 2 will expand the facility to process spent catalysts from heavy oil upgrading facilities to produce ferrovanadium for the steel industry and/or additional battery-grade vanadium oxide.

    Phase 3 involves installing a manufacturing facility for residue-upgrading catalysts.

    In the fourth phase, a vanadium electrolyte production plant will be developed.

    The developers expect a total reduction of 3.6 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions a year when the four phases of the project are commissioned.

    SARBV first announced its intention to build a metal reclamation and catalyst manufacturing facility in Saudi Arabia in November 2019. The kingdom’s Ministry of Investment, then known as the Saudi Arabian General Investment Authority (Sagia), supported the project.

    In July 2022, SARBV and UCI signed the agreement to formalise their joint venture and build the proposed facility.

    The project has received support from Saudi Aramco’s Namaat industrial investment programme. Aramco, at the time, also signed an agreement with the joint venture to offtake vanadium-bearing gasification ash from its Jizan refining complex.

    Photo credit: SARBV

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/15305326/main.gif
    Edward James