meed-logo

line1 line2 line3
SIGN IN / REGISTER

UAE counts energy infrastructure costs

8 April 2026

Since the conflict began on 28 February, the UAE has faced the most sustained aerial bombardment in its history. The two-week ceasefire announced on 7 April promises to halt the strikes, but does not address the damage they have left behind.

Energy infrastructure bore a significant share of the impact, with strikes and interception debris shutting down or curtailing operations at the Habshan gas processing complex, the Ruwais refinery, the Borouge petrochemicals plant at Ruwais, the Fujairah export terminal, and upstream assets at the Bu Hasa and Asab onshore fields.

Fujairah bypass degraded

The Habshan-Fujairah pipeline – also known as the Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline (Adcop) – is the UAE’s principal strategic asset for keeping crude exports moving in case of disruption to the Strait of Hormuz export route.

Running approximately 400 kilometres from Abu Dhabi’s onshore fields to the port of Fujairah, Adcop can routinely carry an estimated 1.5 million barrels a day (b/d), with a reported maximum throughput of close to 1.8 million b/d.

Iran moved against the Fujairah terminus almost immediately. On 3 March, debris from an intercepted drone triggered a fire at the Fujairah Oil Industry Zone, damaging one of JSW Infrastructure’s storage tanks.

On 14 March, a fresh attack caused fires at oil storage facilities at the Port of Fujairah, with loading operations suspended. A separate drone strike on 16 March then triggered a large fire, leading to another suspension of oil loading operations.

The International Energy Agency estimated, prior to the conflict, that the UAE was exporting around 1.1 million b/d of domestic crude through Fujairah, leaving up to 700,000 b/d of additional headroom in a strait-closure scenario.

Despite the terminal disruptions, Kpler tracking data show Fujairah exports averaged 1.62 million b/d in March, up from 1.17 million b/d in February – but the repeated strikes compounded a crisis already defined by the Hormuz blockade.

Upstream oil field impacts

Iran’s strikes also spread well beyond the processing hubs and export terminals. On 16 March, a drone attack struck the Shah gas field, 180km southwest of the capital, deep in Abu Dhabi’s desert interior, and ignited a fire at the facility.

Operations were suspended while damage was assessed; no injuries were reported.

Shah supplies approximately 20% of the UAE’s gas and accounts for around 5% of global granulated sulphur output.

The field is operated by Adnoc Sour Gas – a joint venture 60% owned by Adnoc and 40% by Occidental Petroleum – with a capacity to produce 1.28 billion standard cubic feet of gas a day. The current status of operations is unknown.

On 30 March, Nasa Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS) thermal anomaly data identified active fire signatures at two further onshore sites: at the natural gas processing facilities operated by Adnoc Onshore, and the Bu Hasa natural gas field – both around 120km southwest of the capital.

Separately, satellite imagery indicated significant damage at the Asab Central Degassing Station, an Adnoc facility 130km directly south from the capital.

No official statement from Adnoc or the Abu Dhabi Media Office has confirmed the nature or extent of damage at any of these three sites.

Industrial cluster damage

The strikes on the Ruwais Industrial Complex, roughly 200 kilometres west of the capital, have perhaps been the most concerning for Abu Dhabi’s long-term strategic ambitions.

The complex houses the Adnoc Ruwais refinery, the Borouge petrochemicals plant, the Fertil fertiliser facility and a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal under construction.

On 10 March, Adnoc halted the Ruwais refinery – capable of processing 922,000 barrels of oil a day – as a precautionary measure after a drone strike ignited a fire in the surrounding industrial zone.

The most recent strike at Ruwais landed on 5 April, when authorities confirmed they were battling fires caused by falling debris following successful air defence interceptions. Operations were suspended at the time, pending a damage assessment.

The latter strike came at a commercially sensitive time – just five days after the 31 March creation of Borouge International – a $60bn merger by Adnoc’s investment arm XRG and Austria’s Borouge, Borealis and Nova Chemicals into a single industrial platform.

Upstream gas field strikes

The Habshan gas complex at the Bab field was targeted three times over three weeks.

On 18 March, Abu Dhabi confirmed an attack on the Habshan facility, stating it had been successfully intercepted with no injuries. Operations were temporarily suspended before the site returned to service.

The second strike, on 3 April, was more damaging. Falling debris from intercepted projectiles ignited two fires at the complex.

The Abu Dhabi Media Office confirmed that one person lost their life during the evacuation of the site, and four others sustained minor injuries – the first fatality at an energy facility in the conflict.

Operations were suspended immediately, with Adnoc assessing damage at the UAE’s main facility for collecting and processing gas from the emirate’s fields and distributing it for domestic use. No recovery timeline has been made public.

The third strike came on 7 April, in the hours around the ceasefire announcement, with the Abu Dhabi Media Office confirming authorities were responding to a fire at Habshan following an intercepted attack.

The accumulation problem

The repeat targeting of multiple sites, and most notably, Fujairah, Habshan and Ruwais, has demonstrated Iran’s readiness to re-engage restored sites throughout the conflict.

That pattern materially complicates any assessment of repair economics or restart confidence across the affected portfolio, even under ceasefire conditions.

The UAE is now simultaneously managing the suspension or curtailment of activities at multiple facilities across multiple verticals within its energy sector value chain.

No official repair timeline has been provided for Habshan, Shah, Ruwais or Borouge – let alone the sites for which no official confirmation of damages exists.

This absence could become increasingly difficult to sustain commercially as customers seek contractual certainty on when supply from the UAE’s core energy infrastructure will resume.

The ceasefire may have halted the strikes; but remaining are both the repair bill and the need for clearly articulated answers to critical commercial questions.

UAE energy infrastructure: conflict timeline

Key strikes on UAE energy assets, 28 February – 7 April 2026

Date

Facility/site

Detail

28 Feb

Conflict begins

US-Israeli strikes on Iran trigger Iranian retaliatory aerial campaign against UAE and wider Gulf

3–16 Mar

Fujairah Oil Industry Zone / Port of Fujairah

Repeated strikes and interception debris cause fires at storage and loading facilities

3 Mar – JSW Infrastructure storage tank damaged

14/16 Mar – incidents suspend loading operations

10 Mar

Ruwais refinery

Adnoc halts refinery as precaution after drone strike ignites fire in surrounding industrial zone

16 Mar

Shah gas field

Drone strike ignites fire; operations suspended

18 Mar

Bab field/ Habshan gas complex

Interception debris causes shutdown. No injuries. Operations temporarily suspended before resuming

30 Mar

ADCO facilities / Bu Hasa field / Asab CDS

NASA Firms thermal data identifies active fire signatures at Adnoc Onshore gas processing facilities and Bu Hasa field. Satellite imagery indicates damage at Asab Central Degassing Station. No official comment

3 Apr

Habshan gas complex (second strike)

Interception debris ignites two fires. One fatality during evacuation. Four injuries. Abu Dhabi Media Office confirms “significant damage”

5 Apr

Borouge petrochemicals, Ruwais

Three fires at Borouge plant following interception debris. Operations suspended

8 Apr

Two-week ceasefire agreed

US and Iran agree two-week ceasefire mediated by Pakistan. Iran agrees to allow coordinated passage through the Strait of Hormuz.

8 Apr

Habshan gas complex (third strike)

Authorities confirm response to fire at Habshan following intercepted attack, in the hours around the ceasefire announcement.

Sources: Abu Dhabi Media Office; UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs; JSW Infrastructure exchange filing; NASA FIRMS thermal data; OSINT satellite imagery, MEED.

 

https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/16300091/main.gif
John Bambridge

Register for MEED's guest program now to access this article.

Click here to register
Exclusive from Meed
Related Articles
  • Consortiums submit bids for Shagaya zone two plant

    27 July 2026

     

    At least three consortiums have submitted bids for zone two of the third phase of Kuwait’s Al-Dibdibah power and Al-Shagaya renewable energy project.

    The Kuwait Authority for Partnership Projects (Kapp) is procuring the 500MW solar photovoltaic (PV) independent power project (IPP) in partnership with Kuwait’s Ministry of Electricity, Water & Renewable Energy (MEWRE).

    According to a source, bids were submitted on 26 July. The bidding consortiums are: 

    • Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company (Masdar, UAE) / Al-Ghanim International (Kuwait)
    • Acwa (Saudi Arabia) / Arabian Engineering Projects Contracting Company (Kuwait)
    • EDF Renewables (France) / Al-Kharafi & Sons (Kuwait) / Korea Western Power Company 

    Kapp issued a tender to develop the project last November. In October 2025, MEED reported that five consortiums and five individual companies had prequalified to participate in the project.

    The Al-Dibdibah power and Al-Shagaya renewable energy phase three zone two project is located within the administrative boundaries of Kuwait’s Jahra governorate, west of Kuwait City.

    The winning bidder will design, finance, construct and maintain the project.

    The zone two scheme is the fourth renewable energy project to be developed under Kuwait’s public-private partnership programme.

    Zone one

    Kuwait aims to have a renewable energy installed capacity of 22,100MW by 2030 as part of the 20-year strategy announced in March 2025 and ending in 2050.

    In July, MEED reported that a frontrunner had emerged for the Al-Dibdibah and Al-Shagaya phase three, zone one contract following the opening of financial bids.

    The phase three, zone one IPP will have a total power generating capacity of 1,100MW.

    Similar to the zone two project, EY and DLA Piper, together with DNV, are advising the client on the zone one solar IPP.

    Separately, Kuwait-based contractor Power Grid Company recently won a KD48.6m ($158.7m) contract to build a 400kV overhead transmission line linking the Shagaya solar energy generation station with Wafra in southern Kuwait.

    The transmission line will connect Shagaya to the Wafra (Z) transformer station and is part of the wider Shagaya masterplan. The contract was awarded by MEWRE, with Power Grid one of three firms that submitted bids last year.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/17786075/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • GCC banks prove resilient amid turmoil

    27 July 2026

     

    Gulf banks are proving adept at navigating the economic and geopolitical turbulence that comes with operating in the region. These skills have come to the fore this year, as regional lenders draw on stable funding profiles and ample capital and liquidity buffers that protect them from near-term credit risks. 

    GCC banks’ fundamentals have proved remarkably resilient to the Iran-related turmoil, assuming the intensity of the February-April stage of the military conflict does not resume.

    There have not been any significant outflows of external funding. While anecdotal evidence suggests some depositors briefly moved funds out of the region at the start of the war, ratings agency S&P Global notes that their return reflects confidence that the war will prove short-lived.

    Funding strength

    Metrics for the early part of the year revealed a robust picture. Domestic deposits held up strongly in the first quarter of 2026, total GCC domestic deposits rising by 16.9% in year-on-year terms, compensating for the decline in interbank funding. 

    State-linked deposits grew at a particularly rapid pace, led by the UAE and Kuwait, which offset decelerating private-sector deposit growth in those countries. 

    Domestic deposits accelerated in April, a pointer to GCC governments’ proactive stances in shielding their banking systems from undue stress. The inflow of public deposits accelerated quite significantly in this period, although that pace will likely subside as conditions gradually normalise. 

    Such deposits continue to underpin GCC banks’ wider performances. “Funding and liquidity is generally a strength for the region. Government deposits typically make up 20%-30% of the banking sector deposits. That is really important as these are sticky deposits,” says Redmond Ramsdale, head of Middle East ratings at Fitch Ratings.

    Funding and liquidity is generally a strength for the region

    Gulf states’ heavy reliance on public sector and government-related deposits has proved valuable in the current environment, anchoring banks’ funding profiles and helping reduce potential risks.

    Fund outflows have not materialised to any significant degree. “We had some anecdotal evidence of funds being withdrawn, but they returned in the following weeks,” says Ramsdale.

    Solid fundamentals

    GCC banks entered the conflict period in strong shape. According to S&P, domestic private sector credit growth in the region remained robust in the first quarter – the annualised growth rate was 8% at the end of March. 

    Core capital buffers are about 15%-16% – higher still for the top lenders – ensuring total loss-absorbing capacity stays below 9% of equity. Regulatory ratios exceed relevant thresholds, providing a significant buffer, according to ratings agency Moody’s.

    “If you look at the whole region, the proportion of the lending book that is non-performing, on a weighted average basis, sits around 2%,” says Badis Shubailat, a senior analyst at Moody’s. 

    “Against this solid level of asset quality, you have a cushion of provisions for expected losses that more than covers the existing stock of problem loans, which provides a strong first line of defence.”

    Then, as a second line of defence, are core capital buffers that remain high by global standards, with levels around 15%-16%. Put together, this explains why the banks are sitting on comfortable positions in terms of loss-absorption capacity.

    At the end of Q1 2025, the top 45 GCC banks reported an average Tier 1 capital ratio of 17%, with coverage ratios of 155.8%, according to S&P. 

    “Credit losses are at historical lows of 50 basis points (bps) for the region, and there are very good provisioning buffers – all of which helps to mitigate the negative consequences of the expected asset quality deterioration,” says Tatjana Lescova, director and lead analyst at S&P.

    According to Shubailat, the fact that the conflict impact on GCC banks has not been as pronounced as on other sectors reflects that over the past three years – and until right before the conflict started – the region as a whole, and its banking systems, had demonstrated remarkable resilience. In contrast, major advanced economies were struggling with inflationary pressures and subdued economic growth. 

    “This was visible in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, the two largest economic diversification engines in the region, which happen to also represent more than two-thirds of total banking system assets,” says Shubailat.

    Limited exposure

    Gulf banks have also been helped by the fact that those economic sectors most impacted by conflict – tourism, hospitality, energy – do not generally form a large part of their collective loans books. 

    “There will be weaker performance of borrowers in the most obvious affected sectors like infrastructure, tourism, logistics, transport and real estate, but tourism is actually a pretty small exposure for the banks – less than 3% of loan books,” says Ramsdale. “There might be a bit of pressure on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which are less able to cope with the pressures than the larger corporates, but again, for banks, SME lending is not very big.” 

    Banks’ exposure to the real estate and construction sectors is highest in Qatar – 31% of total credit at the end of March – while the exposure in Kuwait stands at 25%, with Saudi Arabia at 16% and Bahrain at 12%, notes S&P. UAE banks have been consistently reducing their exposure to these sectors, down to 13% at the end of March, compared to 21% at year-end 2020. 

    Moody’s Shubailat says that developers in the UAE sit on solid balance sheets and strong revenue backlogs, while banks’ exposure to the construction sector has declined. “So the quantum is lower, the credit quality of the exposure is better, and the banks are sitting on higher capital and provisioning buffers,” he notes.

    Gulf bankers are not resting on their laurels. They know that even if bad loans have been limited, they cannot forestall the possibility of problem exposures further down the road. 

    “Asset quality deterioration is a risk that we expect to materialise later in the year. This is because of weaker macro expectations, and negative impact on some of the corporate sectors, albeit varying across different GCC countries,” says Lescova.

    On average, for the region, S&P expects 20 bps of increases in credit losses for this year. When it comes to asset quality, the regulatory forbearance measures announced by three central banks will help alleviate the impact.

    Policy support

    Central bank moves have added another layer of support. Forbearance measures from the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar central banks have allowed additional headroom.

    For example, in mid-March, the Central Bank of the UAE launched a five-pillar resilience package that relaxed capital buffer stipulations, representing more than $272bn in support. 

    Kuwait eased liquidity requirements, raised maximum lending limits and released a portion of the capital conservation buffer to expand refinancing and credit quality absorption capacity. Qatar, meanwhile, has cut the reserve requirement from 4.5% to 3.5% for deposits.

    Forbearance measures from the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar central banks have allowed additional headroom

    Such measures were not a response to a banking crisis, says Ramsdale. “Some of the support packages that we have seen coming out of the central banks, in the UAE, Qatar and Kuwait, were preventative support measures,” he says.

    “They were designed to boost confidence and limit that pass through from temporary deposit volatility. It was not to do with acute banking stress.”

    Market confidence

    Larger banks are better positioned to cope with straitened economic times. They are generally more geographically diversified beyond their domestic markets, and international operations have historically been a growth driver for them. 

    “When there is increased market uncertainty, larger banks may benefit from a flight-to-quality movement, with deposits moved away from smaller banks. Based on Q1 results, only a few smaller banks have reported a contraction in the customer deposits,” says Lescova.

    The GCC’s largest banks, including Al-Rajhi Banking & Investment Corporation, Saudi National Bank, First Abu Dhabi Bank, Qatar National Bank, Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and Emirates NBD, remain highly profitable, although they may not perform as strongly as they would have had the conflict not occurred.

    “We already expected some softening in profitability before the conflict, because of the normalisation of the cost of risk upwards from incredibly low levels over the last three years, [which] were driven by a very strong recovery performance from the banks,” says Shubailat. 

    “In turn, this current situation adds a layer of pressure to the normalising profitability story by increasing provisioning needs in light of the recent economic shocks,” he adds.  

    Confidence in GCC banks was evident from the outset of the conflict. In early April, Emirates NBD priced a $750m AT1 capital issuance, the first international debt capital markets transaction by a GCC issuer since late February.

    “The first ceasefire saw things like private placements start happening again, and that slowly translated into the opening up of public markets. 

    “Emirates NBD was one of the first banks to open up that market, and we are seeing the largest banks issuing again,” says Ramsdale.

    The operating environment for Saudi Arabia is ranked BBB+ – a strong position, all things considered. Ramsdale notes that Riyadh’s reprioritisation of large projects associated with Vision 2030 “means growth will probably be slightly slower in Saudi Arabia”, but adds: “That is actually a good thing, because growth was so strong it was beginning to pressure funding, liquidity and capitalisation. 

    “Taking off some of that pressure is a positive for banks.”

    Growth prospects

    Stronger earnings performances will allow banks to bankroll mergers and acquisitions (M&A), building on inorganic routes to growth. Within the past year, the National Bank of Bahrain and Bank of Bahrain & Kuwait (BBK) have agreed to explore a merger, while BBK has also absorbed HSBC’s retail banking business.

    Emirates NBD is reported to be looking to acquire HSBC’s business in Turkiye, a country where the Dubai bank already has a presence through its takeover of DenizBank in 2019. It also grew its stake in India’s RBL Bank this year to 60%. 

    “Certainly the big banks will remain opportunistic over M&A – where the value comes at the right price, then they are interested. And if the big international banks are going to pull out, they tend to have some of the best-quality assets, so you can understand why regional players might be interested in them,” says Ramsdale.

    Such moves should provide reassurance that, despite recent challenges, GCC banks are well placed to ride out the remainder of 2026 and resume the positive trajectory  that was evident before the Iran war shook the region. 

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/17722682/main.gif
    James Gavin
  • Saudi Arabia issues RFQ for third round of gas-fired IPPs

    27 July 2026

     

    Saudi Power Procurement Company (SPPC) has issued the request for qualifications (RFQ) for the third round of its combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) independent power producer (IPP) programme.

    According to the documents, the deadline for developers to submit statements of qualification is 16 August.

    SPPC expects to issue notices of prequalification on 11 September, after which request for proposals documents will be issued to qualified applicants. 

    The latest date for the submission of clarification questions is 9 August.

    The RFQ covers future CCGT IPPs, although the document does not specify the number, locations or capacities of the projects.

    Earlier in July, MEED reported that Saudi Arabia had begun qualification for CCGT plants to be built with provision for future carbon capture units.

    The projects will comprise new CCGT plants developed on a build-own-operate basis. Each project will be implemented through a special-purpose project company wholly owned by the successful bidder.

    The project companies will sell the entire capacity and output of the plants to SPPC under 25-year power-purchase agreements starting from the respective commercial operation dates. SPPC will be responsible for dispatching electricity from the plants. 

    The plants will use advanced H-class or J-class gas turbine technology. Each IPP is expected to comprise two or three gas turbine generators, corresponding heat recovery steam generators with duct firing, and one or two steam turbine generators.

    Natural gas will be the primary fuel, with diesel used as a backup. SPPC will be responsible for supplying both fuels under the power-purchase agreements.

    CCGT IPP programme

    SPPC said the procurement marks the next stage of its CCGT IPP programme.

    The first four projects comprise Taiba 1, Taiba 2, Qassim 1 and Qassim 2, with a combined capacity of 7,200MW.

    The second group comprises Rumah 1, Rumah 2, Nairyah 1 and Nairyah 2, also with a combined capacity of 7,200MW.

    All eight plants are under construction, with Qassim 1 and Taiba 1 expected to reach commissioning in 2028. 

    Developers that were prequalified as financial or technical members for the Rumah and Nairyah projects can request to maintain the same qualification for the upcoming CCGT projects. They must submit the request and updated financial information by the 16 August deadline. 

    For new applicants, financial members must have reached financial close on at least two non-recourse IPP, IWPP, IWP or ISTP projects since January 2010. At least one must have involved senior debt of $500m or more. Applicants must also have a minimum net worth of $350m.

    Technical members must demonstrate development experience on at least two conventional energy IPPs with a combined capacity of 2,000MW since January 2016. They must also have ownership experience on at least two such projects totalling 3,000MW and relevant operations and maintenance experience.

    US/India-based Synergy Consulting is the financial adviser for the procurement, Germany’s Fichtner is the technical adviser and UK-headquartered Eversheds Sutherland is the legal adviser. 

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/17785272/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall
  • Contractor wins The Chedi residences Dubai contract

    27 July 2026

    Dubai-based firm Ancient Builders Constructions has won a contract to build The Chedi Private Residences, located in the Barsha Heights area near Sheikh Zayed Road.

    The contract was awarded by local developer Al-Seeb Real Estate Development.

    The project comprises a 250-metre-tall, 44-storey tower and will offer about 117 residential units upon completion.

    Enabling works are under way and are being undertaken by local firm Soiltec Piling & Foundation.

    Dubai-based High Art Engineering Consultancy is the project consultant.

    Local architectural firms Bruno Guelaff and BG Group are the project designers.

    Construction is expected to be completed by 2029.

    Al-Seeb Real Estate Development’s latest contract award in the UAE market comes amid heightened real estate activity in the construction sector. Schemes worth more than $323bn are in the execution or planning stages, according to UK-based analytics firm GlobalData.

    GlobalData forecasts that output from the UAE’s residential construction sector will grow by 3% in real terms over 2026-29, supported by infrastructure, energy and utilities developments, as well as residential construction projects.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/17785193/main.png
    Yasir Iqbal
  • Saudi Arabia issues RFP for Group 2 bess projects

    27 July 2026

     

    Saudi Arabia’s principal buyer, Saudi Power Procurement Company (SPPC), has issued the request for proposals (RFP) for the second phase of its independent battery energy storage system (bess) projects in Saudi Arabia.

    The Group 2 programme comprises six independent storage provider (ISP) projects with a total capacity of 3GW, equivalent to 12,000 megawatt-hours based on a four-hour storage duration.

    According to a source, the RFP was issued earlier in July and developers have since submitted a first round of clarification requests to SPPC as they prepare their bids. 

    Developers have until October to submit proposals, the source said.

    The six bess projects include:

    • Samha bess ISP: 500MW (Qassim)
    • Al-Leeth bess ISP: 500MW (Mecca)
    • Al-Henakiyah bess ISP: 500MW (Medina)
    • Khulis bess ISP: 500MW (Mecca)
    • Sadawi bess ISP: 500MW (Eastern Province)
    • Ashyrah bess ISP: 500MW (Mecca)

    On 1 July, MEED reported that up to 27 firms had prequalified to participate in the second phase. SPPC previously received statements of qualification on 13 May.

    It is understood that Abu Dhabi National Energy Company (Masdar, UAE), Acwa (Saudi Arabia), EDF (France), Korea Electric Power Corporation (Kepco, South Korea), International Power (Engie, France) and Marubeni Corporation (Japan) are among the companies likely to make offers for the contracts.

    Winning bidders will hold 100% equity in a special purpose vehicle (SPV), with each SPV entering into a storage services agreement with SPPC as part of the independent storage provider structure. 

    The programme forms part of Saudi Arabia’s National Renewable Energy Programme (NREP) and supports the kingdom’s target of generating about 50% of its electricity from renewable energy by 2030. The projects will be developed under a build-own-operate model.

    US/India-based Synergy Consulting is advising SPPC on the energy storage Group 1 and Group 2 programme.

    Contracts are expected to be awarded for Group 1 Bess projects in the coming months, with both Acwa and Engie understood to be frontrunners for these contracts.

    Separately, SPPC has extended the deadline for developers bidding for four solar projects under round seven of the NREP, led and supervised by the Ministry of Energy.

    The deadline for the four solar photovoltaic independent power producer (IPP) projects with a combined capacity of 3,100MW has been extended to 30 August.

    The deadline for the two wind IPPs with a combined capacity of 2,200MW has been extended to 14 September.

    https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/17742724/main.jpg
    Mark Dowdall