Al Sudani struggles to maintain Iraq’s political stability
9 May 2024

Iraq’s Prime Minister Mohammed Al Sudani is now more than halfway through his term. While there have been some notable economic developments, such as the massive energy deal with TotalEnergies signed in July 2023, his main accomplishment may well be maintaining a fragile political settlement.
When he took office in late October 2022, it ended a year of tense political infighting following the 2021 election. The next national poll is expected in October 2025, but while the government itself may appear secure, Iraqi politics is as turbulent as ever.
The Council of Representatives has not had a permanent speaker since November, when Mohammed Al Halbousi was dismissed by the Federal Supreme Court and forced to step away from parliament. Mohsen Al Mandalawi was named acting speaker, but fierce debate continues over handing the job to anyone else on a more formal basis.
The latest figure to be proposed is Salem Al Issawi, who is backed by three Sunni blocs but opposed by the largest Sunni group, Al-Halbousi’s Taqaddum (Progress) party.
Under Iraq’s ‘muhasasa’ system of dividing the political spoils along religious and ethnic lines, the speaker’s job goes to a Sunni politician, while the federal presidency goes to a Kurd and the prime minister is Shia.
Al Sudani is now also facing a fresh challenge on the domestic front in the shape of a mooted return to the political scene by rival Shia leader Moqtada Al Sadr, who announced his retirement from frontline politics in August 2022. Earlier that year, he had pulled all his MPs from parliament, effectively handing power to Al Sudani’s Coordination Framework.
Al Sadr now looks set to change course. On 10 April, he renamed his organisation from the Sadrist Movement to the National Shiite Movement and further statements since then point to a possible return to the electoral battlefield. Given his past ability to mobilise large numbers of followers, he could have a significant impact on the next election and events leading up to it.
“Al Sadr maintains strong support from parts of the street, but it may prove difficult for him to reassert himself after ceding control over powerful institutions to the Coordination Framework,” said Winthrop Rodgers, an independent analyst focused on Iraq. “However, his return will certainly complicate dynamics within Shia politics.”
His likely return will also test Iranian influence on Baghdad. Tehran has been able to exert huge influence over Iraqi politics through its allied Shia politicians and militia groups, but Al Sadr has been the most prominent Shia figure to resist such ties in recent years.
Al Sudani has, though, been reaching out to other neighbours, too. In April, he hosted Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who was making his first trip to the country since 2011. The visit resulted in more than 20 agreements and memoranda of understanding, including one covering the contentious issue of cross-border water resources, as well as security and trade. However, there was no sign of progress on re-opening an oil export pipeline from Iraqi Kurdistan to Turkey.
Trade route
Under Al Sudani, Baghdad and Ankara have also managed to get Abu Dhabi and Doha on board with the Development Road initiative, a $17bn plan to develop a 1,200km trade route from the Gulf through Iraq to Turkey and, from there, on to Europe. The UAE had previously thrown its weight behind the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor initiative, launched in New Delhi in September – but that plan involves using Israeli ports.
“In light of the Gaza war, a trade route through Israel is unlikely to be something that many Gulf rulers want to be too closely associated with at the moment,” said one regional analyst.
For the Iraqi trade route to build up real momentum, the security situation around the country will need to improve further. While the Islamic State has been largely defeated, other pro-Iran groups continue to be active, including several that have banded together as the Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI).
Many of that umbrella group’s recent actions have been directed against Israel, including a cruise missile attack on 2 May, which targeted Tel Aviv. Such actions hold the potential for Iraq to be drawn into any expansion of the Israel-Hamas conflict, perhaps as a proxy battleground between Iran and Israel.
Other apparent IRI attacks have been directed at local targets, such as a drone attack on the Khor Mor gas field in the Kurdistan region in late April, which killed four Yemeni workers and forced UAE-based operator Dana Gas to suspend operations for several days.
Kurdistan election in doubt
Kurdistan, meanwhile, has other all-but-intractable political problems. Most recently, the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) insisted it will not participate in the regional parliamentary election planned for 10 June – two years after it should have been held.
That stance was prompted by a Federal Supreme Court ruling in February that ended the practice of reserving 11 seats for minority groups including Turkmen, Christians and Armenians after ruling that the quota was “unconstitutional”. The MPs holding those seats had generally voted in step with the KDP – something that led its rival, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), and others to file a court case arguing that the communities were no longer properly represented.
The KDP has emerged as the largest party from every election in the region over the past two decades and its pledge to sit out this election creates a thorny issue for Baghdad, which is now in charge of the process – after the Supreme Court also ruled in February that oversight of the elections should be handed over from the Kurdish authorities to the federal Independent High Electoral Commission.
“If the KDP does not participate in the election, the Kurdistan Regional Government will effectively cease to function as a cohesive political entity; if Baghdad gives into the KDP’s gamesmanship, it sets a bad precedent that a single party can prevent an election if it feels it will be disadvantaged,” said Rodgers.
No solution has been found as yet. Kurdistan region president Nechirvan Barzani was in Tehran on 6 May, where he held talks with Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, among others. Trade and cross-border security issues were at the top of the agenda, but some reports suggested Barzani had also tried to persuade Tehran to put pressure on the PUK to agree to a delay to the June poll.
On 8 May, a further element of chaos was leant to the proceedings when the High Electoral Commission suspended preparation for the Kurdish election in response to a lawsuit filed by the KDP over the distribution of constituencies.
Together, the prospect of a major rival Shia bloc returning to Baghdad politics ahead of the 2025 Iraqi parliamentary election and the risk of the breakdown of the political process in Kurdistan threaten to disrupt the relative political calm that Al Sudani has worked to cultivate. Handling the shifting political landscape will require astuteness.
Image: مكتب اعلامي لرئيس الوزراء, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Exclusive from Meed
-
Saudi projects hold steady24 September 2026
-
Petrokemya selects turbine supplier for cogeneration plant24 September 2026
-
What IFAD’s wind-down means for Gulf commodity markets24 September 2026
-
US DFC approves $1.8bn financing for Jordan National Water Carrier24 September 2026
-
Tecnimont breaks ground on Ruwais NGL train 5 project24 September 2026
All of this is only 1% of what MEED.com has to offer
Subscribe now and unlock all the 153,671 articles on MEED.com
- All the latest news, data, and market intelligence across MENA at your fingerprints
- First-hand updates and inside information on projects, clients and competitors that matter to you
- 20 years' archive of information, data, and news for you to access at your convenience
- Strategize to succeed and minimise risks with timely analysis of current and future market trends
Related Articles
-
Saudi projects hold steady24 September 2026
Commentary
Colin Foreman
EditorSaudi Arabia’s project market is holding steady in 2026, with contract awards reaching $68bn in the year so far. The resilience is notable given the regional conflict that began in February and ongoing security threats that have disrupted shipping through key maritime chokepoints.
The kingdom’s investment strategy has also shifted. After years of aggressive project spending through sovereign wealth vehicle the Public Investment Fund, Riyadh has moved towards event-driven procurement with fixed deadlines: the 2034 Fifa World Cup, Expo 2030 Riyadh and non-negotiable housing and healthcare commitments, together with a focus on the future economy with major investments earmarked for data centres.
The approach is leaner than the sprawling gigaproject model that characterised early Vision 2030 years, and more focused on achieving tangible milestones.
Construction contract awards hit $20bn in the first half of this year, maintaining momentum against the backdrop of geopolitical uncertainty and a GDP contraction in the second quarter.
Saudi Aramco’s upstream investment programme remains substantial, with $50bn-$55bn committed for 2026, split about 65%-70% towards oil and gas. Major projects including the Dorra gas field development and the Jafurah unconventional gas expansion are progressing, underpinned by the company’s strategy of maintaining oil production at 12 million barrels a day while expanding gas capacity.
Downstream activity is also contributing. Chemicals giant Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (Sabic) approved $3.6bn in projects this year, led by the San VII ammonia and urea complex, which was awarded to South Korea’s Samsung E&A for $3.47bn. The company is returning to significant capital investment after several years of constrained spending.
Power sector activity is shifting towards transmission and battery storage infrastructure to support renewable energy targets. The kingdom’s infrastructure pipeline encompasses $175bn of projects in the transport, rail, aviation and roads segments.
Private sector participation is expanding through public-private partnership (PPP) structures, with the National Centre for Privatisation & PPP managing about 200 projects in 17 sectors, worth approximately $190bn.
The market needs more awards. Project completions have reached $91.5bn in 2026, outpacing awards by 35%. While this reflects successful execution of work awarded in prior years, it also indicates that new deals are required in the coming months to maintain activity levels into 2027.

MEED’s September 2026 report on Saudi Arabia includes:
> GOVERNMENT: Riyadh looks to reset its regional defence outlook
> ECONOMY: Conflict bolsters case for Saudi economic diversification
> BANKING: Saudi lenders readjust to lower lending and deposit climate
> UPSTREAM: Aramco upstream spending gathers pace
> DOWNSTREAM: Sabic steps up Saudi petchems investment
> POWER: Saudi Arabia’s power award activity slows
> WATER: Saudi water sector hits sharp slowdown
> CONSTRUCTION: Saudi construction defies the headwinds
> TRANSPORT: Saudi infrastructure pushes forward amid conflictTo see previous issues of MEED Business Review, please click herehttps://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/19794535/main.gif -
Petrokemya selects turbine supplier for cogeneration plant24 September 2026

Saudi petrochemical company Petrokemya has selected Germany’s Siemens Energy as the turbine supplier for its planned 730MW electricity and steam cogeneration project at its complex in Jubail, according to sources.
Under a pre-defined schedule, the supply agreement will be transferred to the winning engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor on 15 June 2027.
This will be followed by the execution of a long-term service agreement with Siemens Energy on 15 July 2027.
As exclusively reported by MEED, developers are preparing to submit proposals for the brownfield project, which will produce up to 1,125 tonnes an hour of steam. It will supply electricity and steam to Petrokemya under a 20-year energy conversion agreement (ECA).
Bids for the project are due by 30 November.
Petrokemya issued the request for proposals (RFP) on 30 June, and provided the technical specifications to bidders on 7 July.
Both Abu Dhabi National Energy Company (Taqa) and Saudi Arabia’s Acwa are understood to be among the developers participating in the project.
As MEED understands, a site visit took place in early August, shortly before prospective developers submitted letters of intent.
Petrokemya is expected to award the contract by 29 April 2027.
The winning bidder will establish a special-purpose vehicle in Saudi Arabia to develop, finance, construct, own and operate the project. Ownership of the project company or plant will transfer to Petrokemya at the end of the ECA term.
Petrokemya is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sabic, which is a majority-owned affiliate of Saudi Aramco. It is understood that Sabic will provide credit support for Petrokemya’s obligations under the ECA.
According to tender documents, the plant will use gas supplied by Petrokemya to generate electricity. Exhaust heat from the gas turbines will be recovered through heat recovery steam generators to produce steam, with a steam turbine generator also potentially producing electricity.
The scope includes the plant and associated infrastructure required to receive gas and feedwater and deliver electricity and steam to Petrokemya. This includes pipelines, substations, cables and other interconnection facilities.
The winning bidder will be responsible for arranging the project’s full financing on a non-recourse basis to Petrokemya and its affiliates.
The final RFP question-and-answer submission deadline is set for 5 November.
https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/19953460/main.jpg -
What IFAD’s wind-down means for Gulf commodity markets24 September 2026

The wind-down of ICE Futures Abu Dhabi (IFAD) – the Abu Dhabi-based futures exchange operated by US-based global exchange and clearing house operator Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) – on 31 July 2026 was the end of an era. It was also the opening move in a transformation whose legal consequences will keep the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) Courts, Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Courts and London arbitral tribunals occupied for years.
One strategy
On 31 July, Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc) announced that all four of its crude grades would move from IFAD pricing to a Platts Dubai prompt-month mechanism in November. ICE published its wind-down circular the same day.
The Iran war was the catalyst: the official selling price of Murban, Adnoc’s flagship crude grade, surged from $63 a barrel in February to $110.75 in May, and Asian refiners – managing their margins against a crude price set two months ahead of loading – demanded a more straightforward mechanism.
But the IFAD wind-down must be read alongside three other key decisions. On 1 May, the UAE withdrew from oil producers’ group Opec, freeing Adnoc from quota constraints that had capped production at 3.4 million barrels a day against a capacity of 4.85 million. On 6 July, Adnoc launched a global liquefied natural gas marketing and trading platform in the ADGM, targeting 47 million tonnes a year by 2035. Then, on 22 July, DP World signed a 50-year concession with the Fujairah Ports Authority to develop the Al-Rugaylat and Dibba terminals on the Gulf of Oman coast.
Together, these decisions constitute a coherent strategic architecture: a Hormuz-independent, Fujairah-centred, Indian Ocean-facing trade infrastructure designed to serve the markets where commodity demand will be most durable over the next 30 years.
Force majeure battleground
The legal consequences of the Iran war are immediate and novel. The most contested issue is force majeure.
IFAD was established within ADGM, which applies English common law, and was regulated by the ADGM Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA). Under English law, there is no freestanding right to invoke force majeure, and the threshold is demanding. General disruption or increased costs do not suffice. The question is whether performance has become legally or physically impossible.
When Iranian strikes damaged the Fujairah Oil Industry Zone, the sole IFAD delivery point, and vessel traffic through Hormuz fell from over 100 ships a day to fewer than 14, the impossibility argument strengthened materially. But a critical distinction separates parties whose non-delivery was attributable to the physical closure of Hormuz from those whose non-delivery reflected elevated war risk premiums and unavailable insurance: the latter falls short of legal impossibility under English law.
The governing law of each contract is therefore significant. Under UAE civil law, statutory provisions address both impossibility and the court’s discretion to reduce obligations. A party whose contract is governed by English law faces a harder test, even on identical facts.
This asymmetry is generating an uptick in advisory work as trading houses assess their positions across portfolios of contracts with different governing law provisions.
The sanctions picture adds further complexity: the successive reimposition of US sanctions following ceasefire collapses has affected the legality of positions that were fully compliant when established, raising questions for which English law provides no settled answer.
The legal consequences of the Iran war are immediate and novel
Legal infrastructure
The FSRA’s regulatory framework has demonstrated resilience during the crisis. Its Recognised Investment Exchange licensing regime, under which IFAD operated, and its Environmental Instrument classification, making ADGM the first jurisdiction in the world to regulate voluntary carbon credits as financial instruments, remain available to new market entrants.
ADGM Courts, applying English common law, has developed a strong body of legal precedent over 11 years. And London-based ICE Clear Europe’s relationship with IFAD provides a model for how future exchange infrastructure in ADGM might access London clearing capability while remaining regulated in Abu Dhabi.
With the 31st UN Climate Change Conference Cop31 opening in Antalya on 9 November 2026 and Cop32 scheduled for Addis Ababa in 2027, the Article 6 Paris Agreement carbon market framework is developing rapidly. The FSRA’s Environmental Instrument classification positions ADGM as a natural regulatory home for the Gulf-Africa carbon market infrastructure that neither London nor Singapore is positioned to provide. The DP World concession, with its East African port network providing the physical verification layer that carbon credit integrity requires, reinforces that positioning.
Legal practitioners who develop expertise in this intersection of English common law, FSRA regulation, DIFC financial services law and international commodity trading before the IFAD delivery disputes are resolved and before the replacement infrastructure is announced, will be well placed in a jurisdiction growing at 57% annually by assets under management. The story of what follows IFAD has barely begun.
https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/19954346/main.gif -
US DFC approves $1.8bn financing for Jordan National Water Carrier24 September 2026
The US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) has approved a loan of up to $1bn and political-risk insurance of up to $800m for Jordan’s National Water Carrier Project.
The $1bn loan will be provided to National Carrier Project Company (NCPC) to finance the design, development, construction, operation and maintenance of the project’s seawater desalination plant, water conveyance system and dedicated solar generation plant.
The $800m of political-risk insurance will be provided to Paris-based investment and utility firms Meridiam and Suez, which are developing the project.
The National Water Carrier, also known as the Aqaba-Amman Water Desalination and Conveyance Project, is being developed under a public-private partnership between Jordan’s Ministry of Water & Irrigation and NCPC, a special-purpose vehicle owned by Meridiam (90%) and Suez (10%).
The project involves the design, development, construction, operation and maintenance of a seawater desalination plant, a water transmission system and dedicated renewable power generation facilities under a build-operate-transfer model.
Jordan signed the project’s final technical and legal agreement with Meridiam in April, following months of negotiations.
The project’s capital cost was put at about $4.3bn, with total costs including financing estimated at $5.8bn.
Financial close has not yet been completed. The project’s technical director said in July that the final agreements required for financial close were still being prepared, with construction expected to start in the fourth quarter of 2026. Water pumping is scheduled to begin in the fourth quarter of 2030.
Jordan’s cabinet approved a $97m financing agreement with the French Development Agency in July as the government continued to complete the project’s financing arrangements.
The cabinet also approved a package of facilities and exemptions for the National Water Carrier Project on 17 September to help finalise start-up procedures for the project in the Aqaba Special Economic Zone.
Jordan’s water needs
The Aqaba-Amman water desalination and conveyance project will desalinate 300 million cubic metres of seawater annually. It will also include a 450-kilometre pipeline and pumping systems reaching elevations of up to 1,100 metres.
The project is intended to help address Jordan’s severe water scarcity. As one of the world’s most water-stressed countries, Jordan consumes nearly 1 billion cubic metres of water a year.
The domestic sector consumes approximately 50% of this, with only 61 cubic metres of water available per person a year, far below the global absolute water scarcity level of 500 cubic metres of water per capita.
According to the government, the scheme will increase overall water supply by 40%, with per capita availability expected to rise to 110 cubic metres annually.
Annual output from the Water Carrier Project will be nearly equivalent to the total storage capacity of all dams in the kingdom and almost three times the output of the Disi Water Project.
The project is expected to supply about 40% of Jordan’s drinking water needs, with operations scheduled to begin in 2030. It will also include a 280MW solar photovoltaic plant in Al-Quweira covering roughly 30% of the project’s energy needs.
Financing
The government previously said the project had secured about $663m in grants from international partners, including the US, the European Union, Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, France, Italy, Japan and the Green Climate Fund.
The Jordanian government is contributing $722m.
Meridiam is arranging about $2.9bn in private sector financing from international financial institutions. The financing package includes support from institutions including the World Bank Group, European Investment Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction & Development, Islamic Development Bank, Proparco, Japan International Cooperation Agency and the Opec Fund for International Development.
A consortium of Jordanian banks led by Housing Bank is providing up to $1.1bn in local financing, with the Social Security Investment Fund also taking an equity stake alongside Meridiam.
Local manufacturing
The project is also beginning to generate associated industrial investment.
On 30 August, Jordan’s cabinet approved the establishment of a steel pipe manufacturing and coating plant in Aqaba with investment of up to JD120m ($169m). The plant is expected to allocate 50% of its production to the National Water Carrier and create about 420 jobs. Its output will also be available for future water, gas transmission and pumping projects.
The Aqaba Special Economic Zone Authority and the Ministry of Water & Irrigation also launched a dedicated single-window platform in August to streamline licensing and permitting for the National Water Carrier project.
Once operational, the project is expected to remain under the PPP structure for 26 years before ownership transfers to the Jordanian government.
https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/19943001/main.jpg -
Tecnimont breaks ground on Ruwais NGL train 5 project24 September 2026
Register for MEED’s 14-day trial access
Italian contractor Tecnimont has broken ground on the third phase of Adnoc Gas’ Rich Gas Development (RGD) programme, which involves building a fifth natural gas liquids (NGL) fractionation train at the Ruwais gas processing facility in Abu Dhabi.
Adnoc Gas, the gas processing subsidiary of Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc Group), awarded Tecnimont a contract valued at $4.3bn in August to carry out engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) works on the Ruwais NGL-5 project.
Tecnimont’s parent company, Maire, previously said its scope of work under RGD phase 3 includes EPC activities for the fifth NGL fractionation unit – which will separate various hydrocarbon components – together with treatment and sweetening systems designed to remove impurities and ensure product quality.
The scope also includes a regeneration gas treatment unit, a propane refrigeration system, ancillary systems and storage facilities. Once completed in 2030, the plant will have an output capacity of 23,000 tonnes a day (t/d), or about 8 million tonnes a year, Milan-headquartered Maire said.
The detailed scope of work on the Ruwais NGL Train 5 project covers the EPC of the following units:
- An NGL fractionation plant with a capacity of 22,000 t/d, including NGL fractionation facilities, downstream treatment units, sulphur recovery units, product storage and loading facilities, and associated utilities, flares and interconnection pipelines with existing facilities
- Two propane liquefied petroleum gas storage tanks and one paraffinic naphtha storage tank
- Buildings, including a central control building, outstations, substations and plant amenities
- Electrical power connections. Power is to be sourced from the nearby Transco substation via a direct underground cable to the plot location
Adnoc Gas requires the project’s feed to be updated based on the design of Ruwais NGL Train 4, which has an output capacity of 27,000 t/d and was commissioned in 2014.
Alongside taking the final investment decision (FID) on RGD phase 3 in August, Adnoc Gas also announced it had reached FID on the second phase of the programme, with the two projects requiring a total investment of $8.2bn.
The second phase of the RGD programme involves constructing a new gas processing train at the Habshan complex in Abu Dhabi. Adnoc Gas awarded the EPC contract for the project, valued at $3.9bn, to China-based Wison Engineering.
Wison Engineering said the EPC contract for RGD phase 2 is the largest in its history. The total contract value is $4.04bn, the Hong Kong-listed company said, adding that the scope includes gas pipelines; separation and condensate stabilisation units; acid gas removal units; deep NGL recovery units; and a 220kV switch station.
Phase 2 will add a new natural gas processing train at the Habshan facility, “expanding Adnoc Gas’ natural gas processing capacity, enhancing operational flexibility, and supporting the UAE’s expanding downstream and petrochemical sectors”, Adnoc Gas said.
https://image.digitalinsightresearch.in/uploads/NewsArticle/19942556/main3743.jpg